SMITHY: The secret of Hasler’s success
Bulldogs NRL coach Des Hasler. AAP Image/Dean Lewins
Related coverage
I don’t subscribe to that tired old line that there is only one successful coach in every footy season. It’s bleeding obvious that there is definitely one VERY successful head coach and crew on grand final day.
And don’t they deserve it.
It’s a very long road to get there in any season and even tougher to ensure you are the best team on that day – don’t tell me about it!
But so too should many other coaches feel successful in every season. Many do great things without achieving the one “success” that everyone wants.
For me, the most obvious in season 2012 was the success generated by Des Hasler and his crew in their first year in charge at the Bulldogs.
Even with some player acquisitions, both pre and mid-season, there were many questions being asked in previews of that season about the playing roster after such a miserable 2011 – most emphatically about the halves.
But first, as the old coaching adage says, “you will only find success comes before work in the dictionary”. Like all successful teams, the Dogs started with work.
Now, Des is well known for his no stone unturned approach to the preparation of his players and staff.
It might be hard to find a greater believer in detail and discipline in achieving 100% of capabilities. Des worked the group very hard in the pre-season, and as we all saw, his players responded in fantastic manner.
This meticulous and demanding regime-like approach sometimes leads to accusations of “control freak” in leaner times or times of great politics (in footy clubs? Never!)
But there were no lean times or politics in a Doggies club committed to their new coaching crew. And the head coach responded to that with what I honestly feel was one of the great coaching performances I have witnessed.
Why?
I read lots of books and articles about other sports and how their greatest coaches are successful.
Much of that info reveals coaches who have a strong personal philosophy on how to get the best out of people and the preferred style he would like his team to play.
Sounds good?
Well, yeah, if you are fortunate enough to be coach at Real Madrid or Manchester City or Manly or the Broncos or Wigan in previous decades. Or perhaps get yourself a five or ten year deal, like one of those legendary college coaches in the States.
No salary cap issues, just blue sky.
Wow. Get back in the real world where some real coaching is required. Time and money to be able to purchase or create a team in your style is a luxury not too many NRL coaches get.
“Winning with what you got” is much more common and definitely what Hasler and others would have found on day one pre-season.
Never mind your own preferred style, this job requires a confident and resourceful leader to make something successful out of what is right there in front of you. Most of it inherited.
The Bulldogs 2012 coaches, players and staff developed a unique attacking style of possession play. Have we seen it before?
Well, kinda, but not with such repetitiveness or as the basis for almost all their possessions. And certainly not from your own side of half way.
The Dogs got MAXIMUM value out of their skilful forwards, mainly front rowers as first receivers to CREATE and threaten in equal measure.
This not only utilised Graham and Kasiano and co. in the skills and method they are best at, it asked questions of other teams that no other team did: questions that involved decision-making in defence in both quality and quantity.
That means the Bulldogs opponent’s defence was being asked bigger questions more often than on any other occasion in the season. And when they got the ball back, most of them were on the back foot with less energy and subsequently lacked quality.
The Doggies became more confident and more in control.
This concept of introducing something ‘new’ to your team is one I will be following up constantly this season.
I loved watching that stuff all year at the Dogs and I hate the negative style our game suffers from with cliche ridden, tired attitudes and behaviours and philosophies of predictable coaching.
Referring back to the questions of many fans and media in previews of the season, Hasler also removed the potential key issue of the “problem” by assessing the qualities and weaknesses of his playing roster accurately.
The halfback roles foreseen as a problem by the worry warts had been eliminated.
In this system, adapting to playing a possession style utilising the team’s strengths, he removed all concerns of the lack of skill/quality/experience/ability to steer the team around.
Brilliant analysis and plan.
It’s not always what your team or your player can add to his kit (or “skill set,” for the trendoids), it’s sometimes more important what he can take out to make him feel free and then confident.
Ad then, how easy is footy.
Reynolds and Keating appeared as if they couldn’t care less about their “diminished” traditional halfback roles.
What positions were they playing, anyway? Is there a name for what they performed?
Who cares what name or number a player is wearing in modern day sport. “It’s just, let’s get the job done”. At least, it was at the Dogs.
It seemed like no-one cared who got the credit or what job it was that anyone was asked to do. With that as an attitude, is it any wonder this club lit the whole league up.
If you haven’t checked it out, look at the rest of their teams from Harold Matts to NRL. What a season, alright, even without that big NRL grand final win they all wanted.
And for me, that great success from club to individuals came down to GREAT COACHING.
The challenges for 2013 won’t be any less for Hasler and the Dogs. They will be different and in my view some of the biggest for any club.
But getting the best out of the guys you have by implementing a style that suits their combined talents is not only great success but mighty satisfying I am sure for Hasler and all his crew.
- Explore:
- Canterbury Bulldogs, Des Hasler, NRL, Rugby League

February 16th 2013 @ 6:26am
Ben said | February 16th 2013 @ 6:26am | Report comment
So much can influence the success or failure of a coach. A championship coach who wins the trophy one year and then drops to the middle of the pack…is he all a sudden a poor coach?
February 16th 2013 @ 7:03am
Robert said | February 16th 2013 @ 7:03am | Report comment
We’ll see how good Hasler is in the coming months when the ACC may finally reveal something.All the signs are pointing at something fishy at Manly during his tenure
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
February 16th 2013 @ 11:45am
Gerry@YourLawnAndGarden said | February 16th 2013 @ 11:45am | Report comment
Loose lips sink ships, it’s all talk brother!
February 16th 2013 @ 7:18am
Andy said | February 16th 2013 @ 7:18am | Report comment
The Dank.
February 16th 2013 @ 10:08am
Mals said | February 16th 2013 @ 10:08am | Report comment
Robert – what evidence have they actually uncovered?? They have already indicated it will be testimony based, whistle blower stuff.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
February 16th 2013 @ 10:50am
Lou said | February 16th 2013 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Interesting ,, he brought Manly back from the brink and no one noticed!!! Goes to the dogs and all of a sudden !! But he deserves it ,, as for dank , just like the press conference 2 weeks ago and just like the Labour Party , A SHAME , A DISGRACE ,,, BY AMATURES !!!
February 16th 2013 @ 12:07pm
Old Hand said | February 16th 2013 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
It would be ironic if Manly had a few “premierships” taken from them. They were the biggest moaners and “CHEAT” callers when Storm were dobbed in (not found out by the the Rorters audit man – he couldn’t track an elephant with bleeding piles through a snowfield). Anyone with one top lip would know many Club’s have been and are abusing the salary cap. They say “we are just under our cap”, when, lo and behold, along comes someone and “we’ll squeeze him in”! Amazing, simple mathematics would show that the last 4 or 5 in some Club’s 25 man squad must be PAYING TO PLAY!!
February 16th 2013 @ 12:35pm
Damn Straight said | February 16th 2013 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
Maybe you could ask Des to mentor you Schmitty…he knows how to win titles.
February 16th 2013 @ 12:49pm
Old Hand said | February 16th 2013 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
LOL – Damn Straight
February 16th 2013 @ 12:50pm
eagleJack said | February 16th 2013 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
It will be interesting to see how Des copes in his 2nd year at the Dogs.
The “surprise” factor of playing your props as ball players is gone and he is still left with below average halves. Lose Ben Barba and he loses around 7 or 8 games last year and misses the finals. He would be the first to admit that.
There are now high expectations on the Dogs to back up from last year and go further. I personally think Des can do it but it will be a lot tougher in 2013.
February 16th 2013 @ 3:48pm
Arthur fonzarelli. said | February 16th 2013 @ 3:48pm | Report comment
I have had this discussion over a beer with hundred different people a hundred times so will indulge myself here .
In my opinion the author of this article is if not the best , then in the top 3 coaches of the past 30 years .
Every team – st george , parra , Newcastle & the roosters , was taken through a rebuilding period to an era of success very rapidly , and the style of football played was very attractive, and generally without the best rosters in the comp .
The fact that no premiership was won is irrelevant . Michael hagan won a premiership – is he a better coach than Brian smith ? Most rational observers would say no .
As a dragons fan I have great memories of the early 90′s under smith where losing GFs to the Queensland origin side was a great achievement .
February 16th 2013 @ 6:29pm
Damn Straight said | February 16th 2013 @ 6:29pm | Report comment
He’s also really good at eventually alienating the players, the fans and club boardrooms. I think his footballing brain is there, but his people skills leave a lot to be desired. Great coaches, such as Jack Gibson, Wayne Bennett and Craig Bellamy not only have sound tactics and good systems and structures implemented, they know how to earn the respect of the players and micro manage people.
February 16th 2013 @ 8:51pm
Arthur fonzarelli. said | February 16th 2013 @ 8:51pm | Report comment
I would suggest much of what the general public thinks about smith is gleaned from what they read in the tabloid trash , where certain journos have a major anti – smith agenda . This was also true in Newcastle . So maybe Media management was not his forte .
February 16th 2013 @ 9:35pm
Damn Straight said | February 16th 2013 @ 9:35pm | Report comment
Not much much into tabloid trash fonz(a little hurt that you would think of me so lowly…)

It’s just basic logic, evidence and rational thinking that lead to my conclusions on Mr Smith. The evidence is there, if you dig a little. The clubs who have employed him as a coach have eventually had problems with player/coach relations and coach/boardroom issues. Which can/did/has lead to player exodus and disastrous results on the ladder.
If I was some quack psychiatrist, I would say he had a borderline personality disorder…he loses the dressing room. It happens at every club he goes to, on a long enough time line. Don’t you see that pattern emerging here Fonz?:)
Smith has shown us the map to Bridesmaidville.
Who knows, maybe they can medicate him and perform psychosurgery to “correct” his penchant for getting a case of the difficults. You know that dark cloud that seems to follow him everywhere…like some insidious intestinal worm? Haha, ok throw me a life jacket, I’m definitely going overboard. Must be the 2nd glass of red kicking in.
Look, if you could have one word that sums up the coaching career of Brian Smith it would be: almost.
But in saying all this Fonz, I am sure Brian Smith has many admirable human qualities. We are all human after all. I know I certainly have those “personality disorder” days from time to time.
February 18th 2013 @ 1:53pm
Monners said | February 18th 2013 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
I agree with you Damn Straight and I think the evidence is clear to back you up.
Hasler, Bennett and Bellamy all have players who have included clauses in their contracts allowing them to follow these coaches if they were to move. Many have acted upon these clauses and would require them in new contracts. These players are not underachievers looking for a free ride either, they are champion players who feel indebted to these coaches for extracting their potential from them.
Smithy though….. Left Parramatta in disgrace, left Newcastle in disgrace, left Roosters in disgrace.
I will never forgive him though for what he did to Adam Woolnough. Refused to play him with six games left in the season one game shy of his automatic contract extension. Terrible position to put the poor guy in. How about we ask Clint Newton what he thinks of Smithy?
February 18th 2013 @ 2:39pm
Damn Straight said | February 18th 2013 @ 2:39pm | Report comment
He’s also the reason why Jamie Lyon left Parramatta too Monners. And look at how he is playing these days…we could sure use some of that at the eels right now. So could NSW…are you listening Jamie?
February 16th 2013 @ 3:50pm
Old Hand said | February 16th 2013 @ 3:50pm | Report comment
We used to call them “Quinella” coaches.