The London 2012 Games has been called the ‘first social media Olympics’. Many forms of social media existed in Beijing, however they were not as well established and have grown dramatically in the past four years.
London is expecting close to 11 million visitors between July 27th and August 12th. Many of them will come equipped with smart phones. Because of this, the London 2012 organisers have taken steps to ensure unprecedented access during the two week event.
The IOC has launched an “Olympic Hub”. Consolidating various social media networks like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc. This easy to navigate space will see fans getting never before access to their favourite athletes throughout the Games.
With the London 2012 social media wave in full effect, social networks continue to grow at a rapid rate. Currently London 2012 has over 5 million views on YouTube, 650,000 plus Twitter followers, and over 400,000 Facebook likes. Impressive numbers for still being a little over a month out from the Games.
This social media explosion at the Olympics is poised to produce some exceptional content but at what cost?
The recent case of Australian swimmers Nick D’Arcy and Kenrick Monk and their decision to post a photograph of themselves posing with firearms in a US gun shop few weeks ago illustrated the dangers for athletes.
D’Arcy and Monk were banned from using social media during the Games and furthermore, they will be sent home at the end of the swimming competition in London, meaning they will not be able to attend the Closing Ceremony. The AOC wasted no time in making them an example of what will happen if other Aussie athletes cross the line.
With the London 2012 social media wave in full effect, athletes will continue to be swept up in the action as well. While the IOC is actively encouraging athletes to maintain a presence on Twitter and other social networks they have enforced some strict guidelines.
The first is no video.
Athletes are encouraged to post pictures at their leisure but not videos. Participants and other accredited persons cannot post any video and/or audio of the events, competitions or any other activities which occur, at olympic venues.
The second is no results. Athletes are encouraged to post diary type entries, but are prohibited from posting result related content: i.e. they must not report on competition or comment on the activities of other participants or accredited persons, or disclose any information which is confidential or private in relation to any other person or organisation.
The IOC go on to say that the “accreditations of any organisation or person accredited at the Olympic Games may be withdrawn without notice”.
On top of imposing restrictions on athletes, there even stricter rules for fans attending events. The “conditions for ticket holders” which are printed on the back of tickets include: “Images, video and sound recordings of the Games taken by a Ticket Holder cannot be used for any purpose other than for private and domestic purposes.”
Rightly or wrongly, London 2012 is betting big on social media. “Access” seems to be the unofficial motto of the games, and the LOCOG and IOC are doing everything imaginable to insure that access is unprecedented throughout the 17 days.
Richard Phillips
Guest
Actually, this is false. Vancouver was the first Social Media Olympic Games. Don't believe everything the British Press tell you. http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/2012-summer-games/Vancouver+home+first+social+media+Olympics+London/6978173/story.html It's typical of the British media to be so biased. But it's disappointing that journalism in Australia have simply copied what they are saying rather than investigate for themselves.
Nick Jungfer
Roar Guru
Never really occurred to me that this is the first Social Media Games but yeah you're right. Social media, especially twitter, can definitely enhance watching sport live for me. It's still all about the actual event so as long as you don't become one of those people who let twitter become the event and the event secondary, it can be great...getting the thoughts of mates, celebrities, other athletes, writers, people who are at the events as it happens.
Boomshanka
Guest
And then we have Channel Nine "home of the Olympics". Personally I use Twitter and other smartphone apps for sports coverage important to me. I trust our Free to Air Network provider is aware of the need to be relevant and more importantly "Live". No point in building hype, selling advertising for the result to be broadcast earlier on other media. These free to air networks are going the way of the dinosaur as they become increasingly irrelevant to how consumers access information. Even TV coverage of the recent earthquake in Melbourne was dominated by news readers reading twitter posts. The proposed anti siphoning laws have defined "Live" for the 2016 Olympics as up to 24hrs. Below is from the explanatory statement for the proposed anti siphoning legislation; For example, the permitted delay would allow the Australian broadcaster to choose to televise events in the 2016 Summer Olympic Games in Brazil at a time of day that maximises the potential viewing audience in Australia. Provided the delayed telecast for an event within the designated group does not exceed 24 hours, the free-to-air broadcaster would satisfy their coverage obligations. This definition of live is consistent with the obligations imposed on free-to-air broadcasters about the televising of anti-siphoning events in a designated group , which give broadcasters a certain level of flexibility about this type of events.