It's Wallabies game on against the All Blacks

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

South Africa’s Bryan Habana, right, lines up Australia’s Nathan Sharpe.

In boxing terms, the Wallabies won a clear-cut points decision against the Springboks in Brisbane on Saturday; as opposed to the knockout of the Springboks at Auckland and TKO at Wellington inflicted by the All Blacks.

Part of my confidence leading into this match was related to the Brisbane hoodoo for the Springbok, and in fact for other visiting international rugby sides. Greg Clarke, the excellent Fox rugby caller, gave a statistic that the Wallabies have now won 40 of their last 46 Tests at Brisbane. This includes eight consecutive Test wins against the Springboks.

Suncorp Stadium has the best playing surface anywhere in the world. The ground, which was built to host State of Origin matches, has a great design for watching rugby matches of both codes. The ball-in-hand game that the Wallabies (finally) adopted for the Test is perfectly suited to the venue.

So the hoodoo, the perfect surface to play running rugby, the Springboks’ brain-dead attack on the IRB referees (ensuring their vigilance for the inevitable Springboks foul play), and the fatigue factor involved with the Springboks getting smashed in the two previous weeks by the All Blacks, created the sort of perfect rugby storm that virtually ensured a Wallaby victory.

Helping this outcome was the arrogance of the Springboks in the way they scheduled travel plans which virtually ensured their tiredness was accentuated on Saturday night. It’s hard to believe but at 4 a.m. on the Sunday morning after the Wellington Test, the Springboks left for Brisbane. The lethargic way they played at Brisbane suggests that they had not recovered.

The All Blacks, incidentally, were in Melbourne on Saturday night which allowed their coaching staff to be at Suncorp to watch the enthralling Test live.

The other piece of arrogance is the refusal of the Springboks to change their game from the kicking, thugging, and then run the ball as a final resort type of game that was so successful for them last season.

As everyone in the rugby world knows, except the Springboks apparently, the tackle interpretation has changed from last year and now favours (correctly) the attacking and not the defending side.

So the first two times Ruan Pienaar got the ball at Brisbane he kicked.

Then we had Jacque Fourie commit a dangerous tackle on Richard Brown. He was correctly given a yellow card for this, and has been suspended for four matches. Fourie, like Botha and Burger (who did some un-noticed eye-scrapping in the Test), has form. He was suspended last season for a similar offence.

When I heard Phil Kearns on the Fox commentary say that ‘maybe a penalty’ should have been awarded for the dangerous tackle, I wrote down in my note book: ‘Someone should tell Kearns to shut up.’ This was commentary that was on a par with that of Peter de Villiers for its ignorance. If you make a dangerous tackle, you get sin-binned.

Last week I got plenty of bagging mainly from South African supporters for suggesting that it seems to be part of the Springboks game plan to perpetrate some form of thuggery early on in a Test to intimidate the opposition. Three acts of thuggery in the early moments of the first three Tri Nations tends to suggest a pattern.

There were a number of aspects of the Wallabies’ game that were good. For one important thing, they showed more legitimate mongrel than they have for some time.

Rocky Elsom, I thought, played his best game for the Wallabies. He made some mistakes with the finishing off of his runs. He is not a skillful player as far as passing or kicking are concerned. But his tackling was hard-shouldered and effective, and his running hit the right lines and gave the Wallabies great go-forward ball.

His match statistics were terrific: three linebreaks, 16 runs for 114m, three off-loads, seven tackle busts, four lineout wins. No wonder he looked exhausted, physically shattered in fact, when he faced the cameras after the Test.

The scrum held up, just, against what is not a particularly strong Springboks scrum. At Melbourne, the All Blacks, who do have a strong scrum, will try to do to the Wallabies at scrum time what England did to them. If they get on top at scrum time then the Wallabies could be in for a hard night.

The lineout with only one loss held up better than the All Blacks at Wellington. The forwards stopped the rolling mauls, except a crucial rumble on their try line which resulted in a Springboks try to Gurthro Steenkampf.

Quade Cooper played a perfectly under-stated game, rather like that of Daniel Carter at Wellington. There was no need for him to make sizzling breaks. He took on the line occasionally but contented himself with linking up with his backs and forwards to keep the pressure on the Springboks tacklers.

The threat of his running and the Springboks’ attempts to thwart the gaps created chances for Will Genia. Genia once again demonstrated that he is now ready to be ranked with the greatest of the modern Wallaby halfbacks, a golden line from Ken Catchpole, Des Connor, John Hipwell and Nick Farr-Jones.

With Cooper’s suspension, my guess is that Deans will play Berrick Barnes in Cooper’s place at Melbourne. He must give him the instruction to give away the stupid kicking game that Waratahs coaching staff imposed on him and the other backs this Super 14 season.

David Pocock had a blinder. He exposed the Springboks’ tactical stupidity of not playing a ‘fetcher’. Pocock made a crucial tackle on the Wallabies try line and then forced a penalty by driving through the ensuing ruck. He got turnovers, in the McCaw manner. And by just being there he forced the Springboks forwards to get to many rucks and mauls they were trying to avoid to conserve their flagging energy.

So the Wallabies go to Melbourne with spirits uplifted from their great victory.

They have won in Melbourne against the All Blacks, a victory which resulted in them clawing back an All Black lead at half-time. But that All Blacks side, in 2007, had just made the tough trip back from South Africa a few days earlier.

Unlike the Springboks, a side on the slide, the All Blacks are a side on the up. And so, of course, are the Wallabies. So it’s game on in Melbourne!

The Crowd Says:

2010-07-29T20:34:39+00:00

jus de couchon

Guest


Gitteau like Carter is massively overated. Get in their faces early and they both look ordinary.

2010-07-27T11:10:11+00:00

Willem

Guest


The Aussies will come last this Tri-Nations. The Boks will bounce back but the first two losses against the Blacks will be too much. The Aus won't win a single game against the Blacks. I have put money on it.

2010-07-27T10:30:42+00:00

Eagle

Guest


Reading the comments here some of you must be Spiro's children. Keep watching Cooper, he'll make you proud yet.

2010-07-27T00:21:23+00:00

cinematic

Guest


Quade is already suspended and you'd have to rate the appeals chance of succeeding as damn near zero. They may have a reasonable shot at getting the ban reduced to one game.

2010-07-26T23:56:10+00:00

MarkR

Guest


Jerry - some of the reasons the Boks dominated were; - NZs fear of the rolling maul - Failure to compete on opposition throw (caused by fear of the rolling maul) Now they seem to be willing to attack opposition lineouts (even on their own line) & are defending the rolling maul aggressively the AB lineout seemes to be a good solid part of their game once again. Also I can't remember the Eales era Wallabies dominating NZ in the lineout, I thought they were all pretty erven, but that was a lot of tests ago.

2010-07-26T19:17:45+00:00

Terry Kidd

Guest


What is Brad Thorn's role in the AB line out? Do they ever throw to him? Sorry, but I always forget to look and find out for myself.

2010-07-26T12:29:20+00:00

El gamba

Guest


WCR, I think last weeks yellow card was certainly sending a message early. Jaque's yellow was probably a little closer and validated by cooper's later. Consistency is important you are dead right about reputations - and it's nigh impossible to change a perception (being someones reality!)

2010-07-26T12:28:52+00:00

mampara

Guest


Spiro...you are truly a shocker....A SHOCKER...Surely Judas must have been a South African, Bakkies will probably get the blame when you loose to the ABs on Saturday night. Listen....we were comprehensively outplayed in these 3 tests, you are having your moment in the sun having won one home game. Australia are a very good young side with many players to admire...Cooper in particular, it is very disapointing that he is not playing on Saturday, the game will be poorer for him not being there. Pocock is fast developing into a great flanker. Your open licence on the Springboks is frankly beyond belief... Spiros, surely a man with as astute a rugby brain as you, who knows his team must travel to play these devil worshipers and baby burners in the dark continent after playing NZ , with who knows what suspensions and injuries from 2 tests against NZ...you must be very confident after our recent rugby lesson in Brisbane we have been humbled to such an extent that we will bow down and prepare to recieve another on the highveld in SA. However, the game of the tri nations will be the one where after what I would suggest might be 2 tough tests in SA, OZ will fly directly to Christchurch in NZ to play the ABs the very nexty Saturday...Bakkies must have been involved with that scheduling surely. Oh Dear.

2010-07-26T11:16:55+00:00

Sylvester

Guest


Bennalong, I personally think that both tackles were dangerous, but at the lower end of the scale. However, the nature of the act itself and the potential for greater harm had to play a part in the suspension I'm sure.

2010-07-26T11:12:42+00:00

Sylvester

Guest


Lifting players has the greatest potential for serious injury, I believe, so I'm all for the judiciary trying to stamp it out. You can't blame the tackled for twisting in the tackle, it's natural reaction to the feeling you're going to hit the ground in a prone position. In both cases from Sat, the tackler made a conscious decision to put an arm between the legs and lift, which is pretty hard to achieve inadvertently. I can't see a need for it in any tackle situation.

2010-07-26T10:23:01+00:00

sheek

Guest


OJ, Pleeeeaasse..... we Aussies are as pure as driven snow.....

2010-07-26T09:56:36+00:00

mother teresa

Guest


BENNALONG, why do you think these infringements and penalties seem to happen to the same players-----patterned behavior. should it be predicted and maybe modified.who is responsible in your opinion

2010-07-26T09:47:42+00:00

Joseph

Guest


What kind of post is that MT? ole Mr Fence-sitter, Mr safe, Mr i'll cover my bases aye? On the one hand if Cooper does something extraordinarily spectacular then your in the know because in your opinion he's a "risk-taker" but in your next breath quick to demonise him if he plays the odd sub-par game! Me i'll always back the kid not afraid to express himself well aware his crashes can be just as spectacular but I guess i'm just a "glass half full" kind of guy. Hey watch you dont poke your head too high above the parapet!

2010-07-26T09:45:05+00:00

mother teresa

Guest


yes behavior has to be shaped before bad injuries occur.cooper is impulsive;worse things will happen to that boy if mgt dont mentor

2010-07-26T09:34:12+00:00

mother teresa

Guest


OJ,QUITE RIGHT MATE,you have a keen eye

2010-07-26T09:31:58+00:00

mother teresa

Guest


it would make australia the laughing stock of world rugby;but what price a win? dont think it will be keeping nz up at night

2010-07-26T09:18:35+00:00

mother teresa

Guest


maybe he does have an axe to grind but his summation is factually correct in my opinion.time will tell.

2010-07-26T08:58:46+00:00

mother teresa

Guest


expat,cooper is ill disciplined and impulsive which is a sign of immaturity which will take time to change especially cos the consequences of his behavior have gone unpunished(until now).the spasmodic upside is as a risk taker with talent he is exciting to watch but dont rely on him to make the tackle when needed just the miracle rip the ball.

2010-07-26T08:14:53+00:00

ohtani's jacket

Guest


Nah, there's a disciplinary hearing with an IRB Judicial Officer for red cards. Citing is a different matter.

2010-07-26T08:10:27+00:00

Nashi

Guest


Maybe Shepherd will get a run at 11 and cut back on the angle like Mortlock used to. If what you say is true OJ then that tactic might work against a sliding defence. But we still have to have a 5/8 who can hit the target, I have my doubts on that score. Still Horne made an impression against the Canes this year so I wouldn't dismiss him too quickly either.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar