Proteas attack amongst Test cricket’s best ever
By Pete_Lock, 4 Feb 2013 Pete_Lock is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Cricket, dale steyn, Jacques Kallis, Morne Morkel, South African cricket, Test cricket, Vernon Philander
South African bowler Dale Steyn reacts after dismissing Australian opening batsman David Warner on day three of the first Test between Australia and South Africa at the Gabba. (Image: AAP/Dave Hunt)
Related coverage
Pakistan’s humiliation of being bowled out for 49 in South Africa this week is a pain that many countries around the world know all too well.
Less than 18-months ago Australia was routed in South Africa for 47, while the Proteas win in the third test in Perth this summer can be put down to their second innings bowling efforts.
Their current pace lineup of Steyn, Morkel, Philander and Kallis is surely the most feared in the world, with perhaps only England having similar talent and depth.
The most impressive aspect of South Africa’s attack is the way they bowl as a unit.
Dale Steyn is the leader: aggressive, fast and accurate and superbly complemented by the height and bounce of Morne Morkel, and the swing of Vernon Philander and Jacques Kallis.
In the first two tests this summer, Steyn seemed slightly off his game, and Morkel was able to step up.
Bowling a tight line and length, he took the reins as Graeme Smith’s go to man until Steyn found his mojo. And find it he did with a brilliant game in the third and deciding test.
Michael Clarke in the form of his life could do nothing as Steyn was unplayable, proving why he is the worlds greatest quick.
Pakistan have been embarrassed by South Africa’s pace quartet, an attack that has been described by Allan Donald, perhaps the greatest paceman the Proteas have produced, as the best their country has seen.
The West Indies attack of Holding, Marshall, Croft, Garner, Walsh, Ambrose and co. of the 1980s – early 90s is incomparable.
But South Africa’s current line-up is up there with other modern day great partnerships – McGrath, Gillespie, Lee; Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis; Allan Donald and Shaun Pollock.
South Africa as a team are superb to watch. Smith is an astute and ultra-competitive leader, Hasham Amla’s has a near flawless batting technique, their middle order of De Villiers, du Plessis and Duminy is quality in all forms of the game.
The Proteas pace bowling unit ensures they are never out of a contest. The only part of the line-up yet to be fully established is that of a world-class spinner, with Imran Tahir completely dominated in Australia.
The fact the Proteas could not be swayed to play in Australian crickets showpiece event the Boxing Day Test is a great shame, while a one-day and T20 series between the two nations surely to have received bigger crowds than the Sri Lankan and West Indians encounters have delivered.
South Africa have their own summer of cricket to grow, so their reasons for wishing to play a home series against New Zealand is understandable.
The three Test matches played here however left the Australian cricket public wanting more, and the rest of the summer has not really lived up to the same standards.
The next time the two countries meet could be the June Champions Trophy, however the next red ball cricket will most likely be an Australian tour to the Republic.
Hopefully Australia’s side is more settled by then, and we are talking about Cummins, Pattinson, Siddle and Starc in the same vein as Steyn, Morkel, Philander and Kallis.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- Usman Khawaja’s case for selection (78)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (68)
- Who will Sam Robson represent: Australia or England? (47)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (45)
- Have we been too harsh on Warner? (38)
- IPL has skeletons, whatever Warner tweets
- David Warner and Australian cricket’s ‘Siege Mentality’ (21)
- Could Bird be the difference in the Ashes? (21)
- Warner targets media in Twitter rant (7)
- Strauss wants Pietersen fit for Ashes
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (46)
- HENRY: Oh no, cricket is in a spot of bother, again… (8)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Cricket, dale steyn, Jacques Kallis, Morne Morkel, South African cricket, Test cricket, Vernon Philander

February 4th 2013 @ 9:21am
Johnno said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Now Now settle down.
-They have had success against an average Aussy team, and Pakistan just returning to test cricket.
-Dale Steyn is world class and would make any team in any era of test cricket,. Morne Morkel would not have played much test cricket in the 70′s 80′ and mid 90′s west indies teams, same with Phillander. Good bowlers, as was Ninti , but they are not Holding or Marshall class, only Dale Steyn would be.
Kallis is no strike bowler, and the west indies or aussy attack’s would not need him. Noether would the England 2005 ASHES team.
And no spinner either.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:29am
matt h said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:29am | Report comment
Johnno, don’t forget they also completely owned the then number 1 team, England in England last year.
Steyn is an all time great.
Philander’s figures don’ lie, he is just not as intimidating as Steyn – more a McGrath “make a mistke and I’ll have you” kind of bowler.
Morkel would be a great third seamer for any team in the world.
And Kallis is Kallis
February 4th 2013 @ 12:39pm
Shaun said | February 4th 2013 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
Anybody I mean anybody who picks up almost 300 test wickets is a quality bowler… that’s not even taking into account the pressure and responsibility Kallis has had to absorb as THE senior and #1 batsman in the team.
February 4th 2013 @ 2:02pm
clipper said | February 4th 2013 @ 2:02pm | Report comment
It was a big loss to SA when he couldn’t continue bowling in the second test as he was on a roll and although not a strike bowler, he’s very handy, but obviously with the attack they have at the moment, isn’t needed as much.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:15pm
Jimmy said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:15pm | Report comment
Kallis is no strike bowler? He strikes often enough and especially when it counts – to break partnerships. Soon he will have 300 wickets at a strike rate 50% better than Sobers ever achieved. And don’t bring up Sobers was a spinner as well – his spin bowling was even more unproductive than his military medium pace. He was a very average test bowler.
I do agree though on your point that SA lacks a spinner. Great pace attack but cannot be called one of the all time great bowlng attacks without a quality spinner
February 5th 2013 @ 12:13am
Ben said | February 5th 2013 @ 12:13am | Report comment
I personally don’t think this South African Side is up where the Windies where in the 80”s early Ninties and the Australian Team from early to Mid Nighties to 2005/6. South Africa has a very good bowling squad, best in the world at the moment and thats about it. World Cricket is weak at the Moment, and the Current Aussie side is ranked 2nd/3rd and the South Africans couldn’t put them away.
Australia’s biggest enemy are the Selectors. Once we get the Selectors soughted out. You might be regretting in fact, a little embarressed writing this article.
February 5th 2013 @ 6:20pm
Dadiggle said | February 5th 2013 @ 6:20pm | Report comment
Give credit where credit is due Johnno
South Africa have now dismissed their opponents without even allowing them the token applause for reaching 50 on three occasions in their past 17 Tests and 32 innings.
That is the same number of times as the entire planet managed to bowl out an opposition for under 49 in the 1560 Test matches played, and 5659 innings bowled,
February 5th 2013 @ 6:32pm
biltongbek said | February 5th 2013 @ 6:32pm | Report comment
didn’t know that, but it sounds rather impressive.
February 4th 2013 @ 9:27am
Jason said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:27am | Report comment
How good is Michael Clarke then scoring back to back doubles against them.
February 4th 2013 @ 11:30am
matt h said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:30am | Report comment
Very very good
February 4th 2013 @ 11:40am
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 11:40am | Report comment
You have to contrast that to the bowling performance – SA lost Philander for one test, they lost Kallis’ bowling for two tests, and Steyn was sadly lacking in form until Perth – SA clearly did not play as well as they could in Australia (the mark of a great team is playing poorly and still winning). They were below par in Australia but are clearly back to their best on home soil.
As an interesting aside, Steyn’s lack of form in the first two tests was put down to not enough bowling. Many commentators on both the radio and television remarked on the fact he needed to get some overs into him to get his rhythm back. I wonder what the CA rotation muppets have to say about that.
February 4th 2013 @ 12:45pm
Shaun said | February 4th 2013 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
Clarke is damn good…no taking that away.
That being said Australian public & even media were quick to forget the that SA played the first test with 10 men & duminy being their spin option meant that they had to rely on 4 seamers which eventually tires a bowling unit out.
2nd test they played with Philander and then Kallis got injured after picking up 2 wickets and limited the bowling attack…& the Aussies took Tahir to the cleaners.
February 4th 2013 @ 12:54pm
Johnno said | February 4th 2013 @ 12:54pm | Report comment
Robin Peterson is Hardly Shane Warne, or Stuart Mcgill, or Herath from Sri Lanka
February 4th 2013 @ 3:19pm
Jimmy said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:19pm | Report comment
Agree. A less than test class bowler.
February 4th 2013 @ 2:10pm
jameswm said | February 4th 2013 @ 2:10pm | Report comment
Didn’t we play Adelaide with 10 men? That was what determined the series, 5th day innocuous bowling from Lyon and good old fashioned bloody mindedness from Faf.
February 4th 2013 @ 2:31pm
Red Kev said | February 4th 2013 @ 2:31pm | Report comment
The only reason Australia was in a position to complain about losing Hilfenhaus ‘costing’ us the match was because South Africa had already lost Kallis as a bowler.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:42pm
bilo said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:42pm | Report comment
How could Australia have possibly lost the Adelaide Test?
- Philander pulled out on the morning of the game
- Replaced by Kleinveldt who Australia hammered in Brisbane two weeks prior
- Kallis injured after two early first innings wickets (the ball to Ponting was one of the best of the summer!)
- Tahir conceded the worst bowling figures ever without taking a wicket
- Australia won the toss, batted and made 480 in a day!!!!!!
- Normally Australia NEVER loses when making 500+ in the first dig
- Australia had a first innings lead of about 160. How often have we failed to win after that sort of lead? (discounting rain interruptions of course)
The only real negative Australia had was losing Pattinson with injury.
February 4th 2013 @ 5:14pm
JGK said | February 4th 2013 @ 5:14pm | Report comment
Australia didn’t lose the Adelaide test.
February 5th 2013 @ 11:51am
bilo said | February 5th 2013 @ 11:51am | Report comment
You’re right JGK, we didn’t lose that test. I was trying to say we would normally “win” comfortably a match with those first day results.
Mark Nicholas wrote in Cricinfo after the series loss, “Australia lost the Perth Test in Adelaide”. I think that was about right. Not that I’m a fan of Mark Nicholas.
February 5th 2013 @ 12:00pm
JGK said | February 5th 2013 @ 12:00pm | Report comment
Yes they did because Pattinson breaking down meant that Siddle and Hilf were overworked in Adelaide and therefore rested for Perth.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:18pm
Jimmy said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:18pm | Report comment
Clarke was outstanding and will become an all time great. I was wrong about him but he has matured quickly and soon will be a full time adult. I rate him highly on leadership potential and he is plainly developing into a fine Captain.
February 4th 2013 @ 2:44pm
Johnno said | February 4th 2013 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
We lost James Pattison our no 1 strike bowler 4 the fourth innings in Adeliade. How i am not sure if phillander played in the 2nd test. He made a big dfiference in the 4th. But Kallis was bowling well got ponting, was a big loss when the aussies were in trouble.
I still rate James Pattison a better bowler than Morkel. and about the same as Phillander. James Pattison is a damn good bowler, as good as DIzzy Gillespie and Brett Lee at test level.
This South African i don’t rate as highly as the great west indies, or England 2005, or Australia 1995-2007.
For mine England’s 2010 attack is better too for the ASHES.
-Big 6’8 Chris Tremlett the leader of the attack
-James Anderson
-Stuart Broad
Tim Bresnan
-Gramme Swan
-Grahame Swan being the pivotal point of difference.
Grahame swan is a magnificent spin bowler, England’s best in 50 years.
Swan didn’t take many wicket’s in the 2010 ASHES series but , played a critical role. He is a magnificient defensive spinner.
Applied the pressure at one end, while others took the wickets, and Swan is a genuine wicket taker too when needed, and if the pitch is right, and Swan can bowl well in any conditions.
-paul Collingwodd and Kevin peterson bowled handy spells too.
-Dale Steyn is not needed in this attack. As you have Anderson for swing bowling , and Tremlett bowls a betetr line and length than Morkel on a more consistnet basis, and gets just as much bounce. Stuart Broad of course, and Tim brsenan is underrated.
And Grahame Onions who i rate highly was injured for the ASHES and would of been in contention for a spot.
So I rate England’s 2010 team bowling line up higher than the proteas. No spinner for the proteas.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:23pm
Jimmy said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
You do realise that Steyn as twenty 5 fors? More quickly than other fast bowler before him. Give away your bias and be thankful we have the privilege to be watching one of the all time great strike bowlers in his prime.
February 4th 2013 @ 5:37pm
Johnno said | February 4th 2013 @ 5:37pm | Report comment
Steyn is brilliant, I rate him highly one of the best ever fast bowlers in the last 40 years, but not the rest of the attack. they are good but no world’s greatest ever bowlers.
February 5th 2013 @ 6:11am
jimmy said | February 5th 2013 @ 6:11am | Report comment
Oops! Now twenty one 5 fors. And another 10 wicket match.He can bowl a bit.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:19pm
Pope Paul VII said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:19pm | Report comment
Nah they are rubbish until they bowl England out for 41 or 43 to add to their 45 (NZ) 47(Aus) 49 (Pak).
Pakistan only need another 300 as well.
I think Australia were a bit fortunate that Steyn and Philander didn’t turn up until the third test.
I reckon based on opposition quality, the best attack of modern times was England 2005 , Jones, Flintoff, Harmison, Hoggard ( and you too King of Spain Ashley Giles I suppose ) who took down the excellent Aussies.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:29pm
Johnno said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:29pm | Report comment
I rate the England 2010 attack higher for reasons given above. Anderson is better, than Flintoff,Hoggard,Harmison,as is Tremlett, and Swan is much better than Panesar or Giles. Panesar didn’t even play in 2005. Simon Jones is brilliant though.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:43pm
Johnno said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
Plus Stuart Broad is better than Hoggard and Harmison.
February 4th 2013 @ 4:13pm
Pope Paul VII said | February 4th 2013 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
Hoggy has the better average of the 3, marginally. In that series he often took the first wicket expensively while Hayden and Langer unconvincingly tried to blast their way clear. It generally opened the gates to the middle order. By the end of the series they were treating Hoggard with the respect he deserved.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:32pm
Rhys said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:32pm | Report comment
The best bowling attack of the modern era would have to be Warne, McGrath, Gillespie & Lee. The quartet occupy 4 of the top 6 all time wicket takers for Australia, with no fewer than 1840 Test wickets between them.
February 4th 2013 @ 3:38pm
Jonny Boy Jnr said | February 4th 2013 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
Give me the old:
8. Warne
9. Gillespie
10. Fleming/Lee
11. McGrath
Any day !!
Note: Dale Steyn seriously is a superstar of any era
February 4th 2013 @ 4:22pm
Pope Paul VII said | February 4th 2013 @ 4:22pm | Report comment
McGrath, Gillespie, Lee, Warne. Exceptional. What was their greatest triumph? Were they all in India when Australia won for the first time in a brazilian years?
They made nearly everyone look silly but I can’t recall the best team they bowled to?
February 4th 2013 @ 9:01pm
Roy said | February 4th 2013 @ 9:01pm | Report comment
I think you’ll find Kasper was the third quick in the series we won in India, not Brett Lee.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:45pm
pope paul v11 said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:45pm | Report comment
thanks Roy
February 4th 2013 @ 5:15pm
biltongbek said | February 4th 2013 @ 5:15pm | Report comment
Yep, our bowling attack is rather average. I just keep wondering how we took 3 teams for less than 50 in the last 18 months.
Apparently it has only happened 5 times since wickets were covered.
I suppose there is an element of luck to it.
Pretty similar to how lucky Kallis has been during his entire career opposed to Garfield Sobers who had to really toil hard for his 90 + strike rate.
February 4th 2013 @ 6:35pm
Johnno said | February 4th 2013 @ 6:35pm | Report comment
Well said Biltongbek. Garflield Sobers was overrated as a bowler that’s for sure. Kallis is the man.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:50pm
Matt h said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:50pm | Report comment
Apart from the sarcastic dig at Sobers, I agree with you. We are obviously seeing an all time great attack, just that not everyone appears to know that at the moment. SA owned England in England last year as well. Steun is seriously a legend
February 5th 2013 @ 12:24am
biltongbek said | February 5th 2013 @ 12:24am | Report comment
It is more a sarcastic dig at thise who doesn’t rate Kallis, but be it as it may, the point remains.
February 5th 2013 @ 6:15am
shakazul said | February 5th 2013 @ 6:15am | Report comment
Jimmys superb analysis of the Kallis vs Sobers debate has put the matter to rest for all time. Kallis clearly superior by some distance.
Sobers ranks as one of the all time great batsmen but a mediocre test bowler.
February 4th 2013 @ 6:14pm
Steele said | February 4th 2013 @ 6:14pm | Report comment
Wasn’t impressed with their effort in Australia, regardless of results. Aussies are in transition yet outperformed SA for a lot of the time. Steyn is an all time great, but that’s where it stops, the others are just good, that play well when conditions suit. Philander looked ordinary when the wicket didn’t offer anything. If we get Cummins, pattinson, starc all going at the same time then look out!
February 4th 2013 @ 7:01pm
biltongbek said | February 4th 2013 @ 7:01pm | Report comment
Yeah, I wasn’t impressed either.
TEST 1
SA doing well on day one, ending on 255/2, day two rain, day 3 SA finishes on 450 all out (not really Duminy injured couldn’t bat.) Then Clarke in top form makes a big score and Australia at end of day four on 487.
Now if you expect a result in a test match when it takes four days for both teams to finish their first innings, and think one team dominated the test match, then sadly you are mistaken. Australia tried to make the play on day 5 in hope of a result, it didn’t happen. So you might want to say they had the edge on day 5.
SA didn’t have Duminy in this test which meant we batted with 10 men.
TEST 2
Australia puts up a first innings of 550, once again Clarke in tremendous form hits a double ton, SA dismissed for 388 by tea n day three, by end of of day 4 SA in deep trouble and it takes Faf du Plessis to save the test. Australia dominated test 2, yet didn’t have the ability to finish SA off.
Philander injured, Kallis injured after bowling 3 overs, and Tahir got blown away.
The fact is both teams lost players and it affected the series.
However SA blew OZ away in the last test, regardless of having to make personnel changes.
February 4th 2013 @ 10:49pm
Felix said | February 4th 2013 @ 10:49pm | Report comment
Cummins has two years in the wilderness to get back any semblance of skill, he hasn’t Bowled a red ball in years. Starc is formidable at present with a white ball but is well short of anyone in the SA lineup yet. Pattinson is good when fit, but they are all light years away from consistently scaring batsmen the way SA do.
February 5th 2013 @ 10:45pm
Richard said | February 5th 2013 @ 10:45pm | Report comment
I wouldn’t have said they are light years away. Starc is developing very quickly, Pattinson is young but I think he is on the cusp of really coming good(we shall see). Forget Cummins for the time being. Bird could do anything in England and Of course Siddle is in his prime. I have a hunch they might all fire in unison come the ashes in England, should be a good show.
February 4th 2013 @ 7:04pm
mactheblack said | February 4th 2013 @ 7:04pm | Report comment
When I started reading this post: the thought immediately came to mind ..Oh no here we go again, but I was relieved to see the quote: “The West Indies attack of Holding, Marshall, Croft, Garner, Walsh, Ambrose and co. of the 1980s – early 90s is incomparable.” We really need say no more; the Proteas attack though brilliant have some way to go before they can be compared to that West Indies quartet. IN the present test set-up no doubt the best – but there are Aussies and England breathing down their necks! SA still looking for a world class spinner though? Robin Peterson seems to be hitting his stride and is now emerging as a potent weapon in their attack. He should have been the mainstay long ago, but SA cricket dithered initially, instead of nurturing his talent – and now at the age of 33 has only got about 10 tests behind him. Their bowling attack still at times struggles with the old ball, as they have not developed the art of reverse swing. A lot of reliance on Philander and Steyn. Just look at Pakistan’s second innings, with Misbah and Shafiq putting up a lot of resistance, the attack seems to be tiring. But of course with Steyn refreshed this morning and the new ball due in a few overs, don’t think Pakistan will be hanging around much longer. SA pacemen also posses a bit of a bully-boy mentality with emphasis on short-pitched bowling, when they can’t get their way. This dominance will not go on forever mind you – consistency is what is needed when you’re at the top. Let’s see if they can maintain it, before everyone starts gushing too much. Smith is a captain worth his salt … excellent batsman of course; but how good a captain? Will go down as too ultra conservative perhaps and where it sometimes seems it’s all about his achievements first .. and the team’s next. His departure to Ireland after their last World Cup exit, instead of facing the fans to explain a case in point, in it being about the man, Many questions wil be posed of his leadership style though once he bows out .. you’re only as good as the people under you .. and he has been fortunate to have good players under him and aided and abetted by a good management system. Good captain, but to me never a great captain he will be.
February 4th 2013 @ 8:31pm
IvanN said | February 4th 2013 @ 8:31pm | Report comment
what would have happened if this SA attack, could have had a Glenn McGrath in his prime to replace Morkel, and a Shane Warne in his prime to replace Pietersen….
February 4th 2013 @ 8:33pm
IvanN said | February 4th 2013 @ 8:33pm | Report comment
Steyn, McGrath, Philander, Kallis Warne…. That… would be comparable to the windies of the 80s
February 5th 2013 @ 6:18am
shakazul said | February 5th 2013 @ 6:18am | Report comment
It would be superior because of the balance and Warne.