Arthur defends Lyon’s spin-bowling

By Greg Buckle,

Tagged:
 ,

8 Have your say

    Related coverage

    Australia Test offspinner Nathan Lyon said on Monday he couldn’t care less about accusations he bowls too fast.

    “I’m definitely not afraid of tossing it up and seeing if they want to take me on and really explore and get in that contest and try and get some wickets,” Lyon told reporters.

    “I’m not really fazed about what people are coming out and saying.

    “We’re out there in the middle. We know what pace we have to bowl on that pitch.

    “It’s easy sitting at home. I’m communicating with ‘Pup’ (Michael Clarke) and ‘Wadey’ (wicketkeeper Matthew Wade) every over about my pace.”

    Lyon attracted more criticism following his 0-57 in Sri Lanka’s second innings in last week’s first Test in Hobart.

    Former Test legspinner Stuart MacGill said not only was Lyon rushing through his overs too quickly but he was bowling too fast.

    “People are going to have their own opinion but I’m really confident in my own skill set,” said Lyon, 25.

    “I have the full confidence of (coach and selector) Mickey Arthur and (captain and selector) Michael Clarke.

    “Whatever people are saying outside the Australian cricket room doesn’t really affect me.

    “I’m learning every time I go out to bowl,” the 17-Test player added.

    “There have been a couple of day-five pitches but in Adelaide South Africa batted fantastic and in Hobart we got the result (with pacemen Peter Siddle, Mitchell Starc and Shane Watson sharing the 10 wickets between them).

    “There are a lot of expectations on the spinner but I’m not worried about that.

    “I’m worried about doing the right thing for the team and working well with ‘Pup’ and all the other bowlers.”

    Arthur took a swipe on Monday at Lyon’s critics.

    “I’ve read a lot about Nathan Lyon over the last couple of weeks. He’s still the quickest offspinner to 50 wickets,” Arthur said.

    “He’s young. He’s still finding out about his bowling.

    “He has immense potential though. Spinners only reach their peak at 28 or 29.

    “Nathan’s doing everything right.”

    Lyon said the Australians had backed their quicks to do the damage on a Hobart pitch that offered variable bounce.

    “Hopefully here or even the SCG might be a bit more friendly to spin bowling,” Lyon said.

    “It comes down to the different conditions and the different roles you have to play.”

    Sri Lanka’s retired spin great Muttiah Muralitharan also had a pop at Lyon on Monday in a News Limited newspaper column.

    “Australia doesn’t have the person to take wickets on a turning wicket,” Murali said.

    © AAP 2018

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (8)

    • December 25th 2012 @ 7:50am
      Brendon said | December 25th 2012 @ 7:50am | ! Report

      I like Gaz, but in Hobart he lost his loop and bowled 89kph every ball nearly, variation in speed and bounce is the offies key weapon, don’t lose it. He looked a bit like xavier doherty, spearing it in at the stumps at the same speed every ball

    • December 25th 2012 @ 8:12pm
      Bearfax said | December 25th 2012 @ 8:12pm | ! Report

      If I was in the Sri Lanka team, I wouldnt be underestimating Lyons innocuous little twirlers. And despite the PR I dont think they will

    • December 25th 2012 @ 8:28pm
      Jason said | December 25th 2012 @ 8:28pm | ! Report

      “Arthur defends Lyon’s spin-bowling”

      Just like every other batsman in international cricket it seems.

    • December 27th 2012 @ 12:14am
      sittingbison said | December 27th 2012 @ 12:14am | ! Report

      Still bowling darts today, regardless of getting 10 and 11 to wild slogs he is bowling without guile

    • December 27th 2012 @ 12:14am
      sittingbison said | December 27th 2012 @ 12:14am | ! Report

      And it again demonstrates that captain and coach should not be selectors

    • December 27th 2012 @ 9:02am
      Bearfax said | December 27th 2012 @ 9:02am | ! Report

      Meanwhile Cowen again out in the thirties (his average of 34 remains unchanged) and he runs Hughes out with a crazy attempted single.

      • December 27th 2012 @ 9:23am
        Rob said | December 27th 2012 @ 9:23am | ! Report

        It was Cowans call. Have a good look at the replay, and you will observe that if Hughes had not hesitated and done his version of the shimmy, he would have made it comfortably!. Hughes was at fault here.

        • December 27th 2012 @ 9:48am
          Bearfax said | December 27th 2012 @ 9:48am | ! Report

          Cowan called and ran. Hughes could see that a fieldsman was going to get onto the ball quickly and hesitated. Perhaps he would have made it if he had run straight away but it was a very risky single and unnecessary.

    Have Your Say



    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    Explore:
    ,