Five of the big questions that will be answered in 2013
Crusaders captain Richie McCaw, and coach Robbie Deans hold the Super 14 rugby trophy. AP Photo/NZPA, Ross Setford
Related coverage
Blessed is the turn of the year. With it comes the promise of fresh starts and renewal: clean pages for all after a largely disappointing year for Australian rugby in 2012.
Already there is talk out of Sydney of a revival and out of Perth a relaunch. These are encouraging noises, especially when accompanied by an apparent determination to raise fitness levels.
But while they are to be welcomed the performances of the Australian Super franchises are one of the big questions to be answered in 2013.
Here are five of the biggest.
Will the Australian conference bounce back or will the painful teething problems of expansion continue?
Be grateful for the work of the Queensland organisation. Since the the introduction of the conference system, there has been only one appearance by an Australian team in the last four of Super Rugby, with New Zealand (four) and South African (three) sides well represented.
If that sort of imbalance is repeated this year, the murmurs of discontent from South Africa and New Zealand about standards in Australia will only grow louder.
The Australian sides can shut that down by raising their games, but there is work to be done.
The Rugby Channel in New Zealand has been showing repeats from the 2012 season and they are a sharp reminder of where the gaps need to be closed, with the breakdown and counterattack two areas in particular need of attention.
Don’t expect the New Zealanders and South Africans to stand still either. Optimism in Australia is justified – it is now the third year of the five-franchise model – but it should be of the cautious kind.
Will it be Beale, O’Connor, Lealifaano, Barnes or Cooper?
The Wallabies’ No.10 jersey is in the strange position of having been through several sets of hands without anyone demanding possession.
There is so much talent, but with so many question marks attached. Robbie Deans probably has a fairly clear idea about much of his preferred 22, but the five-eighth position looks more open than most, and dependent on Super Rugby form.
Despite his antics last year, Cooper has one card up his sleeve the others don’t – his partnership with Will Genia. If Genia can come back early enough to string together a number of convincing games with Cooper, the drums will start beating for the Reds’ pairing.
Can the Wallabies beat the Lions?
Already the mind games have begun, with Warren Gatland and Ewen McKenzie stating (though for completely different reasons) that first-choice Wallabies should be available for their franchises in the lead-up games.
They shouldn’t, for the obvious reasons, but this will be the first little battle of many. The Wallabies are my favourites to win the series, with home advantage, the brilliance of Will Genia and lingering doubts about the quality of the Lions’ 9-10 options outweighing any question marks over the hosts.
There is enough talent in Australia to get the job done.
Will Robbie Deans remain as Wallabies coach?
Linked, but perhaps not inexorably, to the Lions series. Deans has already stated his desire to continue through to the 2015 World Cup, and a Lions series win would fortify his case hugely.
But look at the 2013 schedule and it’s entirely plausible that his Bledisloe drought could also continue next year, with two of the three Tests in New Zealand (Wellington and Dunedin).
Would a Lions series win but further disappointment against the All Blacks merit a contract extension for Deans to the next World Cup?
To my mind yes – a Lions success would be evidence of the New Zealander’s resilience as well as his nous – although a win against the All Blacks in Sydney next August and greater fluency in attack would make that argument much, much easier to prosecute.
How will the All Blacks cope without Richie McCaw?
There will be an element of sink or swim when the All Blacks take on France in three Tests in June this year, especially if the increasingly injury-prone Dan Carter is absent from one or more of the encounters.
There will be plenty of takers for France to win at least one of the three Tests, but the All Blacks have quietly been grooming young Chief Sam Cane for the No.7 role over the past year and France’s recent success without their own talismanic openside and captain, Thierry Dusautoir, showed that there are always others who can step up.
The All Blacks will lose something without McCaw – how could they not? – but the machine is too well constructed for the wheels to fall off.
Paul Cully is a freelance journalist who was born in New Zealand, raised in Northern Ireland, but spent most of his working life in Australia. He is a former Sun-Herald sports editor, rugby tragic, and current Roar and RugbyHeaven contributor.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Rugby Union, wallabies



January 9th 2013 @ 8:44am
Atawhai Drive said | January 9th 2013 @ 8:44am | Report comment
Another question will be answered this afternoon, when the ARU announces the appointment of a new CEO.
Anyone know who the candidates are?
January 9th 2013 @ 8:48am
Grimmace said | January 9th 2013 @ 8:48am | Report comment
They kept that quiet. Even in my at times fruitless hunt for rugby news I didn’t see that. “No rugby on TV make Grimamce go something something”
January 9th 2013 @ 9:01am
Uncle Argyle said | January 9th 2013 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Top of the morning AD and Planet Roar,
If my information is correct – William Joseph Calcraft.
January 9th 2013 @ 9:12am
Atawhai Drive said | January 9th 2013 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Really, Uncle? Wow, and other exclamations of surprise.
I can see him in my mind’s eye _ for some reason, always in a Manly jersey and not a Wallabies one.
January 9th 2013 @ 9:18am
Uncle Argyle said | January 9th 2013 @ 9:18am | Report comment
From my understanding he has been in mix for a while. When you think he and Hawker both toured in the 1984 Grand Slam Team and both are very well accomplished in financial circles it appears to be a good match. Ive never met Calcraft however I hear he is a 1st class bloke. He actually played 3 tests for the Wallabies as a flanker and has a 100% winning record as a player. If I am right and Calcraft gets the nod lets hope some of that rubs off on the team. I am not 100% but confident it will be Calcraft.
January 9th 2013 @ 1:35pm
Chas said | January 9th 2013 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/union-news/collar-bomb-hoax-victims-father-to-take-over-as-aru-ceo-report-20130109-2cftj.html
January 10th 2013 @ 8:48pm
sheek said | January 10th 2013 @ 8:48pm | Report comment
Uncle,
I met Calcraft a couple of times during our years at UNSW studying Commerce. I dropped out & he went onto greater things.
I also played against him at colts in 1976, when he was at Manly & I was at Easts. From our brief interchanges I found him a very decent bloke.
January 9th 2013 @ 9:08am
Hightackle said | January 9th 2013 @ 9:08am | Report comment
I dont know who its gonna be but he has to be brave or crazy imo.
January 9th 2013 @ 8:53am
Hightackle said | January 9th 2013 @ 8:53am | Report comment
The Australian conference is stronger this year imo but I guess we will see. Im expecting the Tahs and Reds to go well but I also expect the Rebels to upset a team or two.
Cooper may have his combo with Genia but it hasnt helped at test level in the past. Speaking of “past”, when is Australia going to learn from it?
No Australia wont win the Lions series and if they do, it wont be good enough to take pressure off Deans becuz it wont be pretty enough. My guess is that Deans will remain and whats with judging Aust, its players or coach based on beating the best team in the world (NZ)? You guys know that only 4 teams have done that in over 60 years right?
Will the ABs cope without Richie? No they will all become bad players all of a sudden. Yes the ABs will cope.
January 9th 2013 @ 8:56am
kingplaymaker said | January 9th 2013 @ 8:56am | Report comment
I wonder which of these three questions will receive the most discussion in the debates.
It’s strange of anyone to expect 5 franchises to immediately be as competitive as 4 were: the process will evidently take some time. Young players need to come through and an evening out and expansion of the spread of young talent. At the beginning a small number of new players will appear who wouldn’t have made the old squads packed with more senior players blocking them, such as Pyle or Neville. Then as more and more players who can’t break into the Waratahs, Reds, Brumbies squads are given chances new franchises will be composed increasingly of Pyles and Nevilles. Furthermore, the game should grow in these new areas and at a slow rate they will begin to produce new players of their own although that takes longer, while being well worth it given the potential gains (which is why the neglect of the only large market left unrepresented, South Australia, is such a disaster) Then, finally, you will have 5 franchises of more even strength (if expansion is run properly as it is not with the Force! One should assume come competence in the administration). This doesn’t mean they will be as good necessarily as the older franchises, but that is the case in New Zealand and South Africa and in most sporting competitions, where the biggest and most glamorous franchises will get many of the best players. The important aim is to make sure the less glitzy teams are good enough to compete. But this in the case of new teams takes time. So rather than expecting immediate results, it’s better to have faith in a long-term decision to bear fruit in time.
January 9th 2013 @ 9:06am
nickoldschool said | January 9th 2013 @ 9:06am | Report comment
‘Don’t expect the New Zealanders and South Africans to stand still either. Optimism in Australia is justified – it is now the third year of the five-franchise model – but it should be of the cautious kind.’
Am not sure Australians are that optimistic about franchises success all across the board. I think most predictions have the Rebels and WF in the overall bottom three alongside the new SA franchise. All five kiwi Teams have the potential to be in the mix and I would say the same about 4 from SA. At full strength I do rate the Reds, Brumbies and Tahs but a couple of injuries or individual setbacks could disrupt their Plans. So more a wait and see attitude for me rather than plain optimism really.
January 9th 2013 @ 9:09am
Acorn said | January 9th 2013 @ 9:09am | Report comment
the Reds should be better, assuming they don’t get hit by all those bloody injuries. The Brumbies will keep improving you’d think. The Waratahs HAVE to be better. The Rebels don’t have as much leadership on the field, but do have Higgers… their front row is abysmal though. And the Force? wow, who knows what will happen there. I reckon that’s the order they’ll all finish in the Aussie conference, how they finish overall will come down to who pinches some games away from home against SA & NZ teams, and whoever gets to play the Southern Kings and Auckland Blues too.
January 9th 2013 @ 9:21am
Valleys Diehard of Brunswick st said | January 9th 2013 @ 9:21am | Report comment
It took the South African teams 10 years to become competitive. It was always the Bulls and Cats that were a certain victory for opposing teams. Until Victor Matfield and co. arrived and cared about Super Rugby it looked like SA teams barely made up the numbers. It would therefore be a bit rich for SA to bleat about the Aust teams in 2013 regardless. Both the Force and the Rebels rarely get flogged like the Lions did, and the Spears are only going to emulate the Lions.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
January 9th 2013 @ 11:05am
The Kebab Connoisseur said | January 9th 2013 @ 11:05am | Report comment
Cannot believe Jozi no longer has a team in the competition. The wealthiest city in the wealthiest country of Africa with no representation. Must be some real rocket scientists running rugby over in S.A. nowadays.
January 9th 2013 @ 10:12am
Redb said | January 9th 2013 @ 10:12am | Report comment
Do I gather from these commetns that the Rebels will struggle in 2013? I’ll be attending a couple of games this year probably against the Waratahs and Crusaders if they don’t clash with the Bombers.
January 9th 2013 @ 2:02pm
Robbo said | January 9th 2013 @ 2:02pm | Report comment
NO mate the Rebels will be competitive this year – only doubt is the front row – and I know they have big raps on Eddie Aholelei and Paul Alo-Emile – but they are essentially untried at this level – we’ll see. Also this is the year for Laurie Weeks to stand up. Also a new Japanese hooker is supposedly the goods – but once again, yet to be proved. Elsewhere, a year for Pyle and Neville to come of age (if Pyle learns to push in the scrum), the back row will be very competitive (but little depth at 7), and the backs can match it with anyone – subject to solving the riddle: O’Conner or Beale at 10. Interestingly, the newly updated profiles on their web page has Beale as a fullback, JOC as a centre and a certain Angus Roberts (who?) as flyhalf!
January 9th 2013 @ 10:41am
stu wilsons gloves said | January 9th 2013 @ 10:41am | Report comment
Redb
The Rebels will be alright, I would compare them to where Richmond are in the AFL, could have a good season and just be off the pace of the better teams. Or could be exposed for lack of grunt up front. Like Richmond the jury is out on the coach and this year is the crucial year for Mr. Hill.
Our backline looks solid, but we cough up the ball in the tackle/ruck far too often to be an effective side. But one thing is for sure they will play with plenty of passion, I am expecting a big year from JOC and our new Japanese hooker, we have been very weak in the front row since we joined super rugby.
Fingers crossed.
January 9th 2013 @ 10:59am
Acorn said | January 9th 2013 @ 10:59am | Report comment
fingers crossed indeed Stu. i wouldn’t bet your house on our Japanese imports, great story but he ain’t world class. and the props either side of him are decidedly shaky.
Front row is our biggest problem, closely followed by our #10 position. I fear JoC and Beale will be rotated there throughout the season. Problem with both is they are finishers, not creators, Beale is better at 15 than 10, and JoC I’d play on the wing (he’s defensively no good in the inside channels). Problem for mr Hill is he has no other good options for the inside backs, so one of these two will be at 10.
The Rebels backline doesn’t look like it will have a lot of consistency about it, plenty of utilities, which could conceivably deliver a new backline formation every week. I’d be happy if they just stuck with a combination for the first 5-6 games regardless of results to try and get some fluency, something they definitely didn’t have last year.
January 9th 2013 @ 11:18am
Jutsie said | January 9th 2013 @ 11:18am | Report comment
weekes is a decent front rower (not excellent but holds his own) he was sorely missed last season. Blake for all his size was a light weight at scrum time. Alot of QLD Roarers have talked up Paul Alo-Emile too so hopefully he takes the next step this year.
January 9th 2013 @ 12:26pm
Redb said | January 9th 2013 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
thanks mate. Richmond gawd/
January 9th 2013 @ 4:23pm
hog said | January 9th 2013 @ 4:23pm | Report comment
And no pressure on Mr Hird to actually achieve something with Essendon this year, you may actually want to go to some of the Rebels games if they clash with Essendons. Go Tigers!!
January 9th 2013 @ 4:50pm
Jutsie said | January 9th 2013 @ 4:50pm | Report comment
As rebels, bombers and wallabies supporter i dont know whether to laugh or cry.
January 9th 2013 @ 12:33pm
Terry Kidd said | January 9th 2013 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
Early prediction …. Oz conference finishing order will be Tahs, Reds, Brumbies, Rebels, Force with the only possible alternative being a switch between 3rd and 4th.
The Tahs pack will be their cornerstone and I expect Bernard Foley to come of age in the 10 jumper. Their big weakness is a good 12 option because BB will play fullback and AAC will play 13.
The Reds pack while being mobile will lack weight and height and power at the set piece and this will be their huge weakness. The backline will be fine but it is difficult to shine when you are continually trying to exit your 22m.
The Brumbies pack looks ok for the set pieces but could be a tad slow around the park and might struggle combatting an expansive game. The inner and outer backline looks ok but the linking centres are a weakness. I would start with Coleman at 12 and Tomane at 13. CL must be the 10 and Mogg or McCabe at 15.
The Rebels … well they will have a red hot go but their front row is going to get monstered week in week out and the backline will have to learn how to play effectively off a lot of back foot ball. Beale will play 10 and JOC will play 15. Their big backline weakness will be 12 and 13, Inman will be solid at 13 but Sidey at 12 …. no hope.
The Force …. hmmm they are going to have a hard working pack, ok at scrum time but hopeless at line out time. Their biggest problem will be to manufacture a working backline. IMHO the Force need to build that backline around Kyle Godwin, he will be their future at 10, the new signing Sam Christie would go well at 12, the Honey Badger will fill 13 or a wing spot, the best SNK can hope for is 15 until they find someone better.
January 9th 2013 @ 3:28pm
Jim said | January 9th 2013 @ 3:28pm | Report comment
Gotta love a Tahs supporter. They seem to take a Tahs strength (in this instance scrummaging) and beleive that it will win them games. There were many games last year with less than 10 scrums. So a strong scrum is handy, but forward mobility and impact around the park is more important. Just look at the Reds of 2011 – there scrum was average at best, but they won the title.
The Tahs might be better this year. But they have a lot of mental baggage to overcome. On paper they should have dominated last year and instead they were an embarrassed. Cant see them turning that around in a hurry.
January 9th 2013 @ 5:21pm
sittingbison said | January 9th 2013 @ 5:21pm | Report comment
Sam Christie is in the EPS.
Alfie Mafi came of age last year at full back and starts ahead of SNK. The halves of Mathewson/Sheehan and Ebersohn/Godwin have real potential and more depth than ever before. The outside backs Cummins and Dellit are fine. The new centres Hayward Teutara-Morrison and Rasolea are unknown, Stanley and Tupou were serviceable with Tupou showing potential.
Under Mitchell it was all backs and star imports with huge discontent and total disconnect between coach and players, under Graham it was all forwards with zero playmakers, terrible recruiting and no strategy or tactics with an ambivalent at best coach. Even so Mitchells teams finished mid table beating all other teams and Aus teams home and away, and Grahams farcical team still beat Reds at home and Tahs away, lost by a single point to rebels twice, and lost to Brums by only 2 points in Canberra. And this was the worst ever performed team.
Write this 2013 team off at your peril, they are better equipped and more importantly better organised, trained and drilled and captained than ever before. I think they will finish above the Revels, and wouldn’t be surprised they finish ahead of the Tahs who I think have a fatally unbalanced roster.
January 9th 2013 @ 6:23pm
Kipper said | January 9th 2013 @ 6:23pm | Report comment
and maybe even above the reds SB ?
What with Graham in charge
January 10th 2013 @ 2:57pm
sittingbison said | January 10th 2013 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
hehe good one Kipper %)
Yes, the Reds hiring Graham is the most perplexing move last year in Rugby. They have replaced a championship winning coach in link with the worst performed coach with a proven track record of poor recruiting, poor communication and player rapport, no game plan or strategy and more importantly no tactics. And with a fatal character flaw that had him negotiating with the Reds pre season (the start of only his second year) after he demanded to be in charge of recruiting and player retention – and saw no conflict of interest.
He was a disaster at the Force, it was not the case of him being a good coach at a basket case club but a basket case coach at a struggling club making it worse in every aspect and throwing them to the wolves.
Watch out Reds if link really does relinquish coaching and/or game day to Graham. Kiss the past three years of development and success goodbye.
January 9th 2013 @ 2:18pm
Justin2 said | January 9th 2013 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
“Robbie Deans probably has a fairly clear idea about much of his preferred 22″
That line had me pussing my pants with laughter!
January 9th 2013 @ 2:41pm
Amateur Hour said | January 9th 2013 @ 2:41pm | Report comment
Hilarious. Next he will be somewhat sure about what style he thinks he wants the Wallabies to play.
January 9th 2013 @ 5:13pm
GWS said | January 9th 2013 @ 5:13pm | Report comment
Then he will develop a vague notion of using the bench…
January 12th 2013 @ 11:46pm
bennalong said | January 12th 2013 @ 11:46pm | Report comment
Better get a shot of penicilin Justin2!!