Cutting on standby an unnecessary logistical nightmare
By Brett McKay, 18 Jan 2013 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australia cricket, Ben Cutting, Cricket, Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Starc, one day international cricket, Shane Warne
Australia's Ben Cutting. AP Photo/James Elsby
Related coverage
Earlier in the week when I posted the just-named 12-man squad for Australia’s next two One Day Internationals (in Brisbane today, and Sydney on Sunday), I mentioned Queensland quick Ben Cutting was not in the 12, but on standby.
I had to correct myself though, having misheard the national selection panel (NSP) chairman, John Inverarity, during the live coverage of the press conference. The squad had been cut from 13 in Adelaide back to 12, and Cutting wasn’t in it, with the two left-arm Mitchells (Starc and Johnson) fit to play again.
On Wednesday afternoon, the day after steering the Brisbane Heat into the Big Bash League final, Cutting was suddenly back in the Australian squad, and was indeed on standby for Starc and Johnson, who had previously been declared fit.
While his Heat teammates remained in Melbourne for an extra day, in case they needed to fly to Perth for the BBL Final (which they now do), Cutting was back in Brisbane with the national side “as a precaution due to Johnson and Starc coming back from injury”.
“If both pace bowlers prove their fitness to play as expected, Ben will re-join the Brisbane Heat on Friday afternoon for the Big Bash League final,” Inverarity said.
So let’s just recap the timeline here.
On Monday when the ODI squad was first named – without Cutting – the explanation from Inverarity surrounding Starc and Johnson was, “The medical staff said that it is very likely they’ll be fit. We’ll make a full assessment on Wednesday and, if there’s any doubt, we’ll bring other players into the squad.”
On Tuesday, free of national duties, Cutting took 3/24 to rip the heart out of the Melbourne Renegades’ order as they chased the Heat’s healthy Luke Pomersbach-inspired total.
By Wednesday, Cutting was back in Brisbane “as a precaution” and will remain there until either Starc and/or Johnson are passed fit, or he’s required to wear his Australian cap today at the ‘Gabba.
If he’s not needed today, he’ll be on one of only a few direct Qantas flights this afternoon or this evening flying five-plus hours across the country to re-join his Heat teammates for tomorrow night’s BBL final.
It makes you wonder why a 13-man squad wasn’t just named in the first place. I have a sneaking suspicion the answer lies in a bit of a conspiracy orchestrated by the BBL marketers and the NSP, which is bound to get Shane Warne’s goat.
I suspect Cutting was always going to be in the squad for the next two games, but might not have been expected to play today, with Starc and Johnson fit again.
Therefore, they ‘dropped’ Cutting, freeing him up to play as one of the Heat’s key bowlers in the semi, as he has been for most of the tournament.
Come Wednesday, the ‘assessment’ determines that maybe Starc and Johnson aren’t as fit as first thought, and that it’s probably worth getting some cover in.
What are the odds Starc and Johnson are passed fit to play today, Cutting flies to Perth and plays in the BBL final, but then is suddenly rushed back to Sydney on the red-eye when one or both of the lefties tweak something again?
Now, those who’ve followed me enough on these pages and forums would know I don’t usually peddle conspiracy theories like this, but this scenario just seems too perfect to me.
And what must Warnie think? He blew up deluxe before the Melbourne Stars’ BBL semi loss in Perth that, among other things, his Stars couldn’t recall James Pattinson – who had just returned in Melbourne club cricket – to help fill some of the holes left by his team’s four Australian reps.
None of the Stars’ Australian players were allowed to play on Wednesday night yet, on the surface, it appears the Heat might have got a bit lucky with Cutting.
Of course, the bigger underlying issue here, aside for the frequent flyer points Cutting has racked up this week, is that this is all a logistical nightmare for which Cricket Australia can only blame itself.
It went into the first ODIs of the current series with a squad of 13, added two more for the second game, and then for the next block of games recalled three blokes who’d been putting their feet up while chopping the squad back to 12.
If all the new faces get a run today at the ‘Gabba, Australia will have used 18 players in three games.
Even without such fun as rotation and ‘informed player management’, this is surely taking experimentation and revolving door strategies too far.
It’s hard to disagree with Allan Border’s opinion as aired on Inside Cricket earlier this week. Building squad depth and even wanting to rest and/or rotate players is fine, but surely it’s a better plan for all involved just to name a squad of say 15 for a series and pick from within that squad.
Having one squad for two games, then a different squad for the next two games, even if they’re not intending to, does give the impression Australian one-day shirts are being handed out.
If Cutting was needed as a precautionary cover for Starc or Johnson, then their worth in a 12-man squad in the first place is arguable. If their fitness is a game-by-game proposition, then why not leave them out completely to get the required treatment (or rest), and let the likes of Cutting show their wares across the series?
Picking cricket teams isn’t supposed to be a logistically difficult task, but Cricket Australia at the moment seem hell-bent on making selection and these sort of things as complicated as possible. It’s no wonder the head-scratching abounds.
UPDATE: Just as I was submitting this yesterday, news filtered through about the injury sustained by Moises Henriques during the Aussie team’s preparations. Cutting will now almost certainly be required in some shape or form today, which in turns puts the spotlight on the fitness of the two Mitchells.
Michael Clarke spoke late yesterday about not being able to carry players who were less than 100% fit, but here he’ll go into this game with clouds over his two left-armers. So again I’ll ask, why name them in the first place?
Brett McKay is a former non-tackling scrumhalf and not-quite-1st Grade middle order stalwart. A rugby and cricket expert for The Roar since July 2009 (having joined in Sept 2008), Brett has written for Inside Rugby and Cricket Australia, and is also PLAY Canberra's rugby correspondent. He tweets from @BMcSport
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.


January 18th 2013 @ 4:21am
AndyMack said | January 18th 2013 @ 4:21am | Report comment
18 players in 3 games??? That is shambolic.
Brett, have a question on the selectors that hopefully you or other roarers can help me with. Clarke as captain is on the selection panel. When he is rested, and Bailey steps up, does he become a selector (he is the official aust captain afterall), and if so does he replace Clarke, or is he added to the panel, giving us a half dozen??
January 18th 2013 @ 7:39am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 7:39am | Report comment
Andy, the captain of the day is a selector, whoever that might be. The panel remains at 5. I’m not sure at which point Bailey dropped off, and Clarke returned though. For eg, did Bailey pick Clarke as Captain and then step down, or was the panel only 4 for a few minutes before Clarke rejoined them? Not sure how that bit works, but there is only one Captain on there at any point…
January 18th 2013 @ 9:56am
boes said | January 18th 2013 @ 9:56am | Report comment
The selection panel has a rotation policy too..
January 18th 2013 @ 10:25am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 10:25am | Report comment
So do the coaches, Boes. Mickey Arthur has spent this week with his family in Perth, and Steve Rixon is in charge for today’s game. Arthur will rejoin the team in Sydney…
January 18th 2013 @ 11:18am
Nick Inatey said | January 18th 2013 @ 11:18am | Report comment
Hmm, it’s a bit of an unneccessary conundrum. I would think Bailey had no selection power at all. The two line ups for the first ODI’s seemed very pre-ordained, irrespecitive of other factors such as the pitch in Adelaide. For example, John Inverarity himself said Usman Khawaja was only ever going to play the first game (then replaced by Steven Smith in the second game) when everyone wondered why he wasn’t playing. Because surely, after seeing the Adelaide pitch, if you were captain and had some say on the selection table you would be wanting a different line up.
January 18th 2013 @ 11:39am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 11:39am | Report comment
Nick, dis Invers say that, that Khawaja would only play the first game? You may be right though, the two XIs were probably picked up front and then handed to Bailey…
January 18th 2013 @ 7:05am
A1 said | January 18th 2013 @ 7:05am | Report comment
What a joke. Cricket Australia is a laughing stock.
January 18th 2013 @ 7:21am
Robert said | January 18th 2013 @ 7:21am | Report comment
If Cutting is not required today and he flies over to Perth,isnt that putting him at more risk of injury by all this flying than it would be if he was playing cricket.It happened a few years ago to him.Inverarity is a nut case,but i thought Marsh and Bichel had at least half a brain
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
January 18th 2013 @ 7:50am
Allanthus said | January 18th 2013 @ 7:50am | Report comment
Robert, that prompts an interesting question about the dynamics of the NSP. How democratic is it and how do they go about their decision making?
What we know of Inverarity’s background and demeanour would suggest that he’s a “my way or the highway” type of guy. Where his position as head of the panel is much more than just holding a casting vote. This may be totally wrong of course, and I don’t expect him to come out and explain it, but it certainly seems that way.
So we don’t know how much of a stamp Marsh and Bichel have on this, or whether they are just rolling along in behind Inverarity.
January 18th 2013 @ 8:46am
formeropenside said | January 18th 2013 @ 8:46am | Report comment
Interestingly, Greg Chappell picked John Inverarity as his chice for captain of the “Board” Australian cricket team for the 1977-78 series in a book on the 1977 Ashes series which also mentioned his move into WSC. Of course, that never happened due to the return of Simpson and rise of Hughes (after Yallop fell on his sword), but it is interesting to speculate.
So much of the cricket of the 1980′s might have been different based on that simple decision.
January 18th 2013 @ 7:42am
boes said | January 18th 2013 @ 7:42am | Report comment
Dare I ask what would happen if both Mitchell’s and Henriques aren’t fit to play.
January 18th 2013 @ 7:49am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 7:49am | Report comment
We play with 10, Boes….
January 18th 2013 @ 8:49am
Red Kev said | January 18th 2013 @ 8:49am | Report comment
We effectively do that with Maxwell in the team anyway.
January 18th 2013 @ 8:59am
boes said | January 18th 2013 @ 8:59am | Report comment
I thought as an “all rounder” he filled 2 spots.
January 18th 2013 @ 9:41am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Not very well, Boes…
January 18th 2013 @ 9:56am
boes said | January 18th 2013 @ 9:56am | Report comment
Yeah I get it….sorry it didn’t read the same way as it sounded in my head.
Oh and I think there was a typo in your article….isn’t it ‘improvised player management’ ?
January 18th 2013 @ 10:12am
Red Kev said | January 18th 2013 @ 10:12am | Report comment
I thought it was funny boes
January 18th 2013 @ 10:26am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 10:26am | Report comment
You may have a point there, Boes!!
January 18th 2013 @ 8:01am
Red Kev said | January 18th 2013 @ 8:01am | Report comment
The selection of a new team for each match is about Inverarity getting in front of a camera. It is completely unnecessary but it feeds his headmaster’s ego.
Border is dead on. Pick a squad (probably 7 batsman if the lineup isn’t settled or 6 if it is, 5 pacemen (likely one is an allrounder) and a spinner and wicketkeeper) and keep them training in camp. Release those not needed to shield games (oh no the Shield isn’t on during the summer anymore) as each comes up if they’re not needed. One press release for the South African test series, with another if you have to replace a player through injury. Then do one for the SL test series, then the SL one day series, then the West Indies series. There’s no need of a press conference where Inverarity obfuscates and dithers around point.
January 18th 2013 @ 9:49am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 9:49am | Report comment
Kev, I don’t have much trouble with the press conferences and the MRs so much – the information has to come from somewhere – but certainly it would’ve made sense in my mind to pick 15 or 16 for the SL series, and do the same again for the WIs. And yes, release a player here and there for state/BBL duties if they’re not required.
Going from 13, which became 15 for Adelaide, right back to 12 for Brisbane though was always going to pushing the limit. It was only going to take one pre-match injury, or even injury concern, for the squad to be at its limit, and that’s before we consider players returning from injury already (and rest, for that matter)..
January 18th 2013 @ 10:53am
josh said | January 18th 2013 @ 10:53am | Report comment
Its all detailed programmatic specificity.
January 18th 2013 @ 8:09am
Pradeep said | January 18th 2013 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Cutting should play, he deserved another game
January 18th 2013 @ 8:30am
jamesb said | January 18th 2013 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Rotation or resting. Standby or player management, at the end of the day, Cutting deserves to play another game for Australia.
Cutting was one of the few bright spots for Australia in that ordinary performance against the Lankans.
January 18th 2013 @ 9:50am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 9:50am | Report comment
James, it sounds like he might get it, too, with the ‘Gabba looking like a 4-quick track from this morning’s reports..
January 18th 2013 @ 8:37am
sledgeross said | January 18th 2013 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Id hate to say it but the priority, at this stage should be for him to play for the Heat.
Of late, selectors and CA have severely de-valued what it means to play for Australia. Selections, rotations, resting layers, shielding players, its all a load of tripe. CA have scheduled one dayers in the BBL “season” you cant have your cake and eat it too. Cutting has put the graft in for teh Heat, so he should be allowed to play in the biggest 20/20 match of the year as a reward for his hard work, not “punished” by being selected for what is an essentially nothing game.
January 18th 2013 @ 9:47am
Allanthus said | January 18th 2013 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Sledgie, the scheduling is terrible and asking for trouble, however, the day a domestic comp take precedence over playing for the national side will be a sad and sorry day.
When this happens the fabric and structure of sport breaks down and there is potential for major chaos. Football (soccer) has suffered for years although this has partly been solved with international windows. UK Rugby has suffered, and French Rugby clubs disgracefully dictate to Pacific Island players about when they can and can’t play for their country.
January 18th 2013 @ 10:02am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Sledgie, I don’t disagree with your sentiments, and certainly CA would want the BBL Finalists to have their strongest teams, but they also set their own precedent by not allowing the Stars to use their four Aust reps on Wed night in Perth. On this point, I must agree with Allanthus above.
And I’m sure if Cutting was given the choice, he do what any other cricketer would do, and play for his country. There will be ample opportunity for him to play for Heat, most notably next years Champions League…
January 18th 2013 @ 11:07am
sledgeross said | January 18th 2013 @ 11:07am | Report comment
Brettles/Allanthus, I agree, National team should always take precedence. My issue is that the powers that be have cheapened and diminished national representation through selection and scheduling blunders. George Bailey’s opinion aside, its obvious that selectors do not think this one day series is fair dinkum, which is insulting to Sri Lanka and sends mixed messages to players and punters alike.
From memory, all teh Stars players actually played, Cutting could easily be replaced by some other young bowler like Richardson etc who has already played in the series, but isnt playing in the BBL final.
January 18th 2013 @ 11:31am
Bayman said | January 18th 2013 @ 11:31am | Report comment
Brett,
It’s quite true he might get next year’s Champions League but it might also cost the Heat this year’s BBL title. It may not concern Cutting if he’s playing for Australia but the other Heat players might be a tad annoyed.
It strikes me as odd, given Australia apparently is a stake-holder in the CL, that CA would not try to get the best possible two teams in the BBL final with the best possible winner to then try and win the CL next time around.
Unless, of course, money is the object and they do not give a toss how that money is generated. If so, I might say that if CA don’t really care about the BBL competition then why should I? If they do care about it why not schedule the games so they do not clash with the international ODI series, e.g. The ODIs play around the weekends (Friday, Saturday, Sunday) and the BBL on mid-week (Tuesday, Wednesday). Or, at the very least, don’t play both within a day of each other.
January 18th 2013 @ 11:37am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 11:37am | Report comment
I don’t disagree with that at all Bayman, that exact scenario is what prompted the conspiracy theory thinking..
January 18th 2013 @ 7:39pm
sheek said | January 18th 2013 @ 7:39pm | Report comment
Hi Bayman,
Your suggestion is far too sensible for CA…..
January 18th 2013 @ 9:02am
DingoGray said | January 18th 2013 @ 9:02am | Report comment
I’m really getting sick and tired of hearing about these muppets on the NSP!
Clearly they live in another World!
How Cutting wasn’t retained initially is the real question here?
January 18th 2013 @ 9:04am
josh said | January 18th 2013 @ 9:04am | Report comment
It reminds of of the old Australia A days when they called Reiffel into the Australian squad only to be 12th man.
I say an article where Ryan Harris said the selectors need to tell players when they can play. Carrying a little niggle, every player will say, “Yeah I’m right to go”. The selectors with advice from team doctors/physios need to make the call. The players and support staff would know if they are match ready. Why pick two injured players in the squad then call some one up, for a day.
January 18th 2013 @ 10:04am
Brett McKay said | January 18th 2013 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Josh, that was a really interesting perspective from Harris, who was essentially saying that injury management needs to be taken out of the players’ hands. Harris, of course, was the first player to be rested from a Test (the 3rd Test in the Caribbean, in April) when on the surface he was fit..