My Aussie squad for the first Ashes Test
By Brian Zhang , 10 Jan 2013 The Crowd is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- 2013 Ashes Series, Australian Cricket, Cricket, England, Michael Clarke
Australian batsman Phillip Hughes leaves the ground frustrated after being bowled on 86 by Chanaka Welegedara on day 1 of the first cricket test match between Australia and Sri Lanka at Blundstone Arena in Hobart, Friday, Dec. 14, 2012. (AAP Image/Chris Crerar)
Related coverage
The 2013 Ashes is only 6 months away. Recent history, Test rankings and players’ experience suggests that England should be outright favourites to retain the famous urn.
But the back-to-back series could see one, if not two, of the closest Test series played in the last decade.
Trent Bridge, a ground that does not hold many fond memories for the Australians, hosts the first Test.
In the 2005 series, England won that Test match by three wickets, gaining a 2-1 lead in the series. In that same test, Australia was forced to follow on for the first time in 17 years.
However, if the selectors go with the right squad, this result will not be repeated and could set the tone for the Aussies to regain the urn.
1. Shane Watson – if he doesn’t return bowling, then Watson must open the batting in this series. Watson averages well over 40 opening, having scored his only two centuries in Test cricket opening. He averages below 25 batting anywhere else.
When he was recalled for the 2009 series as an opener, Watson scored 240 runs at 48 with three fifties.
Like Warner, Watson likes the new ball coming onto the bat and when he plays his shots, especially down the ground (he is one of the best straight drivers in world cricket), runs will come quickly.
Ever since Watson dropped to number three and four Australia have only seen one hundred opening stand.
2. David Warner – he is one of the most dangerous opening batsman in world cricket at the moment in all formats.
Warner has made a fairly good start to his Test career scoring 1068 runs at 44.50 at a strike rate of 75.15 including three hundreds and five fifties. Matthew Hayden, arguably Australia’s best ever opening batsman, scored 536 runs at 35.7 in his first 15 tests.
Warner’s form over the summer so far shows that he is maturing with every Test match, and although wasn’t able to convert four consecutive fifties to hundreds, his ultra attacking style of play may be able to nullify the English attack.
The worry for most people is that the Duke ball swings far more than the Kookaburra and Warner must control his shot selection while still backing himself.
His 85 in the first innings at the SCG was full of control, timing and elegance and his only loose shot was the one that led to his dismissal.
If Warner backs himself, he could have a huge series.
3. Phil Hughes – there still may be questions over his ability against the English conditions but Hughes has improved dramatically over the last year and he will feel he is ready for England.
4. Ed Cowan – this will be a surprise to many but with Watson being a must in the opening position, and Warner starting to become more convincing as an opener, Cowan goes down the order.
He is still in the side because he is capable of making hundreds.
Many will say that Cowan will never be able to dominate a bowling attack and he will probably agree, but what he is capable of is working a hundred out of nothing.
He can be a supporting partner for when Warner, Watson or Clarke gets going. But he must start turning starts into hundreds or else he could find himself without a position.
5. Michael Clarke – Australia’s best batsman and most experienced player.
In recent times, Clarke’s aggressive captaincy tactics and bowling changes have paid massive dividends, and it will be interesting to see how he goes in England.
Clarke will be confident, even after a poor 2005 series, as he bounced back to be the second leading run score in the 2009 series.
Its simple, if Clarke fires and makes the right decisions, Australia will win.
6. David Hussey – junior Hussey is a must for the Ashes, even if it’s just a one-off tour.
Many will disagree with me considering his shield record this season has been abysmal, but his experience, especially in county cricket, will be important to the Australian middle order.
The conditions will not be foreign to Hussey and if he can get off to a good start in the first Test, he could be a major factor in helping Australia win. His off-spinners will come in handy at times as well.
7. Matthew Wade – most of the country will agree to that his keeping needs vast improvement, but when in form and on song, his batting is brilliant and entertaining.
The swinging conditions will test Wade’s keeping ability, as will his job keeping up to the spinners, but if Wade can do well in India, continue his batting form and stay injury free he will just about end Brad Haddin’s Test career for good.
8. Mitchell Johnson – he has made a successful comeback to the Australian test team and will be ready for revenge against the old enemy.
While it is hard to see him becoming a complete all-rounder, he is a very capable bowling all-rounder. If he can get his radar right the English batsmen will have to watch their backs.
9. Peter Siddle – He is the team’s heart and soul. Courageous, lion-hearted and their best bowler, Peter Siddle will lead the Australian attack come Ashes time. There is no doubt he will ready to fire.
In 2009 he picked up 20 wickets and was the second leading wicket taker in that series. If he bowls well with a hint of movement and swing, he will cause problems.
10. James Pattinson – if fit, Pattinson will take the new ball with Siddle.
Despite the fact he has only played seven tests, he is a dangerous fast bowler and his stats show that. 31 wickets at an average of 22 is a phenomenal start to a career that could see him take 350 test wickets if he can avoid injuries.
The Ashes will be a huge test for the young man but if he bowls well, he and Peter Siddle will shake the English batsman.
11. Nathan Lyon – all summer is has been criticized, pressured and questioned over his bowling.
But his stats show that he is Australia’s best spinner even since Warne. 61 wickets at 32 is a good start.
Lyon will no doubt take wickets and maybe trouble the Indians but England will be different again. He slow down a little and bowl more balls just outside off stump on a good length. If he can execute he will takes 20 wickets against England and cement his spot as Australia’s number one Test tweaker.
12. Jackson Bird – in his first two Tests, he has already drawn comparisons to Glenn McGrath and James Anderson. Obviously he is a long way off but at 26, Bird is no rookie and his performances in the first two Tests will see him go to India and England.
I do have Pattinson ahead of him for the first couple of Tests but if an injury occurs, one of the three bowlers performs poorly or if Australia win the series before the five tests are played, then I will have him playing in at least two games.
13. Ryan Harris – if he is fit, then he is a must have inclusion in my squad. Like Shane Watson, Harris’s career has been cut short because of re-occurring injuries and he is among the most frustrated cricketers in Australia.
His record of 47 wickets at 23 in 11 tests shows he is one of Australia’s best bowlers when playing.
The back-to-back Ashes series’ could be Ryan Harris’ last season of international cricket and if he can force his way back in the side, he will play a major role.
14. Pat Cummins – he, alongside Pattinson, will be Australia’s two youngest bowlers going into the Ashes.
In the one test and 16 limited overs matches he has drawn comparisons with Brett Lee in terms of speed and firepower. Cummins is capable of bowling up to and over 145 kilometres consistently.
This young, tall fast man, if fit, will rattle the English batting line-up.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- This fast-tracking of Ahmed is a concern (117)
- David Warner stood down after attacking England player (114)
- Does Australian cricket need a clean out? (112)
- Doesn’t Warner want to play cricket for Australia anymore? (108)
- Botham is wrong on Aussies: de Villiers (90)
- Is Steyn Test cricket’s best ever fast bowler? (86)
- It’s a drink problem, not a team one (76)
- Aussies knocked out of Champions Trophy (8)
- Inverarity drops Ahmed Ashes hint (3)
- Australian cricket rotting under Clarke’s off-field leadership (120)
- Siddle says spinner Ahmed not overawed
- Coulter-Nile to stay on until Ashes (2)
- Get ready for the 2013 Champions Trophy semi-finals (2)
- Cricket’s All Time K Team (20)
- Get ready for the 2013 Champions Trophy semi-finals (2)
- Cricket’s All Time K Team (20)
- Australia vs Sri Lanka: 2013 ICC Champions Trophy live scores (3)
- Ask yourself: what would Davey do? (12)
- Ravichandran Ashwin: The silent workhorse for India (7)
- Why the Champions Trophy still rocks (7)
- Come on Aussie, come on (please) (3)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- 2013 Ashes Series, Australian Cricket, Cricket, England, Michael Clarke

January 10th 2013 @ 4:34am
AndyMack said | January 10th 2013 @ 4:34am | Report comment
Hi BZ
not a bad line up. switch cowen for khawaja, and mitch for bird and i’m with you all the way.
agree on harris. if he can get himself fit again, he is def in the running for the tour.
January 11th 2013 @ 2:19pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 11th 2013 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
I agree with your changes. Ed Cowan doesn’t deserve to tour at all.
January 10th 2013 @ 7:39am
Red Kev said | January 10th 2013 @ 7:39am | Report comment
The only way Cowan stays in the side is if he opens. Khawaja is a far more accomplished batsman but especially so in the order between 3 and 6.
January 10th 2013 @ 10:37am
James said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:37am | Report comment
Agree with RedKev, Khawaja is a key man for the ashes because of his ablity to face swing bowling. I would have got Khawaja in given he is the best number 3 in the country. I do like the fact that Inevarity acknowledged Khawaja’s great progress since comign to the Bulls and hopefully he is close to a callup for India . Long term we need Khawaja in the side as he is among the best players of swing bowling in Ausralia as seen from his runs this year, all made on very difficult decks.
January 10th 2013 @ 10:41am
Robie said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:41am | Report comment
Agreed, Khawaja has to be in our top 6, I would put khawaja at 6 and take D Huss as backup batsman. Khawaja is a fantastic talent who scored 138 against Tasmania when they as a team only got 95. And that Tasmanian team included the likes of Bailey, Paine, Cosgrove, and Doolan. He also top scored against NSW which included a star NSW attack of Starc, Hazelwood, Bollinger and Copeland. For me the most impressive improvement has been his running between the wickets and fielding which everyone has seen in the Ryobi cup.
January 10th 2013 @ 8:21am
The no. Three said | January 10th 2013 @ 8:21am | Report comment
Good squad, Who said Khawaja converts his fifties into hundreds either? Bird has to be in the starting side, Do Harris and Cummins still play cricket, since when??
January 10th 2013 @ 8:53am
Red Kev said | January 10th 2013 @ 8:53am | Report comment
You could at least look up the stats before making a comment like that. Khawaja’s First-Class record says he converts his 50s into 100s. He may only scored one century this shield season (and three 50s) but that is still a decent conversion rate.
Innings = 103
Runs Scored = 4045
Scores between 50-99 = 20
Scores betweem 100-199 = 10
Scores over 200 = 1
Who would you like to compare that to?
January 10th 2013 @ 9:41am
Behold said | January 10th 2013 @ 9:41am | Report comment
If you pull Watson’s test figures out of his FC record it is similar –
Innings = 122
Runs Scored = 5136
Scores Between 50-99 = 24
Scores Between 100-199 = 14
Scores over 200 = 1
Hopefully Khawaja can do a better job than Watson in Test cricket at converting his 50s into 100s but nothing is ever guaranteed.
I am more worried about someone thinking David Hussey should be in the team he has scored no first class 100s this season and 1 last season and at 35 its hardly the time to pick a guy on promise. He hasn’t been able to carry his domestic form in the shorter formats to the international stage, so why would anyone assume he would do it in the most testing format.
January 10th 2013 @ 10:42am
Robie said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:42am | Report comment
The fact is that Khawaja was asked to improve on 2 things, fielding and running between wickets, he has done both in abundance this year. Furthermore he has scored on extremely difficult tracks against Tasmania where he outscored Tasmania and also against a star NSW attack where he outscored the likes of Clark, Warner and Watson. He has the best technique out of all the younger batsman going around and he has to be the best replacement for Hussey. The fact he is captain against the Sri Lankans in the warm up game shows the selectors are seeing the improvements they wanted. Good luck to him.
January 10th 2013 @ 10:44am
Red Kev said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:44am | Report comment
Great article on cricinfo about Khawaja’s improvements under Boof:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia/content/story/599253.html
January 10th 2013 @ 3:37pm
Dean said | January 10th 2013 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
Great article, boof deserves alot of credit for Khawaja’s progress this year, both wtih the bat and also on the field.
January 10th 2013 @ 10:38am
James said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:38am | Report comment
I would drop Cowan and get Kawaja in, and if not Cowan then Khawaja has to be picked ahead of David Hussey who is averaging 17 in shied cricket this year while Khawaja is second leadng shield scorer after Hughes.
January 10th 2013 @ 10:19am
Brian said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:19am | Report comment
D Hussey averaged 17 this year and is the wrong side of 35. Mitch is also a recipe for disaster. I would drop Cowan for India but bring him back for the Ashes tour
Warner
Cowan
Hughes
Khawaja
Clarke
Watson
Wade
Starc
Siddle
Pattinson
Lyon
Rest of Squad – Burns, Paine, Beer, Bird, Cutting, Hilfenhaus, Cummins/Hazlewood
January 10th 2013 @ 10:39am
James said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:39am | Report comment
Completely agree with Brian, at average of 17 you can’t pick D Huss over Khawaja, this team is spot on and will give us best chance of regaining the ashes.
January 10th 2013 @ 10:44am
Robie said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:44am | Report comment
This team is good, with only one change, I would take Johnson instead of Hilfe, but the batting lineup looks good except that if Watto comes back then bring Watto in for Cowan and Khawaja to stay at 4.
January 11th 2013 @ 2:21pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 11th 2013 @ 2:21pm | Report comment
Drop Cowan for a series and then randomly bring him back?
January 11th 2013 @ 3:47pm
matt h said | January 11th 2013 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
I’m not sure about Beer for tests, but he looks the goods in the short form this year. Possibly should be replacing Doherty for 20/20 (not that Doherty has been that bad iin limited overs games).
January 10th 2013 @ 11:33am
Slimey_Sam said | January 10th 2013 @ 11:33am | Report comment
1 Watson
2 Warner
3 Hughes
4 Khwaja
5 Clarke
6 Hussey.D
7 Wade
8 Johnson/Harris/Cummins
9 Pattinson
10Siddle
11Bird
January 11th 2013 @ 3:46pm
matt h said | January 11th 2013 @ 3:46pm | Report comment
No spinner?
January 11th 2013 @ 3:48pm
matt h said | January 11th 2013 @ 3:48pm | Report comment
Brianm did you get all fired up and then ran out of steam after three paragraphs on each operner
January 12th 2013 @ 3:32am
James said | January 12th 2013 @ 3:32am | Report comment
agree thats probably the australian side with the best chance of doing well but i disagree with your statement about clarke, where if he fires and makes the right decisions australia wins. this ashes and the next few at least, unless something dramatic happens are englands to lose. clarke at his best, which he has been quite near to quite often in the last year or so is very very good but so are a few of the english batsmen, especially cook. what im saying is that clarke on fire and cook of the last few years pretty much even each other out. its not simply if clarke on fire australia wins, if clarke is on fire australia have a chance, him not on fire and australia lose hard. england have a pretty settled team and with a core of players from the last ashes series, i dont see them being afraid of any of the australian players outside of clarke and the younger hussey and maybe one or two bowlers. warner and watson hold no fear, england know that watson will get a couple of guys run out in making 40-60 and then will get out himself.