Who’s the best pro road racer of the modern era?
Bradley Wiggins winning the 2012 Tour de France(Image: ASO)
Related coverage
First, what is the modern era? I’m taking it as post Miguel Indurain, and the question of who is the best arises now because the man who was accepted in the top slot, Lance Armstrong, has been stripped of nearly everything he won.
Which throws up another stumbling block. If Armstrong is no longer the best, then anyone else who has been involved with doping since Indurain can’t be considered as his replacement.
So that’s Alberto Contador out for a start.
The next filter is to look at the word ‘best’. I’m taking that to mean that on their day, and at what they are best at, to make the short list a rider has to not just win but make winning look inevitable when you look back and analyse how they did it.
Inevitability is rare, and I reckon that once anyone with a doping conviction is removed only eight riders since Miguel Indurain have had that stamp of inevitability. They are: Paulo Bettini, Tom Boonen, Fabian Cancellara, Mark Cavendish, Cadel Evans, Oscar Freire, Philippe Gilbert and Bradley Wiggins.
Think about Philippe Gilbert and his 2011 Ardennes Classic triple. Think about Tom Boonen in a cobbled classic, sprint or break. Any way his rivals want to cut it, especially last year, if Boonen has the form Boonen will win.
Think Cancellara, at least the Cancellara of a few seasons ago, in a time trial or in a lone break. Think Cav in a bunch sprint. Think Evans winning the 2009 worlds. Think Oscar Freire or Paulo Bettini in a small group at the end of a big race.
And finally there is Bradley Wiggins, he had the air of inevitability in every race he rode in 2012.
But how do you rank all those different riders in order and find the best? First I took out the ultra-specialist. So that’s Mark Cavendish in eighth. He is probably the greatest roadman sprinter of all time.
He’s certainly the fastest sprinter ever, and he will probably set lots of new sprint records, like the most Tour stages in a career or even the most in a single Tour. But so far he’s a sprinter and that’s it. It sounds brutal but it’s true. Still, eighth best of the whole modern era isn’t bad is it?
Next is Oscar Freire. Three world road titles take a lot of winning. Only Alfredo Binda, Rik Van Steenbergen and Eddy Merckx have done what Freire did, and they are all-time greats. Plus Freire has won Classics and stage races. He’s seventh.
Paulo Bettini takes sixth place. His inevitability didn’t have the dominant trait that others in this list have. Bettini won by having playing his cards better than the rest rather than by ripping their legs off. He was great, but great at being crafty.
Fabian Cancellara did rip his rivals legs off, that’s why he is fifth. Having said that though he has a bit of the specialist about him, not just because he’s a time triallist, but also because his best road race victories are achieved with one tactic, a blistering attack followed by lone break.
Even the Tour de France stage win at Compiegne in 2007 was a lone effort, albeit one where he finished with riders all around him because he had scythed through the people in front of him. His Roubaix and Flanders victories were also executed in the same glorious way.
It’s a fantastic tactic, but if he didn’t make a clean break, like he didn’t when Tom Boonen won the 2008 Roubaix, Boonen will always beat him.
If Roger De Vlaeminck was Mr Paris-Roubaix, Philippe Gilbert is Mr Ardennes Classic. He’s so good at these races he has already reached legendary status, but he sacrificed them in 2012 because he had the chance to win the rainbow jersey.
As soon as he did that his world title win on the Cauberg looked inevitable, and it was achieved with class and authority. And Gilbert is still young, there are still pages of his story to write. He gets fourth but will end up higher.
Third place goes to Cadel Evans, and that’s probably unfair because Evans has the longest career and it stretched back through the darkest doping days. There is no doubt that Evans lost races to doped riders during the first part of his career, a point underlined by the fact that he only began winning the biggest races once the blood passport was introduced.
The inference is that Evans stayed the same while the dopers slowed down because they couldn’t get away with what they’d been doing. Evans achieves his podium position for the races he should have won, as well those he did.
I’m putting Bradley Wiggins in second, but if he has another year like 2012 he will be the number one. This is a look at road racing, so Wiggins track past scores nothing. That means we are looking at one Tour de France podium, fourth elevated to third in 2009, and his Merckx-like 2012.
More than Merckx-like in fact. Not even Eddy Merckx achieved a string of Paris-Nice, Romandie, Dauphine Libere, Tour de France and Olympic time trials in one year. Wiggins winning in 2012 looked inevitable. The only thing that prevents him being number one is that he hasn’t looked inevitable for as long as the winner.
Tom Boonen is the man I judge to be the best pro road racer of the post-Indurain. I know that some will argue that a Tour de France trumps any Classic, or even any number of Classics, but I don’t think it does.
The Tour is the most famous bike race in the world, the biggest, the most prized, but it’s still a race, just like a Classic is. Ok, you have to be good for three weeks in the Tour, but in a Classic you cannot make the slightest mistake.
They are both races, and although more riders take their best form into the Tour each year than do so in any given Classic, there are still only a handful how can win the Tour. It’s the same as for the Classics.
Wiggins’s 2012 Tour win looked inevitable, but so did Boonen’s 2012 Wevelgem, Flanders and Roubaix triple. The thing is, Boonen has been inevitable for much longer.
Wiggins had one stellar season in 2012, Boonen has been like that for ten years. If he’s on form he will win a cobbled Classic, sometimes two, and in 2012 he won all three.
Only one other man has ever done that, Rik Van Looy in 1962, but Boonen has also rivalled Roger De Vlaeminck’s career total of five Paris-Roubaix victories. They are all-time cycling greats and Boonen has equalled them. Wiggins has to do a little more to say that.
So my post Indurain eight is
1. Tom Boonen
2. Bradley Wiggins
3. Cadel Evans
4. Philippe Gilbert
5. Fabian Cancellara
6. Paulo Bettini
7. Oscar Freire
8. Mark Cavendish
- Explore:
- Cycling, Tour de France

January 31st 2013 @ 6:32am
Sean Lee said | January 31st 2013 @ 6:32am | Report comment
How do you rate Carlos Sastre Chris? His grand tour record is extremely consistent and who knows how many of those he could have won had the dopers been excluded? In fact, the dopers may have robbed us of a Sastre/Evans rivalry with both men trading grand tour victories. As far as I can remember Sastre was never caught up in any doping controversy.
January 31st 2013 @ 7:27pm
sittingbison said | January 31st 2013 @ 7:27pm | Report comment
from memory Sean Sastre has 5 and Evans 3 TdF when the dopers are excluded
February 1st 2013 @ 9:45pm
Chris Sidwells said | February 1st 2013 @ 9:45pm | Report comment
Sean, Yes Sastre competed with dignity and was a good rider who didn’t win as many races as he should have. I just didn’t feel his victories had the inevitability of the others. That attak to win on Alpe d’Huez was amazing, but I’ve a feeling that it was helped by there being 2 of his team mates with Evans. Maybe it should have been a top ten with Hushovd and Sastre in 9th and 10th.
January 31st 2013 @ 7:51am
Doug said | January 31st 2013 @ 7:51am | Report comment
About a year and a half ago a cycling magazine published a list of TdF top ten placings with drug cheats or those reliably considered to be cheats highlighted. Excluding the cheats Cadel Evans and another rider IIRC Carlos Sastre finished 1-2 most of the Lance years. With the other rider “winning” something like 5 to Evans 2. So if Evans is there this guy should be as well.
January 31st 2013 @ 9:06am
Justin Curran said | January 31st 2013 @ 9:06am | Report comment
I like your list Chris. I am only relatively new to pro cycling (since 2008), so I never saw Bettini or the best of Freire. I am going to admit my huge bias, but I believe Cadel Evans should get the number one slot. He has consistenly been top ten in Grand Tours for a prolonged period, including against proven dopers. He won a world title, not too mention dominating mountain biking. Secondly I think Cavendish should come in second. To put him at the bottom of the list purely because he is just a sprinter is denying him justice. I think I would have Gilbert and Boonen coming in next. Wiggins has not dominated for a long enough period to be placed above the rest.
January 31st 2013 @ 10:01am
Riddos said | January 31st 2013 @ 10:01am | Report comment
A good list Chris.
Unfortunately injuries have ruined his last year or so but Thor Hushovd would be a rider I’d have on the list.
World RR Champ.
10 x TDF Stage wins.
2 x TDF Green Jersey points wins.
A bunch of days in yellow inc some brilliant riding in 2011 TDF.
Vuelta Stage wins plus a points win.
Good bloke.
Hopefully is back in form this year and gets a good crack at Paris-Roubaix.
Sagan most likely of the young brigade to earn a spot.
January 31st 2013 @ 10:31am
Justin Curran said | January 31st 2013 @ 10:31am | Report comment
Good call on Hushovd
January 31st 2013 @ 10:12am
Michael said | January 31st 2013 @ 10:12am | Report comment
How come inevitability such as BW in 2012 is still accepted without question, even though so many admired LA for the same unquestioning reasons. I’m not saying BW isn’t clean, but why is it not being discussed? Hi feats were unusual.
January 31st 2013 @ 1:14pm
Doug said | January 31st 2013 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
Have you any evidence that he was in anyway dirty? If not give the anonymous potshots at his reputation a rest. He was a fantastic rider with a support team of fantastic riders with fantastic team work.
February 1st 2013 @ 9:49am
Michael said | February 1st 2013 @ 9:49am | Report comment
That’s cool. I guess I agree with you and it was just an amazing year I guess. Lots of people felt same way about LA over the years.
February 3rd 2013 @ 10:24am
Doug said | February 3rd 2013 @ 10:24am | Report comment
Yes LA certainly did have a good team (of dopers). And it is possible that BW does too. But it seems unfair to have a go at the guy just because he did well without any other evidence to suggest his success isnt based on lots of hard work..
LA started out as a mid field rider, then after his cancer came back strong faster better with an improved aerobic capacity which just doesnt happen without pharmaceutical assistance. BW on the other hand was an olympic gold medal cyclist.
January 31st 2013 @ 11:25am
Bones506 said | January 31st 2013 @ 11:25am | Report comment
Agreed on Boonen. Whilst the wider world loves the TDF and Grand Tours, cycling fans adore Boonen and love the classics. -
His record is absolutely exceptional and the envy of every cyclists. He absolutely dominates the Hard man classics (his 2012 Parid Roubaix attack with 55km to go was the highlight of 2012 cycling for me) and was instrumental in Gilbert getting the 2012 World Champ jersey.
I expect him to be right there again this year.
January 31st 2013 @ 12:59pm
Lee Rodgers said | January 31st 2013 @ 12:59pm | Report comment
And he likes recreational drugs! Just joking…
Sastre definitely up there, I feel his record is often overlooked because he didn’t have the charisma of other top riders. Consider what he did and when he did it though and he goes from being a very good cyclist to an exceptional one.
As for Evans, if I ever meet him I will apologise profusely, because I always thought he was too conservative. Turns out he was probably the cleanest guy in the pack, struggling, even at the height of his powers, to keep up with juiced up muppets. His World Road Race win in 2009 was truly magnificent, the win at La Fleche Wallone in 2010 also, and that day he rode Alexandre Vinokourov into tears on the muddy roads of Stage 7 of the 2010 Giro was one of the best I have ever seen. It just seems to be the case that his once-phenomenal powers are on the wane, and that he missed out cruelly (but by the smallest margins, commendably) when he was at his best in the heavy doping years.
Hushovd of course deserves a mention I feel too, he is such a gentleman and very much respected in the pack, and when he wins, he wins big. Gilbert is mesmerising but lacks the flat power to win the truly, truly huge Classics like Roubaix, San Remo or Flanders, but still, winning in such style at the Giro di Lombardia and in the Ardennes is pretty special.
Cavendish, just the greatest sprinter ever, and possibly the smartest, they say his power numbers for the first 99% of a stage are almost non-existent, as he just spins and coasts through the pack, waiting to unleash that trademark in the last 200m. He’s a genius on the bike, but less than cordial at times off it.
Wiggins, I think we need to see more. That sounds churlish but, unfortunately for Sir Brad, those who have done what he’s done in the past were juiced. It’s a shame to have to note that but it is completely true. We need more transparency from Sky. Having said that though, I do veer towards belief. The 1% Philosophy of Brailsford has worked before.
I could go on all day… My top three though are:
1. Cadel Evans
2. Tom Boonen
3. Philippe Gilbert
January 31st 2013 @ 1:27pm
Bones506 said | January 31st 2013 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
I love the fact that Tomeke was busted for Coke and everyone was like – ‘Yeah Tomeke.’ You gotta live a little and all these guys ever do is ride bikes and train. They really don’t have amuch of a life outside of that for the better part of each year.
Agreed on Cav being the greatest sprinter. Not so much his power (which is low compared to others) but his ability to carve through the bunch and pick up the wheel he needs and sniff out the win. His explosive speed is 2nd to none.
Agree on Evan’s – he was under used by some of his previous teams which indicates to me he was clean as he was not down with their doping programs. he is a very tough competitor and when he had 3 mechanicals at the 2011 TDF I thought it was all over. he switched bikes, got back on and decended like a demon and got himself right back into contention.
Tomeke still gets my vote though. He is near faultless in the classics. And he rides A Spec!
January 31st 2013 @ 1:48pm
Lee Rodgers said | January 31st 2013 @ 1:48pm | Report comment
everyone knows it’s a Schwinn painted in the Specialized colors…
Yeah in my head I go for Evans cos of the Tour win and the ability to also win one-day races, but in my heart it’s Boonen. last year at the Tour of Qatar, when we arrived at Doha Airport, many of the teams were arriving at the same time. There we were, my little Continental team with all these World Tour guys, and then Boonen arrived, and even other World Tour guys were nudging each other and saying ‘It’s Boonen!’!
It was incredible. Just how huge he is in his native Belgium is hard to overestimate, he’s like Beckham, Warne and Kobe Bryant in one. That he went off the rails a little was forgiven immediately by just about everyone. Top, top rider and a nice guy too.
January 31st 2013 @ 1:52pm
Shaun said | January 31st 2013 @ 1:52pm | Report comment
Definitely Lance Armstrong…lets face it, 99% of the riders in his generation doped …even Contador got nabbed for doping. So many of the riders that finished behind Lance even got pinned for doping. So that being settled, Lance was the most successful/dominant rider in a ‘level’ playing field.
Just like I question Lance, I’d questing any top rider who says they didn’t dope during that era.
Even think of the successful riders since Lance…Contador, F Schleck etc…all got tainted names
February 2nd 2013 @ 3:27pm
Punter said | February 2nd 2013 @ 3:27pm | Report comment
’99% of the generation doped’ if this is true then it’s still not conclusively correct that Armstrong was the best, just means he had the best drugs, the most advanced, the most sophisticated.
This is why drugs should never be allowed, because it stops being about who is the best athlete, but who has the best drug.
January 31st 2013 @ 3:33pm
OwenJames said | January 31st 2013 @ 3:33pm | Report comment
Does it have to be a man?