Wallabies can do it with TH Lawrence in hearts

By Argyle / Roar Guru

When I think of the name ‘Lawrence,’ my immediate thought is that of a young Peter O’Toole awkwardly placed on a camel, trotting across the Arabian desert, plotting the downfall of the Ottoman Empire.

When I think ‘Lawrence and rugby’, my thoughts go to the equally-awkward New Zealander Bryce Lawrence, who will be officiating the sudden death quarter-final between the Wallabies and Springboks in Wellington this Sunday afternoon.

Conversely, I do not think Bryce Lawrence, a former Bay of Plenty School Master, is plotting the downfall of Wallaby World Cup dreams.

However, rightfully so, Australians should anticipate a penalty-fest come Sunday.

Lawrence has form to prove it.

Lets be fair though. BJ Lawrence has been present when Australia has tasted some of its sweeter successes of recent times.

Three games immediately come to mind against opposition with renowned scrumaging skills; those being the English, French and South Africans.

Twickenham, which has been the graveyard for many Australian scrums, was the venue where Australia defeated England 18-9 in 2009, with Lawrence on the whistle.

On that day, Australia gave away 11 penalties, and only two from scrum infringements. England, conversely, were penalised six times, also committing two scrum infringements.

The record shows Australia still won because they were committed!

Arguably, Australia’s best win in Robbie Deans’ tenure was the 59-16 drubbing of the French in Paris in 2010. Again BJ Lawrence was on the whistle and again he found 12 Australian infringements, three from the scrum.

The French conceded nine with two from the men up front.

The record shows Australia still won becuase they were committed!

August 2011, Australia go to Durban, Rocky Elsom was under extreame pressure to hold his position in the team.

Australia wins 14-9. Again Australia conceeds 12 penalties, four coming from the scrum. South Africa concede six with two coming from the scrum.

The record shows Australia still won because they were committed!

Now, Australia has also had some monumental losses when BJ Lawrence was officiating.

Perth 2009, Australia lost to South Africa 32-25, however the penalty count showed Australia conceded only four penalties, one from the scrum. South Africa conceded a massive 18, with five from the scrum but still won the game.

Johannesburg 2008, Australia were thumped 53-8 and yet again Lawrence found that South Africa had infringed 10 times, two from the scrum. Australia conceded seven with 0 from the scrum but still got drilled.

Auckland 2011, Ireland down Australia 15-6, with Australia conceding 12 penalties in total, with five coming from the scrum. Ireland conceded eight with one scrum infringement.

Australia’s commitment was questioned in all these performances.

I think from these facts, two things can be interpreted.

BJ Lawrence likes to blow the whistle. Australia should expect nothing less, come Sunday.

Importantly, the times Australia has won with BJ Lawrence in charge, the Wallabies have applied themselves and taken their destiny into their own hands. The times we have lost under BJ Lawrence, our mental application has been woeful.

The moral of the Lawrence story and Australia is that if the Wallabies apply themselves to the task at hand and understand Lawrence’s style, do not whinge and fall in heap, Australia can move into a semi-final againt New Zealand if they are committed.

Australia must be willing to take on the big physical South Africans and take their destiny into their own hands.

In considering Peter O’Toole again as TH Lawrence, Australia would be well advised to take a page out of TH Lawrence’s book, when he rallied his men for the fight by decreeing ‘No prisoners. NO PRISONERS!’ and went on to massacre his enemy.

Australia must be this ruthless come Sunday and forget about the referee BJ Lawrence as history has shown Australia can win and win well with BJ Lawrence on the whistle if they are committed.

The Crowd Says:

2011-10-08T11:24:49+00:00

ScotandProud

Guest


Good piece Uncle, agree with you whole heartedly on some points but I don't appreciate other posts falling for the stereotype of NH rugby fans being nerdy and pedantic. We are not. Hope it's the Wallabies tomorrow but these Boks are looking ominous. (By the way it's T. E. Lawrence - really upsets me when people get those initials wrong. T. E. was into getting birched, D. H. was into men wrestling in the nude... Hopefully they'll be none of that tomorrow.)

2011-10-07T02:31:09+00:00

Sage

Guest


I suppose some go into the battle and some don't. Willy Wallace did but Patton didn't. He used to, but so did Deans. But true, when you're on the pitch in the heat of battle it isn't Robbie it's Kevvy and the rest of the leadership group who need to rally the troops and maintain the passion

2011-10-06T22:02:46+00:00

warrenexpatinnz

Roar Guru


Yeah JB I pondered about giving the back stabber Jones any credit in regards to the Wallabies but he gave me great pleasure in 2003 with a ageing Wallaby side that should have been beaten by a far better AB side but the the commitment and passion that every player showed for 80 minutes was amazing.

2011-10-06T15:01:24+00:00

DaniE

Guest


Nothing nerdy at all about the man who broke the bank at Monte Carlo

2011-10-06T12:15:17+00:00

NC

Guest


the nerd factor of this article is off the charts

2011-10-06T12:14:42+00:00

chloe

Roar Rookie


Good article. According to the panel on Foxsport's 'The Rugby Club' after reviewing the Ireland game he admitted that three of the penalties against the Wallabies were wrong. It makes you wonder how he still gets a gig in the quarter final?

2011-10-06T12:01:09+00:00

jeznez

Guest


I've been guilty of complaining about Lawrence and his scrum rulings - before I had a gripe about this I have never had an issue with the bloke. Completely agree that the commitment level from the Aussie is the key. I don't think Lawrence is biased against the Aussies but even if he was that would just mean we need to lift and beat 16 blokes instead of the normal 15. Wallabies, no matter what happens just get stuck in and have a crack. Fight the Bok fire with your own. Blow through the breakdowns like wind through wheat, tackle with venom, attack with purpose, kick chase with the same effort you apply with ball in hand, run your hearts out, play the full 80 as though it could be your last and walk off the field head held high.

2011-10-06T09:16:15+00:00

Uncle Argyle

Guest


True Sage but I see Horwill the leader who should be making the William Wallace, George S Patton or Harold Moore type speaches. Robbie is the Chief of Staff who ensures the boys are prepared for battle. He can't fight it for them.

2011-10-06T08:54:32+00:00

Sage

Guest


Unrelated Blinky but did you sneak into the music festival over the week end ??

2011-10-06T08:52:40+00:00

JohnB

Guest


Uncle, as others have pointed Lawrence of Arabia was TE. I suspect you or your mates are thinking of DH Lawrence, of Lady Chatterley's Lover etc fame.

2011-10-06T08:37:50+00:00

Damo

Guest


It's only for us fans to whinge about the ref. The players haven't got time to even think about his calls. They just need to play the game and ref in front of them. And the team behind them on the scoreboard.

2011-10-06T08:34:12+00:00

Damo

Guest


Yeh Uncle ... Hope everyone from 1 to 22 reads it.

2011-10-06T06:37:42+00:00

Sage

Guest


Didn't always use his mouth for "sensible" reasons though

2011-10-06T06:32:51+00:00

p.Tah

Guest


:)

2011-10-06T06:25:18+00:00

sixo_clock

Roar Guru


Top piece Uncle. Solid bit of research, cheers. Go the Wallabies, pleeeeeease!

2011-10-06T06:21:03+00:00

sixo_clock

Roar Guru


Bugger Bennett, we want Uncle in there revving them up! Let 'em know that only victory will do!

2011-10-06T06:18:54+00:00

Sage

Guest


Which is why they'll roll the Paddies

2011-10-06T06:16:16+00:00

Sage

Guest


2011-10-06T06:14:45+00:00

Sage

Guest


Good article Uncle. A breath of fresh air after Spiro's fear and loathing of The Lawrence. I do disagree somewhat with the "it's up to you" comment. Whilst it is in theory true and we would expect them to be self motivated, the same example can be given for great military campaigns. Many times it was the way the leader spoke to and impassioned his men before battle that affected the outcome and I'd think dieing was already pretty good motivation for not losing.

2011-10-06T04:10:58+00:00

granville

Guest


COMMITTMENT

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar