Saddle up, Captain Siddle?
By Keagan Ryan, 19 Dec 2012 Keagan Ryan is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Australia cricket, Cricket, Peter Siddle, Shane Watson, Test cricket
Peter Siddle hunts more wickets (AAP)
Related coverage
Michael Clarke’s hamstring strain has opened a can of worms for Australian cricket, as the debate of who should lead Australia in next week’s Boxing Day Test, should Clarke not recover, gains spectacular intrigue.
In the absence of Clarke, his deputy Shane Watson would seemingly be favourite to lead on arguably the biggest day in the Australian cricketing calendar.
However, the jury is still out on how to effectively manage his workload without succumbing to injury.
The captaincy would only further burden Watson, who is coming off the most strenuous bowling return of his career, sending down 47.4 overs in Australia’s 11th hour, 137-run victory in Hobart.
More importantly for the Australians is Watson’s form with the bat and so far this summer, he is yet to hit full flight.
Australian cricket constantly asks a lot of the champion all-rounder, surely the added pressure of captaining your country would only further weigh on Watson’s hulking shoulders.
John Inverarity and company would be well advised to think outside the box for this particular scenario should it eventuate, and select the one member of the current Test team who has epitomised pride, determination and mental toughness in recent times.
Peter Siddle has been outstanding for the past 18 months and just reward for the patriotic Victorian would be to lead his country into battle at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, his home.
Although bowling captains are scarce on the international scene, the merits of Siddle leading could potentially lift his game further as he aspires to inspire his teammates.
As a bowler he is a captain’s dream as he runs in all day and puts his heart and soul into every delivery. As a captain, Siddle would be a bowler’s dream as he understands a bowler’s wants and needs.
As is the case under Clarke’s tenure, attacking fields would be a formality. The distinct advantage Siddle possess is he understands the art of bowling and furthermore a bowler’s thought process.
Siddle would be an inspired choice and would allow Watson to focus on his batting, which, in the absence of the prolific Clarke, will be vital to the outcome.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (167)
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (74)
- Clarke take note: England has some weak points for Ashes (48)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (46)
- DIZZY: It’s time for the Aussie batsmen to fulfill potential (41)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (0)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (0)
- Australians off to win back the urn (0)
- Has cricket corruption been filed in the ‘too hard’ basket? (2)
- Cricket’s all-time alphabetical G team (16)
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (167)
- David Warner and Australian cricket’s ‘Siege Mentality’ (29)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australia cricket, Cricket, Peter Siddle, Shane Watson, Test cricket

December 19th 2012 @ 7:23am
Jason said | December 19th 2012 @ 7:23am | Report comment
There is a rule against Victorians being made captain of Australia.
December 19th 2012 @ 8:19am
Redb said | December 19th 2012 @ 8:19am | Report comment
Got my vote
December 19th 2012 @ 9:04am
TheGenuineTailender said | December 19th 2012 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Won’t happen.
December 19th 2012 @ 9:38am
matt h said | December 19th 2012 @ 9:38am | Report comment
But what if it did? Happy Gilmore for cricket.
December 19th 2012 @ 9:34am
Brian said | December 19th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Given the way Siddle chuckled at the ball tampering affair I don’t think he is captaincy material. Leave it with Watto
December 19th 2012 @ 9:48am
jameswm said | December 19th 2012 @ 9:48am | Report comment
What was he supposed to do?
December 19th 2012 @ 11:42am
Brian said | December 19th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
A simple I didn’t and never had would be enough without the smirk and commentary that Australians don’t ball tamper. Not saying there was anything wrong with it but a captain needs a certain intelligence and media knowhow and Siddle does not strike me as having it.
Clarke answer that he didn’t know about it and that they didn’t do it is exactly what I would expect from an Australian Captain.
Anyway there is a vice captain who is fit so I am not sure why anyone thinks he should not captain should Clarke not play
December 19th 2012 @ 1:09pm
jameswm said | December 19th 2012 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
Because he wouldn’t be very good at it and has enough to worry about with his own form.
I liked the cheek Siddle showed in answering the question. Can’t an Australian captain have fun?
Sorry, but I still don’t see what he did wrong. We don’t do it, wouldn’t and don’t need to. Good answers.
December 19th 2012 @ 9:49am
jameswm said | December 19th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
I’d have Hussey captaining them. He’s the obvious choice. Smart, reliable, respected.
December 19th 2012 @ 11:48am
TheGenuineTailender said | December 19th 2012 @ 11:48am | Report comment
Agreed. I’m sure Watson is capable of doing a good job though.
December 19th 2012 @ 1:14pm
sittingbison said | December 19th 2012 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
I’m not. He displays not a single attribute of being a leader of men or tactical acumen of captaincy.
December 19th 2012 @ 9:59am
Whiteline said | December 19th 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
Hussey is the only option. Smart has to be a characteristic.
December 19th 2012 @ 10:56am
Sideline Commentator said | December 19th 2012 @ 10:56am | Report comment
Keagan, my concern with Siddle being captain is exactly because of the traits you described. He has a huge heart and huge pride and would push himself. Push himself far too hard. I think that if he could, Siddle would try to tie up one end of the pitch for an entire innings, if he didn’t die first. He’s a great asset to the team, but as a captain he would depend too much on his own bowling. There’s a reason bowlers are rarely captains.
Huss is the best option. He has the most experience, is respected and intelligent. So naturally, he’ll be ignored.
December 19th 2012 @ 11:16am
Jason said | December 19th 2012 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Sadly, SC, I think you are right re Hussey.
December 19th 2012 @ 5:31pm
Keagan Ryan said | December 19th 2012 @ 5:31pm | Report comment
To be honest, I myself don’t understand why Hussey’s name hasn’t appeared more regularly in this discussion. My argument was Siddle has led the bowling unit sensationally over the past 18-months, and showed tremendous leadership doing so. He lets his performance do the talking, much like Captain Cook has in India.
But overall, the romance of Siddle captaining a test match in Victoria would be brilliant to watch – passion personified!
December 19th 2012 @ 11:29am
Seano said | December 19th 2012 @ 11:29am | Report comment
Hussey?? Love him as a player but remember that nz tour they made him capt? He didn’t win a game in an unloosable series!!!! Smart he ain’t!
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
December 19th 2012 @ 11:49am
TheGenuineTailender said | December 19th 2012 @ 11:49am | Report comment
How was his captaincy the cause of that series loss and how does that not make him smart?
December 19th 2012 @ 12:29pm
Mat Coch said | December 19th 2012 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
Doesn’t this discussion suggest that what the Australian side lacks is strong leadership among its players?
Further, does it raise questions about the selection process and ideology given we’ve a raft of relative youngsters who are not ready or unequipped to lead their country?
Should Clarke not play in Melbourne the underlying problem remains. One feels that whoever leads the team will be a band-aid fix rather than a clear solution or direction.
December 19th 2012 @ 12:42pm
Jason said | December 19th 2012 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
To be fair, Clarke is still pretty new in the job. It doesn’t seem like we need to have a ready made replacement at the moment. There is plenty of time for others to develop. Who knows, the next long term captain might not have played first class cricket yet.
December 19th 2012 @ 12:50pm
Mat Coch said | December 19th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
There is no stand out like there once was. Under Taylor there was Warne and Waugh and Healy. Under Waugh’s reign there was Ponting and Warne, under Ponting there was Clarke and co. Now though, under Clarke, there is seemingly no fall-back position.
December 19th 2012 @ 1:51pm
The Barry said | December 19th 2012 @ 1:51pm | Report comment
Border didn’t have anyone under him at the start and he ended up with Taylor, Waugh, Warne.
I don’t think no ready made replacement is a problem at the moment other than for one off scenarios like this. We’re not likely to need a new test captain for at least 5 years.
From reports Wade, Warner, Cowan all have good ‘cricket brains’, Cowan will be out of the test side before Clarke is – Wade and Warner and whoever else will have the opportunity to develop if they can nail down their spots in the side.
With hindsight the selectors probably shouldn’t have brought Watson back as VC given he hasn’t cemented his spot in the XI.
I’d go with Hussey and tell Watson he is still VC but needs to concentrate on his own game at the moment.
December 19th 2012 @ 2:50pm
Brian said | December 19th 2012 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
I’d say Warner the next long-term captain, he’s a young smart opening batsman from NSW. When Ponting retired he wasn’t in the side but Warner elevation to vc can’t be far away.
The Saffas made Smith captain quite young and in the long-term it paid off.
December 19th 2012 @ 1:05pm
Christo the Daddyo said | December 19th 2012 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
Yes, and this is the underlying problem with the current situation. If Watson isn’t the obvious solution, then he shouldn’t be vice-captain. Simple.
But if Watson is ruled out, there are no real options at the moment, and that’s a real worry. What happens if Clarke suffers a serious injury that rules him out for a year? We’re rooted then…
December 19th 2012 @ 1:50pm
Jason said | December 19th 2012 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
Well if Clarke is out for a year, we’ll need a middle order batsman to replace him anyway so the likes of Bailey come into the frame.
And Warner was captain of the PM XI last year I think and by all reports did a decent job.
In any case, I think the captaincy role is a bit overrated. Australia won plenty of tests while Ponting was captain.
As for Watson, its not really the case that the vice captain would automatically become captain if the captain wasn’t available. Marsh and Boon were VC for many tests but would have been unlikely to be captain if AB had fallen over because Taylor and Waugh were also in the team.
December 19th 2012 @ 1:28pm
sittingbison said | December 19th 2012 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
Watson was NOT made vice captain because he is a natural leader of men, with the nouse and tactical acumen to captain a cricket team. Lets face it, he has never captained any cricket team in his life for a very good reason – he is an egotistical individualist of the highest order. He was made VC as a sop to his fragile ego, along with opening the batting and opening the bowling. Good grief what a fiasco.
So who does that leave out of the 9 others excluding watto and Clarke? Huss is experienced as a cricketer, but again never displayed leadership of men material over a long and illustrious career – he is more like a Jesuit Inquisitor dedicated to the holy cause of accumulating runs. Cowan is an enterlictle – he read an illustrated novel once on the ferry from Tassie. Usman is not the life of the party in the dressing room according to the NSP, and besides should concentrat on getting to double figures. Hughes shares the same name as Kim – ’nuff said. Wade needs to concentrate on catching and stumping, and besides seems a little hot headed lacking self discipline at times. Mitch Johnson? hahahaha. Lyon? Cant even slow himself down to 80kmh late on the fifth day.
Soooooo….that leaves….suburban boy Dave Warner!! Thats who I’d want to lead the Boxing Day Test in Clarkes absence. Seems to have the aggression, flair but temperance required for the role. A little like what we thought Warnie could have brought to the table (maybe without the guile).
But in general terms, it is a travesty that there is not a natural back up to Clarke. We should not even be discussing who takes over.
December 19th 2012 @ 1:53pm
Red Kev said | December 19th 2012 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
I just do not understand why (since Watson was VC of both the test and ODI side) he was not made captain of the T20 side when Clarke removed himself from T20s. Watson is one of the best T20 cricketers in the world, surely it makes sense to have him cut his captaincy teeth in the format of the game he dominates. Instead the NSP brought in George Bailey…seriously WTF?
December 19th 2012 @ 3:07pm
sittingbison said | December 19th 2012 @ 3:07pm | Report comment
I think its because even the blind freddie NSP (sorry Glenn) can see Watto is not captain material – even for 20 overs of hit and giggle. Which more seriously begs the question why is he vice captain of the Test and one day sides.
December 19th 2012 @ 3:49pm
Rhys said | December 19th 2012 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
Yeah, bringing Bailey in out of the blue to captain T20 was a strong indication as to the lack of belief the selectors have in Watson to be a fulltime captaincy option – in any form of the game.