The Roar
The Roar

American Football
Advertisement

How I changed my mind about the Washington Redskins renaming
Justin Twell
Roar Guru
13th July, 2014
6
Join the conversation
Advertisement
Write for The Roar

Anyone can contribute to The Roar and have their work featured alongside some of Australia’s most prominent sports journalists.

Justin Twell
Roar Guru
13th July, 2014
6

If there is one topic in the NFL in recent years that has divided opinion among fans, it is the possible renaming of the Washington Redskins NFL franchise and the reasons behind why it may just have to happen.

The word ‘Redskins’ is a derogatory word used to describe Native American Indians, although I have seen this being debated by many.

So you may now be wondering why the team were named ‘Redskins’ in the first place? Well it dates back to 1933 when co-owner at the time George Preston Marshall changed the name from the Braves to the Redskins, apparently to avoid confusion with the Atlanta Braves Baseball team.

Marshall was against African-Americans playing for his team and was therefore identified as the leading racist in the NFL for over 20 years. Fast forward to now and the NFL and the Redskins themselves are under pressure to change the name altogether. Sounds easy, right?

First of all the NFL itself are actually in support of Washington keeping the Redskins name, which makes life that little bit easier for current Redskins owner Daniel Snyder. Then of course money comes into play here, as the Redskins brand is the third most valuable in the NFL.

The franchise is worth a whopping $1.56 billion dollars as of January 2014 according to Forbes. Imagine how much the Redskins would lose if they are forced to change their name?

However last month the US patent and Trademark Office decided to cancel the team’s trademark registration, which is a huge blow to Snyder in his fight to keep the Redskins name, and could ultimately force Snyder’s hand.

Growing up following the NFL I had personally never heard of the Redskins term in a derogatory way, so when I first heard of this whole saga, my initial thoughts were that I sided with the NFL and the Redskins. I couldn’t understand why the name was even an issue. Admittedly I found myself being quite ignorant.

Advertisement

However after some research and discussions with people in the know, my opinion has changed and I feel now that the name should be changed – mostly due to the wider meaning of the word Redskins, but also because I am a father of two young children and I would not want them growing up in a world where racial and derogatory terms are acceptable in any part of the sporting world.

There was a commercial run by a Native American Indian group during the recent NBA finals calling for the name to be changed. Whether this will lead to its desired effect remains to be seen. Ironically there are some Native American Indians who support the Redskins name, or simply don’t care what happens. So not only is opinion divided among NFL fans, but among those who the name Redskins directly affects.

Then of course there is the question of what name should the team be changed to should it have to be changed. Some names thrown around as possible replacements are the Warriors, Senators, Pigskins, Renegades, Redtails and possibly reverting back to the original team name when the team itself was based in Boston, the Washington Braves.

The more I think about it, the more I like the Washington Braves. Braves being a less controversial term that would still honour the Native American Indians.

I believe the name change will come eventually, it’s just a question of whether it will be sooner or later, and to what name.

6
Join the conversation

Hey, supercoach?  Choose your own ultimate NFL team and compete with other players for cash prizes in daily competitions on any match.  If you’re after the best odds on the NFL, PlayUp is your best bet.  Chances are you’re about to lose.  Set a deposit limit.

Related Posts

close