The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

DIY Player Ratings: Ireland vs Wallabies Spring Tour Test

26th November, 2016
Advertisement
The Wallabies stand for the national anthem. (AAP Image/Dan Peled)
26th November, 2016
3
2057 Reads

Well, close but no cigar – the Wallabies put in a good effort (you know, aside form the first half) against Ireland this morning, but ultimately came away three points in arrears.

That means no Grand Slam this year unfortunately, but there is still one match left on the Spring Tour, against an old nemesis – Eddie Jones’ England, with whom the Wallabies have a date next week at Twickenham.

All the wash-up from Ireland vs Wallabies:
» LORD: Grand Slam gone, Mumm must follow
» Match report: Ireland victorious, 27-24
» Five talking points from the match
» What changes should Australia make for England
» Re-live the match with our live blog
» WATCH all the highlights from the match

Who were the weak links in the Wallabies loss, and which players shined despite the defeat? We want to know what you think.

And so we’re opening up our DIY Player Ratings to you, Roarers. Have a vote and let us know what you thought of each player’s performance.

If you’ve not done our DIY player ratings before, it’s a simple enough process. Hit up the form below and rate each player from 1 to 10 based on their performance. We’ll keep track of the results and publish our findings on Monday morning.

You’re free to rate players as you like with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, but if you’re look for a bit more detail than that, we leave you in the capable hands of The Roar‘s editor Patrick Effeney who put this guide together last year.

1. Had he not played, the team would have been better off. Negatively affected the performance of the side. May God have mercy on his soul.
2. Anonymous. Was he even there?
3. Did some things that you expect a player to be able to do, but did a whole bunch of other things that sucked.
4. Was passable in patches, but not up to standard in a squad of such depth.
5. Performed his role without anything really noticeable happening.
6. Good.
7. Pretty good, actually.
8. Very good.
9. Excellent.
10. Might as well have been John Eales.

Advertisement

Thanks for voting, and we’ll see you on Monday with the full results.

close