Australian batsman Phillip Hughes leaves the ground frustrated after being bowled on 86 by Chanaka Welegedara on day 1 of the first cricket test match between Australia and Sri Lanka at Blundstone Arena in Hobart, Friday, Dec. 14, 2012. (AAP Image/Chris Crerar)
Related coverage
You just have to love writing about cricket and cricketers. On Wednesday, a day after I questioned whether he’s really playing that delivery angled across him any differently to how he was last summer, Phil Hughes compiled a beautiful century in the last match of the limited-over series against Sri Lanka.
Batting at first drop in Hobart, Hughes didn’t look particularly good until he was north of 60, but really kicked on after that, and indeed, produced some late-innings carnage to push Australia’s total from 5/218 at the end of the 47th over, to their eventual 5/247.
Hughes’ own innings could neatly be broken up into three blocks. His first fifty was raised in 82 balls, the second fifty came at a neat run-a-ball as the confidence started coming back, and the last unbeaten 38 from just 22 deliveries.
As far as one-day innings go, Hughes’ 138* was certainly the highlight of this five-match series, and might even be as well-compiled an Australian one-day innings in the last twelve months or so.
Such a well-constructed innings was timely, too, on a number of fronts.
Not just for the obvious reasons in the context of the game, but rather that with the rapid infiltration of Twenty20 cricket, it’s not that often that we get to see the lost art of ‘building an innings’ against the white ball.
And when it does happen, it invariably wins matches, as Hughes’ knock did.
For those willing to see the 50-over format disappear, this is probably worth considering. Sure, you’ll still get the big innings in the shortest form, and nearly all of them will be match-winning, but how many of them will really be constructed, rather than just… well, bashed?
The other timely aspect of Hughes’ hundred was that I’d only just read an interesting article in a book that discussed the beauty of the being able to build an innings in one-day internationals the night before.
No, it wasn’t a Christmas present, but rather a two-year old book of Gideon Haigh’s comprising articles he’d written in the two years before that.
I hadn’t even bought it deliberately; it was one of those you-might-also-like six-dollar beauties thrown up as you wander through the Amazon checkout.
Haigh’s book, Sphere of Influence, is a collection of articles from numerous publications and media outlets, mainly concerned with the growing empire of Indian cricket and the IPL, and how its/their power is seemingly expanding exponentially. There hasn’t been much disagreement so far.
One particular article, “How to save one-day internationals”, first published by our dear colleague, the late Vinay Verma, in the Seriously Cricket Chronicles in October 2009, made reference to a one-day century made that year by South African captain, Graeme Smith.
Haigh described it as being “as complete an innings as no Twenty20 innings ever will be.”
Now it’s true, Haigh is often less than complimentary about the Twenty20 game, though I believe his distaste is not necessarily toward the format itself, but rather the over-commercialisation of the format, and what effect that over-commercialisation is having on the broader cricket schedule. Not to mention the effect on the cricketers themselves.
Regardless of the motivation behind the obviously pointed remark, Haigh’s point stands. And Hughes’ innings in Hobart should be similarly celebrated, rather than left to fall deep into the abyss that contains every other decent one-day performance before it.
It’s an innings that shouldn’t be forgotten so hurriedly, even though it almost certainly will be.
Cricket Australia could do a lot worse than to put Hughes’ innings onto DVD and send it to every junior coach in the country. This innings, kids, is what you should be looking to emulate when you need to bat for any length of time.
There will be times when you’re coming off a couple of low scores in a row, and when the questions resurface as to whether you’re really as good a bat as was being made out. It won’t matter that you made a significant score four innings beforehand, scores of 3, 3, and 1 will get the tongues wagging again.
There will be times when you start off looking very shaky, maybe even on the verge of giving the critics even more ammunition. But somehow, you’ll get through that early period. You might manage a few good shots, but largely, you’ll be looking streaky for a good while.
Eventually, suddenly even, you’ll find yourself reaching fifty. You won’t have looked particularly good but you’re still eking out runs, almost in spite of yourself. However, this will also be a major mental hurdle you’ve overcome.
Push this scratchy fifty a bit further, and you’ll feel the confidence starting to build. The shots will come more freely; the feet will move faster and more decisively, and the ball will start finding the middle of the bat more often.
You’ll find yourself in the middle of a major partnership, and naturally, you’ll start projecting ahead, thinking of what kind of total you might be heading the team towards.
The the runs will really start flowing, you can do no wrong, and luck starts coming your way. Your century will arrive, you’ll raise the bat, and then you’ll have a bit of fun at the end with wickets in hand and nothing left to lose.
And you’ll walk off unbeaten, and look down to realise you’re wearing coloured gear.
This is building an innings, kids, and its place in one-day cricket should never be forgotten.
This is what I imagine Hughes went through on Wednesday afternoon. To be honest, this is what Hughes seems to go through whenever he makes a solid score. Ignore the colour of the gear and the ball, and this was just another Phillip Hughes innings.
An innings like this makes you realise why Hughes’ record is as good as it is in all three forms of the game. He has that wonderful ability when he’s ‘on’ to ignore the surroundings, and even his most recent form, and just go out there and bat.
With Michael Hussey now consigned to the ‘former’ prefix, Hughes is arguably the best innings builder behind Michael Clarke in the Australian team. It’s an art form that the proliferation of Twenty20 cannot teach, and which will be lost forever if the 50-over game is allowed to die.
Brett McKay is a former non-tackling scrumhalf and not-quite-1st Grade middle order stalwart. A rugby and cricket expert for The Roar since July 2009 (having joined in Sept 2008), Brett has written for Inside Rugby and Cricket Australia, and is also PLAY Canberra's rugby correspondent. He tweets from @BMcSport
- Explore:
- Cricket, Phil Hughes

January 25th 2013 @ 3:01am
Johnno said | January 25th 2013 @ 3:01am | Report comment
Phil Hughes has found his home it seems, at no 3. He could go on and not do a Bradmanesque, form, but a Pupesque form.
Potential wise Phil Highes is now showing more potential, than Greg Chappell, Alan Border, Steve Waugh, Ricky Ponting, and Pup.
So potenital wise phil Hughes is the best batsmen since Bradman and has now overtaken yesterday’s man Ponting, and veteran of the team Pup.
Phil Hughes has all the shots, but the boy from working class Macksville has more shots and more power and talent and reflexes, than the boy from working class Mowbray.
Working class cricketers are generally the best cricketers , Australia produces, there tough men from tough towns and areas, .
Mssrs : Dave Warners formt he working class Sydney suburb of Matriville, and Pup form working class tough west sydney suburbs Liverpool, and Punter and Phil Highes from working class Mowbray and working class macksville.
Guys like Ed Cowan, Matt Nicholson, Jackson Bird, all from CAS and GPS schools in Sydney, didn’t have to fight and scrap for every pea at the dinner table unlike these working class lads, and didn’t have to get the most out of a trusty old gray Nicholls, they were able to get a new GM or duncan fearnley bat every year.
So these men like phil Hughes grew up tough, and fight much harder for there wicket unlike the Ed Cowan’s of this world. Just look at boxing, just about every world class boxer has grown up tough, and all boxing trainers say it’s very rare to find a lad from a well to do family , to make it in boxing.
Soccer is the same guys like Daivd Beckham and Wayne Rooney grew up tough. Beck’s said now with is son who , has played a bit of junior chelsea and LA Galaxy , he say he gives his son tough love like his old man did, and makes him fight hard working class hard, at every training session like his working training was. And he rarely gives him praise, just always says you must do better, and just alright but not good.
these are the type of players the Gaffas(Englush working class word for manager).
I know my self form experience , having been in both the public and private school systems, and playing sport in both, the public schoolboys were definaatly tougher and went in harder, and definaalty had to make do with out the fancy kits, and cricket bats, and fancy footy boots.
So Phil Hughes talent and hard work, is another triumph for working class lads in aussy cricket, form Bobby Simpson too, Punter, SHane Watson (Watto is an Ipswich lad a working class town right next to Brisvageas and a rugby league heartland produced the Langer Brothers Alan and Kevin langer, and the Walters brothers make em tough in Ipswich)Dave Warner ex-Randwick boys High boy, and Pup.
And phil Hughes is carrying on the tough as tee working class tradition, and leading form the front for the aussy cricket team.
Well doen to the talented and working class lad from working class Macksville.
I think Phil Hughes will be the star batter of the ashes, and will be a central batter in the 2015 world cup team , with the ODI world cup being held in OZ/NZ.
Good luck Hughsey.
January 25th 2013 @ 9:08am
Felix said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Johnno, Hughes, Clarke and Warner are well under 35 but you make it sound like they grew up in the great depression with their old man working in the coal mines, I doubt they’ve scrapped over a pea in their lives!
I’m not going to weigh in on the merits of someone’s education and background and their cricketing ability, but think about Alistair Cook and his elite education. I’ll take his record over theirs. Interestingly there was an article written about this a little while ago, it seems the trend in the UK is for all of their players to come from private schools due to the access to grass pitches. Thankfully the average kid in Australia can wander down the road and find a fairly well maintained wicket to play on at their local club.
Personally I don’t give a toss what their background is, so long as they play the game in the right spirit and give their all when selected. I’m not happy with the recent sense of entitlement to a position in the test team, P.Siddle I’m looking at you fella – there is no way known McGrath, Lee or Gillespie would have sat out shield games before a tour of India.
January 25th 2013 @ 10:05am
Vivek said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:05am | Report comment
Hughes real test will come in the ashes when the ball is moving around. It is there where i predict our young batsman will show what they are made of and Warner and Khawaja are 2 that i feel will stand up as they play swing bowling well and i am hoping Hughes is among those batsman too.
January 25th 2013 @ 10:40am
Happy Hooker said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:40am | Report comment
Bizarre!
So Phil Hughes fights harder for his wicket than Ed Cowan, beacuse of his background?
Based on the evidence, that is, their actual performance in the middle, I’d suggest Ed Cowan fights at least as hard for his wicket because he has to. Hughes is a far more talented player and is extravagant with his shots whereas Cowan is a grafter with a limited range of strokes.
January 25th 2013 @ 12:36pm
John Philipson said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
This is the biggest load of tripe I have ever heard. Who cares where they came from as long as they deliver results?
January 25th 2013 @ 9:35pm
Todd Johnson said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:35pm | Report comment
Terrible chat mate – seriously that should be you done on this site
I guess working class boys like Quade Cooper and Kurtley Beale make better footballers than soft private school boys like John Eales and Phil Kearns
January 26th 2013 @ 1:43am
Yola said | January 26th 2013 @ 1:43am | Report comment
Mate, Shane Watson went to Ipswich Grammar School…..not a good person to use in your argument.
January 26th 2013 @ 2:42am
peeeko said | January 26th 2013 @ 2:42am | Report comment
quite a bizarre post by Johnno
January 25th 2013 @ 4:57am
AndyMack said | January 25th 2013 @ 4:57am | Report comment
Hi Brett
I’ve said it before, but will say it again: I love the ODI’s
While everyone seems to moan about the “middle overs”, i love watching an innings build, watching the batting team judge when to explode, keeping a balance between wickets in the shed and keeping the run rate reasonable. It is cricket after all.
Good to see Hughes do well. We need him to step up over the next couple of years and become a leading light. Pup cannot do it all.
January 25th 2013 @ 7:14am
josh said | January 25th 2013 @ 7:14am | Report comment
Speaking of timing it right to explode. There was a West Indies game (forget who they were playing) where Gayle and Co. chose to use the batting powerplay at the 35th over. Then used that to then score at 10 an over for the next 15 overs. – If my memory serves my right.
I think many teams have lost the nous to use the powerplays creatively.
January 25th 2013 @ 12:21pm
Renegade said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
You nailed Andy-Mack.
That’s the beauty of One Day cricket.
Still my favourite form of the game.
January 25th 2013 @ 6:40am
Vicboy said | January 25th 2013 @ 6:40am | Report comment
I agree with the building of an innings theory. Great to see a batsman scoring runs, as opposed to a slogger getting away with a few. Very Geoff Marsh. Could we perhaps pick a few batsmen, rather than “bit of everything men” so we can see innings built regularly? I don’t watch as much cricket as the selectors, but Smith, Maxwell etc maybe good for 20/20, but too much to ask them to bat in the top 6 for Australia if they don’t bat in the top 4 for their state.
With the swinging ball a constant threat to our batsman, and two new white balls, the “build an innings” could be the perfect training for test cricket, rather than 20/20 ( I am with Gideon!)
Jonno
Please don’t compare Phil Hughes with Ricky Ponting, other than their suburbs. Hughes has an eye like a dead fish, but Ponting played every shot. Hughes has worked hard to develop a pull shot, but it is not natural.
Hughes has a good eye, and the ability to keep batting when he is “in”. He just loves batting, hence the big scores come. This is a trait of the greats, but Hughes technique will need constant supervision. He loves to hit the ball through point, but needs to keep at scoring all round the wicket. You can see this in his innings still
I hope Phil Hughes plays the next 10 years for Australia, but he is not Ricky Ponting.
January 25th 2013 @ 9:09am
jameswm said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:09am | Report comment
Not yet. It isn’t impossible that Hughes can end up as good as Ponting. He’s got the eye and the temperament.
I won’t be writing him off.
January 25th 2013 @ 12:25pm
Renegade said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
I don’t think anyone said he is better than Ricky Ponting however at the age of 24 he seems to be ahead of where ponting was at the same time.
By the time he is 37 we can certainly make a better judgement and i think hughes is going to go down as a great of australian cricket.
January 25th 2013 @ 12:41pm
Jason said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
At 24y and 2 months:
Hughes 1305 runs at 36.25
Ponting 1209 runs at 36.64
January 29th 2013 @ 1:18am
Matt h said | January 29th 2013 @ 1:18am | Report comment
That’s a bit freaky
January 25th 2013 @ 6:55am
Steve said | January 25th 2013 @ 6:55am | Report comment
I’m confused, should I admire Phil Hughes for making as many centuries he has at his young age (in all forms of cricket) or should I lambast him for getting out the same way year after year with a technical deficiency and looking awful doing so?
When he gets out caught in the slips I think he’s not up to it because he just looks like he has no idea, and then he goes and top scores with 130+!
January 25th 2013 @ 9:10am
jameswm said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Steve, most left handers get out this same way. Right arm over sliding it across them is standard operating procedure.
He’s less troubled by it than he was, for lots of small reasons.
January 25th 2013 @ 9:44am
TheGenuineTailender said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:44am | Report comment
He’s not the only batsmen to have ever been caught in the slips you know…
January 25th 2013 @ 7:24am
Red Kev said | January 25th 2013 @ 7:24am | Report comment
Good read Mr McKay. I must admit it is an aspect of ODI cricket I had overlooked, I honestly believe the two new balls makes the ODIs far more interesting again. Until that change, the games seemed to be about how much more than a run a ball you could get, not anymore. Building an innings makes ODI’s useful again as test auditions as they used to be.
January 25th 2013 @ 11:45am
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 11:45am | Report comment
Absolutely Kev, Hughes has proved that form with the bat translates to any format, too. That’s probably one thing he has over Khawaja, if we’re honest, even though Khawaja has also has success in all forms – I mentioned last week that he’s just shy of 1000 runs of the season already – he does seem to take time to adapt.
But your point about two new balls is also very valid, too, it would have to be easier batting in the last ten overs against balls that are by that stage only 20 over old themselves..
January 25th 2013 @ 12:30pm
Red Kev said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
I posted in a thread yesterday that I thought Khawaja had been really consistent in all forms of the game averaging 41 per innings regardless of the format this summer.
January 25th 2013 @ 12:37pm
John Philipson said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
I would love to see more Khawaja analysis his treatment is swiftly heading towards the sort of ‘Hodge’ territory. Wondering how much that is the case – god I hate Australian cricket politics.
January 25th 2013 @ 12:46pm
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
John, I’ll be honest, I’m getting bored by all the Khawaja commentary. No doubt he’s getting a rough time, but no amount of analysis is going to change the selectors’ minds currently. Only Khawaja can do that, and he just needs to keep making the runs and make his case unignorable..
January 25th 2013 @ 1:18pm
Bearfax said | January 25th 2013 @ 1:18pm | Report comment
And how does he do that Brett when the selectors refuse to offer him an opportunity. He is doing very well in Shield cricket, he just had a good T20 performance. Yet he has only been given ONE game in international cricket this summer. He was made 12th man several times, he was made stand in for Clarke and Ponting at different times. But whenever a definite position became available, it went to another player. We all thought at last in the ODI games that he would be given an extended chance. Played one game, got unfortunately run out early in a mix up with Hughes, and again other than coming on as 12th man he has been ignored. T20, where he was one of the best and might I add in a very poor team, he’s again been ignored.
The problem is Brett, he is not being given the chance to prove himself to the selectors (if thats what they want). In the meantime he is getting very little game time because he keeps getting held in reserve.
This kid is probably over a three or four year period the best or second best performed Shield batsman. Only Hughes would be his equal. Yet he’s being ignored. I wonder how many games he’ll get against West Indies, despite the poor showing of Australia’s batting middle order in the latest ODI. Hardly an opportunity to prove himself for India, and increasingly gives selectors the right to take a lesser batsman in his place.
January 25th 2013 @ 2:18pm
Peter said | January 25th 2013 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Brett i would have to agree with Bearfax, how can Khawaja state his case when he gets dropped after 1 ODI where he was unluckily run out, not picked for the SCG test even though he was the backup batsman and we lost Watson who was primarily a batsman. All the guys are asking is for him to get his chance to show what he can do, if he fails we accept that but he isn’t been given a chance.
January 25th 2013 @ 2:20pm
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 2:20pm | Report comment
He has to keep doing well for Qld, Bearfax, it’s that simple. If he’s called into the Aust squad his attitude, work-ethic, everything needs to be faultess, and his net form excellent.
He can either sit back and believe he’s been hard done by (and get nowhere), or he keep putting the runs on the board. That’s what it comes down to; that’s his currency..
January 25th 2013 @ 3:17pm
Red Kev said | January 25th 2013 @ 3:17pm | Report comment
His form in the nets? Oh Brett, you’ve fallen to Ponting disease, so sad.
January 25th 2013 @ 3:59pm
Bearfax said | January 25th 2013 @ 3:59pm | Report comment
Brett I appreciate what you are saying and that could apply to anyone wanting to get into the Oz side. But I know of no other player who has been stuffed around like Khawaja in the last few years. And this year he is not being given the opportunities a lot of other lesser players have. How does he demonstrate what you think he needs to do if he is not selected. He is doing what you said he is required to do, and it is not him who is complaining. He has been a paragon of virtue about the whole issue. perhaps he shouldnt be.
We’re the ones complaining and we’re doing it because of perceived injustice. He’s not being given a Fair Go. I agree if he fails after several stints then send him back. But let him play the several stints. And by the way I said the same things about Hughes when I felt he was not being given a Fair Go. He got his chance et voila
January 25th 2013 @ 5:38pm
Sunil said | January 25th 2013 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
Brett great article, I just think that in hodge era we had the best batting lineup whereas at
the moment there is no excuse not to give khawaja the run he deserves, and even you have to admit he has been hard done by, most recent example being that he wasn’t called up for Clarke in the Hobart ODI
January 25th 2013 @ 5:38pm
Sunil said | January 25th 2013 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
Brett great article, I just think that in hodge era we had the best batting lineup whereas at
the moment there is no excuse not to give khawaja the run he deserves, and even you have to admit he has been hard done by, most recent example being that he wasn’t called up for Clarke in the Hobart ODI
January 25th 2013 @ 7:21pm
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 7:21pm | Report comment
Bearfax, or course that applies to all other players as well, but the fact remains, it’s all that Khawaja can do. At the end of the day, perceived injustices or not, Khawaja needs to keep making runs in order to get in the national side. That’s all there is to it..
And Kev, just to clarify, when I mentioned Khawaja’s net form, I meant that in the context of being in the national squad, as in whenever he gets the chance to bat in front of the selectors, the captain, and the coaches, he needs to be at the top of his game. Not his net form for Qld!!
January 25th 2013 @ 10:58pm
Bearfax said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:58pm | Report comment
Bleeding obvious Brett. This is about our anger, not the reality of the injustice. Of course he has to keep performing. But that doesnt make what is happening right and these forums at least give us some opportunity to express that frustration. The present coach and selectors, as is being noted even by leading commentators, albeit very politely, have lost the plot. Hopefully promoting that enough even on these forums may assist in getting rid of them. Get Boof as National Coach for a start.
January 25th 2013 @ 2:16pm
Peter said | January 25th 2013 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
What’s impressed me most about Khawaja is that he is getting runs in the shorter format(Big Bash and Ryobi) which we didn’t see last season,this shows that under Boof he is becoming more aggressive and backing his game. I am hoping we get to see more of this in the Indian tour.
January 25th 2013 @ 7:26am
Robert said | January 25th 2013 @ 7:26am | Report comment
Hughes is a must for Australia in Tests and ODI’s.He makes big scores unlike Watson,Cowan and Warner.Every now and then he’ll fail but if you have a player in your side that you know if he makes a start he’ll go on with it,gives others confidence
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
January 25th 2013 @ 8:21am
Allanthus said | January 25th 2013 @ 8:21am | Report comment
Hi Brett
I enjoyed Hughes’ innings at Hobart and agree with the premise of your piece. It was intelligent batting in a season that for many reasons has been short on common sense and clear thinking. The pitch was slow, batsmen all day struggled with their timing, yet he fought through that and eventually got the pace right and scored at ease.
One thing that struck me though, is the fickleness that is cricket, and the fine line that there is between success and failure. He was out bowled for all money, on any other day the bails would have fallen. Or if it had been Quiney or Khawaja instead.
All credit to him for making the most of his good fortune, but by all rights this piece would not have been written and instead we may have had a few fleeting thoughts about him making a solid start but failing to go on with it….
January 25th 2013 @ 10:09am
Peter said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:09am | Report comment
Allantus Hughes has done very well and hats off to him. With regards your comment on there being a thin line for success and failure someone like Khawaja hasn’t even had half the chances at both ODI and test level, Red Kev gave a very good summary the other day about how Khawaja has always been use as a injury cover being given one game only and i feel that if he gets even a few more games he can cement himself as a superstar of cricket here. For hobart he should have come in for Clarke and not Maxwell as we needed to cover our best batsman and had we been chasing that selection blunder may have come back to bite us. Both Khawaj aand Hughe are key batsman for us going forward.
January 25th 2013 @ 11:47am
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 11:47am | Report comment
Allanthus, you only have to look at Hughes’ five digs to prove your point: 112, 3, 3, 1, and 138*. You’re bang on the money..
January 25th 2013 @ 9:15am
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Some great comments guys, I will come back to them later this morning, so please keep them coming..
I especially want to hear more about this ‘working class cricketers’ theory, Johnno, given that Australian cricketers in general have apparently been on million-dollar contracts since the U13 rep teams..
January 25th 2013 @ 9:36am
Allanthus said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:36am | Report comment
I think I know where Johnno is coming from – a throwback to the idea that someone like say Colin Meads was a superior rugby player because he grew up carrying a sheep under one arm and half a dozen fence posts under the other. And I agree that many talented kids don’t kick on like they should because it seems like everything comes too easily for them and they aren’t equipped to tough it out as they rise into higher levels of competition. But…
Australia is overwhelmingly middle class – whatever that actually is – and I seriously doubt how class and upbringing is a factor which translates into elite success in 2013, if indeed it ever did.
January 25th 2013 @ 9:50am
josh said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:50am | Report comment
Add something about playing on substandard pitches from a young age and playing in the local men’s comp underage etc…
January 25th 2013 @ 9:55am
Johnno said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Allanthus good points, good old Colin Meads . I think it does . Wayne Rooney grew up tough, so did Mike Tyson, and Jeff Fenech. All boxing trainers say,and the statistics prove it, very few world champion boxers ever grew up in a middle class home. Majority were from the hood, in dirt poor backgrounds, left to fend for themselves, and the fight game was there only meal ticket. Same in India and Pakistan poor kids using cricket as there meal ticket. Look at Amir the talented your Pakistan quick,and Shaid Afridi all poor backgrounds , . And rugby league is full of ids who grew up on the wrong side of the tracks, so many kids gus Gould has talked about at length who grew up in tough disadvantaged spots. I could name 100 hundred league players who did it rough just like that, I know a few who had to put up with some really tough stuff, to rise above it all.
Jonah Lomu himself says he there was a good chance if it were not for rugby he would of turned to a life of crime as poverty was everywhere in his area.
January 25th 2013 @ 10:24am
Allanthus said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:24am | Report comment
Now there’s an idea Johnno – replace Andrew Hilditch with Tommy Raudonikis…
January 25th 2013 @ 11:21pm
pope paul v11 said | January 25th 2013 @ 11:21pm | Report comment
I’d replace Mickey Arthur with Tommy Raudonikis
January 26th 2013 @ 1:48am
Yola said | January 26th 2013 @ 1:48am | Report comment
There are just as many Pakistani cricketers from advantaged backgrounds as there are from poor backgrounds…
January 25th 2013 @ 9:22am
MadMonk said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:22am | Report comment
The thing I liked about the innings was how patient he was early on. I had the sense that at 2 for he felt that if he went, there was not a lot of quality to follow.
On that subject if Quiney’s 9 was polished, I would say Henriques was sensible and Maxwell’s was indescribeable.
January 25th 2013 @ 11:51am
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 11:51am | Report comment
Monk, I cannot agree with your Henriques/Maxwell comparo more, I tweeted as much on Saturday, that Maxwell should be made to watch every ball of Henriques’ innings batting with Hughes, and take particular note of how he just got bat on ball, and turned over the strike. No improvisation, no invented shots, no trying to hoick slow off-cutters outside off through mid-wicket, just good quality cricket shots to get Hughes on strike. The quality gap in their innings was immeasurable…
January 25th 2013 @ 2:15pm
Nick Inatey said | January 25th 2013 @ 2:15pm | Report comment
You are definitely not a fan of Maxwell are you Brett? And for good reason too.
His Hobart innings along with his Adelaide innings are the hallmarks of a man who either can’t or won’t change his batting approach according to the game situation. He was intially right to swing at some initial shots, but he also must be mindful that he needs to look for singles the ball cannot be hit. It seems evident that he is unable to do this.
January 25th 2013 @ 9:25am
Johnno said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Brett that is very funny, I am laughing a lot, good call.
Well I can say I went to school with Ed Cowan we both went to the same school, and there were million dollar training facilities, and the Cowan family who I know were not short on a quid let me tell you.
The working class lads, who had to fight for every pea on the dinner table, or the last bit of nugget shoe polish, and the last piece of mum’s apple pie and pecan pie, may of secretly been on the million dollar contracts, just couldn’t say.
But I love the working class lads , like punter form the tough no nonsense town of Mowbray Tasmania, Macksville’s favourite lad Phil Hughes, west sydney’s favourite son Pup, and Dave Warner from the tough streets of Matraville south sydney rabbitohs turf.
All these lads fought hard to get there and earn there 5 dollars to buy lunch at the tuckshop , good luck to the lads. Now they are swimming in the IPL million’s some of them.
January 25th 2013 @ 9:38am
Allanthus said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:38am | Report comment
Apple and pecan pie?? That were luxury….
January 25th 2013 @ 9:49am
TheGenuineTailender said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:49am | Report comment
A lot of the private school kids just don’t play grade cricket growing up. Their facilities are so good they never have to dig in and grind out a scratchy innings on a wet, or sticky or hulk like green monster. They miss out on the mentoring, the match knowledge and in-game experience of playing 15 odd two day matches a season with and against grown men.
That’s a huge factor in the development of young players and I believe it leaves them behind in the long run.
January 25th 2013 @ 10:18am
Christo the Daddyo said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:18am | Report comment
We were so poor…
http://www.cmoore.com/funstuff/humor/mp.script.weweresopoor.php
January 25th 2013 @ 10:27am
Allanthus said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:27am | Report comment
Thanks Christo, I knew someone would do the honours…
January 25th 2013 @ 12:11pm
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Johnno, I think with cricket being the national game, the classes have actually been ignored, largely. It truly is the game for the people, regardless of background or upbringing, and I don’t think your stereotypes really apply.
I put to it too you that anyone who plays representative-level senior cricket, but particularly those that have managed to play even a Second XI game for their state have had to fight just as hard as you think only the working class can. The fact is, that playing state cricket is not easy; there’s only 66 First Class spots at any one point, and only another 84 2nd XI spots behind them (you can play 12 in the Futures League, which also includes the ACT). That’s 150 spots being fought for by how many hundred thousand Australian males playing cricket?
Likewise, because there hasn’t been any great proliferation of private school kids coming through the state ranks, those that do graduate to grade clubs have to work exceptionally hard just to get their talents recognised and respected by even just their team-mates. And that’s before they actually start playing a game! You still think these guys have got it easy?
On another note, in well over 20 years of senior cricket, I can’t tell you how many super-talented kids I’ve seen come through the ranks who’ve had all the coaching, have all the gear, wear the rep shirts, etc, and ultimately amount to nothing more than a wasted talent. I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve seen a 15yo kid playing shots I only ever dreamed of, and who aren’t playing the game by their 21st birthday. I have no doubt that if I had even half of those kids’ ultimately wasted individual talents along with my work ethic, I would have become the 1st Grade middle order stalwart that I never did…
January 25th 2013 @ 12:45pm
John Philipson said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
Brett – there has been interesting murmurs doing the rounds for a while now about the positive treatment of the ‘working class’ individuals over the GPS/CAS/ISA/CCC when it comes to selection of state teams and other representative teams. Look for example at the treatment of Jackson Bird (could not get a game in NSW – emerged from club level in Sydney and scalped by Tassie).
Having played against CHS 1st XI teams at Lord Taverners weeks and competed for selection against them – the bias can sometimes be pretty evident – and more it is a feeling of ‘not fitting in a team culture’ – I think Ed Cowan may have discussed this.
My overwhelming feeling is that the best XI should be picked irrespective of their school etc background (its irrelevant)
January 25th 2013 @ 12:47pm
Brett McKay said | January 25th 2013 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
I can’t disagree with any of that, John, I’ve seen similar things myself..
January 25th 2013 @ 3:04pm
Go the Wannabe's said | January 25th 2013 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
Rod Hogg had to go to SA didn’t he? Gilly to WA etc etc….
January 25th 2013 @ 5:40pm
Nick Inatey said | January 25th 2013 @ 5:40pm | Report comment
Hi John
I don’t think there is an inherent bias in the establishment to pick the working class school kids over the private schools (by the way, judging by your selection of private school associations, you are from NSW). I have a feeling the self-isolationalist policies of the private schools (of which I went to one) actually hinders a private school kid’s chance of making it big. Most private schools play only between themselves and not a town/city based league. In many caes private schools explicitly forbid their students playing for other teams but the school team.
The town/city leagues are bigger and feature a wider talent pool than the private schools. As the non-school leagues generally have a more longstanding affiliation with Cricket Australia, NSW,VIC etc etc than the private schools you generally find that unless you are an absolute star in the private school system, talent is more likely to be identified in the city comps than in the private school comps. Scouts/coaches/talent identifiers commonly watch local junior cricket than private school cricket as it is a more open system.
January 25th 2013 @ 1:02pm
Don Corleone said | January 25th 2013 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
Johnno, don’t forget the inland country boys…Dan Christian from Narrandera, Nathan Lyon from Young, Brad Haddin from Cowra, Glen McGrath from Narromine. Tough towns and tough 40-degree heat cricket on clay pan pitches and bone dry outfields.