Australia’s Ashes fast bowling line-up appears close to settled, providing injuries don’t get in the way between now and July.
Sydney man-of-the-match Jackson Bird has stormed into the reckoning after just two Tests, with his accuracy and movement seen as perfect for English conditions.
Australia selectors are likely to send around six quicks with them to England, if the 2009 squad is anything to go by.
However the new rotation system lends itself to taking an even larger pool of seamers, particularly if Mitchell Johnson is considered an allrounder.
Young tearaway Pat Cummins would be well and truly in the frame for a shock call-up after two years out injured if the squad is slightly bigger.
Peter Siddle, Mitchell Starc, Johnson, Bird and a recovered James Pattinson (side strain) are set to be the bowling arsenal for next month’s India tour.
Allowing for injuries or form slumps, the same five will also be the core of the Ashes squad.
Australia coach Mickey Arthur said 26-year-old Bird, who took seven wickets against Sri Lanka at the SCG, would be up to handling sub-continent conditions.
“We’ve got such a wealth of bowling talent in Australia and Jackson’s just a reminder of that,” said Arthur.
“It’s given us a pool of fast bowlers that we can call on that we know have the ability to play at this level and perform. I think that’s really important for us.
“Jackson’s stocks have risen considerably.”
One Test wonder Cummins won’t play any first-class cricket before the Ashes, as the express bowler continues to recover from a back injury.
Cummins’ inclusion in the Ashes squad would be based on potential alone.
Others in the reckoning include Josh Hazlewood and Ben Hilfenhaus – although Hilfenhaus may have been overtaken by Bird.
One bowler nearly certain of going to England is spinner Nathan Lyon.
Despite his indifferent form this summer, Lyon has support in all the right places.
He was trusted with taking over as the custodian of the team song by retiring great Mike Hussey. Captain Michael Clarke and coach Arthur also have plenty of time for the 25-year-old offspinner.
“With the state of where we’re at as a team I don’t think anybody can say they’re entrenched. But I’m a massive believer in Nathan, and Michael is too,” said Arthur.
“We think he’s got all the right attributes of being a really good finger spinner. We’ve just got to keep working and he’ll just keep being exposed to situations.”
© AAP 2013
Passionate about your cricket? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily cricket email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
January 8th 2013 @ 9:21am
WW said | January 8th 2013 @ 9:21am | Report comment
i’d be taking 6 seamers in ordre that we can cover like for like replacements for injury.
forget 4 seamers for the ashes.. that is a recipe for failure
Right arm medium fast: 1. Bird 2. Siddle
Left arm medium fast: 1. Starc 2. Johnson
Fast: 1. Cummins 2. Pattinson
i’d tqke 2 spinners: Lyon and Hauritz
I’d be taking 7 batsman including 2 young all rounders to cover no 6 (Watson-Warner-Hughes-Khawaja-Clarke-Henriques-Marsh) and 2 wicketkeepers (Wade and Haddin) who can both cover for reserve keeper and reserve middle order batsman
January 8th 2013 @ 1:50pm
jameswm said | January 8th 2013 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
I’d rate Harris ahead of both Johnson and Starc, assuming he’s played a bit of FC cricket before then and proven himself fit.
Two ordinary spinners there WW. I think Holland, Maxwell, Zampa, SOK and Beer are all in the mix.
Geez Haddin and Henriques, I’d go a bit differently there.
January 8th 2013 @ 7:58pm
WW said | January 8th 2013 @ 7:58pm | Report comment
Lyon is the current spin bowler and hauritz is proven in England.
Haddin has just been named in the odi side effectively confirming he’s back in the thoughts of selectors.
Henriques is averaging 75 with the bat and 17 with the ball in shield cricket this year.
Harris is not a viable option with so man better options.
Anything else?
January 9th 2013 @ 7:55am
Red Kev said | January 9th 2013 @ 7:55am | Report comment
Henriques has scored one FC century ever, he’s not good enough to be in the test team yet.
Nor does a test team need an allrounder.
Haddin is in the selectors’ plans but should not be, that just shows how poorly they do their job
So while you might accurately predict the side with your absurd selections, that is only because you are drinking the same coolade as Inverarity.