Under Ricky’s watch, how low can Sandow?
By Greg Prichard, 30 Jan 2013
Chris Sandow in action during the NRL round 17. AAP Image/Action Photographics, Robb Cox
Fortunately, Ricky Stuart stopped short of describing Chris Sandow as the “new Alfie”. That would have been taking it too far.
I can understand what the new Parramatta coach is doing, both privately and publicly, with the erratic Eels halfback.
Sending positive messages to him at training, and then displaying a willingness to back his man in the media.
After last season, when his football was all over the place, Sandow needed to feel the firm backing of someone with influence at the club.
And, let’s face it, Stuart and Sandow are in this together.
Stuart can’t succeed at Parramatta unless he finds the key to Sandow performing consistently well, and Sandow can’t succeed unless he believes Stuart has faith in him.
Likening him to the great Allan Langer, by describing him as the “Aboriginal Alfie” in a newspaper story, is one way of doing it, I suppose.
There are similarities in their playing styles, in the area of off-the-cuff brilliance, but there was still a lot more method to what Langer did than anything we’ve seen so far from Sandow.
That is why Langer was able to break into State of Origin football when he was still 20 years old, and play Test football not much more than a year later.
Sandow recently turned 24. He is on major representative-player money, but is yet to play major representative football.
It’s past the time when he should have already been playing quality football on a regular basis, but still not too late to start.
The question is whether Sandow is the right halfback for Parramatta, under Stuart.
Like a lot of people, I’ve got my doubts about whether a halfback who hasn’t shown a penchant for playing a highly-structured game will fit in very well with the Stuart approach.
Stuart, who established strong defences in previous club teams he coached, faces a sizeable challenge with Sandow in that area as well.
I don’t know if Stuart has genuine faith in Sandow or not.
Obviously, at this time of year, with the playing roster locked in and the season not far away, any coach is going to be seen to back his man, and will be doing his best to make question-mark situations work.
We will have to wait until the season unfolds to judge the strength and evaluate the success or otherwise of the Stuart-Sandow partnership, based on Parramatta’s results and Sandow’s form within that guideline.
A bit of body language here and there, and words that are said – or not said – by the parties involved may also help provide clues for the amateur psychologist in all of us.
Stuart and Sandow might prove to be a rip-roaring coach-and-halfback combination, but it’s worth pointing out South Sydney, in their first season without Sandow, improved their results with a rookie halfback in his place, while Parramatta’s results got even worse in his first season there.
Yes, I know, there are many other factors which help determine a team’s finishing position in any given season, but it’s critical Stuart and Sandow start on the same wavelength and stay there – or the Eels can’t hope to be a factor this season.
The Crowd Says (12) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:

January 30th 2013 @ 5:29am
Johnno said | January 30th 2013 @ 5:29am | Report comment
RIcky Stuart I don’t know why, but he seems to have a negative impact on just about, every half back and five-eigth, except Andrew Johns, Brad Fitler, Darren Lockyer , Jonathan Thurston, Craig Wing, 5 blokes , who are all Ricky Stuart’s equal who respect Ricky Stuart, and he respects them, but all 4 clearly of course as they were his playing equal, do not fear him .
Andrew John’s who Ricky coached in State of origin in 2005, to victory, worked great . But that;s the thing with Ricky Stuart, it seems almost like a pattern here, You had to of been his equal or better, for him to get the best out of you. And by 2005 Joey John’s hardly needed coaching on how to be dominant half back lol.
So basically Ricky Stuart seems to have a problem it seems with halves who are inferior to him a lot of the time. He had an akward relationship with Brett Kimmorley, a good player but not in those 4 league, or in Ricky’s league.
How he will tolerate Sandow , who is definatley not in Kimmorley’s class I am not sure. He also had issues with Brett FInch too.
Where as Joey johns is the assistant at Manly, and he seems to have so far had a reputation for really getting on well, and being a lot of support to players, despite them being less talented halfback and halves than he was. Laurie Daley and Trent Barrett by all reports have been the same. Often star players seem to go 2 ways. Patient and maybe humble certainly tolerant, they accept if a player is not as talented as them and lower the bar of expectation, and don’t put that pressure on them as coach to be as good as they were players, .
Or they go the other way, impatient, intolerant of players in there footy position, who were not as good and talented as them.
Ricky Stuart, the jury is still, out on him how he manages halves who are not as talented as he was.
January 30th 2013 @ 6:00am
Knight Vision said | January 30th 2013 @ 6:00am | Report comment
agreed , I can remember reading an article by Gus Gould that touched on this very subject. It will be very very interesting to see how Stuarts relationship with Sandow unfolds
January 30th 2013 @ 9:27pm
Jake said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:27pm | Report comment
Johnno you can’t seriously say that Wing was as good as Ricky?
January 31st 2013 @ 2:57am
Johnno said | January 31st 2013 @ 2:57am | Report comment
No Jake but Craig Wing was a top class player, who in his prime was in the top 5 players in rugby league. And was the best utility in the game, and did play halfback in the 2002 Grand Final. My point was he did play a lot of half back that year, and Ricky Stuart respected him as a top class rugby league player.
January 30th 2013 @ 5:36am
peeeko said | January 30th 2013 @ 5:36am | Report comment
“any coach is going to be seen to back his man” – agree, the amount of positive and feel good stories reported at this time of year is tedious. i cant remember already how many players have had their best off season ever and are fitter than ever before – all will be forgotten once the real stuff begins
January 30th 2013 @ 7:41am
Arthur fonzarelli. said | January 30th 2013 @ 7:41am | Report comment
Bit harsh to criticise sandow for not breaking into rep footy – he has had the likes of thurston Cronk prince in front of him .
Also a long bow to draw to relate the eels decline and souths rise to the impact of sandow. Maybe if sandow had stayed under McGuire he would have been the x factor to give souths a premiership ? Would Reynolds have excelled at parramatta under Kearney in a struggling team – I think not .
I for one would love to see sandow succeed this year , there are always a lot of people who seem to want to see him fail .
January 30th 2013 @ 7:58am
Johnno said | January 30th 2013 @ 7:58am | Report comment
And Cherry.
January 30th 2013 @ 9:54am
George from Sydney ( not an expert) said | January 30th 2013 @ 9:54am | Report comment
Souths got better…
But they also have Inglis, Burgess, Asotasi and had Dave Taylor.
All gamebreakers, whilst Sandow had to work with Park footballers.
Perspective, lets use it.
January 30th 2013 @ 11:57am
peter rabbit said | January 30th 2013 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Don’t underestimate Reynolds,we all saw what happened to bunnies when he pulled his hammie. Asotasi a gamebreaker?
January 30th 2013 @ 4:57pm
Bazzio said | January 30th 2013 @ 4:57pm | Report comment
Too much too fast for Sandow to cope with so far. He needs a mentor who is an honest, astute, financial adviser.
Someone should put Chris Sandow in touch with Nathan Blacklock.
January 30th 2013 @ 6:14pm
itsuckstobeyou said | January 30th 2013 @ 6:14pm | Report comment
The article I read suggested that Stuart was referring to Sandow’s temperament, attitude and personality when he likened him to Langer, more so than his ability or his achievements. I feel the “Aboriginal Alfie” line has been taken a little out of context here.
I’d bet my house that Sandow has a dance that he does in his undies ala Alfie, Stuart’s given him the nickname and has tidied the story up for the press. Nothing to it.
January 30th 2013 @ 7:22pm
Phil Coorey said | January 30th 2013 @ 7:22pm | Report comment
Chris Sandow can not, and never will be able to tackle. I’ve always found the rest of the analysis to be irrelevant. The facts are – he can not tackle.