Do doped world records encourage athletes to cheat?
By Glenn Mitchell, 14 Jan 2013 Glenn Mitchell is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- cathy freeman, Lance Armstrong, Olympics
Inaction by the IAAF continues to encourage clean athletes, such as Cathy Freeman, to dope to beat farcical world records set by doped runners. (Image: AAP)
Related coverage
At the peak of her career, Cathy Freeman was knowingly encouraged to take drugs by the ‘gurus’ who administer the international body that runs track and field.
A big call you say? Well, sadly, it’s not.
There is no suggestion here that Freeman doped. That’s not the story. It is the story behind the encouragement by officials that must be closely examined.
When Freeman officially retired from her sport in 2003 she bowed out with a glittering array of achievements. She won Olympic gold and silver medals, two World titles and four Commonwealth Games gold medals.
There was just one thing that was missing from her CV and it was the piece in the jigsaw that would have defined her as the fastest over 400m in the history of the sport – the world record.
And this is where the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) comes into play.
How you ask? Well let’s journey back to Bruce Stadium, as it was then, in Canberra on 6 October 1985. The last day of a three-day World Cup meet.
At the time Freeman was just a starry-eyed 12-year-old who would have had no interest, you would imagine, on what unfolded that day in our national capital.
A swag of big name stars were in town, participating in the World Cup, including a young Ben Johnson, who won gold in the men’s 100m.
But the biggest news to come out of the meet was the performance by a 28-year-old East German by the name of Marita Koch.
Five years earlier in Moscow she won gold in the 400m but was denied her chance to defend her title in Los Angeles in 1984 due to the Eastern Bloc boycott.
However, on this day in 1985 she shattered the 400m world record – her time a staggering 47.60 seconds, slicing an incredible 0.39 off the existing mark.
And what is more amazing, that record still stands today, over 27 years hence.
Well, maybe it is not so amazing given the fact that Koch posted her time as a result of being plied throughout her career with performance enhancing drugs.
With the fall of the Berlin Wall in late-1989, journalists from around the world were for the first time permitted to access the files of the East German sporting federations.
And what they found, as we have known for a long time, was the irrefutable evidence of a systematic state-sanctioned doping regime.
And among the hundreds of names there for the world to see was one Marita Koch.
Her entire daily drug protocol was there in black and white.
Like so many that preceded and followed her, Koch to this day flatly denies having ever used banned substances, which is a staggering fact.
Staggering because long time anti-doping campaigner, Werner Frank discovered a hand-written letter from Koch in which she complained that one of her main rivals, Bärbel Wöckel was receiving a higher dosage of drugs than herself because she had a relative who worked for the company that produced them.
Fairly damning evidence you would think and the IAAF has had over 25 years to consider what they should do about it. After all that time, what have they decided to do? Nothing.
Since Koch sizzled around the track in Canberra, the closest anyone has got to the benchmark is Marie-José Pérec’s 48.25 en route to claiming gold at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics – that is a whopping 0.65 seconds outside Koch’s tainted time and that is the best anyone has done in 27-plus years since.
Freeman’s gold medal winning time of 49.13 in the 2000 games remained 1.53 seconds outside of Koch’s record.
The question needs to be asked just why Koch’s world record still stands.
Some have questioned over time whether Pérec was clean, but that is all it is – supposition.
Florence Griffith-Joyner’s mind bending 10.49 100m world record in 1987 and 200m world mark of 21.34 at the Seoul Games, both which still stand, have also been highly questioned but again there is no proof.
With Koch, it is a fact – she cheated, knowingly.
So why does she still sit ‘proudly’ in the record books?
The IAAF and the IOC will state that it sits too far outside the eight-year statute of limitations clause with regard to the expunging of performances and times.
Really? Then why has cycling’s world governing body, the UCI, seen fit to strip Lance Armstrong of his Tour de France titles that date way back to 1999?
No issue with the eight-year clause as laid down by sports ultimate drug watchdog, the Montreal-based World Anti-Doping Agency.
Armstrong has been proven to be a cheat and so too has Koch.
By leaving her 400m world record as the single lap benchmark for women, the authorities are openly encouraging young athletes to dope if they wish to be the fastest of all-time.
I would have thought that is actually against the whole ethos of sport.
Unfortunately, the Amex card carrying, five-star hotel and first-class flight brigade who make the ultimate decisions reckon it’s all kosher.
And speaking of grand pooh-bahs who live a life of luxury as a result of their role in sports administration, what about our own Kevan Gosper, the AOC and IOC (former vice-president) board member?
Just before the 1992 Barcelona Olympics I interviewed Gosper for ABC Grandstand and asked him why Ben Johnson, having admitted in 1989 at the Dubin Inquiry into drugs in sport in Canda that he had doped ever since 1981, was still in possession of his two bronze medals (100m and 4 x 100m) from the LA Games of 1984.
He said it was the first time the matter had been raised with him and he would look into it and get back to me.
Sixteen years later, a few months before the 2008 Olympics I again interviewed Gosper for ABC Grandstand and asked about various issues relating to the Beijing Games.
As an aside, I again inquired of him about the Johnson medal issue surrounding the LA Games.
His response was to tell me that it was the first time it had ever been raised with him!
Very strange I thought, and when I twigged his memory his response was an equally strange, “What do you expect me to say?”
But – I was again reassured when he told me on air that this time he would look into it – and be rest assured he would furnish me with a response to my question.
I left the ABC in mid-2011 and guess what; I am still yet to hear from Kevan.
Mind you, in fairness I did only first raise the issue 20 years ago and to expect an answer so quickly is a little presumptuous on my part.
But Kevan, if you do happen to read this and have been able to find an answer to my query, feel free to post a comment below like all good Roarers do.
After 21 years as a sports broadcaster with the ABC, since mid-2011 Glenn Mitchell has been freelancing in the electronic and written media. He is an ambassador for mental health in Australia, and tweets from @mitchellglenn.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
The Crowd Says (32) | Page 1 of Comments
- Explore:
- cathy freeman, Lance Armstrong, Olympics

January 14th 2013 @ 9:06am
sheek said | January 14th 2013 @ 9:06am | Report comment
Glenn,
You’re on fire – another thought provoking article.
A workmate has a saying, “Go with the flow & take the dough.”
I’m sure this is the mantra of many people who climb the ladder, or those who are on the committees of sports organisations – IOC, FIFA, IAAF, FINA, etc, etc.
It’s all about socialising, networking & enjoying the fruits of office. It’s all about traveling the world first-class in aircraft, staying at first-class hotels, dining at first-class restaurants, receiving “gifts” & yet still being paid handsomely for all these privileges.
The thought that they might actually be required to make difficult decisions based on moral integrity hardly enters the brain system.
Okay sorry, my cynicism knows no bounds I know.
Lance Armstrong won’t be apologising any time soon & people in offices of responsibility won’t be making any morally correct decisions anytime soon either.
For many people life is only about making lots of money & acquiring lots of “toys,” plus maybe acquiring some influence & power along the way.
January 14th 2013 @ 9:47am
MadMonk said | January 14th 2013 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Great article Glenn.
I didn’t quite get the premise in the title. Is it by implication of the matters you discussed Cathy was encouraged to dope? If so my apologies bit slow this morning.
Isn’t Gosper an enigma (along with Coates). We have long ridiculed the IOC and FIFA as these morally bankrupt organisations yet somehow we celebrate that Australia has players moving in those circles.
10, 20 and 30 years from now will Susie O’Neill be mouthing such banality on behalf of the IOC.
January 14th 2013 @ 9:59am
Tim Renowden said | January 14th 2013 @ 9:59am | Report comment
An interesting read and the point that administrators in athletics have been complicit in turning a blind eye to doping in their sport is well made. However, I think it’s a long bow to draw in equating this to “encouragement” to dope, and the Cathy Freeman angle is pretty tenuous. Do you have any evidence that Cathy was actively encouraged to dope, or is this just a matter of administrators’ inaction creating an environment where athletes in general could reasonably believe that they could get away with doping? Those are two quite different contentions.
January 14th 2013 @ 1:31pm
Glenn Mitchell said | January 14th 2013 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
Tim, the evidence is sitting in the record books. If Freeman wanted to hold the hold the world and the authorities know the record they trumpet as the benchmark is totally and irrefutably bogus, by extension they are encouraging an athlete to cheat by leaving the record there. Why did they remove Ben Johnson’s WR of 9.79 from the record books at Seoul. He was a known cheat,that’s why. They also went a step further by erasing his previous WR of 9.83 from the 1987 Workd Championships in Rome. Surely one of the prime reasons to remove a tainted world record is to try and set goals for aspiring athletes to achieve through simply their own hard work and dedication. If you allow these falsified records to stand you are encouraging young men and women to be unethical in their goals to attain greatness in their sport. Absolutely no good is done by saying to an athlete here is the time that will set you apart as the fastest if all-time – this is what you need to break. Oh, and by the way, we know it is totally illegitimate but do your best anyway. Administrators are abrogating their responsibility to the fans and the athletes by continuing to foster what is, in sporting terms, a blatant untruth.
January 14th 2013 @ 7:31pm
Tim Renowden said | January 14th 2013 @ 7:31pm | Report comment
Thanks for the response, Glenn
Well, Johnson was caught red-handed the day after he ran that time. Koch wasn’t, so there’s one difference. You might also throw in pressure from the Americans and Carl Lewis’ star power, if you wanted to be mischievous
I think most athletes (and fans) look at certain world records, acknowledge that they were set by probable dopers, and put them out of their minds. The incentives to be the best come in the form of Olympic and world championship medals, national championships and records, prizemoney, sponsorship, glory, personal fulfilment, ego… and on it goes.
Do I think Koch’s record should be erased? Yes. It’s dodgy as.
Do I think the fact that it hasn’t been erased is encouraging athletes to dope? I don’t. A few old world records is not a major factor in the decision to cheat, in my opinion.
Athletes who dope will do so because they want to win and think they can get away with it. Winning an Olympic gold medal is, unfortunately, enough incentive to dope for many athletes.
If the IAAF was negligent in enforcing its own doping rules, that’s undoubtedly a problem. An athlete is more likely to dope if s/he thinks s/he can get away with it in the here and now. There might be an argument here about a lack of enforcement creating an atmosphere where doping flourished. Cycling has/had the same problem.
But when you say “Freeman was encouraged to dope”, that sounds like some officials took her aside in a back office somewhere and secretly told her that she had a free pass to cheat. That would be a huge story. Unfortunately, “Sports officials should have done more to prevent doping” is an important story, but it’s not exactly a revelation. I think the presence of a few dodgy world records is a bit of a sideshow to the real issue of whether sports bodies could/should have done more in the past, and what they’re doing today.
I enjoyed the read, but I think the headline and lead par are a bit overblown.
January 14th 2013 @ 10:36am
Ferdinand said | January 14th 2013 @ 10:36am | Report comment
The headline is quite misleading and it doesn’t spell out how, in any way, Cathy was “knowingly encouraged” to take drugs. If it was by their inaction in overturning world records by people later found to have been drug cheats, then that is a long bow at best.
Whilst well written, this article is better suited to a former tabloid journo than one from the ABC in my opinion.
January 14th 2013 @ 10:57am
MadMonk said | January 14th 2013 @ 10:57am | Report comment
A bit harsh. On thinking about it, what the analysis of doping in the last 20 years (ie post the fall of the eastern bloc) has showed is how complicit the administrators have been. Look at the UCI and Armstrong. Did that environment encourage Cadel to dope? Absolutely. Did he dope? None of us know for sure, we just hope.
January 14th 2013 @ 11:06am
Ferdinand said | January 14th 2013 @ 11:06am | Report comment
I take your point, but there is a difference between conditions allowing someone to cheat more readily and actually “encouraging” in my opinion. Cheating is cheating, and all national and international bodies have spent fortunes on promoting the anti-drug messaging to their athletes and the community. Hardly the actions of people that want to encourage doping!
January 14th 2013 @ 11:28am
MadMonk said | January 14th 2013 @ 11:28am | Report comment
I think the point is that not all national and international bodies promote anti-drug messages, there is a lot of meally mouth equivocation and posturing. That needs to be called out. Which I think is one of the messages of Glenn’s article re his interaction with Gospar.
January 14th 2013 @ 1:15pm
Glenn Mitchell said | January 14th 2013 @ 1:15pm | Report comment
Surely, if they wanted to deter doping Ferdinand, wouldn’t erasing a totally bogus time be a good place to start? Can you give me one good reason why Koch’s record should still be recognised? And by leaving it there, what message are you sending to aspiring young athletes who want to be seen as the ‘best’”?
January 14th 2013 @ 1:11pm
Glenn Mitchell said | January 14th 2013 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
Ferdinand, if Cathy Fremman wanted to be the record holder in the women’s 400m she needed to break a time that is irrefutably known to be drug-induced, something admitted in writing, but not verbally, by Marita Koch. By allowing a totally falsified record to be the benchmark to break is reprehensible. Put simply, by the administrators allowing a completely bogus record to stand they are saying to Freeman that if you want to beat it you may have to do what Koch did – CHEAT. The relevant authorities are KNOWINGLY encouraging athletes to cheat should they wish to hold he 400m workd record by being totally happy to let them pursue a fake and ‘artificial’ time. As I wrote, while we can hypothesise all we like about Flo-Jo et al who are in the record rid books, with Koch we know it is a ‘synthetic’ record so rather than let it hang out there like a dangled carrot to young runners today and in the future, administrators should do the ethical thing and expunge it from the books.
January 14th 2013 @ 10:40am
The Kebab Connoisseur said | January 14th 2013 @ 10:40am | Report comment
Personally, I stopped taking Olympic athletics seriously after the 1988 games. It was obvious then a lot of it was tarnished, if not all of it. And the IOC knew all about it, but did not want to destroy their golden goose. It was just plainly clear that doping was so widespread it was more odd to find someone not on the juice.
There was that doco on the 1988 100 metre dash, there might have been one runner out of the whole field not on dope. All the others have been busted throughout their careers on something. The only reason Johnson was nabbed was due to some injury he got and the mad rush to get back into top form in time for the games. He allowed his “glow time” too close to the games testing time. He was Canadian also, he would have gotten away with it if he was an American.
Good luck to you if you still believe in the Easter Bunny, but there are other sports more worthy of my attention.
January 14th 2013 @ 10:56am
Australian Rules said | January 14th 2013 @ 10:56am | Report comment
Agree above – great article but dodgy headline.
Marita Koch was the poster girl for E.German doping and it’s a disgrace that her record has not been addressed properly.
January 14th 2013 @ 11:21am
jameswm said | January 14th 2013 @ 11:21am | Report comment
Totally agree
The 400 WR should be wiped
But so too should the 800WR, done by Jarmila Krachtochvilova who was just as doped as Koch, and I’m not convinced Krachtochvilova wasn’t a bloke either.
FloJo’s 100 and 200 WRs should be wiped. They needed to do some tests on her before burial, in poor taste I guess. But she suddenly improved out of sight at age 28 or so.
Yordanka Donkova’s 100 Hurdles WR should be wiped, she was as doped to the eyeballs as anyone. Sally’s PB ranks her as 4th best ever, but the top 2 (both Bulgarian in the late 80s) were definitely doped. Probably 3rd (Russian, early 90s). Not sure on Devers at 5th.
It’s all a but of a shame, but I think things are improving, ike in cycling, and the testing is catching up to the taking. Let’s hope.
At the last Olympics, iy look at the 100-800, they were all won be clearly the tallest there, all 3 almost physical freaks. I’d like to think those three were all clean (Bolt, Rudisha and Kirani James), and Bolt and Rudisha were brilliant 16yos, with normal improvement since then. The question marks come when people suddenly improve and change shape well into their 20s.
January 14th 2013 @ 12:40pm
sittingbison said | January 14th 2013 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
I changed shape after my 20s %)
January 14th 2013 @ 1:55pm
The Bush said | January 14th 2013 @ 1:55pm | Report comment
Classic.
January 14th 2013 @ 1:22pm
Glenn Mitchell said | January 14th 2013 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
James, An autopsy was carried out on Flo-Jo and the findings could not ascertain whether she had been a user of performance enhancing drugs. She reportedly died of an epileptic seizure in her sleep, aged 38.
January 14th 2013 @ 2:57pm
jameswm said | January 14th 2013 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
She had an enlarged heart and other signs of sustained doping.
Don’t really think there’s any doubt there, but it’d be nice if they could prove it so the records could be wiped.
January 14th 2013 @ 12:46pm
sittingbison said | January 14th 2013 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
not sure if the headline is Glenns, sometimes the editors change it. I see the gist of what Glenn is saying *could* be applied to the headline but its tenuous at best.
However as an article in its own right well done Glenn, not talking with forked tongue like the sports admin and all the cheats. If only all the commentators and journos would call out all the “extraterrestrial” and “out of this world” and “superhuman” and “not normal (thanks Lance)” comments. In cycling Phil and Paul have knowingly mislead the general public (who trust their commentary) for decades. Gosper and his ilk at the IOC are liars pulling the wool over the general public – what would you expect from acolytes of Juan Antonio, a corrupt lickspittle of Franco.
January 14th 2013 @ 2:27pm
richard said | January 14th 2013 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
Anyone read- Lords of the Rings ?
January 14th 2013 @ 6:41pm
Chui said | January 14th 2013 @ 6:41pm | Report comment
Yes, highly recommended.
Even if half of it’s true, you can’t look at the Olympics the same way. Especially Samaranch.
January 14th 2013 @ 3:20pm
tommy said | January 14th 2013 @ 3:20pm | Report comment
Great article Glen & I understand your argument about linking administrators negligence in not erasing a World Record to encouraging Cathy Freemen to dope but I think it is a long bow as Tim mentioned above. Encouraging someone to dope means pointing someone in the direction of a dodgy doctor or telling them that everyone else is doing it & that you should also. I would call not erasing a doped result as grossly negligent on behalf of the administartors but I disagree with your assessment that this means that they encouraged Cathy to dope.
January 14th 2013 @ 3:24pm
Dadiggle said | January 14th 2013 @ 3:24pm | Report comment
Why did Perec go to Germany and trained with Koch? Then didn’t turn up for the Sydney Olympics? Superstition my ass
January 14th 2013 @ 3:56pm
Glenn Mitchell said | January 14th 2013 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
Dadiggle, unfortunately we can think all we like – and believe me I do – but in the end is supposition. Without hard evidence we have to take athletes at their word.