The Khawaja enigma
By TheGenuineTailender, 30 Jan 2013 TheGenuineTailender is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Cricket, Usman Khawaja
164 Have your say
Usman Khawaja (AP Photo/Tertius Pickard)
Related coverage
Usman Khawaja is touted as Australia’s next in line and he showed why for the Prime Minister’s XI yesterday. He built a solid 69 against the touring West Indies.
Already this season he is the Sheffield Shield’s fourth leading run-scorer. He has been praised as one of the brightest young batting talents in Australia. He has a classy and sightly technique adept at combatting tricky conditions. He has tasted Test cricket before.
Despite all of this, Khawaja’s ascent to a mainstay in Australia’s middle order appears to have hit hurdles at every turn.
Khawaja is a shining light in the otherwise barren landscape of talented young Australian batsmen. In his 60 first-class matches to date, the stylish left hander has amassed 4045 runs, mostly in the toughest domestic competition in the world, Australia’s Sheffield Shield.
His average of 43.03 is all the more remarkable when you consider how highly-geared conditions have been towards fast-bowling and the recent and controversial emergence of ‘result pitches’.
The fifth and final Ashes test at the SCG in 2011 was the scene of Khawaja’s Test debut. Within only a few balls, he had clipped a two and stamped his authority on the match with a glorious hook for four off the bowling of Chris Tremlett.
A star was born, or at least, that’s what most casual observers thought that day.
Khawaja has since added only a further five Test caps to his name. He’s been a sporadic member of the side.
Had he been made a full-time test match player, he could have played a total of 21 Tests.
He would be an engrained, experienced and crucial middle order batsman. This is not the case, the selectors missed a trick here and his limited exposure may well come back to bite them come the Ashes this year.
The National Selection Panel continues to look for reasons not to play Khawaja. Last season, John Inverarity, head of the NSP, cited Khawaja’s fielding, nonchalant work ethic and application as areas of weakness, which if improved would warrant reconsideration of a return to the Australian side.
All areas of concern were valid and Khawaja needed to lift his off-field commitment.
It is evident that under the guidance of his new coach, Darren Lehman, that Khawaja has addressed these concerns and developed further into a well-rounded, adaptable and professional cricketer.
Despite his re-elevation to national squad honours, as injury cover, an actual breakthrough return to the Test XI is yet to come to fruition.
Khawaja was called upon as Michael Clarke’s back-up for the Boxing Day Test when the captain was under the cloud of a hamstring injury.
Clarke overcame his fitness concerns and took the field, while Khawaja seemed to have finally sealed his place as the next cab off the rank.
Yet when in Sydney only six days after the MCG test had finished, Shane Watson was forced to withdraw with a calf injury. It looked logical to most that Khawaja would slot seamlessly into the side.
However, it was opted for an extended tail and five specialist bowlers. It didn’t make sense that the side was made unbalanced when including Khawaja would have maintained team structure.
Khawaja was given a long overdue chance in the Australian ODI side. He was unluckily run out for three and abruptly dropped. His opportunities have been severely limited and this is another example of the selectors showing no faith in Khawaja’s ability.
All things considered, it is evident that Khawaja is deserving of a return. He has addressed his issues, is showing strong form and continues to score runs, especially when it matters.
Australian cricket fans are unanimous in favour of Khawaja’s return. Yet the NSP still look less convinced than ever that he’s ready.
The time to get him in the side came long ago, and the opportunity must now be acted upon before it is gone. If Australia is to continue its rebuild towards world number one, the classy left-hander is a must.
Over to you Roarers, how does Khawaja fit into the Australian side and at whose expense?
![]()
Passionate about your cricket? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily cricket email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (169)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (74)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (54)
- Clarke take note: England has some weak points for Ashes (48)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (46)
- DIZZY: It’s time for the Aussie batsmen to fulfill potential (42)
- I should have called Craddock: Warner
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (29)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- Landmark day for women’s sport as cricket cuts a cheque (13)
- Cricket Australia fines Warner (7)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (54)
- Australians off to win back the urn
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (29)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (54)
- Australians off to win back the urn (0)
- Has cricket corruption been filed in the ‘too hard’ basket? (2)
- Cricket’s all-time alphabetical G team (18)
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (169)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Cricket, Usman Khawaja


January 30th 2013 @ 6:16am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 6:16am | Report comment
The pivotal point is the one you made half-way through:
“The National Selection Panel continues to look for reasons not to play Khawaja.”
It really is that simple. His fielding has yielded two run outs in his last two matches, but critics will cling to the tough dropped catch of Pollard. His batting was faultless until a mis-cued lofted drive got him caught out on 69, but critics will point out that Doolan scored more runs yesterday despite offering up a chance on 44 that wasn’t taken. His batting this season has been very consistent, 438 @ 39.8 in the Shield, 257 @ 51.4 in the Ryobi Cup, 206 @ 41.2, 56 against SL in the Chairman’s XI match and 69 against WI in the PM’s XI match, but critics will cling to the 3 in his only ODI or bring up his most recent shield match (where he scored 0 & 8) instead of the one before where he notched 138 on a deck where no-one else passed 50.
The touring squad will be announced on Thursday and while I would be leaving Watson at home and taking 2 batsmen + SOK, I can almost guarantee that the NSP will take Watson + Maxwell + 1 batsman and given their track record I don’t expect it to be Usman Tariq Khawaja.
Averaging 42.9 regardless of the format of the match is good consistency from Khawaja, but expect the selectors to prefer Doolan’s 161* against South Africa and 87 against the WI and better shield season so far. Doolan’s poor fielding won’t count against him because they aren’t looking for reasons not to select him – especially not with Ponting backing him, Maxwell is being backed by Langer and Arthur, and Watson is spruiking for Henriques – make no mistake the boys club is alive and well in Australian cricket and not enough people in high places are pushing UTK’s case (it doesn’t matter how much support we give him).
January 30th 2013 @ 6:37am
AndyMack said | January 30th 2013 @ 6:37am | Report comment
Red Kev, one thing you seem to be saying here is the public seem to jump on board one or two performances, and i couldnt agree more. Surely long term performance is the most critical thing, with recent form the secondary criteria.
Remember Cowan had an ordinary FC career over many years, played 2-3 good innings within 6 weeks and was in the Test team. Shows that we should not put too much stock in recent form, esp for batsmen who will nick one today, and play and miss 3 of them next week on route to a century.
January 30th 2013 @ 7:11am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 7:11am | Report comment
I actually think the Press and the Selectors are far worse in this regard than the general cricket watching public.
The news cycle is now so much shorter than 24 hours that considering an opinion is a thing of the past nevermind actual investigative journalism.
Selectors have been hounded about form so much they don’t allow players to settle, the absudly high rate of personnel turnover this summer is evidence of that. They also play favourites and regardless of stats like to see runs scored. I can guarantee there was a selector at the NSW v Qld match in which Khawaja scored 0 & 8, but I am not so confident one was at Bellerive to see his match winning 138.
January 30th 2013 @ 7:13am
John Philipson said | January 30th 2013 @ 7:13am | Report comment
Great analysis RedKev, as a form Usman camp supporter, I always look forward to your analysis across the cricket threads (despite your analysis in some of the Rugby threads!). Honestly if Maxwell makes it on the plane, I may go close to losing my faith in Australian Cricket. I like Doolan – but he is not there yet, and his case can surely not be stronger than UTK?
January 30th 2013 @ 10:40am
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:40am | Report comment
Doolan’s probably viewed as a ‘good bloke’, full of mateship, digger spirit etc. etc.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:24am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:24am | Report comment
John i think both Khawaja and Maxwell will be on the plane but it will be a big misktake if we take Maxwell as allrounder, SOK is a better allrounder and so are about 5 other allrounders. The number 6 spot should go to Khawaja, another 70 today in the PM’s game and his fielding oks brilliant. He is averaging above 40 in all 3 formats and was stand in batsman for the last 2 tests so lets get him in. And one of either SOK or Doherty should be our backup spinners.
January 30th 2013 @ 12:36pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 30th 2013 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
Doherty, absolutely not. SOK definitely.
January 30th 2013 @ 10:38am
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Khawaja won’t go to India because the squad isn’t chosen solely on cricketing grounds.
“Doolan’s poor fielding won’t count against him because they aren’t looking for reasons not to select him – especially not with Ponting backing him.” Precisely
January 30th 2013 @ 1:47pm
Richard said | January 30th 2013 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
Ponting actually backed both Doolan and Khawaja after the game. I’m not sure where you are getting his bias from
January 30th 2013 @ 2:00pm
Bearfax said | January 30th 2013 @ 2:00pm | Report comment
I think what Disco is saying is that a number of the prominent players in the game are publicly pushing, almost always on state basis, their favourites for selection, especially in those positions vacated by Ponting and Hussey. Ponting may have backed Khawaja but he also pushed Doolans case. Warne, David Hussey, Watson etc have pushed their favourites from their state sides. Mickey tends to pick his WA favourites Marsh and Voges having coached there. No one of these top line players are really saying much about Khawaja except as an afterthought and yet he should be the first in line. Such is state politics. At present no strong South Australian or Queensland reps to push their team mates so we dont hear anything about it. That was why it was such a relief when Hughes finally got his chance.
January 30th 2013 @ 4:56pm
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 4:56pm | Report comment
Indeed.
January 30th 2013 @ 2:04pm
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
There’s pre-match press on it. Ponting is smart enough not to be caught saying “this guy should be in the team” on the record.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:05pm
Richard said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:05pm | Report comment
Khawaja is next in line. I don’t think the selectors would survive the fallout if he is passed over again, especially with Warne wading in saying Arthur should be sacked. The heat is being turned up
January 30th 2013 @ 11:22am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Khawaja showed last night that he can field fine and he also showed in the first ODI that he is a good fielder. Khawaja got the second hightest score yesterday. In the ODI you refer to he was unlucky to be run out and should have got one more game in Adelaide. As mentioned by Re Kv Khawaja’s 2012/13 domestic season has yielded 438 runs @ 40 in First-Class matches, 257 runs @ 51.4 in List-A matches, and 206 runs @ 42 in the BBL, not bad consistency across all formats and boof deserves alot of credit for this. But most importantly the bloke has ticker and gets runs when its difficult conditions similar to Waugh, Clarke and those before him, take a look at his 140 against Tasmania where he outscored the Tasmanians on his own a team which included Bailey, Doolan, Cossie, Paine, Faulkner
January 30th 2013 @ 6:34am
AndyMack said | January 30th 2013 @ 6:34am | Report comment
TGT, you know you are risk incurring the wrath of one Brett McKay with this article (joking Brett….)
Over the last 20 odd years of watching test cricket, there are lots of examples of fans being divided over selections, but i cannot ever recall there being overwhelming support for one guy to make the team. until now with UTK.
Really hope Red Kev’s assessment above is incorrect and UTK makes the india trip.
January 30th 2013 @ 7:09am
John Philipson said | January 30th 2013 @ 7:09am | Report comment
Andymack – you are spot on, in all my sports following on this site, I find it hard to recall a situation where there has been such unanimous support for the selection of a cricketer.
I think it is because his class is so self-evident, I have loved watching him bat since he came on to the scene. I wish so much that he gets his chance in India. Come on UZZIE!
January 30th 2013 @ 7:23am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 7:23am | Report comment
Not just his class but the lack of class in the team or being touted by ‘insiders’ in press statements.
We just lost Ponting and M.Hussey and Watson is more fragile than ever. It is obvious that Hughes and Khawaja are miles ahead of everyone else, but the NSP is pushing (through the media) Maxwell, Steve Smith, Doolan, Bailey and Henriques and even Haddin as a specialist bat. Nevermind that Hussey is pure class and needs to be replaced with class, we’ll keep going with guys like Cowan and Shaun Marsh.
The other factor is that Khawaja has been treated harshly by the selectors and Australians respond to that, we like the underdog not the annointed (case in point is Clarke).
It also astonishes me that Joe Burns hasn’t been mentioned at all.
January 30th 2013 @ 10:42am
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:42am | Report comment
How can the NSP find a spot for Burns when there’s such quality top 7 candidates knocking about as Smith, Maxwell and Johnson?!
January 30th 2013 @ 11:43am
formeropenside said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:43am | Report comment
I assume this is tongue in cheek.
January 30th 2013 @ 4:57pm
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 4:57pm | Report comment
Johnson ‘s almost a good a No.7 as Graeme Swann!
January 30th 2013 @ 9:33pm
AndyMack said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:33pm | Report comment
Openside, Swannie doesnt bat at 7, Prior does, with usually Broad or Bresnan following. Swan bats #9 mostly…..
January 30th 2013 @ 11:26am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:26am | Report comment
Yes i see both Hughes and Khawaja as future of our batting lineup.
February 4th 2013 @ 5:03pm
Ken Hambling said | February 4th 2013 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
With Khawaja’s selection in the Indian tour we can see now that selectors realise that Khawaja is a important player for us in the next 12 months
January 30th 2013 @ 10:41am
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:41am | Report comment
Oh, no, not the wrath of an expert!
January 30th 2013 @ 12:11pm
Brett McKay said | January 30th 2013 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Grrr, wrath….
January 30th 2013 @ 1:43pm
Bearfax said | January 30th 2013 @ 1:43pm | Report comment
Be gentle with us Brett. We were asked. I know you get twitchy when we mention the K. word. But hey there are other fine letters in the alphabet we could use…such as U.
January 30th 2013 @ 3:41pm
Brett McKay said | January 30th 2013 @ 3:41pm | Report comment
Again, I’ve got no problem with reasoned discussion, which this one obviously is. It’s the hijacking and pointless comments that really grates..
January 30th 2013 @ 4:01pm
Bearfax said | January 30th 2013 @ 4:01pm | Report comment
Ah yes but of course we all have different perspectives on things dont we. Its like I say to a French mate of mine. One man’s fish is another man’s poisson……hope you understand French otherwise the meanings lost.
January 30th 2013 @ 4:20pm
Brett McKay said | January 30th 2013 @ 4:20pm | Report comment
sorry mate, no French, but I certainly get your point..
January 30th 2013 @ 9:34pm
AndyMack said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:34pm | Report comment
haha, nice one Bearfax.
A little bit of wit and class on the Roar, like it.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:31pm
Matt h said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:31pm | Report comment
It actually reminds me of the massive push for Hughes to displace Hayden a few years back
January 30th 2013 @ 8:17am
John Philipson said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:17am | Report comment
Yup you have hit it on the head there – Australians respond to those being treated harshly. Although I think UTK differs slightly to the situation with Hodge. Not to denigrate Hodge, but it just appears that UTK is a classy, gentleman of a cricketer. Do you think that there is a cultural element – eg not fitting the Aussie team culture aspect here?
I hope not.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:25am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:25am | Report comment
I honestly don’t think so (although in my darker moments I find it easy to sling that accusation around my head). Khawaja has been in Australia a long time and around high level cricket squads a long time. I judge it more likely that someone in the national setup just doesn’t like or rate him – I know from press and tv statements that Ian Chappell and Mark Taylor don’t think much of him; if similar comments were forthcoming from say a fielding coach or one of the selectors it would carry a lot of weight.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:50am
John Philipson said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Not even from a racial/Pakistani culture perspective, more from a team culture perspective. You just get the feeling that guys like George Bailey, Glenn Maxwell, Steve Smith fit the ‘baggy green culture’ and guys like UTK don’t. And in the end that may work against him somewhat. I have heard that from Taylor – genuinely surpirsed that Chappelli holds that opinion.
Khawaja in some way suffers (incredibly) from the fact that he is such a calm, relaxed batsman (consider his first test appearance). I think people mistake this for a lack of desire or lack of effort or grit. I think that his career choices (England stint and QLD shift) speak against this. Just because he is not a mongrel, unsportsmanlike player like Maxwell does not make him any less suitable to wear the baggy green. UTK would be a truly great role model for young aussie cricketers.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:57am
Johnno said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Usman is bright , he has an aviation degree, so is a trined pilot. Ed Cowan has been to uni,. SO why does Ed Cowan give ivers the shiver’s , but not Usman. And this thing that Ed Cowan is this amazing team man, there was a lot of innuendo about him being arrogant at NSW. Usman is a good bloke, Iver’s should give him a go.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:02am
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:02am | Report comment
Cowan gave the ANZAC address, don’t you know?! That makes him an integral Test player.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:31am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:31am | Report comment
hehe oh yes the anzac address, but seriously Khawaja is educated like Cowan and perhaps more so and is easier to get along with as i also read that Cowan had isssues fitting into the NSW team. Cossie said in a Sydney Thunders game that Khawaja is the funniest guy in the dressing room so its not him fitting in the dressing room but perhaps he doesn’t follow the skipper and coach around everywhere like the other players but he shouldn’t have to.
February 4th 2013 @ 5:03pm
Ken Hambling said | February 4th 2013 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
I didn’t know he was a pilot as well, talented kid.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:57am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:57am | Report comment
You’re right about that.
Brettig in one of his articles wrote that “Khawaja entered the home summer having developed a perception of self-containment, if not absorption.” an observation that has to have been articulated by one of his CA sources. Although interestingly in the BBL promo interviews he was cited as one of the funniest players in the Thunder squad by his teammates.
I should clarify about Chappelli – his comments concerned Khawaja’s footwork and application and were technical in nature rather than regarding the intangible “good sort” “blokey” nonsense that Taylor’s comments did (and that any press comments about Quiney or Cowan invariably contain).
January 30th 2013 @ 9:49am
Hansie said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:49am | Report comment
Brettig is very tight with Langer, which would be ironic because Langer’s coaching did little to develop Khawaja and a number of other young batters entering the test ranks.
January 30th 2013 @ 5:28pm
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 5:28pm | Report comment
Very well said John, Khawaja is a great role model and very hard worker and he doesn’t need to insult opposition teams to prove this
January 30th 2013 @ 9:18am
nachos supreme said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:18am | Report comment
Could it be that he doesn’t fit the drinking culture?
January 30th 2013 @ 9:23am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:23am | Report comment
I never thought of that – the team is sponsored by VB and is always photographed spraying beer around the room while singing ‘underneath the southern cross I stand’ after a victory and Khawaja a Muslim so doesn’t drink.
But no.
20 years ago maybe it might have been a point of tension, but not these days – not drinking wouldn’t be a big deal (it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that Siddle was a tea-totaller).
January 30th 2013 @ 11:35am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:35am | Report comment
Yeah i don’t think not drinking is a issue, Siddle would watch his drinking and so would Cowan so we are passed that .
January 30th 2013 @ 12:00pm
langou said | January 30th 2013 @ 12:00pm | Report comment
Red Kev
Many of my muslim mates enjoy a beer or two
It annoys me how much is made about his religion. Does anyone know or talk about the religion of other Australian crickets? If you found out that George Baily was a Christian would you say he is not getting picked ‘because he is Christian and therefore doesn’t have sex before marriage’ or he ‘he can’t have a mix of wool and linen in his jumper which could cause problems with teammates’
Obviously the selectors don’t hate the guy otherwise they wouldn’t have picked him to be back up for Clarke and wouldn’t have picked him in the first one-dayer. Yeah he is unlucky but let’s keep all this rubbish about his race and religion out of the argument.
January 30th 2013 @ 12:42pm
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
Back off. nachos supreme asked a question and I gave a considered answer.
Personally I don’t give a fig about anyone’s faith or lack thereof. I will however say that it is not unreasonable to assume that Muslim’s don’t drink alcohol (intoxicants such as alcohol are deemed unlawful by the Qur’an based on my dim recollection of high school religious studies and a quick Google search). Not to say that people of Islamic faith don’t consume alcohol, nor that people of Jewish faith don’t eat bacon – but is not an unreasonable assumption and the question/comment has a legitimate place in this discussion, especially when Australia does (or did) have a reputation as a drinking culture.
January 30th 2013 @ 12:56pm
Jason said | January 30th 2013 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
Siddle’s a vegan FFS. It doesn’t get any more unAustralian than that.
January 30th 2013 @ 2:09pm
jameswm said | January 30th 2013 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
But Siddle’s a good bloke to have around the dressing room.
January 30th 2013 @ 9:23am
John Philipson said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:23am | Report comment
That is a great point – didnt really think of the Muslim perspective. I certainly hope not, but that could be a valid point.
January 30th 2013 @ 9:30am
jameswm said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:30am | Report comment
I doubt that’s such an issue under Clarke.
January 30th 2013 @ 12:45pm
Hansie said | January 30th 2013 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
What did Mark Taylor say about Usman Khawaja? Taylor handed Khawaja his first test cap, so I’m surprised that he is now critical of Khawaja.
January 30th 2013 @ 10:44am
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:44am | Report comment
I hope not, too. But it’s hard not to suspect that at least Khawaja’s maybe more intelligent than the gormless yes-men (known as ‘good blokes’) that tend to be in favour, and as such his face doesn’t fit.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:29am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:29am | Report comment
John i don’t thnk it can be an issue with Khawaja fitting in.. From what his team mates in Bulls and Thunder have said publicly he is a very funny guy and a great team man so it can’t be his issues with geling with the team unlike someone like Ahmad who will take time to undersand our culture and humour. It seems clear that the selectors are biased towards Maxwell more than Khawaja which is a shame because Khawaja is a fantastic long term talent.. Talent and performance in shield is surely on Khawaja’s side. The obvious improvement on Khawaja’s fielding also gives Khawaja a tick of approval in the ‘hard worker’ department too. On cricketing terms Khawaja should be treated with the same level of ‘next generation’ appreciation of the likes of Bailey, Warner and Hughes. I really hope Khawaja is our number in India and is given a proper go like the other younger batsman, just give him half the games Cowan got and we will have a long term test star.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:47pm
Matt h said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:47pm | Report comment
Ok, this is getting a little over the top. Maxwell and bailey have not played a test. Khawaja has got nine and averages 29. I fail to see a bias in the test ranks here. That might change once we see the squad for India, but for now we appear to be jumping at shadows. It seems plain from being on standby that khawaja is likely the next in the middle order. If he was averaging 80 in the shield and hit a Doolanesque set of scores in the A games the conspiracy theory may have more legs.
January 31st 2013 @ 6:09am
Red Kev said | January 31st 2013 @ 6:09am | Report comment
Wrong.
Khawaja has played six (6) tests in two blocks of three, not nine.
He was unused injury cover (for Ponting) for one test. Then played as an injury replacement (for Ponting) for one test. Then he got selected in his own right for two tests. Then got dropped. Then got used as injury replacement (for S.Marsh) for three tests. Then got dropped. Then he was unused injury cover (for Clarke) for two tests this summer.
And for the record, both times he was dropped Khawaja was averaging over 60 in the shield.
Cowan has had 13 tests in a row.
Give Khawaja the faith of 9 tests in a row (India and England) and you’ll see the yawning gap in class between the two.
January 31st 2013 @ 6:50am
John Philipson said | January 31st 2013 @ 6:50am | Report comment
@Matt h – owned
January 31st 2013 @ 11:58am
matt h said | January 31st 2013 @ 11:58am | Report comment
6 not 9 – you’re right, sorry about that Red Kev.
re conspiracy theories I was talking about Rob Barrow’s post which inlcuded references to Maxwell and Bailey, but neither have played a test so any inference of bias towards them compared to Khawaja is obviously false … so far, but as I said the Indian touring party selections may change that.
And I have no problems with Cowan being taken to task for his record to date. I would replace him in a heartbeat.
So owned on the 6 vs 9 tests absolutely.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:24am
jamesb said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:24am | Report comment
Khawaja averaging 43 at first class cricket is very good when you consider that he has been dropped from the test side a couple of times already, which I think he has been very unlucky,
Then he went back to NSW, we’re NSW cricket has been a basket case. Then, he has gone to QLD and is slowly turning his career around. Alot of that credit should go to QLD coach “boof” Lehmann. “Boof” should be coach of Australia, not Uncle Arthur.
The point I’m making is Ussie has had a few setbacks, yet his average is still very decent. Many people (and experts) regard Khawaja as one of the best batsman technically in Australia.
I wonder if Invers agrees with that.
January 30th 2013 @ 10:46am
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:46am | Report comment
Don’t forget NSW picked Khawaja ahead of Cowan, Forrest and Warner.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:34am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:34am | Report comment
Yes i regard him the best technical batsman in Australia and the best player of swing bowling in Australia. Khawaja has the most pure technique among the younger batsman as pointed out by Border, Taylor and Inevarity himself. Both Hughes and Khawaja have earned their spots but the issue here is the mistreatment of Khawaja which can’t go on forever. And with regards his fielding boof has improved his fielding tremendously this year and he has been snaring some tough chances in slips and covers. I saw footage of his 100 against tasmania this year on a deck where he got 138 and Tasmania got 90 and 130 and that lineup included Doolan,Cossie, Bailey, Paine and Faulkner.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:46am
Christo the Daddyo said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:46am | Report comment
I wonder whether the fact that Khawaja is a pure batsman and not an all-rounder counts against him. There seems to be an search bordering on the obsessive for an all-rounder, particularly now that Watson’s future is starting to look a little shaky for the first time.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:48am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:48am | Report comment
He got Sangakkara in the Chairman’s XI game. I think he bowled himself because he was the captain and he probably harbours that same thought – showing he has that string to his bow was important, probably as important as his two run outs this month.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:51am
John Philipson said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Yeah I saw that – he bowls military mediums right? Yeah the runouts are important. Although I think that realistically – he needs to develop into a catching batpad – given that longterm Warner and Hughes will open and he will no doubt take the no 3 berth (all going to plan)
January 30th 2013 @ 9:00am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:00am | Report comment
Batpad / short leg is a difficult spot to field. I have been encouraged by his work for Queensland in the covers and at point and in the slips, so hopefully he’ll be able to adjust to the David Boon fielding spot.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:37am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Yes he did get Sanga out and PatHoward cknowledged this in his development, but they need to give him more bowling similar to how we encourage Maxwell. But Khawaja’s batting is miles ahead of Maxwell.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:47am
pope paul v11 said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:47am | Report comment
The fundamental flaw of the Argus report is that it expects the coach and captain to 1be 00% objective as selectors. It’s impossible with mates and favourites. If Arthur C Clarke weren’t involved, I have no doubt Khawaja would have not have been dropped after Hobart loss to NZ, which was primarily because of the lack of runs from Ponting, Clarke, Hussey and Haddin.
Anyway just give him a run and we can all shut up.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:39am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:39am | Report comment
Khawaja was vey unlucky to be dropped. Khawaja had a highest score in a record 300 chase and then got run out on 40 in the next game and then got dropped the game after as we lost to NZ and he was unfortuantely caught in the harsh decisions made.Buthe went back and worked with boof and we can see the improvemet in is batting and fielding thisyear.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:49am
Andrew said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:49am | Report comment
I disagree somewhat with Red Kev’s analysis, excellent though as it is. I think UTK will get selected for the India tour. It’ll be a big squad and the NSP just couldn’t get away with not picking him. But the selectors will play their usual trick – dangle the carrot in front of him but not give him a proper run. He won’t play the two Tests that Watson will play. For the other two, either he’ll probably miss out because they pick Glenn Maxwell or some other club cricketer. Either that or they’ll select him for those one or two Tests, he’ll do ok, but get run out by Cowan or Hughes once he’s set and drop back out of the XI when Watson returns for the Ashes.
January 30th 2013 @ 8:53am
John Philipson said | January 30th 2013 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Quite honestly if that happens – I think it will have a devastating impact on Khawaja, while also overloading the comment posting server at the Roar.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:42am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:42am | Report comment
I would like to give the selectors more credit and think that Khawaja will get at least the number 6 spot and not simply fill in for Watto as he has always done throughout his career. Cowan has had 10 games in a row averaging 30, just give Khawaja half that and he will be established,
January 30th 2013 @ 11:50pm
Matt h said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:50pm | Report comment
Um, he got 9 and averages 29, although to be fair they were not in a row.
January 31st 2013 @ 6:08am
Red Kev said | January 31st 2013 @ 6:08am | Report comment
Wrong.
Khawaja has played six (6) tests in two blocks of three, not nine.
He was unused injury cover (for Ponting) for one test. Then played as an injury replacement (for Ponting) for one test. Then he got selected in his own right for two tests. Then got dropped. Then got used as injury replacement (for S.Marsh) for three tests. Then got dropped. Then he was unused injury cover (for Clarke) for two tests this summer.
Cowan has had 13 tests in a row.
Give Khawaja the faith of 9 tests in a row (India and England) and you’ll see the yawning gap in class between the two.
January 31st 2013 @ 12:04pm
matt h said | January 31st 2013 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
Yeah refer above – agree 6 not 9. Not sure where the 9 came from.
And a for Cowan I agree he is not good enough, but I get a little irritated with comments that imply Khawaja is some sort of certainty to be the batting messiah of Australian cricket. He might be, but it’s not as clear cut and obvious as some think. History is littered with batsmen who look great but do not deliver to expectations. I hope Khawaja is not one of them, because frankly there isn;t a whole lot else around.
January 30th 2013 @ 9:27am
Sailosi said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:27am | Report comment
I’m a big fan of Khawaja and find him to be a quality individual and a talented player. Unfortunately I just don’t think he up to test match standard. He must however be given a fair chance. Technically he still has the same problems outside off stump that he had as a 17-18 year old and whilst I’ve only been to two of Queensland’s shield games this year it doesn’t look as though he has made major changes to this. One thing he does seem to have improved on is his concentration, hopefully Lehman has had a lot to do with this because it makes the move to QLD all the more worthwhile. As for his fielding I would love for him to work on his slip catching because with the loss of Ponting and Hussey this is one are where the current test team is lacking in quality.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
January 30th 2013 @ 10:35am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:35am | Report comment
If you don’t mind then Saliosi (and I am not trying to pick a fight or anything, I am genuinely curious), what batting lineup of test match standard players would you select to represent Australia?
I would pick, Warner, Hughes, Khawaja, Clarke, Burns, Watson if everyone was fit.
However if you don’t think all those I have picked are test match standard, I would like to see who you think is up to it.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:07am
Sailosi said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:07am | Report comment
It’s bloody tough at the moment.
1. Warner
2. Hughes
3. Khawaja
4. Clarke
5. Watson
6. Voges
That is a terrible top 6 i have just named
I believe that Khawaja deserves a chance. I just doubt that he will be successful. I honestly have no idea who to pick. I can’t think of any player who will succeed at test level that is of an age to have a 50 test career playing shield cricket at the moment. Mark Cosgrove is one of the most talented and if you speak to a lot of shield players they seem to say that but unfortunately he just doesn’t seem as if he wants it enough. If If somebody like Joe Burns had a strong finish this year and a good shield season next year he should come into consideration.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:19am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:19am | Report comment
Thanks for the response, no question it is hard at the moment but I guess that is why the selectors are paid (instead they are all focussing on personal project players so they can get discovery kudos).
I often think Australia puts too much emphasis on the gym and fitness. Our NSP would never select David Boon or Inzumam Ul-Haq. Perhaps Cosgrove deserves a shot.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:45am
jameswm said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:45am | Report comment
I’m thinking swap Khawaja and Hughes around. Khawaja’s the steady hand with Warner, and Hughes is doing well at no.3. The alternative is go with the aggressive pair, and Khawaja the steadier when one of them gets out.
But I’d like to let Khawaja bat at 4 or 5 for a few tests and consolidate his spot, before moving him up to the top 3.
February 4th 2013 @ 5:04pm
Ken Hambling said | February 4th 2013 @ 5:04pm | Report comment
Instead of Vogues i would have Quiney in there.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:25am
Bearfax said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:25am | Report comment
Point is Sailosi. If you dont think Khawaja is up to being a test player, then who is left. Quite frankly if Khawaja is not good enough, then the rest of the possible have no hope. Maybe we should just play Warner, Hughes and Clarke as our only batsmen..Mind you I like Cosgrove but he’s definitely not going to get a shot unless he drops half his weight. He could be a star but the Big Macs must be too tempting. I watched him in a T20 match with Khawaja at the other end. He was fine at hitting boundaries and ones, butthat was it and I could see Khawaja getting frustrated when a likely two became a pedestrian one.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:41am
Sailosi said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:41am | Report comment
That’s what I’ve said. I’m a Khawaja fan, just don’t think he’s going to be up to it. He deserves his chance and a fair chance. There is nobody else. Unfortunately and sadly Cosgrove has to be forgotten about.
January 30th 2013 @ 9:42am
jameswm said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Khawaja was solid, effortlessly got 70-odd at close to a run a ball, then got out. His detractors will say this is evidence of not going on with starts.
He spilt a catch, looking slow and cumbersome. He did also effect a brilliant run-out and make a couple of good stops. He’ll never be a Ponting or Symonds in the field, but his detractors will point to that dropped catch.
Cowan is far from the best fielder in the world.
Stuey Clark suffered a bit I think from being bright.
If they take Watto for the first two tests, Khawaja could miss out. Watto could bat 4, Clarke 5, Wade 6/7 and an all rounder (Henriques or Maxwell) at 6/7. Then for the 3rd and 4th tests they’d need an extra specialist bat to cover Watto, so Khawaja comes in at no.4.
I could see this happening. He’ll be in the squad, but I can see him getting squeezed out of the X! for the first two tests in the selectors’ obsession with having an all rounder (even a bits and pieces one, because that’s all Maxwell is at the moment) and Watto’s return.
I would bat Watto at 6 (Warner and Clarke can make up the 5th bowler), Clarke/Khawaja at 4/5, and leave the top 3 the same. Cowan’s last chance. If Cowan doesn’t cut it in these 4 tests and Uzzie goes OK, he moves to the top 3 (he and Hughes at 2 and 3, don’t really care which way round as there’s not a big difference to the spots, and I think Khawaja could be a better foil for Warner than Cowan).
Watto stays 6, I would move Clarke to 4, and you need another batsman for 4/5. There’s youngster Burns, and all the other suspects.. I can see a spot for Henriques in the ODI team right now, but he needs more consistent FC performances to make the test team. As I’ve said before, our best all rounder outside Watto is Ronnie McDOnald, but he’s injured, though back soon I’m guessing.
So my squad (16) to India would be:
Warner
Cowan
Hughes
Khawaja
Clarke
Watson
McDonald if fit, otherwise Burns unless someone else cleans up the Shield
Wade
Paine
SOK
Lyon
Siddle
Pattinson
Bird
One of Johnson and Starc
One of Harris and Cutting
January 30th 2013 @ 10:31am
Bearfax said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:31am | Report comment
I’m not going to say too much about this that I havent already said lest I receive the ire of Brett McKay and Steele again.
But the item has been specifically raised so I’ll speak to it.
Khawaja is potentially a star test batsman in the making. I’ve been watching cricket now for over fifty years and I think I can pick a player with talent. Anyone with any cricket nous can see that Khawaja has that talent.,which makes me wonder about the national selectors competence. Seems to me they’ve done everything to stop this kid from having an opportunity to prove his case, which makes me also wonder at some form of discrimination, not necessarily racial, but not being one of the favoured sons. Is this nepotism
The Australian selectors have been choosing a bunch of reasonably good first class cricketers ahead of this kid and what do they have to show for it. Australia is hardly abounding with batting wealth at present. If we still had Hayden, Langer, Ponting, Clarke, M.Waugh and Hussey in the batting line up, I could well understand Khawaja missing out. BUT WE DONT. We have a few potentially outstanding young batsmen in Hughes and Warner, a good but often broken down all rounder, an opener who in any other age would not get close to a start, Captain Clarke and a bunch of first class cricketers many with sub 40 averages as well as a Wicket keeper being used as one of our major batsmen and further reducing Australia’s batting potential. No wonder we are struggling.
And then there is Khawaja, a young man blessed with a natural skill in the game, sent away to improve his attitude, which he did, sitting like a cricket garden gnome, blessed with a talent these selectors for some reason want to ignore.
For mine, if Khawaja doesnt make the Indian tour, I’d drop the coach and selection panel. They’re not really serious about Australia winning, have a bad attitude and need to be dropped and sent away to improve their skills and attitude to their role.
January 30th 2013 @ 10:57am
TheGenuineTailender said | January 30th 2013 @ 10:57am | Report comment
If we lose these back-to-back Ashes. The selectors must all be sacked. Captain and coach should also be removed from selection meetings.
The less selectors the better if you ask me. That way they can head in one absolute and definite direction, no clouded selections or clashes of opinion and you’ve also just got one man responsible and accountable if things go wrong.
January 30th 2013 @ 12:17pm
Sanjay said | January 30th 2013 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
I hope we don’t have to learn that players such as Maxwell are not up to it by losing the Indian series and the ashes. Lets get it right now but fixing our number 1 issue and that’s our batting collapses and Khawaja is the man to bring in to fix that.
January 30th 2013 @ 12:45pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 30th 2013 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
We need six specialist batsmen. No all-rounders. It would also help if our six specialist batsmen also happened to be the six best batsmen we’ve got. In that case you have to have Khawaja in there. If we want purely the best batsmen then you’d have to think a line up of Rogers, Warner, Hughes, Khawaja, Clarke and then maybe Burns is the way to go. I say Burns because he’s on par with any other options but at least he has youth on his side and a big future ahead of him.
Having an all-rounder for the sake of it is a waste. We don’t need the extra bowler as our bowling is our strength. Our four best bowlers can take 20 wickets. Our batting is our fundamental weakness and needs to be bolstered.
January 30th 2013 @ 3:34pm
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 3:34pm | Report comment
Mate i agree with you, we can’t pick allrounders for the sake of it and that’s what we are doing with Maxwell as his bowling is clearly not up to test standard. Go with 6 test speicalist and include Khawaja as one of them as he is the best option we have for that position.
February 3rd 2013 @ 5:42pm
Herbert Pocket said | February 3rd 2013 @ 5:42pm | Report comment
TGT, it does make you wonder sometimes whether all of these “project” and “X-factor” players are backed to the hilt to justify the size of the selection panel. If the NSP were in accord all of the time about the players to select, what would they report back to the board?
Similarly do they look for perceived character flaws in players, that simply aren’t there or are negligible in nature, to justify their positions as selectors?
I don’t know, and selection is no doubt a difficult job. But certainly worth consideration.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:06am
Disco said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:06am | Report comment
Or perhaps Khawaja should do a Luke Ronchi.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:14am
Red Kev said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:14am | Report comment
Not now. He just represented Australia at the start of Jan. Before that ODI he was already one year through the four-year gap the ICC requires.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:45am
Rob Barrow said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:45am | Report comment
I echo your every word BearFax, Khawaja is a fantastic talent and his time is now, our weakness is our batting and he is just the guy we need as he scores when the going is tough whcih at the moment i priceless.