Ashes will be true test of rotation policy
By rselvage7, 8 Jan 2013 rselvage7 is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Ashes, Cricket, Cricket Australia, Michael Clarke
Australian Test cricket captain Michael Clarke speaks with teammate Ricky Ponting watched by Test umpire Billy Bowden. AFP PHOTO / Greg WOOD
Related coverage
As Australia concluded the home Test summer in a winning way, I could not help but sit bewildered hearing Lawry and Slater continually chastise the selections of the team.
Sure, I can deduce that superficially, the rotation policy, may appear comedic.
I mean, yes, Bill, the best XI players should play in every match.
However the enigmatic compilation of such a side continues to create a debate that will rage on until ultimately, the critics become silent or the selectors’ heads roll.
Yet as the sun set on Mike Hussey’s international career, Captain Clarke graced the post match presentation stage in the presence of Australia’s former captain, Mark Taylor.
Tubby himself questioned the policy of rotating fast bowlers in and out of the side, however he too stated that a side should be picked on it’s merits, accounting for both form and injury concerns.
So, I pose these questions to those who condemn the rotation policy.
Who was the player of the match in Sydney? How did they enter the Test side?
The answer? Jackson Bird. A previously unheralded shield bowler toiling on domestic wickets before gracing the international arena with a consistent line and length not witnessed since Glenn McGrath played his final test at the same ground in the season of 2006/07.
Bird was granted an opportunity to don the Baggy Green a week prior in the Boxing Day Test, a game in which he claimed four wickets removing key scalps along the way.
Bird was “Rotated” into the side in place of Mitchell Starc, who too put in a Herculean effort in Hobart eight days earlier.
Backing it up with another seven poles in Sydney, Bird has pushed his claims for a ticket to India and also London’s Ashes series, in which he looks a likely figure to contribute with the swinging Dukes ball.
So as Lawry and Slater criticised the decision to not select the best side in Test match fixtures, their praise of Bird was taken with a pinch of salt as hypocrisy reigned supreme once more.
Slater has always had a problem seeing the bigger picture, demonstrated clearly as he played rash shots in the 90s so often during his time as Australia’s opening batsman.
Instead of holding patience working his way to a triple figure score, once more Slater is unable to foresee the future benefits of ensuring the full fitness of Australia’s bowling stakes.
Once more, the policy ensures that when the inevitable occurs, and fast bowlers do break down, the likes of Bird and his fellow shield stars have top flight experience and do not crumble on the big stage.
And in so, I plead with the Australian public – for the sake of themselves, not that of my own – to observe the bigger picture. Judge the selection policy once Pup holds aloft the Ashes trophy.
For without such a method installed, I can guarantee you will not observe this sweet sight.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- Usman Khawaja’s case for selection (78)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (58)
- Who will Sam Robson represent: Australia or England? (47)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (41)
- Rogers’ 214 gives Aussies Ashes boost (40)
- David Warner and Australian cricket’s ‘Siege Mentality’ (19)
- Could Bird be the difference in the Ashes? (19)
- Warner targets media in Twitter rant (4)
- Strauss wants Pietersen fit for Ashes
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (43)
- HENRY: Oh no, cricket is in a spot of bother, again… (8)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (68)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Ashes, Cricket, Cricket Australia, Michael Clarke

January 8th 2013 @ 3:33pm
DingoGray said | January 8th 2013 @ 3:33pm | Report comment
“And in so, I plead with the Australian public – for the sake of themselves, not that of my own – to observe the bigger picture. Judge the selection policy once Pup holds aloft the Ashes trophy.
For without such a method installed, I can guarantee you will not observe this sweet sight. ”
You can guarantee with the “Colonel Sanders” “Imbers” in charge you won’t be seeing that sight any time soon!
January 8th 2013 @ 11:08pm
lou said | January 8th 2013 @ 11:08pm | Report comment
I’m bored with reading about fans and press slamming the selectors. They can only pick the talent available and it’s silly to suggest that we have a select three bowler seam attack that should play every game. None of them are in Glenn McGrath’s or even Jason Gillespie’s league yet so what’s wrong with trialling bowlers?
January 9th 2013 @ 2:21pm
rselvage7 said | January 9th 2013 @ 2:21pm | Report comment
couldn’t agree more.
January 9th 2013 @ 3:22pm
Dadiggle said | January 9th 2013 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
There is no rotation policy. They just select certain bowlers for certain tracks. Especially in Australia where they know what the pitch is going to look like. Just another Aussie trick lol