Fill in the blank: The next Aussie Tour de France contender is …

By hamleyn / Roar Guru

Before Cadel Evans’ Tour de France victory last year, Australia had, over the years, seen four riders develop into genuine General Classification (GC) threats at the Grand Tours.

Phil Anderson paved the way, becoming the first non-European to wear yellow at the Tour (in 1981) and won the young rider classification by finishing fifth overall in 1982 (a feat he would repeat in 1985).

Michael Rogers turned from being one of the most formidable time triallists in the world to being a genuine GC contender. After winning three consecutive time trial world championships (2003-2005), Rogers finished ninth overall at the 2006 Tour de France.

On stage eight of the ’07 Tour, he was virtually the yellow jersey on the road and many were beginning to wonder whether he would win it overall, before he crashed and broke his collarbone, ending his race.

He hasn’t been able to rediscover his form since, instead switching to become Bradley Wiggins’ lieutenant.

Cadel Evans himself developed from a budding young superstar, who wore the pink leader’s jersey for a day at the 2002 Giro d’Italia (before finishing 14th overall), into a full-blown contender. He entered five Grand Tours from 2005-2008, grabbing 5 top 10 finishes, including back-to-back second places at the 07-08 Tours.

He is the current Tour champion.

And, finally, Richie Porte, who has a remarkably similar story to Evans. Porte started cycling at 21 and wasn’t discovered until he was 24. Yet, in his first year as a pro with Team Saxo Bank, Porte finished seventh overall at the Giro, held the pink jersey for three stages and won the Young Rider Classification.

Yet, with all this success, it’s difficult to see where Australia’s next Grand Tour contender is going to come from. Sure, Porte is only 27, which means he’s still got plenty of time to develop into a strong GC chance. But that’s the thing, he’s a chance, a dark horse, a smokey who doesn’t warrant being considered among the big guns but can’t be completely ruled out either. Porte is a brilliant rider but I’m not sure he’s Grand Tour-winning brilliant.

Aside from this, developing someone who might be able to contend is not enough. You can’t sit back and expect a Grand Tour victory to just fall in your lap. They are something to be earned through attacking, aggressive yet calculated riding. Cadel Evans learned this the hard way in 07-08. The most recent example of a rider coming to this realisation and making the most of it is Ryder Hesjedal, whose ride at this year’s Giro was as remarkable as it was brilliant.

With all this in mind, who exactly can Australia look to for future Grand Tour success? It’s more difficult to answer than it seems.

We certainly have a lot of track converts who are becoming successful road riders, such as Luke Durbridge and Cameron Meyer, but aside from that most of them are still a long way off being ready to tackle their first ever Grand Tours, let alone winning the damn thing.

This is not to say that none of them absolutely can’t develop into Tour de France winners, but for all the chest beating that goes on about Australia’s incredible young cycling talent, stage race success beyond Cadel Evans is hard to see.

Simon Gerrans can’t climb or time trial well enough to be considered, we’ve already mentioned Michael Rogers, and Matthew Lloyd, who is a strong enough climber, is a bit too mentally fragile to be a genuine threat.

Perhaps we will see one of these track stars develop into a great all-rounder (if I had to choose one, I’d pick Cameron Meyer). But what we’d really like to see is a rider come up through the ranks like Tejay Van Garderen has in the United States.

He is a strong time triallist who can climb and has plenty of talent to develop over the next decade. Of all the young Grand Tour contenders out there now, I think he is the most likely to step onto the top step of the podium. If only Australia could boast such a bright Grand Tour future.

The Crowd Says:

2013-07-03T11:16:28+00:00

Big Matty Goss

Guest


Hahahaha. yeah nice. Simon Gerrans can't climb yet he can still win a mountain stage in the Tour de France. good work guys. PS Greenedge also won the team time trail and Gerrans was in there the whole time, but don't worry, he can't time trial.

2012-06-13T03:39:05+00:00

Maria Szczerba

Guest


I believe that the next contender will be Bradley Wiggins or TJ Van Gardaren or even Luis Leon Sanchez. Should be a great race!

AUTHOR

2012-06-12T04:47:13+00:00

hamleyn

Roar Guru


He could well do, particularly since he was so late coming into the sport. I'm not sure whether he is a good enough climber. So far we've seen him ride okay in bunches up the mountains but, to win a GT, you need to be able to break away, be attacking and ride aggressively. Not sure whether he's got that skill, although, apart from his Giro results a few years ago, we haven't really seen him ride for himself yet, being the 2IC to Contador and now Wiggins. Maybe my expectations of where Porte should be at this stage of career are a bit high but I don't think he's quite good enough to win one. I'd love him to prove me wrong but I'll stick to my convictions until he proves otherwise.

2012-06-12T04:36:30+00:00

Ben Z

Guest


I don't understand why you discount Richie Porte? He seems to be a more comfortable climber than Cadel and is Wiggins' 2IC. Give it a few years and I'm sure he will be contending the Tour de France

AUTHOR

2012-06-12T04:34:03+00:00

hamleyn

Roar Guru


Absolutely, it'd be like Gerran winning 3 classics in a row one season. I'm not too worried about our Classics stocks, I think we've got plenty to look forward to there with some of the trackies coming across to the road. But the whole reason behind the post is because I can't see where our next GT will come from (apart from Cadel obviously). Like you said though, the Tour is not the be all and end all of the calendar. It's huge, but so is a Paris-Roubaix, a Paris-Nice, a Tour of California or a Criterium du Dauphine. However, the general public, who aren't particularly informed on cycling, associate pro cycling with the Tour de France. Hence, if we want to continue to convert more to the sport, we need continued success in it. Part of that is stage wins and minor classifications, but I don't think anything will replace a GT win. A side note: imagine how big cycling would be now if Cadel had converted his 3 chances at GT success into wins!! People talk about Australia being a cycling golden age at the moment, it'd be more like a platinum age!

2012-06-12T03:36:39+00:00

Chris

Guest


Agreed - Lots of great riders named. I was saying the last ten years are definitely our best to date. But one of my points (briefly made at the start) was that the Tour is the biggest race, but it is not the whole cycling calendar. Would the Belgians like another win in a GT? Sure. Would they trade, for example, Tom Boonen's success in the cobbled classics and the Worlds, Gilbert's success in the Ardennes or De Vlaeminck's succes in every classic for it? Nope (well, the few Belgians who don't know much about the rest of the calendar might, but they'd be living in Australia, surely). But yeh, the Tour is great for cycling exposure in Oz. Success there has helped grow the TDU, which is a really well run race that now gets guys coming to race. Glad I found Roar via twitter - bookmarked it.

AUTHOR

2012-06-12T03:16:12+00:00

hamleyn

Roar Guru


Fair point but that's what the Belgians were probably saying in the '70's when Merckx was dominating the Tour, but look what happened. Lucien Van Impe won in '76, Belgium hasn't won one since, nor have they won a Vuelta a Espana since '77 or a Giro d'Italia since '78. I think you misunderstand my point of view if you see this article as "yeah, yeah but who's next". Cadel has been fantastic for cycling in Australia over the past 12 months and the effect of his Tour de France win will be felt for many years. I think he has a magnificent chance to win this year as well. However, I'm looking further into the future. I don't want Cadel's Tour win to be an isolated event (like Australia II's win at the America's Cup) but I want it to be followed up by the next generation of Aussie GC riders which, as far as I can see, aren't ready to pick up the mantle. I'm not saying we need someone to immediately come in and take over, but it would nice to be able to say (like you can with Van Garderen): "Okay, five years down the track, X is going to be in a position to win a Tour/Giro/Vuelta, let's make sure we move his development in the right direction". If we don't do this, cycling may well fade back into obscurity again. As for not having it so good, again I have to disagree, I'd have to say we're just as good as we were 10 years ago, just that cycling has moved a bit more into the media's spotlight. Robbie McEwen, Baden Cooke, Bradley McGee, Stuart O'Grady and Michael Rogers were all at the height (or close to it) of their winning powers between 5 and 10 years ago.

2012-06-12T02:22:25+00:00

Chris

Guest


Meh - Australia would be better served just enjoying our ridiculous success in cycling as a whole and not looking for who's next for one race, especially when we have the reigning champion in Cadel. Aussie cycling fans have never had it so good as the past ten years. This article, while it does pose a question that lacks a definite answer, is a bit odd. The TdF is a big, big deal. It's so hard to finish, let alone do well in, that asking "yeh, yeh, but who's next" seems churlish.

2012-06-11T19:24:37+00:00

Darryl Kotyk

Roar Pro


It's an interesting question to pose and I'm looking forward to seeing what responses come in on this one. Nice post.

Read more at The Roar