Di Matteo should be regretting Essien’s departure

By Daniel Quinn / Roar Pro

European Champions Chelsea opened their defence of their Champions League crown with a somewhat lucky 2-2 draw with Serie A Champions Juventus. The sluggish Blues midfield showed a glaring flaw in Di Matteo’s setup.

Frank Lampard and John Obi Mikel started in the two deep midfield positions and were exploited by the Juventus midfield of Andrea Pirlo, Arturo Vidal and Claudio Marchisio, forcing Di Matteo to regret letting Michael Essien leave for Real Madrid.

Mikel was at fault for the equaliser, misplacing a simple ball, but more important was his reaction after losing the ball.

The Nigerian just stood in the middle of the park, as Juve pounced through Marchisio who brilliantly passed to Fabio Quagliarella, who made no mistake sliding it through the legs of Petr Cech.

Mikel and Lampard were both lethargic in their attempts throughout the contest. Both struggled to threat, while failing to do a solid defensive job.

It was evident that Lampard was in his mid-thirties as the Chelsea vice-captain, as well as Mikel, were easily beaten numerous times and lacked the pace a central midfielder needs in such a high tempo Champions League encounter.

Mikel is a one-dimensional player. He can win the ball well and play basic back and side passes, but can’t really do much else.

One thing on the Nigerian’s side is his endurance – he can easily play out the whole 90 minutes each week.

Mikel and Lampard were outnumbered by the Juventus midfield as Marchisio and Vidal used the space left vacant by the Chelsea duo.

Lampard and Mikel also sat deep far too often, allowing the Juventus midfield and strikers to penetrate the edge of the Blues box, therefore letting Juve increase their chances of scoring.

Despite Oscar’s successful job in restricting Pirlo’s impact, Vidal and Marchisio controlled the Chelsea midfield. The two Bianconeri midfielders had chances, in fact Vidal exploited the space and found Juve’s first, while the duo moved well, especially Marchisio who should have buried at least one of his chances.

Essien could have been another option for Roberto Di Matteo to try and contain the Juventus midfield, but the Blues shipped the 29-year-old off to fellow Champions League contenders Real Madrid on loan.

To aggravate the situation, Essien moved on deadline day, while Portuguese midfielder Raul Meireles also left the London club days after, joining Turkish giants Fenerbahce early in September which gave Di Matteo no chance to sign a replacement for the two central midfielders.

Spaniard Oriol Romeu is the only other like-for-like replacement for Mikel, but the 20-year-old lacks big game experience. Therefore Di Matteo is forced to stick with Mikel especially after Josh McEachran and Yossi Benayoun also moved out on loan, while Florent Malouda stays in the reserves.

On a positive note, Oscar played exceptionally well on his Champions League debut, scoring two stunning goals.

But the Blues seemed to have packed their squad full of flamboyant attacking players (Oscar, Eden Hazard, Marko Marin, Victor Moses), whereas the imperative deep central midfield position is lacking some certain depth.

After the Juventus defeat, Chelsea and Di Matteo should realise that letting Essien go was a bad move.

He may not have been first choice, just like at Real, he may not be the same player he once was, but would be an important squad member for the Blues.

The Crowd Says:

2012-10-01T14:36:06+00:00

Rugwizangoga Eric

Guest


i'm in Rwanda i like chelsea so much but i support the vews Essien's come back or joining chelsea.i like him for what he didi can't blame him.courage

2012-09-23T14:04:28+00:00

philipo inzaghi

Guest


mikel is a back pass player but essien is not.mikel always gives a back pass even when he is suppose to move forward, this is where essien is very good he always moves forward and gives accurate passes.have you counted the number of back passes mikel gives in a match? it is very bad. I will miss essien.

2012-09-22T17:08:39+00:00

drogbra

Guest


you all should look at mikel paas. the ball was back to the midfield. wat about the last man trying to beat offside instead marking the striker.

AUTHOR

2012-09-22T06:25:50+00:00

Daniel Quinn

Roar Pro


Yeah one of my favourite goals ever to be scored! That's what I remember Essien for. Good point re Alonso though.

2012-09-22T05:59:49+00:00

HarryBalding

Roar Guru


Yeah I took ages to warm to him as well. He might not be the biggest name in defensive midfield, but I think that Chelsea's midfield doesn't really need another star - the have enough guys on the field who can control the game already. I can't say much for de Rossi, I have only really seen him play in the national team, but Xabi Alonso would never suit Chelsea's style. He's a long ball man. He distributes the ball really well, but Chelsea are trying to move towards a fast, short passing style (similar to Barcelona I guess) and I think Mikel suits that style very nicely. I can see why you don't like him though. Man, Essien was a beast when Chelsea first signed him though. It's such a shame that injuries have destroyed such a promising career! If you're interested, check out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9DhnG37mrc

AUTHOR

2012-09-22T02:03:20+00:00

Daniel Quinn

Roar Pro


Definitely agree with you there regarding Lampard, but in this one game he struggled, so Essien could have come on to see if things could be changed. Never been a big fan of Mikel to be honest. Always thought Chelsea should sign a first-choice Defensive mid, like Daniele De Rossi or Xabi Alonso (even thought that won't happen).

AUTHOR

2012-09-22T02:00:54+00:00

Daniel Quinn

Roar Pro


Competition still has a long way to go. Who knows, maybe Chelsea will invest over the winter window which might increase their chances of retaining the title.

AUTHOR

2012-09-22T01:59:39+00:00

Daniel Quinn

Roar Pro


Completely agree! Quality midfielder.

2012-09-22T00:48:26+00:00

HarryBalding

Roar Guru


I think that was more a case of Mikel and Lampard both having a bad game. Look at previous matches where those two have played together there, most notably the Champion's League final last year. They're a perfect partnership in my eyes! Mikel is a dominant defensive midfielder in every way except his offensive capabilities - he is impossible to knock off the ball, wins most of his challenges, rarely (and I do realise it was his mistake that probably cost Chelsea the win on Thursday morning) gives away possession, and is very strong in the air. Lampard is Chelsea's version of Pirlo now. The midfield genius who isn't as mobile as he once was, so he moves a little deeper to pull the strings more effectively. He is still Chelsea's best all-round midfielder by a long way, and probably their only all-round midfielder now that Essien and Meireles have moved on. Mikel's mobility, strength and defensive focus make him the perfect partner for Lampard in that deep midfield role. I agree with you though, letting Essien go was a poor choice. He is a tailor-made substitute for this kind of game. In fact he probably would have started the game at most other clubs; he started for Real vs Man City. Nice article mate, but I think it's a little easy to respond to the result of Thursday's draw in this fashion.

2012-09-21T21:59:38+00:00

Willow mused

Guest


On loan? Decision borders on farcical. Essien is a star. Covers the pitch and has the propensity to finish which Mikel lacks. -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].

2012-09-21T20:05:01+00:00

Ablorde

Guest


this is very true....chelsea should be cursing their stars for letting essien go...With the duo of mikel and lamps,I don't think they'll be able to defend their champs league title...

Read more at The Roar