Phil Gould vs Ricky Stuart: and the winner is ...

Nice one Spiro, did you notice in Gould's " The analyst " article he referred to " The Games Best Thinker " as Mr Stuart throughout. You know things are grim between the two if first names aren't mentioned. Gould was a mentor to Stuart in his early years coaching the Roosters. In saying this I think Gus has resented Stuart since he won the 2002 Premiership and guided the to Grand Finals in 03 & 04. Gus didn't have anywhere near the success in his term as Roosters Coach. He didn't even take them to a Grand Final. I believe Gould craved more praise for turning the Club into a power but that kudos went to Nick Politis, Ricky Stuart and Brad Fittler. Gould has a massive ego and needed to vent his frustrations at someone and Stuart was number 1 on his list. Mind you I agree with Gould in that Stuart should have been punted, no question at all.

Stuart is actually my all-time favourite rugby league player and the 'vs' battles he seems to get himself into continue to amuse. Stuart vs Allan Langer for the Aussie No. 7 jersey Stuart vs Laurie Daley for the Canberra captaincy, post-Mal Meninga Stuart vs A.R.L. during the Super League War Stuart vs Kevin Neil (Raiders exec) before leaving for the Bulldogs It's Stuart vs the world. You might accuse him of not being able to reinvent himself (though, my bias remembers two Kangaroo tours in a row in 1990 and 1994 where he ousted Langer for the No.7 spot to lead Australia to series wins), but he's got no problems inventing new enemies. But for mine, the man's a conqueror, an achiever, with a passion for the game not many rival. But if he's not careful, he may one day become like Gould is today, and undermine his achievements with his mouth. Should take a leaf out of Peter Sterling book of dignity, he may well continue to prove his critics wrong.

I always had the impression that Ricky Stuart capitalised on what Phil gould and Graham Murray built at the Roosters. When he had to be creative with Fittler et al moving on he was found wanting. He's someone who seems to flog a dead horse, i.e. try harder and harder doing the same thing without really being able to reinvent himself. As for Cronulla, well if Gibson couldn't win a comp there, Ricky Stuart certainly won't. As for their columns, well Gould's columns win hands down. I learn alot from reading them. I have never learned a thing from Stuart's.

Plato, Dream on. People who still hold a News Ltd grudge are just bitter. News pretty much have want they wanted anyway. Rugby League on their pay TV channel. 100 year old clubs were kicked out long before News Ltd got involved...Newtown, Glebe??? There have been petty arguments in all sport since year dot. Stop jumping at shadows. I think it was Napolean who said "Don't look for conspriacy when the cause is likely to be incompetence" Phil Gould falls out with just about everyone he comes across.

I like Gould. His columns are excellent most of the time and I seem to learn a thing or two when I read them. Except he said Soths were home on Sunday and I thought we would lose for sure. Stuart only had success at the Roosters when the Bulldogs were kicked out and he had Fittler to hold the teams ahnd around the paddock. Bitter, me? Never...

I know this is about Gus and Ricky, but further to my earlier post - have a look at what game is on sunday on 9: Wide World of Sport presents Parramatta Eels v St George Illawarra Dragons from ANZ Stadium. Join your expert commentary team for all the action. I'm not sure if I hate news for trying to take over the game as much as I hate 9 for trying to do away with any team outside of 5 Sydney teams by simple never covering them...

The real culprit in this is News Ltd. They tried to steal the game, boot out hundred year old teams and create their own competition. People predicted back then that no matter what happened in the future, the game would always remain worse off because of 'the war'. Those predictions are right. There is so much anger and so many agendas left over from the Super League fight that it might take a lifetime for league to truly work its way back to where it was. The residue, in the meantime, is for all to see through petty arguments like that going on between Gould and Stuart. Imagine for a moment how the rugby league landscape would look if News's influence had been positive instead of trying to steal a code for their own financial and strategic benefit.

Ah..Hatchet...those pudgy fingers caressing the the microphone in an ever increasing torrent of passion..........for the greatest game in the world in the history of civilization as we know it. Does something for you doesnt it??

Sometimes on weekends when I find myself agreeing with Gould I feel dirty and have to go and wash... Actually, it's rare for me to hear him because the collective ego of the channel nine commentary team - and 'not hidden' agendas mean I haven't watched them regularly for years (that and the fact that if I watch nine I'll only ever see St George, Souths, Easts, West Tigers, Broncos and Cowboys). Interestingly I will read Gould's articles and find much more to agree with there (when I can't hear his voice, it doesn't involve a game and it's edited by professionals). He is about as close to the high level of analytical analysis our friends in the AFL take for granted league gets. Though Roy Masters is even better for analysis and story telling and Jaquilline Magnay is streets ahead in unbiased tackling of taboo topics. As for Stuart, he's not much better. He's on the way to breeding a culture of thuggery and alienation at the Sharks (perfect for the Shire some may say...). And the Kangaroos - I could coach them and they would win - plain and simple. So - Stuart v Gould - who cares... The fact that Sterlo has been overshadowed by bullies like Vautin and Gould on the 9 commentary for years when he is much better at the job is one of the great tragedies of broadcasting history (though anyone who knows anything about how TV Executives work aren't surprised the Vautins, Goulds and Sam Newmans of the world take precedence).

Phil Gould comes across a a prize bitch.

Spiro, I think the other source of aggravation between the pair was the perceived role of Gould in Ricky's sacking from the Roosters. Who wins? Who cares! It's great theatre and there is nothing like a bit of drama in the game to arouse interest.

1. Stuart's fall-out with Gould follows on from his even more bitter fall-out with Wayne Bennett. Indeed, this is probably Bennett's major motivation for taking on a coaching role with the Kiwis (and from all reports he is doing a lot of coaching of them!). There is an obvious pattern here. Bennett and Gould probably don't agree on that many things, so when they do, one should take note. So Stuart should pull his head in and stop alienating himself from the game's most senior and most respected coaches. Stuart is a very good coach, but he is not bigger than the game. He will be ultimately be the loser if he keeps going down his current path. 2. Re Stuart's ability to coach 7s, Warren Ryan constantly argued last year that the reason why Kimmorley and Dykes didn't work as a halves pairing at the Sharks is because Stuart played them in the wrong positions. Kimmorley is good at passing to ball-runners, while Dykes is better at sparking wider ball movement. This suggests playing them at 6 and 7 respectively as a combination, rather than in their traditional positions of 7 and 6 respectively. But Stuart never seemed to get Warren Ryan's point that Kimmorley (at 7) passing to Dykes (at 6) could never work, for the stated reason.

Good point about Peter Sterling Bulldog. I have always thought that he is a wonderful commentator, not too full of himself, has a wonderful knowledge of the game, gives some brilliant insights into a game or player, and is nearly always right ..... but also willing to admit when he is wrong. You also have no doubt who he supports .... the Eels .... but he does not shove it in your face or allow his support to colour his commentary. I always thought that he would be a very good coach, very smart about the game, a very good role model, someone whom I feel would be very good at getting the best out of his players ..... maybe too smart and thats why he won't coach.

I agree with Terry Kidd above that Phil Gould does come across as a bit arrogant and full of himself and of his own opinions, however I must admit that a lot of times he is right and seems extremely knowledgeable of the game and its player etc. It however does seem that sometimes he (and other ex players in the media) have too much influence on the day to day outcomes of the game, the judiciary, rep selections etc. Ricky Stuart however I have never rated as much of a coach and I think it has been more NRL politics that has lead him to be the Kangaroo coach and not neccesarily coaching skill. The impression I always had when he was "coach" of the Roosters during their sucessful years was that Phil Gould as "coaching director" at the club was really pulling the coaching strings. My take on this coaching arrangement was that it allowed Gould to continue to "coach" the Roosters whilst allowing him also to participate as a commentator which is very convenient from a number of angles. Ricky Stuart acted as team manager and got all the plaudits as the coach and based on that false impression gained the Kangaroos job (this is purely my speculation). When Gould stepped away from Roosters and Stuart had to actually "coach" the team on his own two feet. They then fell in a heap and he was subsequently sacked. His time at the Sharks to date has been solid but in no way can it be seen that he has turned the club around by the force of his coaching talent. To answer your question Spiro "who will be the winner" - my guess is that the loudest voice in the media will always win. Therefore look for Gould to score a knock out blow here. My guess is Ricky will be on shaky ground as Kangaroo coach from here on in - particularly if they get beaten by the Bennett backed Kiwi mob. Just on the point about commentators supporting teams - although I do not disagree with a commentator being passionate about a team they support, I must admit it was annoying on Sundays commentary of the Souths vs Cowboys game when Phil Gould said on air midway during the game that he thought that the Rabbits deserved to win and that everyone else thought the same. From there he went on to be fairly one eyed about the performance and some of the 50/50 calls that appeared to go against the Cowboys during the game. Peter Sterling (who seems much more balanced in commentary) went on to distance himself from Gould by saying that he actually hoped the best team deserved win. (PS - I am a Cowboys supporter).

G'day Steve, maybe you don't have to like Phil Gould to sometimes agree with him. I have never met Phil Gould in person and can only comment from what I see on tv and on what I read. He does not come across as a likeable person but I do recognize that he is passionate about the game, is very knowledgeable about the game and does seem to be able to recognize young talent. Most Qlders seem to hate him, mainly because he is so passionate about NSW, or because he sometimes lets his allegiances show when he is commentating, but I don't hold that against him .... I actually think that there should be no golden rule about commentators supporting any team .... anyone remember Rex Mossop and his love for all things Manly? Or Frank Hyde and North Sydney? Or Ferris Ashton and Eastern Suburbs? My main beef with Phil Gould is that sometimes he is over opinionated and allows his opinions to colour his commentary. For instance last Saturday night he criticised the referee for penalizing a player for stripping the ball in a tackle, a first tackler had fallen off and a second tacklerthen came in and stripped the ball. Gould called this a stupid rule, which I agree with, but then berated the referee for applying the rule. Gould's actions then were beyond the pale, he takes unfair aim at a referee for applying the rules, making the referee look incompetent on national tv, yet the ref cannot fight back. Not a good look from Mr Gould.

Spiro, I read that article and thought the same thing....the gloves are off. It will be interesting where it leads. Gould in an interesting character in that I don't know a single rugby league supporter that likes him, yet there are clearly plenty who do out there. I probably need to get out more.