A-League tactics starting to stack up with Europe

By Davidde Corran / Roar Guru

This weekend I watched a fairly underwhelming Turkish Super Lig game which, when compared with the same situation occurring in the A-League, became rather illuminating.

Before we get to that though, here’s a hypothetical question for you.

Your A-League team is away from home and starts the game defensively, looking to settle for a tight draw. The plan didn’t work though, and you’re now 3-1 down early in the second half and the opposition have just had a player sent off.

Would you expect your team to stick with their approach or change their tactical philosophy, using your numerical advantage to press your opponent while committing more players to attack as you chase a result?

This is the situation Manisaspor found themselves in on Saturday and their coach Kemal Özdeş decided to stick with his original plan.

While the visitors eventually narrowed the margin to 3-2, it was Istanbul who dominated the latter stages of the game and walked away with all three points.

Whether by design or because their players were unable to do so, Manisaspor’s inability to alter their tactics in light of the game’s new reality cost them the result. It also capped the potential of the game as a spectacle.

I bring this up as I’m certain if we saw this kind of performance from an Australian team they would be roundly criticised by pundits and fans.

For the record I watch a number of Turkish games a week and this is not unusual in a league that has a massive drop off in quality from top to bottom.

I’ve also seen similar situations in Greece’s top flight, a league that I’d roughly put at the same level as Italy’s second division.

I bring this up because the comparison gives us an insight into how we expect our teams to play.

There was a lot of discussion following Pim Verbeek’s reign as Australian national team coach about how comfortable we should be with the reactive way the Dutchman set the Socceroos up. One argument that was often mentioned was Australian football doesn’t have a style of play.

In my opinion what this comparison shows is, even if it’s not completely explicit yet, we very much do. There is something in our cultural mentality that demands we seize an opportunity when it’s placed in front of us.

It’s the same thing that makes Australian fans feel uncomfortable with conceding the initiative to a team that isn’t vastly superior to their own, just as Istanbul was to Manisaspor.

Thankfully in the case of clubs like the Central Coast Mariners, Brisbane Roar and Melbourne Heart we now have teams who are adding a detailed system of play to back up this philosophy.

The continued development of this area is crucial and it’s why many have been imploring the virtues of raising the technical level of Australian coaches – whether it be by importing knowledge or encouraging it to grow organically.

Why is it important? The enthralling nature of almost all the games over the last 12 months when either of Brisbane, Central Coast and, this season, the Heart have met should be evidence enough.

The Crowd Says:

2012-02-21T16:43:56+00:00

James

Guest


Greek League is much stronger than Italy's Serie B. Olympiakos have one of the better sides in Europe this year.

2012-01-30T06:52:57+00:00

Brendan

Guest


I think the J-League as a target seems to be a logical goal but to use them as a comparison I don't think so. J-league currently is streets ahead of us. Like comparing Turkish and La Liga I do think is amusing these sorts of article that the focus is continually on Europe. The future is Asia !

2012-01-26T04:05:58+00:00

Ben of Phnom Penh

Guest


They are also a more useful gauge as we play them often enough at club level

2012-01-26T01:18:32+00:00

Nick

Guest


I to believe the J-League is a more realistic competition to compare the a-league to. Not only is it in Asia, it is also a very technical league with the teams wanting to play attacking football rather than just using the archaic long ball that is often employed by some A-League teams. The J-League I believe is up there with those European leagues but i think the J-League because of where it is and the fact that it is a rather new successful league it is a good league to gauge the success of the A-League.

2012-01-26T01:03:11+00:00

Axelv

Guest


I think our target should be matching the J-League. If we do that, than we have a very high standard of competition with many top players being snapped up by major European clubs, while maintaining very good players in our own domestic league with some even representing the national team.

2012-01-26T00:50:01+00:00

Bondy

Guest


Davidde, When i played outdoor football the numerical advantage was never really an impost whether it be our's or their's, whether that was down to the level of football i was playing, i dont know . You cant storm the Bastille, but i would ask why not play for a win away, why should playing away be their advantage ? I also believe with the National team it depends on where and who we play if we play in Europe we play some decent stuff (better opposition ) but if we are out in Bahrain or at home to Malaysia it might'n be to pretty ( lower ranked seeds, travel and so on) . I enjoyed the tactical battle of last night's A League game . Enjoyable read interesting .

2012-01-25T23:23:22+00:00

pete4

Guest


I think that's the challenge for the A-League to be on par with countries like Turkey, Greece, Portugal, Scotland, Belgium and even Holland. Acknowledge we won't be able to compete with the Big 5 mega bucks leagues due to financial reasons, glamour etc If we can continue to build a stable professional league towards 12 solid clubs with continual development, infrastructure to match we can create a platform for the National team to do well into the future (and possibly steal the World Cup one day)

Read more at The Roar