No more jerseys for dunces

By Inky / Roar Rookie

It’s impossible to know whether Richie McCaw would have made a difference to the awful result on Saturday night. Daniel Braid’s suitability as McCaw’s understudy aside, it’s not like Braid had actually been understudying him. He was brought in late and made to sweat on selection for a week.

What was more significant concerning McCaw’s absence was the make-up of the loose forward mix. The chosen four were one recently-elevated openside specialist playing with three number eights, and when specialist Braid was subbed off early in the second half (when the All Blacks were leading) we then had three number eights on the park.

Sione Lauaki’s introduction at number eight and the reshuffle of the other two loosies triggered a disastrous sequence. The All Blacks had already struggled at the breakdown, where the three Wallaby specialists were relishing the battle against a New Zealand side much reduced in experience and skill for once. When Lauaki trundled clumsily into the midst of proceedings, the All Blacks’ game, based around forwards and backs linking, completely fell apart.

Every time Lauaki touched the ball… and usually in such situations when I say “every time” I’m exaggerating, but this time I mean EVERY TIME HE TOUCHED THE BALL… the Wallabies were gifted possession via poor ball security. The more he tried to get involved, the more possession he squandered. It was truly horrible to watch, and the walls of the War Room were spattered with foam from my frequent cursing.

I never agreed with the selectors’ original faith in this guy (not to mention their continuing faith in him, when the Kelston BHS old boy has officially coughed up well more than half the possession he’s been given in his sixteen tests)… and when he scratched his nuts for the cameras outside that French hotel last year I actually turned away from the image in shame… now, after his latest total and utter failure on the field, I’m beginning a campaign to stop him ever sullying a black jersey again.

Lauaki wasn’t the only offender, of course. Greg Somerville and Ma’a Nonu, two other hot-and-cold munters with dubious credentials, also spilled everything they were given in the first half.

Others were guilty of far less, maybe one or two each at the most, and this constant rash of missed tackles and handling mistakes may already have been enough against a highly motivated, ruthlessly focused and very thoroughly coached Australian team. Without Lauaki’s contribution, we may still have lost by one point instead of fifteen.

Robbie Deans had the Wallabies humming. The Crusaders style that had blown away the Springboks a week before had been further honed and distilled. The usual heroics from Dan Carter and Mils Muliaina were never going to be enough in the face of Wallaby numbers beating the All Blacks to the breakdown, when a green midfield combination without McCaw’s support was already struggling behind the advantage line and the tight forwards were constantly isolating themselves.

The signs weren’t good from the outset. Somehow Jay Laga’ia was chosen to sing the national anthem, and he butchered it in much the same way an American Idol contestant might chew the gums off an Ella Fitzgerald classic, with unnecessarily hammy trills tacked onto what used to be quite an austere melody. Some Sydney bros homesick for Maorioke loved it, but I could see the All Blacks’ teeth grinding as they were once again forced on camera into straight-facing another extended ending to the anthem… this one the worst they’d heard for a while, when they’d really like to finish simply each time with a backslap.

Whether God is defending it or damning it, it’s Zea-ea-land, not Zea, ee-ee-ee, ee-laaaaaaaand.

Sigh.

Australia, let’s face it, looked about eight IQ points higher. Athletic ability is one thing, and an area where New Zealand stocks are high, but smarts on a rugby field are far more valuable if the more athletic team are making basic errors. With wolfish grins the Wallabies swallowed every pill coughed up by the visitors.

That they were confident enough in such a high pressure situation, to calmly kick it back to the All Blacks via the left-footed Matt Giteau or right-footed Berrick Barnes and then feed off the errors, was testimony to Deans. The Wallabies have blown a lot of leads over the All Blacks in recent years with dummies coaching. This was classic Deans, a la the Antarctic Bledisloe test at Christchurch in 2002 and countless Crusader dismantlings of oppositions over the years… punish errors instantly… put it behind them, come up in a line, bust the ball loose and feed off compound errors in their half.

The Wallabies were magnificent, and this was their night from the kick-off. They were pounding away early at the New Zealand tryline when Brad Thorn threw out a stiff arm worthy of Victor Matfield and got himself sin-binned, but they found their way instantly back into the New Zealand half after the penalty via Lote Tuqiri’s weaving run. The tacklers strewn in his wake were the ones missing from the defensive line ten seconds later on the blind, when ball was recycled quickly for Matt Giteau’s quick-handed transfer to Ryan Cross, who went around from the corner to under the posts.

Double digits up quickly, the Sydney crowd got involved. Who’s to say if Craig Joubert, one of the more lenient African referees, liked being cheered rather than booed when he whistled? He seemed to have his back turned to some off-the-ball play, and I could only go by television pictures with New Zealand commentators, but the overall impression I got despite the broadcast complaints was that the Wallabies were way down the filth scale from the Springboks, and that Joubert’s occasional adrenalin blindness put him less than halfway up the Wayne Barnes-o-meter.

At this stage his rulings were inconsequential. Thorn had more than earned his yellow card. The All Blacks replied to the Australian try with a beauty from Mils Muliaina, who broke clear out of his own half after a quick tap then kicked, regathered and found support, then drove for the line superbly when others looked to have almost lost control of the ball.

Simple evasion in blind side space from scrum ball saw Giteau thread clear, Cross backed up and threw wide to fullback Adam Ashley-Cooper who kicked ahead for Tuqiri then wing Peter Hynes to get toes to the ball quicker and the in-goal bounce. That twelve-point lead was good until just before half-time, when the All Blacks took a quick tap and hooker Andrew Hore first sidestepped then bulldozed his way over for a tremendously heartening score.

The All Blacks claimed a lead for the first and only time after the break when yet another quick tap by Andrew Ellis saw the halfback finish for a try after Carter had blown the Wallabies defence wide open, and found support in Nonu who for almost the first time in the match retained possession when tackled.

And this doom I was on about before? So far this all seems quite routine, Bledisloe 101, right? Hell yes… aside from Somerville and Nonu’s hooves letting them down, we had a cracking test match on our hands.

Then on came Lauaki for Braid.

Ellis was also subbed off for Jimmy Cowan, in the first of no less than three All Black halfback swapsies in the second half that the Wallabies looked justifiably angered by. The increasingly butter-fingered replacement hooker Keven Mealamu took the dependable Hore’s place, too, but the Lauaki-Braid swap was fundamental to the outcome from this point.

Inneffectual at the first breakdown, cleaned out easily by George Smith… watching idle ten feet away at the next turnover, then a missed tackle on Luke Burgess… blind when the Wallabies went open, open when they went blind… watched first Ashley-Cooper then flanker Rocky Elsom stroll past him for the go-ahead try… Lauaki’s first five minutes may as well have been spent still watching from the sideline. There were only fourteen functioning All Black neocortexes on the field.

Lauaki then immediately lost possession the first time he handled after the try. His first and only useful act since entering the fray came soon afterwards, when he won possession back with an aggressive tackle… but only after someone hospital-passed the Wallaby hooker, with Lauaki practically offside and Joubert asleep again.

This possession led to the All Blacks almost scoring through Sitiveni Sivivatu, who toed ahead and looked certain to score but for being tackled without the ball by Hynes in one of the more blatant examples of this infringement ever seen.

Referee Joubert looked totally and strangely disinterested in the details of the complicated, high-speed tryline exchange. Everyone in the stadium seemed to spot the obstruction but him.

He held a quick conference instead with the sideline officials and All Blacks manager Darren Shand, who were debating the legality of Ellis somehow having found his way back onto the pitch in Cowan’s place. Cowan returned a few minutes later, having found some blood from somewhere to satisfy the doctors that he was kosher.

The penalty try possibility was never discussed with any of the officials, and the upshot was that the lead had been surrendered by the All Blacks and not regained. While already up there at the expected Sydney Bledisloe level for sheer excitement, even now it didn’t beat some tests we’ve seen for controversy. Joubert was no worse than usual in the current environment. Paddy O’Brien probably gave him an A minus. Incompetent officials are an ongoing blight on the game and the necessary forbearance when criticising them still makes veins stand out on my forehead, but I’m getting used to it these days and there were yet plenty of ways out from under this Wallaby yoke.

Except when your designated impact player can’t make the gain line… and let alone if he can’t even hold onto the ball when stopped short of it.

Lauaki went on to hand over possession no less than six more times, in each instance holding the ball either one-handed or otherwise injudiciously at the tackle. The third of these shellings led directly to a Giteau dropped goal. Lauaki also got penalised at a breakdown and, after having turnstiled Elsom for the try that gave Australia the final lead, missed three more vital tackles, one on lock James Horwill who took advantage to score the coup de grace and post the final 34-19 humiliation on the scoreboard.

Mose Tuiali’i, Kieran Read, Liam Messam and others might still be in the picture, if the All Black selectors are prepared to admit the obvious… that changes to this squad are not just necessary but overdue. With two losses in a row for the first time since 2004, and the biggest losing margin since 1999 at the same venue, this was a loss that sent a dread chill through more than just the odd heart.

The Crowd Says:

2008-07-28T22:06:09+00:00

The Riddler

Roar Rookie


Now Peter, that;s not strictly true, we all know how fair and reasonable Kaplan has been to Aussie teams in the past ;-)

2008-07-28T10:01:48+00:00

Peter K

Guest


The refs get worse and worse. Kaplan has to be the worst ref. I would prefer NH refs to be honest.

2008-07-28T09:07:05+00:00

ohtani's jacket

Guest


Jonker is the ref for Eden Park and Kaplan will ref in Brisbane.

2008-07-28T09:00:13+00:00

The Riddler

Roar Rookie


With all the talk on the ref, who has been appointed for Auckland?

2008-07-28T03:54:11+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Joubert didn't make any mention of field position or a deliberate infringement - trying to claim it was a yellow card for a professional foul is just rationalisation in my opinion. It was a high tackle, no question, but if all tackles like that were given cards there'd have been 4 or 5 given in the Dunedin test for instance.

2008-07-28T03:21:18+00:00

Benny R

Guest


Inky - I watched the game at the stadium not on TV. I am curious to know what you are referring to in the following passage:- " He seemed to have his back turned to some off-the-ball play, and I could only go by television pictures with New Zealand commentators, but the overall impression I got despite the broadcast complaints was that the Wallabies were way down the filth scale from the Springboks, and that Joubert’s occasional adrenalin blindness put him less than halfway up the Wayne Barnes-o-meter."

2008-07-28T02:37:24+00:00

Leg Break

Guest


Thorn’s yellow was for dirty play rather than a professional foul I thought. Sivi’s foul was bad, but it often seems to be the case that if a try is still scored, refs don’t seem to mind as much. The foul on Sivi was probably not a penalty try, but it was certainly a yellow card offence.

2008-07-28T02:32:45+00:00

Scrum Importance

Guest


Clearly deserved a yellow card. If he had tried to maake a legal tackle chances are he would have missed easily and a try would have resulted. The only way to stop a try was by making a high tackle which is illegal and therfore warrants the sanction he was given. The fact he was taller has nothing to do with it. It is just as illegal as sticking the foot out to trip someone because you've been beaten. I am sure if the tackle had occured in the iddle of the field it would have been a penalty only, but in try scoring situations they are dealt with more severly - the players know it and need act aaccordingly.

2008-07-28T01:01:23+00:00

Ben C

Guest


It was a tough night at ANZ Stadium for an All Black supporter. Mind you, it was a tough night for Wallaby supporters as well but only because that stadium is a dump. The refereeing was ordinary but ordinary both ways. He didn't really favour one team or the other, he just let a lot of stuff go through fairly softly. Thorn was a professional foul but given it was 8(?) minutes into the game, I would have thought a stern warning, ie another stupid penalty in your own 22 will get a card. A penalty yes and a yellow card was theoretically available but a bit of an over-reaction. The Hynes tackle was pretty blatant. I would have more sympathy if Sivi was chasing a kick by someone other than Andy Ellis who should not have returned to the field at that time. Sivi's tackle on Tuqiri was woeful. On watching the replay at home, Sivi comes in and never once loooks at the ball. He eyes Tuqiri all the way in and took him out with a blatant cheap shot. Both sides got away with a lot at the offside line and in the breakdown, once they realised Joubert was doing little to control this area. There have been a lot of criticisms of Henry's selections. Lauaki srpings to mind, as does Kahui and Tuitavake. I would offer So'oialo. He is turning into the new George Gregan. Every ruck where he perceived some injustice, instead of doing his job, ie going to clear out and secure possession, the enduring image was him arms spread in mock distress comlaining to Joubert. Hasn't he learned after watching years of Gregan doing the same thing that referees are no longer gulled by shrieks of pain from the on-field captains?

2008-07-28T00:30:08+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Jeez - take a breath, why don't you? It was a pretty weak high tackle and at the lesser end of the spectrum as far as severity goes. Such tackles often occur when players step inside and rarely get carded . It was a split second reaction and for you to infer it was deliberate rather than reckless or careless is laughable - it's far more likely given the situation that he was trying to hit him accross the chest. You can say it deserved a yellow but I suspect you'd be in a small minority as far as that goes.

2008-07-28T00:23:44+00:00

LeftArmSpinner

Guest


gentlemen, As tough a time as the AB's have had in the past two games and the prognosis for the future, if this is a dark as reported, I believe that this might be a blessing in disguise. have a look at this post: http://www.theroar.com.au/2008/07/28/losses-may-be-blessing-in-disguise/.

2008-07-28T00:21:39+00:00

Peter K

Guest


Jerry it was an illegal tackle, it was a head high tackle as you said his elbow was around his neck, it was a coat hanger. This is foul play. In the context of the attacking situation and the pressure the AB's were under the ref IMO was correct to give that yellow card. Thorn made NO attempt to take him lower, it was deliberate so that is a professional foul. Ref doesn't have to use the words profesional fould, it is a greater charge of a deliberate dangerous tackle which is why he was sent off, not an accidental slip that went high as is being claimed.

2008-07-28T00:14:23+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Peter - the ref didn't mention anything about a 'professional foul' when issuing the yellow and why would he? Thorn was onside and had no incentive to take Giteau high as a legal tackle would be just as effective. What happened was a tall man got stepped by a shorter man and tried to reach out to collar him accross the chest. His forearm hit Giteau on the chest/ball but his elbow was around Giteau's neck. Careless at worst, certainly not worthy of a yellow. LA - a ref can issue a yellow even if a try results from playing advantage, I'm sure.

2008-07-28T00:13:08+00:00

Peter K

Guest


Sivi deserved a yellow for a deliberate professional foul in a try scoring situation. He changed direction and shoulder charged Tuqiri, a shoulder charge like that in itself could earn a yellow. It is irrelevent (or should be) that a try was scored. If a try is not scored then you look at a penaltry try AND a yellow card. Refs are far too lenient on deliberate foul play.

2008-07-28T00:04:33+00:00

LeftArmSpinner

Guest


I agree that the ref missed the Hynes tackle. I was a professional foul that should have got a yellow card, not a penalty try. The tackle on Burgess in the first few minutes after his chip through was another line ball decision, but I'm fine with them all. There is such a thing as instinctive reaction in the tackle, but not at the breakdown. there is usually more time to consider their course of action. I clearly remember several Wallabies about to hit the ruck when they hear the ref say something and they quickly pull back. I didnt notice them coming in from the side, but I'm a full back. I just liked the speed with which he issued free kicks at the breakdown for not rolling away etc. quick decisions favour the attacking team.. Conversely, the longer it goes on, the slower the ball and the less advantage for the attacking team and hence the poorer the spectacle. An interesting point is: Do you issue a yellow card even if a try has been scored? Sivi on Tuqiri?

2008-07-27T23:52:45+00:00

Mitch O

Guest


Thorns tackle was ball, chest and shoulder; take a look at the video. Not only should Siti have been awarded a penalty try but Cross should also have been sent to the bin. I don't really care about 'cheating' at the rucks as each team should give as good as it gets. But the calls (or lack of a call) above critically altered the direction and tempo of the game. Why the video ref can't be given the power to be proactive in his communication with the ref is a mystery to me. In the meantime tv viewers are left bemused and the games credibility in tatters. Credit to Aussie for their win and looking forward to a controversy free (hopefully!) contest at Eden Park.

2008-07-27T23:40:37+00:00

Peter K

Guest


The ref was poor. 2 blatant yellow cards in try scoring situations, Hynes (not Cross) on Sivi, and Sivi on Tuqiri. Not a penaltry try since Tuqiri was closer to the ball than Sivi. Joubert allowed players to come in on the side of rucks all game. The yellow on Thron was deserved considering the situation, a professional foul when the team had been under pressure, also deliberate head high, no accident. It does not have to injure or hurt the player to deserve a yellow card. His policing of the few penalty areas left were abysmal through the gate and offside.

2008-07-27T23:33:35+00:00

Jerry

Guest


LA - the ref was poor at the breakdown allowing both sides to come in from the sides. I don't know how you can say he "got it right" with the sin bin on Thorn - to me it was a huge over-reaction to a fairly harmless high tackle which gave the Wallabies a big head start. I've no idea how he missed the blatant tackle without the ball by Cross (I don't know if he would have penalised Sivivatu for his similar tackle on Tuqiri if the Wallabies hadn't scored the try but didn't see him play advantage for that either). A penalty try in that situation may or may not have affected the result - I suspect the Wallabies would have finished stronger regardless - but it would have given the AB's what could be a crucial bonus point which could be very significant in the final TN standings.

2008-07-27T23:30:53+00:00

Ando

Guest


Lefty, I agree in the thought that the ref wasn't too bad. He had a pretty solid game all around, but the negative highlight of his match was the tackle by Hynes on Sivivatu, a blatant penalty, if not a penalty try (and this coming from an Aussie). People will probably look at that error and judge his entire night from that one mistake.

2008-07-27T23:19:32+00:00

LeftArmSpinner

Guest


Inky, beautifully written article. While there are things I probably dont agree with, I really enjoyed the craftsmanship with which you communicated. I agree completely that the AB breakdown work was ineffective. I am from the coaching school that dictates that you select people in their best positions and that you stick with combinations. So why didnt AB's have another specialist 7 in the squad since the start of the international games? What had Smith done to lose his place at 13? However, despite having three 8's, they didnt play to that strength. Ah Hoy, I completely disagree about the ref. He was decisive at the breakdown. Got it right with Thorn and sent a very clear message to all players that yellows would flow. In my view, this decisiveness and early yellows should be part of the ELV's. It maximises the benefits of the new laws.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar