AFL's new TV deal redefines our sporting landscape

By Adrian Musolino / Expert

AFL CEO Andrew Demetriou addresses the media during an AFL Media Conference at AFL House, Melbourne. Slattery Images

The AFL’s billion-dollar television deal is the equivalent of a big bang for Australian sports – a cosmic explosion that will redefine the landscape. With the AFL’s deal with Channel Seven and Foxtel locked in for 2012 to 2016, other codes most now jockey for their own deals from what’s left.

The deal looks like this: four games on free-to-air (on Seven with the possibility they will on-sell a game or two per round to Channel Nine or 10); all nine games per weekend live on a dedicated AFL channel on Foxtel; significantly better coverage in the outsider territories of NSW, ACT and Queensland, with four live free-to-air games on Seven Mate in addition to the Foxtel AFL channel; all nine games live on Telstra mobiles; live Friday night footy via free-to-air into Victoria, NSW, Queensland and Tasmania (no luck South Australia and Western Australia).

There’s also the $1.25 billion to go into the AFL’s coffers to help clubs on the breadline, fuel Gold Coast Suns’ and Greater Western Sydney Giants’ development, and assist the grassroots game from regional clubs to the innovative Foxtel Cup.

With GWS Giants set to join the Gold Coast Suns in the AFL in 2012, the increased free-to-air presence in NSW and Queensland will be key to the continuing the growth of the game in rugby union and league’s heartlands, helped by the $253 million that remarkably topped up the predicted $1 billion deal.

Greater coverage on Seven Mate as opposed to the current deal’s extreme timeslots should help the sport develop beyond its current niche in those areas.

But the real impact of the deal goes well beyond the AFL’s boundaries and greatly impacts wider Australian sport.

For one, the deal represents, or at least confirms, the key role pay television plays in Australian sports, for Foxtel and Austar are the real winners here.

Foxtel have remarkably scored live coverage of all nine matches per round, plus finals bar the grand final. It’ll see the relaunch of a 24/7 AFL channel – wall-to-wall coverage for the code with uniform coverage on the channel across Australia.

The importance of premium sporting content for pay-TV cannot be understated. 23 of the 25 top rated programs on Foxtel last week were AFL, NRL or Super Rugby content. When OneHD – Australia’s first 24/7 free-to-air channel – was launched amidst the digital television revolution, we assumed the domination of Fox Sports and pay-TV in the sporting realm was on the decline.

But the move away from sports-only content on OneHD and its struggle for ratings, other free-to-air channels stubbornly resisting live coverage, the subsequent dip in ratings and the preference of Better Homes and Gardens over live footy, proved there is only so much demand for sport to the mainstream masses.

With a number of key powerbrokers behind Fox protecting its interests, it’s little wonder it’s held sway in the face of free-to-airs recent sporting dalliance. This deal, if anything, proves how important pay-TV is to Australian sports.

With the launch of the AFL channel hosting all its Aussie Rules content, Fox Sports will supposedly have more room across its three channels (assuming it keeps all three) for other sports, which, you’d expect, to be filled by the fringe sports that found a new home on OneHD but could be squeezed out by their shift to a wider entertainment focus.

Meanwhile, for the one-third of us with Foxtel and the its sports package, why would you bother with Channel Seven’s AFL coverage ever again when Foxtel is showing all matches live, without commercials from siren to siren and in high definition? Foxtel can offer AFL fans a footy utopia for $60-odd per month, away from the infuriating delays, Better Homes and Gardens lead-ins, standard definition and Desperate Housewives promos.

It’s a tremendous selling point for Foxtel – and they intelligently countered fans’ concerns that their AFL content would come at an additional cost, confirming the channel will be part of their current sports package.

Surely Channel Seven has overestimated television consumers’ loyalty to free-to-air. As a current Foxtel subscriber with the sports package, my days of watching AFL on Channel Seven are well and truly numbered. I’m sure I won’t be alone on that front. How greatly this impacts Channel Seven’s ratings from 2012 on remains to be seen. My bet is they’ll come to regret that part of the deal, which will only strengthen Foxtel’s outlook.

But the heavy content on Foxtel prompts the question: will AFL fans be forced to choose between memberships/attending matches or a Foxtel subscription?

The AFL is not immune to the crowd concerns that plague other codes. Clubs such as North Melbourne and Port Power struggle to attract sufficient crowds and remain on the AFL’s breadline, while Gold Coast and Greater Western Sydney have a long way to go to cement themselves in what are immensely challenging markets for the AFL. If crowds are impacted by the pay-TV deal, then a big cut of the $1.25 billion needs to go to compensating the clubs for their declining gate-takings.

Elsewhere, the AFL’s television deal sets up the NRL’s nicely; leaving two major free-to-air players, Nine and 10, free to squabble over the rights, while Channel Seven supremo David Leckie said the network’s AFL deal wouldn’t rule them out of the NRL’s.

Key to the next NRL deal is a bigger free-to-air presence, particularly in its non-heartland markets, namely Western Australia, South Australia and Victoria. As a result of this new AFL deal, there’ll be more live free-to-air AFL games in Sydney than NRL matches – a worrying development for rugby league.

But now the NRL has great bargaining power. Even if Channel Nine or 10 manage to grab an AFL game or two from Seven, they still have a void left by the AFL’s new deal. Channel Nine cannot afford to lose the NRL rights and be left with no major Australian sporting code, while Channel 10, under new management and eager to bounce back after some lean times, could do with the NRL’s huge pull in the two huge markets of NSW and Queensland.

What a contrast it would be for Channel 10 if it got its hands on NRL and State Origin when it has recently been lumped with live Saturday night AFL, which struggles so badly for ratings in NSW.

Meanwhile, OneHD, which will still be used by Channel 10 to showcase premium sporting content, could become a critical ingredient in the NRL’s growth, as the network could potentially carry live matches and other content (it already has NRL-specific programming) across the country.

The NRL’s broadcast deal ends at the end of 2012. Expect a ding-dong battle between Nine and 10 for the rights, or a possible tandem bid to squeeze out Foxtel.

Don’t think for a second the NRL is in any way a loser out of the AFL’s deal. It could actually help along its own deal and growth beyond its NSW-Queensland home. As the AFL’s deal highlights, key to the new television deals for the respective codes is gaining a stronger foothold on the opposing side of the Barassi Line.

As for the rest of the sporting landscape, the next critical development will be to see whether Seven on-sells one or two of its four AFL matches to Nine or 10.

That could have a big impact on V8 Supercars, for example, who are currently locked into a deal with Channel Seven until the end of 2012 and may be squeezed if Seven retains all four AFL matches. Look for Channel 10, the former home of V8 Supercars who still retains important motorsport content in the form of F1 and MotoGP, to go after the V8 rights, particularly if it misses out on an AFL match, as Seven will struggle to cope with V8 races across a weekend alongside its heavy AFL content.

Meanwhile, the Socceroos’ free-to-air package will soon be up for grabs (thanks to the anti-siphoning revamp), while the A-League, Super Rugby, NBL, ANZ Netball Championship and the rest will fight for a free-to-air presence – an eternal struggle – in a post-OneHD sports only landscape.

The concern for them is that the AFL and the NRL would have squeezed free-to-air networks of so much of their allocated budget and time allowance for sport, that there’ll be little if any scraps left, particularly without the OneHD sporting haven. This could have a significant impact on the fringe codes.

Now that the AFL’s big bang billion-dollar deal has been unleashed, the rest of the sporting landscape can form from its remains. And remains is all that could be left once the NRL is done…

Follow Adrian on twitter @AdrianMusolino

The Crowd Says:

2011-05-21T08:25:57+00:00

Gary

Guest


The deal really does nothing for football except load the AFL coffers, to fund new teams who only have a fan base while they are winning. I went to the Brisbane and Essendon game at the gabba the other week, there were more Bombers fans than Lions fans. And tonight, its dreamtime at the G, one of the biggest games of the year, and brisbane gets the brisbane vs Nth Melbourne on free to air. Im not a Essendon fan etiher. What I dont get, is why do 7 and 10 bother when they delay the broadcasts till 11.30 at night. I go for the bulldogs, and for over half their games this year I've had to listen to the games via the internet, as you can't even get coverage on a local radio station, much less TV. To me, The AFL should start looking at ways to cater for the fans of the game already, instead of trying to create bigger market share in places that are a cost to the game unless the team is winning. Brisbane is an example. How long will they fund The Suns GWS, giving them preferences in drafts, financing their losses and creating unfair rules to prop up temporary fan bases. The deal does nothing to support fans of the game already. Forcing tv channels to provide coverage live or at a reasonable time for already fans of the game will give the game more respect and longevity, even if its at some cost to their coverage deals. The Suns and Gws will be failures unless they constantly win. If they dont the AFL will have to keep proping them up at the cost to clubs having been playing for decades or over a century. If this deal is done to fund these new clubs, fans of the game would have preferred it spent on teams in Tasmania of the Norther Territory, where AFL is already ingrained, and the AFL obtains many of its players. More teams doesnt mean more fans, more money doesnt mean better coverage. Something the NRL should consider before another team in SEQ. How long will they continue to prop up the Titans.

2011-05-03T22:06:00+00:00

michael landy

Guest


not delayed becuase no one wants delayed afl delayed friday nights for better homes and gardens that ridiculous and now channel tens doing it to delayed by an hour delayed by 20 minutes why delayed when it could be %100 live

2011-05-03T22:03:53+00:00

michael landy

Guest


its giving fans exactly what they want which is live afl ill be watching all the games on austar signing up to the new afls footy channel next year thats for sure i doubt anyones going to be dissapointed this is going to be great

2011-05-02T10:07:31+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


A mention in the Wall Street Journal, can't argue with that.

2011-05-02T09:55:53+00:00

hutch

Roar Guru


haha if thats what you think cattery! ill have some of what youre on please!

2011-05-02T09:51:44+00:00

hutch

Roar Guru


it is one more country than afl clipper!

2011-05-02T08:02:45+00:00

Jaceman

Guest


Nine and Ten will bid jointly for the NRL rights with packer on Ten's ownership list and his mate Gyngell on Nine. I assume this why Murdoch and packer moved into Ten. The NRL wont break up the rights into SOO/Tests/ weekly games because Nine will have a conniption and strike back hard as it does... Leckie at Seven is betting that not many people sign up to Foxtel for AFL (below 30% in southern states) . In NSW/QLD with 5 out of 8 NRL games on Fox, subscription rates are only at 35% at best. This with no NRL on FTA on Saturday so you need Fox if you are an NRL supporter. On the AFL front, it appears you have to upgrade your Foxtel subscription to HD to get all 9 games so there will be a cost even for current subscribers. On the matter of $$, Demetriou offered Foxtel something new and different and may have left the cupboard bare for next time. What does the NRL have to offer the broadcasters that is new except maybe 2 new teams in Central Coast (NRL heartland) and Perth where there will be support but will be competing with Rugby and a third AFL team in 5 years.

2011-05-01T22:18:32+00:00

Parkridge Panther

Guest


Fuseball. Your article is correct. An independant report over the weekend predicted that the big losers in the AFL deal would be the shareholders of channel seven. The article also went on to point out channel seven ratings wins over the past 2 years did not come because of AFL. Its ratings wins were on the back of excellent purchaing of good quality programs. On the other hand Channel nines dominace over the past 20 years was on the back of RL formost. I note that now people seem to think the NRL and others wlil get merely the scraps left over. I think not. David Leckie channel is a direhard RL tragic and desperatley wants NRL as does channel 9 and 10. It will be intersting times, indeed,when the NRL starts its negotiations as it now has a bottom line to match. Given tha the NRL has Internationals, SOO and National comps (unbundled) is could weel outdo AFL. Again what is the most important observation, IMO, is the absolute reliance by most sports today on TV revenue to prop up a what are failed, economicially at leaST, businessES.

2011-04-30T23:14:39+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


AC if you are thinking of Victoria and Western Australia as rust bucket states, you aren't up with things. I can't speak for Sth Aust and Tassie though.

2011-04-30T23:12:48+00:00

The Cattery

Roar Guru


It underscores the fact that the AFL is now a major sporting competition in world terms.

2011-04-30T13:57:31+00:00

Titus

Guest


So it basically devalues the Fox component, which is also devalued by the Free to Air component. Someone is gonna get hurt by this deal.

2011-04-30T13:44:56+00:00

woodsman

Guest


Definately. NBN will prime the majority of the rural areas and make that money back alone even before you get to the tech-savvy cities where people feel offended paying Foxtel for channels they don't want just to be able to watch the one they do.

2011-04-30T13:13:28+00:00

Peter Wilson

Roar Guru


That's not true redb, Ten replays games on ONE and 7 replays games on 7mate. Foxtel replay AFL games any time of the day or day of the week. Yes its great if you are an AFL fan, but even AFL fans aren't going to watch 40 hours or more of AFL every weekend. What you will have is a number of AFL viewers that are spread thinner over more games and more viewing hours of AFL. Whale in a piddle :)

2011-04-30T12:05:23+00:00

Titus

Guest


Ha, I actually think it would be cool if Fussy/Fossy was there too, anyway I have reached my beer limit for tonight and the girl who stood me up just sent a message to say that she was working, so sorry if I offended anyone and enjoy your sport, especially when Aussies are involved.

2011-04-30T12:03:48+00:00

AC

Guest


Put it this way if the NRL does not stay on Foxtel or in some way foxtel dont pay up the Northern Market goes goodbye. AMy brother in law has Pay simply for the NRL first. NRL has 60 of the top 100 programs on Pay. AFL might be strong in the rust bucket states but it isnt a rater on tv in the eastern seaboard. If the NRL doesnt get a fair shake this time something is really wrong. best wishes to both codes

2011-04-30T11:58:44+00:00

banaba

Guest


no sharp implements within 200 metres (just in case fossy/fussy is in the area), I would gladly have a quiet beer or two with you (don't mind glass or plastic-would prefer glass)

2011-04-30T11:51:50+00:00

ruckrover

Guest


The AFL deal rated a mention in the Wall Street Journal - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704463804576290450804763830.html Interesting that the current exchange rate no doubt increases the impressiveness to the Americans, also the article notes the code rivalry with NRL and soccer.

2011-04-30T11:35:05+00:00

Titus

Guest


No worries banaba, just leave all sharp implements at home, and we drink from plastic cups. Yes, it was a great goal.

2011-04-30T11:31:55+00:00

banaba

Guest


Titus, I thought you lived in the Gold Coast?, but I would love to have a quiet schmiddie or two with a fellow FOOTBALL follower - ps: i saw Messi's goal and read an article about him - only 23, he might be the best ever !!

2011-04-30T11:25:11+00:00

banaba

Guest


Fuss/Fossy/Titus/King of G, stop worrying about the AFL TV figures - for the WHOLE SOCCER A-League FINAL series (over 4 weeks including the momentous final) they got a massive 501,000 people watching the WORLD GAME !!! to put it into perspective SYDNEY SWANS played Geelong - 521,000 for one night (the same weekend almost 3MILLION people watched AFL - not AFR fossy/fussy)

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar