George Bailey heading out of anonymity
By Luke Doherty, 4 Feb 2013 Luke Doherty is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, george bailey, ODI cricket
113 Have your say
Australia's batsman George Bailey (R) is congratulated by teammate Mitchell Johnson (L) after scoring a century during the one-day international cricket match between Australia and the West Indies at the WACA ground in Perth on February 3, 2013. AFP PHOTO/Tony ASHBY
Related coverage
George Bailey is the 30-year-old batsman who has captained Australia in two forms of cricket, yet could probably walk down a crowded street unnoticed.
His ascension to the top job seemed to happen before anyone really knew who he was but after an unbeaten 125 that helped lift Australia out of a precarious position against the West Indies yesterday, is that all about to change?
Bailey is part of a generation of state cricketers who, outside of the Big Bash League, ply their trade in front of largely empty stadiums.
Their feats go unnoticed until suddenly they’re thrown an international cap. Bailey’s rise was stranger than most.
It’s not often, well never since the start of the game, that a player would make his international debut and be named captain at the same time.
It’s almost as if Bailey has had to go to extra lengths to justify his place in the Australian side since being handed his first cap and told to go and lead the team as well.
He has been seen as the poster boy for the B-team. It was an incredibly unfair tag, but one that seemed to stick.
Acceptance could only come through actions.
Any doubters left among the masses after yesterday’s century probably won’t ever be convinced of his credentials.
In Bailey’s 20 international matches he has scored four half centuries, two scores in the 40s, one century and just three single-figure scores.
He has also recorded five and a half thousand first class runs at a tick under 40.
In Bailey’s first full season as captain of Tasmania he led them to the domestic one-day title and scored 538 runs at an average of 59.77.
In the Sheffield Shield last year he scored 697 runs at an average of 58.08.
This year his return hasn’t been as profitable.
In four Sheffield Shield matches he has scored 169 runs at an average of 28.16 while racking up 196 runs in 5 domestic one-dayers at 39.20.
It makes for a man who should be far from anonymous.
Yet Bailey didn’t make the 17-man squad to travel to India with selectors banking on Steve Smith to act as a back-up batsman.
You can’t help but feel they’ve left themselves an experienced batsman short.
The chance to be that man on the subcontinent has passed for Bailey, but the rest of the Sheffield Shield season now shapes as a chance to make a statement ahead of the Ashes.
Yesterday, he came to the crease with Australia at 2/25 and when he left the hosts had 266 runs on the board.
It was a breakthrough knock that should’ve got the selectors thinking.
Here is a man with a sound technique who has consistently scored runs at international level.
Is it time he was given the chance to swap the coloured clothes for the whites?
We could do a lot worse.
You can follow Luke Doherty on Twitter @Luke_Doherty and on Sky News Australia.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, george bailey, ODI cricket

February 4th 2013 @ 7:09am
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 7:09am | Report comment
Good article, I’d much prefer to see Bailey in a baggygreen ahead of Cowan. And certainly before Smith, Maxwell and Henriques.
February 4th 2013 @ 9:09am
josh said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:09am | Report comment
Correct. As an ex doubter, I still question is effectiveness in the T20 format, but in the one day arena he has shown this summer he has the skill and temperament to be in the Australian middle order in the longer format.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:39am
Renegade said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:39am | Report comment
Yes, good article Luke.
It’s no secret that i believe Bailey is one of our best batsmen. He has proven himself at both FC and international level.
A mainstay of the ODI side and should be the number 6 in the test team.
We desperately need another batsmen in the test squad to replace Hussey and there is no better candidate to fill that role than GB.
How’s this for a test batting line-up.
Watson
Warner
Hughes
Khawaja
Clarke
Bailey
Wade
I’m hoping this is the Ashes line up regardless of whether we have success in India or not.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:42am
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:42am | Report comment
Renegade doing a better job than Inverarity – shock horror!
Good team, I also hope we see it soon.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:31pm
Richard said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:31pm | Report comment
That would be my batting order too, Khawaja needs a good run. Doolan should be next in line with his form at the moment.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:33pm
MrKistic said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:33pm | Report comment
Wait – you’re picking 6 batsmen and a wicket keeper? That’s madness I tells ya!!
February 4th 2013 @ 3:42pm
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:42pm | Report comment
Did you see Warne’s team selections in his “manifesto” – thank god he’s nowhere close to the selection table.
February 4th 2013 @ 4:09pm
MrKistic said | February 4th 2013 @ 4:09pm | Report comment
Warnie’s clearly on crack these days, don’t worry about it.
February 4th 2013 @ 4:21pm
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 4:21pm | Report comment
I assumed the fibreglass fumes (from all the remodelling Liz has done to his face) were affecting his cognitive functions.
February 4th 2013 @ 7:56am
John 360180 said | February 4th 2013 @ 7:56am | Report comment
Enjoyed the article.
I also agree with RK above and would add Khawaja to his list who was found wanting batting and in the field again yesterday.
February 4th 2013 @ 8:16am
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 8:16am | Report comment
I disagree for many reasons, here’s a few for you:
M Clarke says he prefers to see players get out in single digits than for a score in the twenties as once you get a start you have a responsibility to go on with it, any batsman can get out at the start of their innings.
M Taylor continually harped on about the WACA being the hardest ground to bat on an “get in”.
Taylor also spoke about the contrast in Clarke’s game now to a few years ago regarding shots in the air as opposed to along the ground – it is a refinement of the game that players need to learn at international level because even state level doesn’t properly punish them for it.
I would also add that across all three formats this year Khawaja averages 40 (I include the tour games and the three ODIs) – that is decent consistency. While I like Bailey I would also point out that his form has not been as good.
I could go on, but I won’t bother, people who want to keep Khawaja out of the side will find reasons to – his selection is justified but he is not demanding a spot in the manner of Hussey when he started his international career (no-one is) so it comes down to selector’s personal bias on who gets a shot.
February 4th 2013 @ 9:15am
josh said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Bailey was the perfect example of the WACA wicket he might have ended up on 125 from 110. But throughout his innings he was 20 (36), 40 (64), 50 (70). Though this could also point to the position of the game when he was in. But on the whole scoring wasn’t as easy as he made out or when Narine slogged.
February 4th 2013 @ 9:27am
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:27am | Report comment
He also should have been out three or four times but capitalised on the lives he got.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:50pm
nmj1654 said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:50pm | Report comment
And I’m inclined to disagree with that. Khawaja’s only innings of substance at international level has been a 65 against South Africa in 2011, and that is from 14 innings.
Yes, he has the technique, his first-class record isn’t great but it’s the best we’ve got, but by no means should he be a lock at the selection table. He has showed no ability to score quick runs, to get himself out of a rut or to rotate the strike.
I honestly hope he can keep performing at FC and LA level and earn his spot, and go on with it, as he is a very aesthetically pleasing batsman and a terrific young bloke, but he hasn’t earned the right to consistently be picked.
If we are picking batsmen based on their technique, then Bobby Quiney would be up for a go based on his ‘polished’ 9 in Brisbane. It’s much like Maxwell. It’s good when it comes off but most of the time it just doesn’t.
Good luck to him, but I wouldn’t blame the selectors for picking batsmen such as Bailey instead.
February 4th 2013 @ 5:13pm
Pope Paul VII said | February 4th 2013 @ 5:13pm | Report comment
11 innings actually incl 2 not outs of 13* and 0*
His record to date is better than the following;
I Chappell
Hayden
S Waugh
Boon
Langer
Watto
Symonds
Anyway he’s no superstar but he deserves a run on the off chance he could be a more than useful test batsman.
Bailey certainly should be ahead of Smith.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:55pm
Matt h said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:55pm | Report comment
Apart from Symonds and maybe Chappell?, all of these players with inferior averages got dropped and had to fight their way back into the side
February 5th 2013 @ 12:35pm
Pope Paul VII said | February 5th 2013 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
Goodo. He’s been dropped.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:33am
Sanjay said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Khawaja played on a difficult pitch yesterday where we were 6 for 98 and was 8 not out last game, surely that’s not found wanting with the bat. If he got half the chances in the test side as Cowan has had we would have a test star but the key is to give him more then 2 games at a time which i hope he will get in Inida. And not sure if you watched him last night but he fielded well.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:44am
Ken Hambling said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:44am | Report comment
John36010 i wouldn’t be so hard on Khawaja, he got 8 not out last game in a chase of only 70 and got out to a veyr good catch today. Finch has had more games then him and you need to give a player at least 4-5 games before making judgement. Khawaja is an outstanding long form talent, but limited-overs batting – either 50 or 20 over format is not as natural to him as long form cricket but he had Ryobi runs to back him up for his selection as he was second best behind Finch this year. And righly so CA has just announced that he will leave for India with Smith, Siddle and afew other players by Wednesday to prepare for the coming tours of Indi. And Review-led days like this remind us how many games were probably won and lost (and careers made and premature ended) by poor umpiring decisions in the old days. I don’t mourn the bad decisions, but it honestly undercuts all those years of cricket-watching for me.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:03am
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:03am | Report comment
I am really suprised that Shaun Marsh wasn’t called into the ODI squad. I hope Watson finds some form too.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:38am
Pope Paul VII said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:38am | Report comment
yeah that’s a bit funny – he belted Qld all over the shop. Also he’s a slow and dodgy starter often, not unlike Georgie Boy, as he was against qld. A good lesson by both players, don’t get yourself out and the runs will come.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:57pm
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:57pm | Report comment
How do WA play so well in short forms and so poorly in long-form cricket? They just got rolled for 111 at the Gabba (unless the pitch is a shocker and I’d doing them an injustice).
February 4th 2013 @ 5:16pm
Pope Paul VII said | February 4th 2013 @ 5:16pm | Report comment
Dunno will have to read up. Hopes had to bring himself on get some wickets before they ran out!
February 4th 2013 @ 9:07pm
Varun said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:07pm | Report comment
Marsh shouldn’t be bought into the test team but he is good at the shorter formats
February 7th 2013 @ 12:48am
lou said | February 7th 2013 @ 12:48am | Report comment
They don’t usually play well in the Ryobi – they’ve been the joke of the competition for the past few years. Any time they are actually in the running, they fall apart under pressure.
February 4th 2013 @ 8:29am
jamesb said | February 4th 2013 @ 8:29am | Report comment
With Khawaja, when your in and out of the side, your not going to get consistency at all.
Meanwhile “the X-Factor”, “the big show”, “the freak show” plays in every game, and fails in every game. Although he got a 50 the other day. WOW!
As for Bailey, I think what I’ve learnt from this article is that Bailey is the sort of batsman that plays at his best when he has responsibility. Whether he is a captain, or when his sides in trouble.
Is there room for an 18th man to India?
February 4th 2013 @ 9:14am
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:14am | Report comment
There will be when Watson comes home, but by that stage it may be more beneficial to play in a Shield final (if Tasmania make it).
February 4th 2013 @ 10:33am
Sanjay said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Yes good point, agree with James
February 4th 2013 @ 9:16am
Richard said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Bailey may yet find himself on the plane to India one way or another if he produces again like that. Faulkners contribution shouldn’t be overlooked either, he played a very important role in a high pressure situation and its only his second game.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:04am
jameswm said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:04am | Report comment
He’s a good player and a consistent performer. He gets the job done, learns and adapts. If the Aussies want a left-arm bowling all rounder type, would you prefer Johnson or Faulkner?
February 4th 2013 @ 11:09am
Disco said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Faulkner.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:15am
formeropenside said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:15am | Report comment
Johnson. Its not even close.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:20pm
jameswm said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:20pm | Report comment
So what wins it for Johnson fos…his batting or bowling? His run rate? His wicket taking ability? His hitting ability? His consistency with the bat?
February 4th 2013 @ 3:26pm
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
His bowling. Neither is an allrounder. Both are bowlers who bat a bit. In limited overs form I’d say Faulkner looks a better player but he is untested so far at international level, in tests he would never get chosen ahead of Johnson.
February 4th 2013 @ 7:32pm
Disco said | February 4th 2013 @ 7:32pm | Report comment
I just think Johnson is a liability with the ball and his batting is a myth.
Not that I’d have Faulkner in the Test side either.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:56pm
Matt h said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:56pm | Report comment
How is his batting a myth. He has a test century and 90
February 4th 2013 @ 11:26am
Renegade said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:26am | Report comment
Johnson.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:47am
matt h said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:47am | Report comment
Johnson
February 4th 2013 @ 3:35pm
MrKistic said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:35pm | Report comment
Starc.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:18pm
JamieJ said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:18pm | Report comment
Johnson. They can both be inconsistent with the ball and have off days when the ball doesn’t swing, but Johnson is quicker and more threatening on those days. Also, Faulkner’s batting’s never quite delivered.
But, give Faulkner a few years to tighten up the line and he’ll be a gun.
February 4th 2013 @ 9:21am
MadMonk said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Maybe occassionally the selectors know what they are doing?
February 4th 2013 @ 10:58pm
Matt h said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:58pm | Report comment
I thought that sort of comment would get you banned from the Roar
February 4th 2013 @ 9:22am
Kris Swales said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:22am | Report comment
Couldn’t be happier for the guy – has been easily our best bat since the test matches finished, and I daresay he would’ve been pretty pleased with himself for sticking it up his detractors yesterday. Would have him in the test squad for India ahead of some of the alleged all-rounders in a heartbeat.
February 4th 2013 @ 9:34am
JGK said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Weren’t similar things being said about Peter Forrest this time last year? Forrest got picked for the Windies tour as well and his career has been in free fall since.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:02am
James said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:02am | Report comment
After 10 matches – Forrest averaged 30 with a strike rate of 67, after 15 matches 26.28 at a strike rate of 65.59
After 10 matches – Bailey averaged 38 with a strike rate of 80.18, after 15 matches 42.76 at a strike rate of 80.11. After 20 matches 45 at a strike rate of 81.17
Forrest also averages only 26.34 at a strike rate of 63.35 in List A matches. Compared to Bailey 35.55 at a strike rate of 83.54. If you really want to be mean – would anyone pick Ed Cowan for a 1 day international – well Cowan scores quicker (Ed Cowan average of 37.14 at a strike rate of 69.78. Even first class – Cowan strike rate of 46.84, Forrest strike rate of 45.63)
Similar things may have been being said about Forrest but they were clearly not based on any factual information. To be honest, I have absolutely no idea why he was selected in the first place.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:29am
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:29am | Report comment
Forrest was selected on half a season of good form – it’s how this NSP operate
February 4th 2013 @ 11:10am
Disco said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:10am | Report comment
And his subsequent Shield season has been horrific.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:32am
Renegade said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:32am | Report comment
Bailey and Forrest are both Australians…..that’s where the comparison stops.
February 4th 2013 @ 9:48am
Johnno said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:48am | Report comment
George Bailey is one of the players that gives Iver’s the Shivers. Same as Ed Cowan, and Maxwell, and Matt Wade.
James Hopes, Brad Hodge, Tim Paine, Chris Hartley, David Hussey, do not.
February 4th 2013 @ 9:48am
Christo the Daddyo said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:48am | Report comment
The most impressive thing about Bailey yesterday was the thoughtful and restrained manner in which he built his innings. Unlike, say, Maxwell, who seems to only have the ability to slog mindlessly, Bailey really crafted his innings.
And I’ve said for days that the announced touring party is unbalanced. Despite how they are officially divided up, Watson and Smith are all-rounders. Surely it would be better to select the best six (or seven?) batsmen, the best six (or seven) bowlers and a wicket-keeper?
February 4th 2013 @ 10:03am
jameswm said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:03am | Report comment
Bailey was pretty awful till he got to 30 or 40, and was lucky to survive. He’d face a lot of dots in a row and could have been out 3 or 4 times.
I’m in two minds about that innings. He got the luck that deserted the others, but he did capitalise on it.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:12am
Lukeling said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:12am | Report comment
I agree Bailey looked very ordinary early on but that was what I liked about the innings. He stuck in there and toughed it out. Even if he didn’t explode at the end (which was very impressive) at least he would have given us the chance to bat out the 50 overs. Too many times in the past Australia have capitulated once there has been a few wickets fall in a clump.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:37am
matt h said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Agreed