The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

DIY player ratings: Wallabies vs England third Test

Stephen Moore has been as captain, and from the team, for the Fiji Test. (AAP Image/Dan Peled)
25th June, 2016
23
1857 Reads

The third Test and the series between the Wallabies and England came to an end last night and disappointingly for Wallabies fans it was a 3-0 win to the English in the end.

The final stanza of the series was certainly thrilling as the home side and the visitors spent much of the night neck and neck, only for England to triumph 44-40 in a high-scoring affair.

More of the wash-up from Wallabies vs England
» Five talking points from the match
» England whitewashes the Wallabies
» Match report: Wallabies go down in points-fest
» Roar Forum: Wallabies to-do list for the Rugby Championship
» How hard does a Wallabies forward hit?
» Re-live the match with our live blog
» WATCH: The full match highlights

The Wallabies played some quality rugby at times throughout the series, but failing to get a win in any of the three matches, when all were at home, is something Australian fans will be mightily disappointed with.

Just how disappointed are you? Or are you a bit more optimistic? Here’s your chance to let us know in The Roar’s DIY Player Ratings for the third Test.

If you’ve not done our DIY player ratings before, it’s quite an easy process. Hit up the form below and give us your rating for each player from 1 to 10, based on their performance last night. We’ll keep track of the results and publish our findings tomorrow morning.

You’re free to rate players as you like, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, but if you’re keen for a bit more detail than that, we leave you in the capable hands of The Roar’s editor Patrick Effeney who put this guide together last year.

1. Had he not played, the team would have been better off. Negatively affected the performance of the side. May God have mercy on his soul.
2. Anonymous. Was he even there?
3. Did some things that you expect a player to be able to do, but did a whole bunch of other things that sucked.
4. Was passable in patches, but not up to standard in a squad of such depth.
5. Performed his role without anything really noticeable happening.
6. Good
7. Pretty good, actually
8. Very good
9. Excellent
10. Might as well have been John Eales

Advertisement

DIY player ratings have closed. Check back soon for the full results!

close