Time to give past failures a second chance

By Kevin Hawkins / Roar Pro

Ten years ago, the best ten Australian cricketers were arguably among the best dozen in the world. More than that, the best twenty cricketers in the country were arguably among the best forty.

Today, Australia no longer has that luxury; it lacks both class and depth in the international arena.

Shane Watson is currently the team’s only world-class performer, with apologies only reserved for the ageing Michael Hussey and the mercurial Michael Clarke.

Australian dismal score of 47 last Sunday only confirmed what we already know, that Australian test cricket has hit rock bottom.

It’s time to not only re-model the team, but the expectations that go with.

More importantly, it’s time to re-model the selection policy, which was a farcical mess underneath the previous regime.

For the last five years, Australia’s scouts have been trying to find the next Shane Warne, the next Adam Gilchrist, or the next Glenn McGrath.

The problem is, there will only ever be one Warney; he’s shiny and gold, and he’s dating a Hollywood actress.

In other words, he’s not coming back.

Instead of reflecting on the glory days, Australian selectors have to be content with what is on offer.

Sure, Australia’s developing cricketers programme might be the best in the world but you can’t manufacture talent; players don’t become superstars by simply joining the Test team.

Patrick Cummins might have it. Ditto Dave Warner and Steve Smith.

But Cummins isn’t McGrath, Warner isn’t Gilchrist, and Smith certainly isn’t Warney.

They are all still young, developing players that need to mature before being thrown into the spotlight.

Rather than constantly looking to the future, he selection panel needs to flick through the not so distant past and see where the last committee went wrong.

Over the last few years the test team has felt like an exclusive club; you’re either in it or you’re not, but you only get one chance. Look at the eight spinners to have made their debut since Shane Warne retired.

Dan Cullen and Beau Casson were touted as the next big thing but were only given solitary games to prove themselves. Neither have been considered for selection since.

The same goes for Cameron White, who should never have been picked as a bowler in the first place. After his dismissal, the blonde haired Bushranger significantly changed his batting style in order to reclaim a Test spot in a higher position. The Test selectors, however, weren’t having any of it. According to them, White had already wasted his one and only chance.

Then there was Jason Krejza, the Brad Hodge of spin bowling. His eight wicket haul on debut was a record breaking performance, yet the spinner lasted just one more game before the selectors had lost patience.

The list continues. Bryce McGain played one match; Steven Smith played five; Xavier Doherty played two; Michael Beer played one*. All had promising (Smith) to decorated (McGain) first class careers before their Test selections. None were ever recalled to the Test arenas after being shown the door.

The ironic thing is that Australia’s one day team is the best in the world.

One may be inclined to attribute this to an anomaly in the system, the fact that we have victories banked up from years gone by.
Nevertheless, a lot can be learned from the selection policy of the one-day side, which is the proud owner of the last two Champions Trophies.

When players get dropped from one-dayers they are given the chance to regain their spot, Brad Hodge the ubiquitous exception.
Brett Lee is the most vivid example of this policy, after last summer making a successful return to the green and gold.

The selectors would never have taken that risk in the five day arena.

The reinvention of “failed” players is not a revolutionary concept.

Indeed, it is the very framework that has delivered Australian cricket some of its finest competitors under Trevor Hohns and co.
Matthew Hayden, Damien Martyn and even Simon Katich are just some Aussies to have rebounded strongly after lengthy lay-offs.

Perhaps it’s unfair to conclude that Australia is a shadow of its former self.

After all, how can we judge our talent pool if we never give them a second chance?

Here’s the ‘Never Again Eleven’ (“failed” players unlikely to get another Test):

1. Simon Katich
2. Phil Jacques
3. Brad Hodge
4. Cameron White
5. Marcus North
6. Andrew McDonald
7. Nathan Hauritz
8. Clint McKay
9. Ben Hilfenhaus
10. Jason Krezja
11. Doug Bollinger

The Crowd Says:

2011-11-20T07:00:58+00:00

David Mitchison

Guest


How is Hodge, Katich, Jaques & Hauritz in a failed XI.. they did nothing to lose there spot & lesser players are getting a extended run

2011-11-18T01:33:16+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


I have to say on that list Hilfenhaus and Krejza are the only two worth looking at seriously. Inverarity's panel of Clarke, Marsh, Bichel and the still to be appointed Coach need to be looking beyond what the old Ponting-era selection panel did in my opinion. It's time for rebuilding, pick some players with 4+ years left in them and then show a little faith and understanding that rebuilding will take time (rather than using and discarding players willy-nilly after a test or two). Not many of those players have four years left in them (sure Tendulkar and Kallis play at 35+ but none of those guys are in that class). Whoever the new coach is needs to come in and put a broom through the set up (with the support of Clarke and Inverarity) getting rid of guys like Langer the "batting" (and I use the term loosely) coach. Then try to build a team. For mine Warner, Marsh, Khawaja, Watson (who needs to come down the order), Clarke and Hussey pick themselves as batsmen. No one domestically is really demanding selection the way Brad Hodge was (despite the fact he was ignored). Callum Fergusson would be my next in line as injury cover. Every other batsmen in the country should be focussing on putting together consistent, crease-occupying innings and racking up big scores. After all Mr Cricket cannot be more than two seasons away from retirement and that'll shorten if someone is demanding selection. I rate Wade as the better gloveman than Paine so I'd go with him. Krejza should be the spinner, Hauritz is certainly a possibility but I think Krejza is the better option. Lyon needs to go back to Shield Cricket for a season or two (rushing him into the test arena off so few matches was just bizarre). Harris is the only one of the Ashes crop of bowlers that should be retained, and he is too fragile to build an attack around. Copeland and Pattinson are the pace attack anchors that should be developed (I would like to see someone work with Copeland to add an extra yard of pace to his deliveries, but he is the guy I'd be building the attack around). Hilfenhaus, Butterworth, Cutting, Cummins and Starc would be the names I'd have in mind for replacing Harris and carrying the drinks.

2011-11-18T01:23:05+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


James, you're right about Marsh being similar to Watson, and I actually posted that comment before finishing that sentence - I was trying to say that Marsh might jump the lot of them once Watson's finished (which admittedly won't be for a few years yet..)

2011-11-18T01:03:18+00:00

Kris

Guest


James, I'd say that's pretty harsh on Butterworth. He ran through SA's top order the other day and looked good in getting to 43. He's averaged 23 with the ball with a great economy rate and a decent strike rate in a side that hasn't dominated.

2011-11-18T00:53:05+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Brett - Faulkner is 21 and Butterworth 28/29. Butterworth isn't doing enough, so I doubt he'll come into the reckoning because it'll be too late soon. I don't see Christian as a test player, but we'll see. I also don't think you need the "batsman who bowls almost first class level mediums" that Mitchell Marsh is, while Watson is there.

2011-11-18T00:41:35+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


and James, even then, Hauritz and Hilfenhaus would be more likely to do so. McDonald now has the likes of Faulkner & Butterworth down in Tassie, and even Christian in SA competing with him for the same spot. Mitch Marsh might even jump the Also, on Kevin's team named above, Brad Hodge retired from First Class cricket 18 months ago, so I'd throw Chris Rogers in his place..

2011-11-17T22:51:14+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Nah only MacDonald, Hauritz and Hilfy have a chance to come back. Forget the rest.

2011-11-17T22:31:09+00:00

Kris

Guest


White, North, McDonald, Hauritz, McKay, Hilfenhaus and Bollinger should certainly all get the chance to have another crack at it.

2011-11-17T21:50:10+00:00

formeropenside

Guest


I'd like to see Steve Smith as 12th man added to that list.

Read more at The Roar