Kennett hopes for NZ AFL team

By Roger Vaughan / Wire

Hawthorn president Jeff Kennett hopes the AFL will consider a team in New Zealand when they decide to expand again. The Hawks have been forging closer ties with AFLNZ and they have a Trent Croad scholarship scheme in the country, named after their NZ-born premiership player.

Gold Coast’s debut on Saturday night and the entry of Greater Western Sydney next year will take the league to 18 teams.

“I suspect in 20 years from now there will probably be another two (teams) and I hope the AFL is looking perhaps at including New Zealand,” Kennett said on Sunday before the game against Melbourne.

“I think rather than taking all the Commission and the gaggle of geese that follow them, all the media, overseas to South Africa and Ireland. New Zealand is our closest neighbour and there are a lot of very good sportsmen over there who can’t get to play in their top Rugby teams because they’re normally occupied by Maoris or Islanders.

“There’s a lot of young men who don’t have a football sport to excel in and I think New Zealand, with it’s population so close to Australia, would be a very good option to consider.”

With league operations manager Adrian Anderson in the audience, Kennett predictably had a dig about the controversial new substitution rule as he spoke about NZ.

“I know we won’t make decisions quickly, it’s not the way we do things in the AFL,” Kennett said sarcastically.

“Like the substitute rule or anything else, we take plenty of time to think about it and discuss it through.

“But I think long-term it’s a good idea is New Zealand is considered.”

Hawthorn have signed a five-year extension on their lucrative deal with the Tasmanian Government, where they play four premiership games per year at Launceston’s Aurora Stadium.

The Crowd Says:

2011-04-08T07:57:29+00:00

Republican

Guest


sherrin - burley - faulkner More power to you I say. It is indeed the cringe element that would compromise our code to appear more 'global'. NZ'ers are not only ignorant to our great game but generally hostile and contemptuous towards all things Australian, so why on earth should we even consider this folly If we were to expand our code off shore, which i believe would be a grave mistake, Saffa or PNG are already far better options and at least Ireland have an affinity for our game given our respective codes historical DNA's. PNG is indeed closer to our shores and already run rings around NZ in respect of their quality of grass roots and have the same population as NZ, while the tyranny of distance is a poor criteria in favour of NZ. Travel by air to the NT, FNQ or WA makes very little difference in this day and age and one only need look at News run Super Union comp to realise this. No, this is all to do with commercial advantage which GK is an expert. This really has diddly to do with potential grassroots or even a NZ market, remembering that there exists NO country on the planet that takes exception to our game being branded 'Australian' as does NZ. They would love to get an opportunity to beat us at our own no doubt and this would add to the already over exposed Trans Tasman contest that some seem to think our game requires in going head to head with the remianing codes. I say this would be a retrograde step and would only see our code compromised and appropriated in the process. Just because NZ are geographically advantaged does not mean they are somehow closer culturally, on the contrary, NZ is no more akin to Australia than Saffa, Canada the USA etc, however they are very good at assuming privilege from us when it suits their agenda. If Kiwis genuinely held some affinity for our code so be it, however this cannot be allowed to happen at the expedience of home demographics i.e. the NT, Tassie and the ACT to mention a few. What a symbolic travesty if the NZ capital, Wellington were to ever be afforded such privilege in being gifted an AFL gig, while the nations own capital was again overlooked and left to whither on the vine.

2011-04-05T04:59:17+00:00

ruckrover

Guest


I was speaking to a NZ friend a year ago in NZ who said awareness of AFL had expanded dramatically - albeit off a low base. The NZAFL website shows sold grass roots growth especially with juniors, but numbers still well below Sth Africa or PNG. So never say never but I think Kennett's 20 year vision is a decade or two too early for NZ and Tassie and Darwin (maybe with occasional game in Pt Moresby) or Perth (with a 3rd WA team playing some games in Sth Africa) are all more likely in the next 20 years.

2011-04-05T03:07:58+00:00

Bob

Guest


Eden Park is crap for cricket- its straight boundaries are tiny. Shahid Afridi cast doubt on its viability for ODI's after the game there in Feb. for that reason. you can't play cricket on a rectangular rugby field. NZ only has 3 decent cricket ovals of international standard at the moment- The Basin, Uni Oval in Dunedin and Hamilton. Considering all the money lavished on white elephant rugby stadia by the govt at present- what a sad state of affairs.

2011-04-05T03:02:09+00:00

Bob

Guest


No money in NZ, the economy is going into a tailspin. To build stadiums and get sponsorship, you need big corporate backing. Given this you'd have to think WA is a lay down misere for the next licence followed by Canberra or Tassie. Jeff's right about rugby though. anyone weighing less than 90-95kg can forget about playing at any good level and NZ has a huge pool of talented athletes who are looking for alternatives. The lack of money is the problem though- this is why the Phoenix and the Warriors will continue to struggle to compete against the richer Australians.

2011-04-04T17:17:27+00:00

amazonfan

Roar Guru


Titus- "If Australia just played Rugby and Football we would have better leagues, a more unified country and more competitive International teams." If Australia only played soccer and Rugby, we might have better leagues and more competitive international teams, but why we would we be more unified? I mean, I don't think we are un-unified anyway, but also, what would it do for those who enjoy League and Australian Football? "There is no need for two football codes and two Rugby codes in my opinion." There is no need for any sport at all. We have two football codes and two Rugby codes, not because we NEED to, but because we WANT to. Need has nothing to do with this. Plus, just because you don't think we need two football codes and two Rugby codes is, well, it's like my saying that I don't think we need an international soccer team. The answer to that, by many people, would be 'so?" "I enjoy international competition, so what?" Well, when you want to sacrifice other sports because of your desire for stronger international teams, it becomes quite problematic. Titus, let's say the Australian sporting landscape was redesigned and soccer was eliminated; I could say 'so what?' as well. "I follow football because I played it, therefore it is my culture," But it's not everyone's culture. You know, a lot of people call the AFL and Australian football supporters arrogant. Well, I will tell you what is arrogant; the idea that we don't 'need' two football codes and two football codes (when we don't 'need' any sport) and that if some of the sports were eliminated, we should keep soccer as you play it and it is your culture, and you like international sport. So who cares about what other people like? Incredibly arrogant. "and yes…..the country is divided, have you not been keeping abreast of the code wars?" Not everyone is on The Roar. In real life, people just follow whatever code/s they are interested in. I personally love the Australian sporting landscape as it offers choice. I dislike both Rugby codes, and I think that soccer is the most overrated sport in the world, but I wouldn't want any of them to be eliminated.

2011-04-04T15:22:53+00:00

sherrin-burley-faulkner

Guest


I enjoy international competition as well, but i dont want to see two great Australian domestic institutions destroyed because of it, i guess thats the difference between me and you. Very bad case of cultural cringe titus

2011-04-04T12:59:37+00:00

NF

Guest


'There is no need for two football codes and two Rugby codes in my opinion.' There always going to be 4 main codes in this country and it will stay that way sure we're not the rest of the world but we still maintain football & rugby so we're still up with the world. The more sport, the more choice I say variety is the spice of life.

2011-04-04T12:39:13+00:00

Titus

Guest


I enjoy international competition, so what? I follow football because I played it, therefore it is my culture, and yes.....the country is divided, have you not been keeping abreast of the code wars?

2011-04-04T12:22:33+00:00

sherrin-burley-faulkner

Guest


Surely joke post of the year, and it's only April, I didn't realise Australia was a country didvided ! ... like the Balkans ?. We are Very lucky in this country to have so much sporting choice, and competition for it. Quite frankly your attitude sucks. Cultural cringe .... we must have stronger international teams !.

2011-04-04T12:15:30+00:00

Titus

Guest


"Yep, thats right, lets limit our sporting choices !!." If Australia just played Rugby and Football we would have better leagues, a more unified country and more competitive International teams. There is no need for two football codes and two Rugby codes in my opinion.

2011-04-04T12:07:03+00:00

sherrin-burley-faulkner

Guest


@ Titus , To be honest I envy the NZ sporting landscape, Rugby and Football, the way the world should be. Yep, thats right, lets limit our sporting choices !!. In fact why dont we limit it some more, and only let girls play soccer and boys rugby !.

2011-04-04T12:02:42+00:00

Titus

Guest


Fair enough dj, I wouldn't claim for a second that football is going to overtake Rugby in NZ but people generally play football because they enjoy it, and this usually gives them at least a fair appreciation of the game. But I agree, it is possible to play more than one game and support more than one game. To be honest I envy the NZ sporting landscape, Rugby and Football, the way the world should be.

2011-04-04T12:00:10+00:00

sherrin-burley-faulkner

Guest


Agreed, if Hawthorn can get a couple of players/rookies and get them by avoiding the draft , by placing them on the international rookie list , that would be the extent of it, anything else is just pie in the sky. Much better options in this country for teams.

2011-04-04T11:53:18+00:00

amazonfan

Roar Guru


"honestly I don’t think the AFL has the expendable resources at its disposal to try." Nor do they want to at this stage, The AFL is focused on making sure GC and GWS work, the last thing they are thinking about is a New Zealand team.

2011-04-04T11:51:54+00:00

sherrin-burley-faulkner

Guest


Dont mean to troll back, but there are around 55k -60k of people playing the game o/s, with only a small % Australian. That is only going to get bigger, not smaller, nowhere near even RL numbers let alone RU, but it's a base. Dont forget, most of the big soccer clubs in the world were founded by expat/migrating English a hundred years ago, they did not materialise out of thin air.

2011-04-04T11:48:30+00:00

djfrobinson

Guest


Titus. Not true at all. Football has always had a very important part of New Zealand culture, and I'm not one of those who wish to see it die, but it also must understand its place in New Zealand. The phoenix have been awesome for New Zealand football, they have done what no other football team, or competition in New Zealand has managed to do which is truly grab the attention of the New Zealand public. I sat down and watched a game of football involving the phoenix with my father, and girlfriend the last time I was home. I and my father are die-hard rugby supporters who would never have dreamed of watching a game of football ever but we made the effort to watch the phoenix and support a wellington team because they are a good side. You will find a lot of the phoenix fans are also die-hard rugby supporters. And while football is currently enjoying a golden age in New Zealand, it is very much unlikely to challenge rugby union for the no.1 spot in the hearts and minds of New Zealanders, if ever at all. As for AFL Titus, it's taken football with the massive international resources at its fingertips 150 years to begin to make ground in the New Zealand sporting culture, honestly I don't think the AFL has the expendable resources at its disposal to try. Enjoy.

2011-04-04T11:39:26+00:00

amazonfan

Roar Guru


Oh please, I do have an idea about about the makeup of my own country. I just don't have much idea, or care, about Rugby/League. Why is that such a big deal?

2011-04-04T11:38:42+00:00

Fool

Guest


Funny thing is, I was in NZ and all AFL matches were on live in some pub I visited. The live coverage of matches was better than you get in Melbourne. There must be some interest or it wouldn't be on the tele. Mind you, as I mentioned earlier there is not much money or people in NZ. So what is the point. Leave it to the rugby codes.

2011-04-04T11:38:01+00:00

amazonfan

Roar Guru


He probably thinks he is. :D

2011-04-04T11:36:08+00:00

Titus

Guest


The Pheonix certainly have some passionate fans, and some good players come out of NZ, so I think soccer must certainly have a presence, I suspect djfrobinson is part of the cultural police like we have in Australia. Anyway, you guys shouldn't dismiss AFL and its money so lightly, if they want to move into NZ they just give out cheap registration, complete with boots and a ball, and before you know it AFL is the NZ national game with a 150 year history.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar