polyglot's Contributions

yes they were great in defense again. The full squad helped,but, but i wish as i was convinced as you. They had them on the ropes for ages and couldn't put them away and if not for a brave effort from an injured Morris the Chooks may have scored the final try and won. Given their dominance and opportunities the Dragons should have sealed the deal much earlier, and with a more cohesive attack would have. But the signs are there for an improved attack coming. Lets hope. I appreciate your point re defense being more important, and i agree overall, even with moderate attack but with none, no. But great game of footy, eh.

More of the same for Dragons supporters?

9 Aug 2010

Well written article, i too would like to nominate Danny Mac for the Independent Commission. The article was broad and sensible. The strength of the Broncos brand is the true yardstick of public sentiment within familiar territory, and the Broncos popularity is not an anomaly, it is reflective of a superior product and a superior spectacle. The NRL need to play off the front foot for a change, they always seem to be responding or reacting when they should be attacking the unwarranted public perception in unchartered territory. They should actively and aggressively debunk the myths and highlight the many unique requirements and qualities required to play our game and the superior spectacle it offers to supporters. The toughness of RL makes it a soft target for those prepared to covertly prey on the unjustified fears of parents and schools. The NRL need to counter perceptions before sowing seeds as a meaningless and symbolic tit for tat

If expansion is done smartly, NRL will flourish

7 Aug 2010

I love a clever headline, very good!

Wallabies add spice, but still lack flavour

7 Aug 2010