Spurs made the wrong call to sack Redknapp

By johnhunt92 / Roar Guru

Any other day of the week, bar Thursday gone, I would have been shocked at the news Lance Armstrong had been charged with doping offences.

However, it was something else on Thursday that gave me more to think about.

I awoke on Thursday to read that Harry Redknapp had been sacked as manager of Tottenham Hotspur after four years in charge.

My reaction to this story has been one of surprise and frustration.

What? Surely not! It’s all a media beat up; he will be there in 2013!

Even though there had been rumours, surely the Spurs board would see sense and give him an extra three years.

But alas it was true; the most successful Spurs manager since Terry Venables was shown the door by an impatient board.

Redknapp is now the eighth Spurs manager in 11 years, which probably makes his sacking a little more predictable.

Spurs seem to go through managers like Italy goes through Prime Ministers.

Once again Daniel Levy and his board have made a mammoth mistake in sacking Redknapp.

While Spurs are a good side (they made a small challenge for the title), they are still not the top team that Levy thinks they should be.

Levy may have invested £100 million on the team over four years.

Yet that is a pittance compared to the title-chasing sides.

As such, the money has never been available to develop title-winning depth.

I’ve got no doubt that injuries to their best players caused the late-season slump; the depth of the squad was not one that title winners need.

It has been argued that Redknapp was distracted by the England job.

But when Spurs were winning matches Redknapp was in court, accused of tax dodging that could have sent him to jail.

While Levy and his board expect more, they should be glad to finish fourth.

The support and money they invested could only have got them to fourth.

If reports are correct and David Moyes or ABV are in the frame to be the next manager and Levy wants his team to challenge, he needs to pull his finger out and bankroll some signings.

If he doesn’t (judging by the past that’s quite likely), the Spurs will tread water or drop back into the pack.

The Spurs’ fans reaction has also alarmed me.

They, like Levy, seem quite content to see the back of Redknapp.

This is amazing, as they seem to have forgotten the past four years or even their history.

Before Harry arrived, Tottenham were a club living on history.

A big club in the 1980s, the advent of the Premier League saw Tottenham become a club associated with mid-table mediocrity.

Bad owners (Lord Alan Sugar) and bad managers (Christian Gross Ossie Adrilies) saw the club become a laughing stock.

When Redknapp took over eight games into the 2008-2009 season, Tottenham were bottom with just two points.

Spurs finished eighth that year, followed by finishes of fourth, fifth and fourth again.

Also included was a run to the Champions League quarter finals with wins over Inter Milan (4-3 match is the best match I have seen in years) and AC Milan.

While new players helped, without Redknapp I doubt any of the success would have come Spurs way.

So before Levy and the board revises history and whitewashes you from memory, well done Harry for your work at Spurs.

I fear it won’t be long before the club realises what a mistake it has made.

The Crowd Says:

2012-06-16T09:48:42+00:00

John Hunt

Guest


Don't even kid about that Steve

2012-06-16T07:19:53+00:00

Steve

Guest


acha does make a good point about the England job, but the overall situation still seems a little reminiscent of when NUFC thought Bobby Robson was 'holding them back' to paltry 3rd/ 4th place finishes. It looks like a similar decision, made for similar reasons, and I suspect it will have similar consequences. Maybe Spurs can coax Graeme Souness into a return to management!

2012-06-16T07:02:01+00:00

acha5066

Guest


Harry would still be in a job if he didn't openly state his desire to quit Spurs for the England job when they were in the middle of one of their best ever run ins the league (2nd at that time).

2012-06-16T05:02:20+00:00

mintox

Guest


I think that you've presented an simplistic view of the situation eg its not Redknapps fault, spend more money and they will be more successful. The reality is that Spurs probably don't have a heap of money to spend, plus they can't really compete for the top players in the way that Chelsea, City and to a lesser extent, United can. It is highly likely that if they did spend money they would end up doing a Liverpool or Arsenal and spending on unproven talent. Their management clearly has two options, continue as is, trying to finish 4th or 5th each year (which is possibly going to be tougher with Chelsea and Liverpool no doubt reinvigorated next season and competing for those spots too) OR they can change the manager in the hope of wringing more out of the quality of players they can attract. It's a bold move by a club that clearly wants to keep up with the Joneses but is struggling to do so.

2012-06-16T01:45:54+00:00

k77sujith

Guest


It is a big mistake indeed sacking Harry, one of the best managers in the business. Spurs have been a reasonably good side for quite some time now, Harry's sacking does come as a shocker. However, it'd be incredible if the management rope in AVB for the job since he's got a lot to prove to his critics. AVB is probably the right fit for the Spurs looking at the players in the squad and AVB's emphasis on adopting offensive play. Thanks.

Read more at The Roar