Cricket's minnows deserve their chance

By Ben Carter / Roar Guru

Now, this is more like it! Pakistan hosting Afghanistan and England hosting Holland – arrangements that look set to bolster claims to get the “world” back into the 2015 World Cup.

Add to that, Kenya welcoming Uganda and the cricketing globe starts shrinking that little bit further again.

Where to next? And is there a clue here for Test nations to take the Associates seriously through bilateral series?

Judging by the past week, there’s hope, surely, for something greater, if a bit of thought is applied in the coming years.

According to a report on CricInfo.com, the Afghani national team will take part in three one-dayers against Pakistan’s second XI in Lahore, Faisalabad and Rawalpindi in July.

It gets better. The Afghanis have already asked if the Pakistanis would consider playing a reciprocal match at Nangarhar later in the year.

And a brand-new Afghani provincial series will be hosted in the Pakistan city of Peshawar.

Brilliantly co-operative stuff there, and perhaps something that the likes of Australia and the West Indies in particular could learn from.

How about if Cricket Australia expanded the Big Bash League Twenty20 series to encompass Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Papua New Guinea?

Or if the West Indies bothered to invite Canada over for a couple of ODIs each year?

England are already ahead of them – Holland, Ireland and Scotland all play in various guises as part of the English county tournaments and perhaps Italy or Denmark could be considered under this format, too.

England already host occasional games against Ireland, Scotland and Wales as well.

How about a four-way series each summer between England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales?

Again, it’s not going to cost anyone too much in effort terms for a big reward in international terms.

Dutch skipper Peter Borren told CricInfo this week that there was huge value in the Netherlands’ getting a hit or two in the English 40-over league.

The Dutch and Ireland are now united in pressing their World Cup case, wrote Andy McGlashan. Continued victories in the domestic sphere should go some way towards piling up handy evidence to that end.

Finally, Kenya will bring in two Ugandan teams into an expanded domestic schedule in Nairobi, wrote Martin Williamson.

Again, all it took was some fresh thinking, and yet another nation gets the chance to play more cricket at a time when the ICC seems intent on cutting teams out of the sport’s bigger picture.

I recall there was a time in the 1990s when former Windies captain Clive Lloyd even dared to suggest that the ICC should stage more regional events – and they could begin quite simply: South Africa/Zimbabwe/Kenya, he said.

It never happened, but why not? It would have been terrific.

Cricket fans should gladly embrace such moves – and dare to dream big and see them as stepping-stones to further the intergration of the game.

West Indies v Canada, Canada v United States, England v Holland, Italy v Denmark, Afghanistan v Pakistan, Sri Lanka v Oman, India v Nepal, Kenya v Uganda, Namibia v Tanzania, Fiji v Papua New Guinea, Hong Kong v Singapore.

Not as endless seven-ODI marathons, but as neatly-added sides to the main Test series events.

Maybe bilateral cricket has found a new niche place on the calendar for second-tier nations? And it could all be done right now. All it takes is a spark of imagination, people…

The Crowd Says:

2011-05-24T08:33:14+00:00

SebiEmi

Guest


@Ross, The reason why i said plummeted, the officials deny the allegations but then again you can't explain why there's no more budding talent from schools making it to the senior team, anymore. Its not a good statistic to hold. Uganda was near to third behind South Arica and Zimbabwe as you said, Kenya were no match and only sometimes we struggled to Namibia. But we lost our key players in their prime, omitted some because of political strings and well what we had could not sustain us through, so we end up in such a dire free fall.Sob sob http://www.monitor.co.ug/Sports/Cricket/-/690272/1162648/-/na16l8/-/index.html

2011-05-07T06:53:15+00:00

TeleBay

Guest


i think i agree with Russ, , CA and the ECB are only interested in making money now qand they dont care

2011-05-06T01:30:16+00:00

Russ

Guest


SebiEmi, plummeted is a bit harsh when they effective got relegated in a 1 run loss with 9 wickets down. But life is tough in the 2nd-4th divisions, every team is very even and a few bad results will get you relegated. Uganda are a good side though, still in the top-8 African/EAP nations, a match for any of the southern associates and not so far behind Zimbabwe. I'd certainly like to see them play, but given the attitude of CA to smaller nations that is probably a pipe dream.

2011-05-05T16:08:50+00:00

SebiEmi

Guest


Russ, wish i knew before, because Uganda plummeted further low to third division...so it will be a while. But i like your format, what ICC does is nasty, only the established sides are assured of continuity, and maybe another one or two who may eventually make the grade, the case of new zealand...would bear testimony. For my dear country, Uganda, that would be the day!!!

2011-05-05T08:07:29+00:00

Brian

Guest


Unfortunately remember your dealing with administrators who in 2011 can't organise a test world cup, incorporate NZ sides into the sheffield shield, pakistani players into the IPL, an IPL window. Not playing 10 Ashes tests in a row! I could go on and on....

2011-05-05T06:15:44+00:00

Russ

Guest


We all know why Ben, CA and the ECB are only interested in making money now, from series that attract a large local and global (Indian) audience - so they aim to play amongst themselves and India, to the exclusion of any sort of sensible scheduling or narrative tournament structure. Regional tournaments would solve several issues with access and qualifying for associate members. It would give them two chances to make an impression on test members, with qualifying in between times. As well as giving more opportunities for more teams, without a large expansion of the world cup. I'd like to see three eight team super-regional tournaments: North (England, WI, Ireland, Scotland, Netherlands, Canada, and probably Bermuda and Denmark); Asia (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, UAE, Hong Kong, and probably Oman or Nepal); and South (Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Namibia, PNG and Uganda). Two groups of 4, a super-4 then a final could get through 19 games in three weeks (22 with a basic plate competition). Much more interesting than a 5 (or 7) ODI series over the same timeframe.

2011-05-05T03:31:55+00:00

Fivehole

Guest


Interesting stuff Ben. Too farsighted for CA and the ICC though, and not enough $$$ for BCCI, unfortunately

Read more at The Roar