Will Tendulkar's record score ever be broken?

By Rick Eyre / Roar Rookie

Indian batsman Sachin Tendulkar nicks a delivery from Australian bowler Brett Lee – AAP Image/Julian Smith

Back on May 21, 1997, I was logged into that great 20th century social medium, IRC, when Saeed Anwar smashed 194 against India to break Viv Richards’ thirteen year-old record for the highest score in a One-Day International.

The big question that was being asked by the Indian fans, who made up the vast majority of IRC participants following the game that night: How soon until Sachin Tendulkar claimed the world record and became the first to break the 200 barrier?

Now we know the answer.

It took Tendulkar another twelve years and nine months to pass Anwar’s milestone and reach 200. He scored exactly 200 not out on Wednesday evening as India went on to defeat South Africa by 154 runs at Gwalior.

What is amazing is that no one, in the intervening years, beat Tendulkar to it, despite Zimbabwe’s Charles Coventry drawing level last year.

Tendulkar’s latest achievement is a delightful and, frankly, unexpected twist in the long career of one of the sport’s true geniuses. If it had been premature to do so before, I think we can now finally proclaim Sachin Tendulkar to be India’s Don Bradman.

Sachin is 37 in April, and the body is well past its peak. How much more is there for Tendulkar to achieve? For India, there is a number one Test ranking to preserve, subject to the whims of the BCCI’s erratic scheduling philosophy. More definite, however, is India’s campaign at home in the 2011 World Cup.

For himself, there are already world record run aggregates to build upon (13447 in Tests and 17598 in ODIs). Not too far into the future, there are the milestones of fifty Test centuries and fifty ODI centuries (he currently has 47 and 46 respectively), and, by extension, the attainment of 100 centuries in all full internationals combined.

There’s also the prospect of an Indian Premier League triumph for the Mumbai Indians. This seems far less important, and perhaps there’s a message in that somewhere.

How long will Tendulkar’s 200 world record last? It could be quite a while.

Take a look at the list of highest individual innings in ODIs. Only Anwar, Coventry and Tendulkar have yet surpassed Richards’ 1984 mark of 189 not out. Clearly the onset of Twenty20 hasn’t inspired its exponents onto greater heights in the slightly-longer-form game. Indeed, it may be discouraging batsmen from having the patience to bat that long.

Looking at the way the record has developed, you could mount an argument to say that we will be waiting till 2023 (if the goose that laid the golden T20 egg hasn’t been killed long before then).

But there’s another statistic from Wednesday’s Gwalior ODI that is possibly very instructive. Tendulkar’s 200 not out (achieved, incidentally, as an opening batsman) was part of an Indian fifty-over total of 401 for 3.

That’s 49.87 per cent of the team total. Compare that with Richards (189 from 272, 69.48%), Saeed Anwar (194 from 327, 59.33%) or earlier record-holder Kapil Dev (175 from 266, 65.79%). With 400-plus team totals more common these days, is an individual ODI 250 a possibility?

Despite the expansion of the ODI circuit to include the top six Associate nations since 2006, we have yet to see any massive individual scores by anyone in a “Minnow versus Minnow” ODI.

I’ll stick my neck out and predict that Tendulkar’s world record will be broken in the near future by someone from Afghanistan.

The Crowd Says:

2010-03-19T19:33:28+00:00

Jimmy

Guest


Gary Kirsten also hit the same score as Richards?

2010-02-26T02:40:08+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


well yeah sort of, but I think we might both be right, on the face of it. One thing is for sure: if Sehwag happens to better Tendulkar's mark, you could be nearly assured he wouldn't need 150 balls!! Only he could hole out in the 290s in a Test!!

2010-02-26T02:36:21+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


yeah true, the cramps were certainly taking hold by then..

2010-02-26T02:35:12+00:00

ohtani's jacket

Guest


Wait, I guess you meant he didn't need 50 overs and 150 balls. Perhaps not, Sehwag himself said he would've tried to finish it in 3 or 4 balls... But I think the chances of getting out in that situation are so huge that any batsman who blasts their way through the 190s is completely and utterly fearless.

2010-02-26T02:30:30+00:00

ohtani's jacket

Guest


Yeah, but Tendulkar was clutching his side and started to cramp up. And he was trying to reach the milestone in singles, which wouldn't have helped India's overall total if the run rate had slowed dramatically. I thought Dhoni played extremely well in that situation, though I can understand why people were sweating on Tendulkar having enough balls to face, especially when his teammate cost him a century in the last ODI series.

2010-02-26T02:25:45+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


OJ, when he went past Coventry and Saeed Anwar in the 45th over, he should've done it on his ear, but from there he only faced something like 9 of the last 30 balls (while Dhoni was teeing off himself), and of course brought up the 200 in the last over. He may well have given Belinda Clark's mark a nudge if he faced even only 10 more balls!!

2010-02-26T02:17:55+00:00

ohtani's jacket

Guest


Two hundred is a difficult score to achieve, because as Tendulkar demonstrated you need to bat for 50 overs and roughly 150 balls. I'm not sure he would've achieved it if Dhoni hadn't managed him through to the last over so beautifully. It was amusing how many people were furious at Dhoni taking the strike in the final overs when it was clearly what needed to be done to allow India to set a big total and guide Tendulkar through to his milestone. Who knows, maybe Tendulkar can do it again? After all, Lara broke the Test record twice.

2010-02-26T02:05:25+00:00

Brett McKay

Guest


Rick, if current popularity has it's way and 50 over cricket is done away with - which should never be allowed to be the case - then Tendulkar's record will stand forever. In fact, if ODIs are killed off, we may not ever see a double hundred in Test cricket again either... This is the single biggest achievement in the history of limited overs cricket, pure and simple... (Just to be pedantic though, Charles Coventry's 194no techically eclipsed Saeed Anwar's 194; so it was actually Coventry's record that Tendulkar beat. Just to be pedantic... Your points here all still stand though.)

AUTHOR

2010-02-26T01:34:13+00:00

Rick Eyre

Roar Rookie


Fair point about Belinda Clark (no "e") scoring the first ODI double hundred of either gender. One caveat to that innings, however, is that the Danish team was very weak, and their national women's cricket association disbanded a few years later through lack of registered players! However, a World Cup fixture is a World Cup fixture, and Clark was a cricketer of the highest order. No other woman has bettered 173 in an ODI against any nation.

2010-02-26T00:23:27+00:00

Tom

Guest


Sachin Tendulkar is in my mind the second best cricket player in history. I actually think the record could be broken sooner than we might think. Pitches seem to getting more and more batsman friendly and as we play more 20-20 cricket more players will come through capable of scoring 8 or 9 an over. And more of those players are being sent in to open the order. Still, its yet another huge achievement for an amazing player.

2010-02-25T22:32:00+00:00

ilikedahoodoogurusingha

Guest


Its the highest level she could play at.

2010-02-25T22:27:38+00:00

Al

Guest


C'mon, as good as her record is, it isn't cricket played at the highest level.

2010-02-25T22:25:10+00:00

ilikedahoodoogurusingha

Guest


One thing that everyone talking about Tendulkar's "record" should remember is that it is only a record for men. Belinda Clarke scored 229 for Australia against Denmark during 1997 World Cup in Mumbai.

Read more at The Roar