The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

DIY Player Ratings: Wallabies vs All Blacks Bledisloe Cup game 2

Quade Cooper needs to sort that kicking technique.(AAP Image/SNPA, Ross Setford)
27th August, 2016
38
5161 Reads

Another Test match against the All Blacks, and another Bledisloe Cup lost for the Australians, unfortunately. Last night’s 9-29 defeat in Wellington maybe wasn’t quite the debacle that some of the Wallabies’ efforts have been this year, but it didn’t give the nation a lot to smile about either.

More of the wash-up from Bledisloe 2:
» Match report
» LORD: Sack Cheika? No way
» Seven talking points
» What changes should the Wallabies make?
» WATCH: Highlights from the match

As the dust settles, it’s time to rate the players! And for that task, we are turning to you, our discerning Roarers, to give us your view.

Was Quade Cooper’s return to the side a success, a failure, or something in between? How about Bernard Foley’s performance at inside centre? And how did you see the debut off the bench of Reece Hodge? This is the place to let us know what you think.

If you’ve not done our DIY player ratings before, it’s a simple enough process. Hit up the form below and rate each player from 1 to 10 based on their performance last night. We’ll keep track of the results and publish our findings.

You’re free to rate players as you like with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, but if you’re after a bit more detail than that, we leave you in the capable hands of The Roar‘s editor Patrick Effeney who put this guide together last year.

1. Had he not played, the team would have been better off. Negatively affected the performance of the side. May God have mercy on his soul.
2. Anonymous. Was he even there?
3. Did some things that you expect a player to be able to do, but did a whole bunch of other things that sucked.
4. Was passable in patches, but not up to standard in a squad of such depth.
5. Performed his role without anything really noticeable happening.
6. Good
7. Pretty good, actually
8. Very good
9. Excellent
10. Might as well have been John Eales

Advertisement
close