Limp Wallabies give All Blacks pathway to new Test record

By Paul Cully / Expert

Further indignities await Wallabies fans beyond the graveyard of Eden Park on Saturday night, because the third Bledisloe Test, in Brisbane on October 20, could be a match of some significance for different reasons than first imagined.

The All Blacks’ flawed yet comprehensive 27-19 win in Sydney, built on a one-sided physical contest at the gain-line, has increased their current winning streak against all opposition to 11 games.

Should they continue in this manner, Brisbane would represent a 17th consecutive victory, equalling the mark of their 1965-1969 team and Nick Mallett’s Springboks (although Lithuanian readers will be quick to point out that their national team broke that record in 2010).

That would leave them needing to win the November 12 Test against Scotland in Edinburgh to move to 18 successive Test wins.

The disappointing first weekend of the Rugby Championship – denied a memorable contest by a mixture of poor skill levels and overly technical refereeing – offered little evidence that the New Zealanders won’t go very close to etching their names into history.

Saturday’s win increased their winning percentage against Australia under Robbie Deans to the region of 85 per cent.

Since professionalism in 1996, they have significantly increased their winning percentage against all teams, up from 71.19 per cent to 81.48 per cent (before Saturday night). New Zealand coaches hold every major piece of silverware, from the Heineken Cup to the World Cup. Their dominance is such that the modern All Blacks have effectively detached, statistically at least, from the rest of world rugby.

Worryingly for the competitiveness of the first four-nation southern hemisphere competition, injuries threaten to compromise the challenge from elsewhere. The Wallabies can point to David Pocock’s knee problem as the latest misfortune to befall them, but news of Bismarck du Plessis’s long-term injury has greater significance.

The Springboks at least understand the level of physicality required to sustain a challenge against New Zealand. Australia, save for a few worthy exceptions such as Nathan Sharpe, were stuck in Super Rugby mode in Sydney.

But without the Sharks hooker, who is integral to their uncomplicated but brutal approach, South Africa are a much diminished side. Du Plessis’ replacement, bustling Cheetahs No.2 Adriaan Strauss, is a fine player but with Chiliboy Ralepelle also on the sidelines they start to look a little light. Tiaan Liebenberg and Craig Burden, energetic contributors at Super Rugby level, are next in line behind Strauss.

The Springboks are already without Schalk Burger, another long-term occupant of the casualty ward, while it while take a while for the outstanding young second-rower Eben Etzebeth to impose himself at Test level in the style of a Bakkies Botha.

With a tricky looking assignment in Dunedin on the cards – the week after a Wallabies Test in Perth – the Springboks’ best chance against New Zealand probably lies in the October 7 match in Soweto. Yet their inability to manufacture tries, evident again against a determined Pumas side at the weekend, is a weakness that the All Blacks will cruelly expose even at altitude.

There is so much power, pace and guile in the New Zealand game at the moment that a back-line of Kerr-Barlow, Barrett, Ellison, Fruean, Savea, Guildford and Taylor could be constructed out of players who didn’t even make Saturday night’s 22. Assemble that lot anywhere but in New Zealand and they’d all be starting Test matches.

As for the Wallabies’ prospects, realism demands that the immediate targets are sadly downgraded from silverware to respectability. There are too many holes to plug and too much splintered confidence to reason otherwise.

While reassurances were given before Saturday night about tough training sessions, demons must have already taken their place in the heads of some players. A lack of belief seemed to accompany them onto the paddock, and it manifested itself in physical timidity.

There were many instances of it during the night, and to single one out is a little unfair, but Richie McCaw’s running line in the 51st minute to create a gap for Israel Dagg summed it up. McCaw strode back 30 metres to get on Dagg’s side of Rob Horne, easing the Waratah out of the way so the fullback could glide past.

It was classic McCaw, walking on that fine line of legality, but there are a number of Wallabies centres of recent vintage who would have never allowed him to get away with it.

The Crowd Says:

2012-08-23T02:08:18+00:00

7andabit

Guest


You can have a 100 back ups you only need 15 determined guys on the day.

2012-08-22T22:10:43+00:00

Eddo

Guest


All of those players left after 07 and NZ still won the World Cup. Says a bit about the depth, no? Fair play that you should never think it'll always be rosy for NZ rugby, but, much as the baggy green has a mythical sway in Australia, the black jersey is all that and a little more in NZ. What else is there to do there?! (Kidding). NZ has been losing more of its best players than any country since the advent of professionalism, but the mentality - perhaps a bit more recently - has been to get on with it. In 09 the ABs were a bit thin and were vilified for losing 4 tests out of 14, yet they bounced back with much the same team and won RWC. The point I'm eventually trying to make is that it will always be thus, regarding NZ's talent drain. But the ABs winning the RWC in their back yard will have inspired a generation of youngsters to chase the jersey as much as the lucre. Perhaps this will help to redress the impending imbalance.

2012-08-22T21:38:05+00:00

Jerry

Guest


A player off their feet doesn't define the offside line. Have a look at the diagram in law 16.5 http://www.irblaws.com/downloads/EN/Law_16_EN.pdf (p101) Notice the offside line for the yellow team - it's not behind the hindmost foot of the blue player on the ground, it's behind the hindmost foot of the player on his feet. This is because of law 16.2 (d) All players forming, joining or taking part in a ruck must be on their feet. Essentially, if you're off your feet, you're not actually a part of the ruck.

2012-08-22T13:34:55+00:00

Richard

Guest


The Wallabies are a national disgrace because the people running Rugby in this country are a national disgrace. What sporting code would put up with being continually beaten by NZ. And do give me tripe about them being "SO " good. They should be lined up and the whole box and dice handed over to people who actually know how to go about winning

2012-08-22T12:33:48+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Regardless of the correctness of that part he called it a maul (and it does fulfill the requirements for a maul, the only possible question is if Rolland was a bit too quick to make that call) and told the players so, before the tackled player went to deck. So it's irrelevant to your point about the AB's not rolling away - they knew it was a collapsed maul so they knew they didn't have to roll away.

2012-08-22T12:08:56+00:00

defunkt

Guest


Pish. Nobody who's appreciated Union's nuances could ever settle for that no-dimensional repeat hit-up nonsense.

2012-08-22T12:00:32+00:00

El Gamba

Guest


OK. Just cause Rolland said if doesn't make it true. That call was a joke.

2012-08-22T11:55:56+00:00

liam

Guest


if nz is being pillaged by all this new deal money, whats to stop the scouts going to SA? to argentina? to ireland, wales for goodness sake? if the money is really such a big mover, they'll be pulling from all over wont they?

2012-08-22T11:44:58+00:00

IronAwe

Guest


I watched it on TV...

2012-08-22T11:31:19+00:00

IronAwe

Guest


Pulease, league will never be big anywhere outside of Australia.

2012-08-22T11:12:10+00:00

Trevor DeAngelo

Guest


KPM what you are saying could not be further from the truth. If it was possible - it would still take many many years for the NRL or AFL to undermine NZ rugby. To be honest I doubt that AFL will ever take off there. Rugby is a totally engrained part of the culture - it is an ethos. League just won't make more than a dent.

2012-08-22T11:11:37+00:00

Jerry

Guest


65:13 was ruled a collapsed maul, what are you on about?

2012-08-22T11:00:11+00:00

Justin2

Guest


Don't understand your post...

2012-08-22T10:14:11+00:00

El Gamba

Roar Guru


And then went back and watched Jerry. Your argument holds water until you read the law about "behind the back feet of the ruck". Although Read was further back than the others, you will note that even he didn't achieve this due to the player lying down. Ridiculous.

2012-08-22T10:09:50+00:00

El Gamba

Roar Guru


Jeez, watched a few bits here and there and struggled to find one ruck where the AB's attempted to roll away 65:13 for e.g. The worst thing is how the Wallabies didn't react the whole game.

2012-08-22T10:00:37+00:00

Pogo

Guest


Ben Smith in for Fruean in midfield.

2012-08-22T09:41:24+00:00

El Gamba

Roar Guru


What to say though? "And the men in black are lying all over the ball and the Wallabies are too inept to do anything about it. Hold on! A knock-on! Scrum New Zealand...... and a set piece try.........AAC and KB bought that move like a two cent lolly bag."

2012-08-22T09:37:19+00:00

El Gamba

Roar Guru


Throw in the $1b TV deal which can be used to shore up League development then compare the opportunity to the embarrassing keystone cops effort of the ARU and the NSWRU tearing down themselves and the odd expansion franchise as they go. Mark Ella was wrong. We'll never hold a Bledisloe again.

2012-08-22T09:22:01+00:00

Nick Cross

Guest


I've watched a replay of that and Reid was onside, the ref had his back to him and guessed.

2012-08-22T09:19:48+00:00

Nick Cross

Guest


Yeah well the USA are still Olympic Rugby 15s Champions and they weren't coached by a kiwi, but like 3N old defunct museum piece trophies are not really the point.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar