Why the Black Caps could beat Australia

By Lee McDonald / Roar Guru

For 20 years, Australian cricket fans have greeted each summer with enthusiasm. This was born from the knowledge that, like Mark Cosgrove at the airport doughnut store, the national team would devour anything put in front of them.

The 2011-12 Australian international summer of cricket (as Channel 9 would put it) officially kicks off today, with the first Test between Australia and New Zealand in Brisbane.

For the first time in a generation the summer begins with no one really being sure how the Australian team will perform.

In case anyone needs reminding, last summer England visited these shores and used the Australian cricket team to wipe several unsanitary floors.

It was smelly, it was icky, but it must be said that before that series most home fans genuinely believed Australia would defeat England.

Although those thoughts appear optimistic in hindsight, the optimism was based on sound assumption. Not least of which was the fact that England hadn’t won a series in Australia since 1987.

Also, unlike 2005, Australia were unlucky to lose the 2009 Ashes in England. Considering they had bounced back so well in the last Ashes on Australian soil – a monumental 5-0 whitewash just 18 months removed from the classic 2005 series – the home conditions were anticipated to swing the series in Australia’s favour once more.

In the end, just like Australia’s bowling, the swing happened in Australia’s favour in Perth but nowhere else.

The start to this summer feels different. There is still belief that Australia will win, but it’s the kind of baseless optimism idiots like me have when going to see an action movie sequel even though the first film was riddled with plot holes and Jason Statham.

There is a new coach in Mickey Arthur, the experienced players are mostly out of form, others are still finding their feet at the highest level, and there could be as many as four debutants.

Definitively predicting how anyone will perform is like predicting how Kanye West will behave at an awards ceremony.

Mitigating this concern is the fact that New Zealand have not won a Test in Australia since 1985, never mind a series, and have won just four of their past 28 Tests against all opposition.

More worrying for the Black Caps is that Australia have a lot of potential talent. In fact, there is enough potential talent in most state teams to fill two and a half sides to the level of the New Zealand cricket team.

So it’s lucky that the Black Caps will be facing a state-level quality bowling attack.

Like every other cricket/action movie-loving idiot out there, I believe Australia will beat New Zealand. However, potential alone doesn’t determine sporting contests, and the Black Caps beating the Australia is certainly possible.

With that in mind, there are several reasons why New Zealand could beat Australia in their two-Test ‘series’ (and set up a loooooooong summer of Aussie cricket bashing).

First, New Zealand are prepared. To use a footy analogy, this is New Zealand’s grand final. For Australia, this is more like round eight against the second-bottom side when you have a few niggling injuries.

Both sides have prepared accordingly. New Zealand meticulously planning under respected coach John Wright, and Australia only announcing their new coach a week before the match.

Second, Australia are vulnerable. Despite solid performances for one and a half Tests against South Africa, injuries mean up to four debutants could receive their baggy green today.

It’s almost like the dark days of World Series Cricket again, and in case anyone needs a history lesson, that didn’t work out too well for the board-endorsed national side back then.

Third, New Zealand possesses explosive batsmen. Any one of Jesse Ryder, Brendon McCullum, or Ross Taylor can take the game by the scruff of the neck. If one of them gets going, a match can quickly turn in New Zealand’s favour.

It also must be said after a rough start to his career off the field, Ryder appears to be getting his act together. This means that the odds for him being involved in an off-field alcohol-related incident while on tour are now 2-1 rather than evens.

Fourth, Daniel Vettori. Pure and simple.

Vettori’s left-arm orthodox spin isn’t the type of bowling that is going to mow through a side’s batting order like Muttiah Muralitharan on a uncovered pitch, but he is the best spinner in this series.

That might not be saying much but Vettori bowls with precision and guile. Free from captaincy duties he can concentrate on his bowling and I expect him to thrive.

Is it possible that a skinny blonde nerd might be the difference between the two sides? It’s as good a guess as any.

The Crowd Says:

2011-12-06T12:10:59+00:00

PeteB

Guest


When I read his comments in Cricinfo I thought he was either not very bright or just parroting Cricketspeak 101.

2011-12-06T06:38:30+00:00

Republican

Guest


They will bounce back against the Australian B line up. Hobart's conditions are more akin to what they get at home and Australai will go into this test cocky after their easy win - o be sure.

2011-12-05T10:12:52+00:00

Lolly

Guest


That was funny, McCullum moaning about 'shot selection'. Well, I thought it was funny. I don't think he's bright enough to have been joking.

2011-12-05T06:05:05+00:00

PeteB

Guest


I thought NZ had a chance. But their batsmen completely lacked application. McCullum seems to only know how to attack. For him to express disappointment at how he got out in the first innings smelled of you-know-what. No-one, least of all him, should have expected anything else. Jesse Ryder, another player of considerable talents with seemingly no desire to knuckle down when needed. Taylor, one of the best batsmen in the world, was not seen. The Kiwis seem to have the makings of a fine batting lineup. But only on paper. Mind you Hobart may be more to their liking.

2011-12-01T07:38:45+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Massive call Lee Mcdonald. Shane Bond was great in Glen Mcgrath's category could bowl at 150 clicks. But Sir Richard Hadlle can not be discounted, he was quick when young then moved to more line and length bowling coz of injury. he was an amazing bowler and did it all with no support no Vettori or Shane Warne. Shane Bond is great but I am still going to go Richard Hadllee like Bond he did some remarkable things for his team, which is not the top team in World cricket. I regard Sir Richard Hadllee, better than Ian botham, imran khan, kapil dev, Mcgrath, Bruce Reid, Jeff Thompson, Ambrose, Bishop,Wlash Akram ,Younis, Flintoff, Garner, Andy Roberts, only I think Dennis Lillee and Malcom Marshall or Holding,may be better in my opinion if i had to pick form an illustrious bunch.

AUTHOR

2011-12-01T07:25:30+00:00

Lee McDonald

Roar Guru


If he'd stayed fit Shane Bond would have been New Zealand's best ever player. Certainly their best ever bowler. Considering he is a recent player there should still be hope that New Zealand could still produce some world-class players and be competitive more regularly.

AUTHOR

2011-12-01T07:19:08+00:00

Lee McDonald

Roar Guru


I suppose everyone loves a close contest and Australia walloping eveyone had beccome a tad passé. Close games make good games. We'll see tomorrow if the Kiwis have some fight in them.

AUTHOR

2011-12-01T07:15:13+00:00

Lee McDonald

Roar Guru


Could have snuck out more after today. NZ batsmen got out more to poor shot selection than good bowling. Never a good sign.

2011-12-01T01:58:43+00:00

west

Guest


Reality is most kiwi fans have written ourselves off before it began. look at the stats and our history in Australia its not pretty and this Black Cap team will have to play some amazing cricket and ozzie will have to play very poorly to lose, couldent of said it better about putting up better state teams than our whole nation can spew up. I grew up watching Hadlee and Crow and men like Lance Cairns so there's always that dream that one day we'll fight our way back.... maybe not the top but at least to be respectable. Until then we'll hope and dream that maybe this year we can start gaining some respect back.

2011-11-30T22:14:10+00:00

phil osopher

Guest


Cricket fans have greeted the summer with enthusiasm? Not me buddy. This series is far more enticing for their is every possibility of a contest of some sort, even Australia collapsing terribly which is even more interesting. Nothing could be mroe boring than if NZ were coming here to face those old top Aussie sides, nothing. I was originally down about NZ coming here, for they rarely win a test match, they are seriously hopeless. But on paper, they are the experienced side, with the better batters even really, and they should win. The aussies are a very young side, inexperienced, unknown names. So we'll see what happens, that is, interesting, the unknown, this is what makes test cricket interesting, not Aussies methodically piling on runs and bowling kiwis out for 180 just avoiding the follow on. But will the Kiwis win, I dont know, Ive watched these players on Fox quite a bit, Ryder, and that lot, names now that should deliver, but they rarely do. But in any case, the first day shoudl be fairly interesting I think, and I'll be certainly tuning in.

2011-11-30T21:40:12+00:00

Vas Venkatramani

Guest


NZ is going to be the best test of what Australian cricket's appetite for hard work is at the moment. No side works harder or seeks to utilise the most of its limited talent than New Zealand. A good tough two test series against them will be a wonderful preparation for us before India (a highly talented, but less than committed outfit) come to our shores. Motivation shouldn't be an issue for us, as competition for places is high. I expect the three newcomers to do well, but also for the old stagers like Ponting to lift their game. If that happens, it will be the happiest of headaches before India as to who to leave out.

2011-11-30T20:58:50+00:00

Will Sinclair

Guest


I had a sneaky bet on New Zealand at $6.00 - that looks massive overs to me. Also had a saver on the draw at $2.90.

Read more at The Roar