Australia are not ready for Ashes – yet
By TheGenuineTailender, 7 Jan 2013 TheGenuineTailender is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Australia cricket, Cricket, Test cricket, The Ashes
Related coverage
We may have thumped Sri Lanka, the batsmen may be scoring runs, the bowlers taking wickets and some of the fielders snaffling catches. But the giant elephant in the room remains.
We are in no way, shape or form ready for the Ashes.
Ed Cowan continues to speak highly of his increased drive, understanding and comfort in his Test role. However his batting average hovers precariously at 32.66, well below par for any Test match opener.
Shane Watson, the star all-rounder, has through the media been turned into a poor man’s Jacques Kallis, who doesn’t bowl or score enough runs to warrant his place.
Michael Hussey’s exit leaves a gaping hole of experience and runs in the Australian middle order. He’s as irreplaceable as any retiring great.
Matthew Wade’s glove work continues to draw criticism, as names like Tim Paine and Brad Haddin are touted to be hot on his heels.
Mitchell Johnson appears to have recaptured his best form, at least it looked that way throughout the Perth and MCG tests. Again in Sydney however, when promoted to all-rounder status, he has lacked penetration with ball and runs with bat.
Our fast bowling contingent is heavily depleted and the injury ward overflowing. Patrick Cummins, James Pattinson, Ryan Harris and Ben Hilfenhaus are all part of a group of Test match bowlers to have spent significant time on the side lines recently.
Spinner Nathan Lyon hasn’t been able to produce the big day five hauls, heroics and match winning efforts which Australians expect of their front line spinner. His is increasingly being criticized for an inability to finish sides off.
So we have problems, all of them are significant. I don’t know all the answers, but I’ll try solving some for us right now.
Looking ahead to the Ashes, cricket’s Holy Grail, what do we need to do? A team reshuffle is high on the agenda and will address many issues raised.
The Australian side lacks balance, consistency, experience and clear player roles, so I have rejigged the side in an attempt to alleviate some of these issues and hopefully bring clarity to team.
My touring party to India and England will consist of 17 players. My starting XI is as follows.
1. David Warner
2. Shane Watson
3. Phillip Hughes
4. Usman Khawaja
5. Michael Clarke (C)
6. David Hussey
7. Matthew Wade (wk)
8. Peter Siddle
9. James Pattinson
10. Nathan Lyon
11. Jackson Bird
Warner has proven to be highly effective at setting the tone of an innings straight off the bat. He has a world class batting average for Test match openers and can set you flying high towards victory in the first session of a Test.
The enigmatic and often self-absorbed Watson has his flaws no doubt, however it is undeniable that his quality straight driving and powerful technique provides him with tools to set Australia off to many a solid start. His record at the top of the order is as good as any. His bowling should be approached as a last resort, a luxury and used sparingly.
Hughes has begun his reincarnation to Test cricket promisingly, with two half centuries. He was often exploited by the brand new ball, and number three protects him slightly from this, however that doesn’t mean he doesn’t possess the ability to handle things at 1-0.
Furthermore, Hughes is better suited to facing spin bowling than Watson and Warner and thus protects them a bit more if he is the one to bat at three.
Usman Khawaja is the next most talented batsman in the country. He has a good first class record and is in excellent form. Many believe his inclusion to the Test side is inevitable and I’m happy to have this classy player forming part of the Australian middle order.
Michael Clarke, enough said.
David Hussey brings as close to a like-for-like match to his brother as any cricketer in the world – a proper professional with a wealth of experience, particularly in English condition. Hussey has the first class pedigree to prove he is capable at the highest level and has another two good years of cricket in him. Ample time for another young batsman to step up.
Matthew Wade is on notice. His batting continues to instigate a wagging tail and scoring runs will always be a strength of his. Wade’s glove work has been under immense pressure, but I’m willing to persevere as I’ve seen him play Ryobi Cup and know he is better than he is showing.
Peter Siddle is one of the first two picked these days and walks straight into the touring party as the spearhead of the attack.
James Pattinson has impressed many with his aggressive brand of fast bowling. He brings the in-your-face mentality many of us love. Pattinson will need to cage some of that energy and focus on ripping the pegs out of the ground but his short Test career has demonstrated he has a canny ability to get wickets.
Nathan Lyon’s confidence has taken a shot of late but a tour to India might be the perfect thing for him – rank turners are expected to be a major feature of the landscape on the sub continental tour. Lyon still has far and away the best Test match record of any Aussie spinner since the retirement of Shane Warne and will continue to grow in the role as time progresses.
Jackson Bird has risen quickly from Sydney club cricketer to Test match bowler. He has dismantled the Sri Lankan line-up in two Tests already and has a year and a half of first class dominance under his belt. Bird adds a huge amount of balance to the side – his consistency is something that has been lacking a lot lately and will prove invaluable against a world class batting line-up like England.
I have left out Ed Cowan as I believe he really isn’t up to the standard of Test match cricket. His record is poor and he never displayed the first class dominance in the Sheffield Shield that indicates he would be successful at the highest level.
The remainder of my touring party consists of Alex Doolan – as the in-form, next in line spare batsman – Tim Paine the reserve keeper, Michael Beer as a second spin option who brings the variety of left-arm orthodox to the fore and the fast bowling contingent of Mitchell Starc, Mitchell Johnson and Ben Hilfenhaus.
The two Mitchells miss out on starting positions because of their tendency to leak runs and inconsistent form. If an injury occurs they will slot in nicely but I don’t consider them among the top three fast bowlers in the country at the moment.
And for the record, Johnson is as much an all-rounder as Matthew Wade is a fast bowler. He’s a good number eight, nothing more.
Ben Hilfenhaus has a solid record in England and will come in almost seamlessly if required.
So there we have it. The reshuffle is complete and I believe we now have a balanced side as ready as possible to take on India and England.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- Usman Khawaja’s case for selection (78)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (68)
- Who will Sam Robson represent: Australia or England? (47)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (45)
- Have we been too harsh on Warner? (38)
- IPL has skeletons, whatever Warner tweets
- David Warner and Australian cricket’s ‘Siege Mentality’ (21)
- Could Bird be the difference in the Ashes? (21)
- Warner targets media in Twitter rant (7)
- Strauss wants Pietersen fit for Ashes
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (45)
- HENRY: Oh no, cricket is in a spot of bother, again… (8)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australia cricket, Cricket, Test cricket, The Ashes

January 7th 2013 @ 7:46am
WW said | January 7th 2013 @ 7:46am | Report comment
are you surprised that we will not win the ashes.
what gave it away…the fact we haven’t looked the same side since warne and mcgrath retired
it is not so just about the players we have and don’t have though. look at the england side. Quality all around. We can not and will not win the ashes this year.
January 7th 2013 @ 9:05am
The no. Three said | January 7th 2013 @ 9:05am | Report comment
What would a most current Aussie test team look like purely just on form?
D Warner
U Khawaja
P Hughes
A Doolan
M Clarke (c)
J Faulkner
M Wade
P Siddle
J Pattinson- uninjured
N Lyon
J Bird
then
M Johnson
A Zampa
T Paine
J Burns
Well, thats you ashes squad.
January 7th 2013 @ 10:32am
Rob Barrow said | January 7th 2013 @ 10:32am | Report comment
Agree with this article, Khwaaja is a must and I would also get Burns as the backup batsman. I wouldn’t take Maxwell as his bowling won’t stand up in the ashes nor the Indian series.
January 7th 2013 @ 1:00pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 7th 2013 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
I’m not sure Zampa has any form. He played one first class match where he did well. But that doesn’t constitute form.
Glenn Maxwell is closer to being a specialist spare batsman than replacement all-rounder.
January 7th 2013 @ 1:28pm
matt h said | January 7th 2013 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
Hmmm, purely on Shield form you would have to include Haddin not Paine.
The BBL makes it so damn difficult. Doolan’s “form” was ages ago and it is his only hot run in his career to date. Risky.
Also, for the Watson’s and Cowan’s of this world, would their form be equally as good as the “form” players if they were playing in the Shield against lesser sides? Remember pre-South Africa Ponting was in fantastic form in the Shield. al this showed is that he remains a class above your average state player.
Faulkner is not a test match 6. Look at his career average well below 30.
And Zampa is a 20 year old who has played a small handful of shield games and his stats are just ok. What form?
Do Starc’s back to back 5 fors in tests not consitute form?
Only one back up paceman when our bowlers break down every 5 minutes?
Back to the drawing board I think
January 7th 2013 @ 10:04am
Jason said | January 7th 2013 @ 10:04am | Report comment
I don’t think we should over estimate how good England are. Much will depend on which KP turns up to play but take out Cook and their batting looks as fragile as ours with Bell returning to his 2005 form and a couple of newbies as well.
I’d take Pattinson, Bird and Siddle over Jimmy, Finn and Broad/AN Other.
Swann and Prior are better than Lyon and Wade of course.
Overall though, in 2012 Australia performed far better against South Africa than England did.
January 7th 2013 @ 10:14am
The Bush said | January 7th 2013 @ 10:14am | Report comment
Trott is better the Hughes, Cook alone is better than any opening combination we can put on the field, KP is a Clarke equivalent and they have the experience of Bell, who averages over 45, to prop up their lower order. As to their bowling attack, Anderson (somehow) has become one of the premier fast bowlers in the world over an extended period. As good as Pattinson or Bird may one day become, Anderson has been at the top of his game for three straight seasons yet.
It could well become a blood bath in my opinion (at least in England).
January 8th 2013 @ 10:38am
Frankie Hughes said | January 8th 2013 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Don’t be silly.
Cook has had more than his fair share of luck during his purple patch. He’s technically limited and Bird will have him in his pocket.
Bell is a fair weather batsman. Only gets runs when everyone else does.
Trott was a flash in the pan. Nothing to fear.
We’ll hammer the Poms easy.
January 7th 2013 @ 11:30am
Pope Paul VII said | January 7th 2013 @ 11:30am | Report comment
The Aussie batting is inexperienced and the single serious fast bowling test since NZ loss, at Perth, they came off second best. The Australian fast bowling is pretty good. Lyon is steady, though his chances of singing the song any time soon are not that great.
The fast men give Australia a chance but as The Bush points out the english bats are no mugs. They will not be intimidated.
Ando, Finn, Tremlett ( if fit ), Bresnan, Onions, Broad ( has been rubbish ) and a couple of youngsters who’s names escape me speaks of good depth. Monty and Swanny also cover our blokes in spin. We can knock Anderson all we want but he does the job to perfection.
Early days yet but our blokes are not 1989 standard tourists and the english are most certainly not 1989 stupid.
January 7th 2013 @ 12:22pm
Andy_Roo said | January 7th 2013 @ 12:22pm | Report comment
i agree with the squad almost completely. One issue though is that AUS will only take 14 players to India, not 17
Cowan will be in the team for the India tour at least. If he does not perform there he will not go to England.
Watson should play at no.6 in india and Khawaja at no. 4.
David Hussey will go to England as a back-up batsman, not as a first choice player.
Maxwell should get a game or two in india and will tour England.
Joe Burns will should go to England.
And sadly I give AUS zero chance of winning in England.
January 7th 2013 @ 1:04pm
Justin Ware said | January 7th 2013 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
Wade will rise to the challenge of keeping in India, his keeping to the fast bowlers IMO has been superb but the same can’t be said for his keeping to spin, give him time to sort it out fellas, it’s a technical issue, nothing more, Healy will be in his ear and once he fixes his keeping to spin he is better than Prior
January 7th 2013 @ 3:47pm
Jason said | January 7th 2013 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
At this stage I’d be happy for him keeping to spin better than Rob Quiney.
January 7th 2013 @ 3:51pm
Dan Ced said | January 7th 2013 @ 3:51pm | Report comment
I’m not going to post a realistic 12, mine is quite close to the one in the article but, here’s my wishlist of fit players.
Warner
Klinger
Hughes
Khawaja
D Hussey
Clarke
Wade
Cutting
Starc
Lyon
Bird
Ferguson 12th man.
I really want to put Putland or Richardson from the Redbacks in, but Cutting has to go there ahead of them for batting.
People will criticise my choices of Klinger/D Hussey due to their age, but I like their style.
Disclaimer: I haven’t paid attention to as much shield cricket this season as I might usually.
January 7th 2013 @ 6:19pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 7th 2013 @ 6:19pm | Report comment
No Peter Siddle?
January 7th 2013 @ 9:55pm
Dan Ced said | January 7th 2013 @ 9:55pm | Report comment
I like Siddle, and his workhorse nature. He could probably fit into my wish list there in Cutting’s place.
January 7th 2013 @ 4:29pm
Redb said | January 7th 2013 @ 4:29pm | Report comment
I hope Starc stays fit he is going to be a handful in England.
Our batting is the worry. Apart Clarke it lacks real class.
January 7th 2013 @ 6:05pm
Fidel said | January 7th 2013 @ 6:05pm | Report comment
It’s interesting how quickly Pat Cummins has fallen from people’s memories.
January 7th 2013 @ 6:20pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 7th 2013 @ 6:20pm | Report comment
It might help if he could add to his tally of first class matches.
January 7th 2013 @ 7:02pm
TheSilentProgressor said | January 7th 2013 @ 7:02pm | Report comment
Until he can consistently play First Class Cricket he shouldn’t be considered. At the moment he is possibly one of the most talented bowlers in the world. But that is all it is talent. I watched his bowling performance from last year against the Proteas and he has the talent to become an absolute star. But he needs to prove he can string together more than one first class game at a time.
January 7th 2013 @ 7:00pm
TheSilentProgressor said | January 7th 2013 @ 7:00pm | Report comment
My touring party for India and looking forward to the Ashes.
1 – Warner – Has rapidly improved this summer, his temperament has really impressed me he showed in his last two matches at Hobart he has the ability to make a big score on a tough batting pitch. Also his leg-spin could prove handy as a second spin option.
2 – Watson – His best batting performances in recent seasons have been at the top of the order. He is a powerful man and despite his struggles Australia desperately need his experience so any talk of dropping him is ludicrous. Also he is a good slip-fielder something that Australia needs after the retirements of Ponting and Hussey. He should not be bowling though, or if he is should only be bowled very sparingly.
3 – Hughes – Has shown enough in his return that he has the ability to bat at number 3. Good pro-active batting against the spin will also help in India and against Swann and/or Monty. One of the most naturally gifted run scorers Australia has produced in the last few years, and with an adjusted technique and minor mental changes he looks likely to take his game to another level.
4 – Khawaja – Should be given the opportunity of an extended run in the test team. Apart from Hughes he has been the other player in the Shield this season to score runs consistently. He has the experience of playing tests in the past and made a promising debut. He has a fantastic technique, just needs to capitalise on some good starts.
5 – Clarke – Because he is simply the best!
6 – Maxwell – Number 6 is the position i’ve had the most trouble choosing. Maxwell seems to be a very talented cricketer his first class average of 46 from 13 games is enough for him to get selected as a batsmen who can bowl a bit. I don’t think his off-breaks will ever be up to all-rounder material, but who knows maybe he will improve rapidly. I think it is worth taking the chance on him in India.
7 – Wade – His keeping still needs to be improved but i’m sure he will iron out those technical deficiencies given time and experience. His batting is very valuable in this team. He has made runs for Australia when they have badly needed them and with an experienced team like this that is a trait that will be needed over the next 14 incredibly tough test matches.
8 – Siddle – He is the heart and soul of the Australian pace attack, and is the second player picked in the team every time.
9 – Pattinson – He is the fire in the pace triumvirate, bowls with good control but also brings in aggression, pace and movement. Has all the skills to become a really good bowler, just needs to remain fit.
10 – Lyon – He is the best spinner Australia have at the moment and has a tidy average. Yes he probably does bowl a bit fast but he is improving. He will benefit from a turning wicket in India. He has the potential to improve, watch the video of him making his debut where he took 5 at Galle. Give him time. He is not Shane Warne, there will probably never be another Shane Warne, it is time Australia gets out of the habit of comparing its spin bowler to Warne.
11 – Bird – He has shown enough in his first two tests to convince me that he has the necessary skills to succeed in Test Match Cricket. He consistently bowls the nagging line and length just outside off with a bit of movement. He is exactly what Australia need to complement Pattinson with the new ball.
The rest of the touring party.
12 – Starc – If a pace bowler breaks down (inevitably) or is rotated Starc should come in, yes his line and length can be inconsistent but he has the raw ability to get batsmen out. he can swing the ball, bowls good pace and has that lethal yorker.
13 – Johnson – Mitch’s problem is going to be his consistency. This Australian team cannot afford a Mitchell Johnson that is going at 4.5 runs an over.
14 – Hilfenhaus – Should no longer be considered to be among the best 3 pace bowlers in Australia, but if a bowler breaks down he can come in a do a job when required.
15 – Haddin – Has the experience to step in for Wade as the wicket keeper, or even as a batsmen should any of the batsmen get injured. Yes he is 35 but he is probably still the best keeper in Australia and his batting for NSW this summer has also been handy.
January 7th 2013 @ 8:06pm
Sydney Kiwi said | January 7th 2013 @ 8:06pm | Report comment
I like this side but with just one change- Sub maxwell out for David Hussey- they need an experienced campaigner for the Ashes and Husseys bowling can hold an end up better than Maxwells. An ideal side would have Starc/Johnson AND Bird but Australia needs a reliable bat at 6 and 7. Perhaps we may see Lyon subbed out of a few games in England when a seamers wicket is predicted.
January 7th 2013 @ 8:39pm
TheSilentProgressor said | January 7th 2013 @ 8:39pm | Report comment
Yeh, i was really tossing up between Maxwell and Hussey, in the end I think either would do the job. And i agree now Hussey probably would be the better option given he is more experienced. And yep I would love to have Starc in the team as well but it’s just to hard to have him with Pattinson,Siddle and Bird all performing well and at the moment he just tends to leak a few to many runs for my liking, but if he can tighten up his economy rate he could really be a world class bowler.
I don’t think we will really see that many seamer’s wickets in England with Swann and Monty bowling well i think we will see pitches that will be fairly favourable to spin. But you never know its England we could get a couple of green tops, here’s hoping we do!!!
January 7th 2013 @ 8:07pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 7th 2013 @ 8:07pm | Report comment
If we took that team overseas I’d be happy.
January 8th 2013 @ 1:03pm
sittingbison said | January 8th 2013 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
the problem is you have two all rounders in the top six! I understand The argument he is a batsman who bowls a bit, but he is not really a genuine batsman, and neither is Watson.