The time is right for Aussie pace quartet

By TheGenuineTailender / Roar Guru

Roberts, Garner, Marshall and Holding are names synonymous with the terrifying West Indies side of the late 70s and early 80s. The fearsome foursome. And what a pace quartet they were.

Australia now finds itself in a batsman drought, where hardened, Test match ready, seasoned pros are hard to come by. But young quicks are coming out of our ears.

Because of Shane Watson’s calf injury, the Australian bowling attack has lost its crucial fourth seamer. Nathan Lyon’s early season shield form has drawn vast criticism. For these reasons, I believe it is time for Australia to go all-out attack.

The stocks of young, strong, lean and athletic fast bowlers in this country has drawn praise the world over in the past 12 months. The time has come to utilise them, to form a new pace quartet with the potential to become a new generation fearsome foursome.

Patrick Cummins, at the tender age of 19, is already considered crucial to the future of Australian cricket. James Pattinson tore through the batting greats of India last summer. And Mitchell Starc’s boomeranging in-swingers destroyed the stumps of many at the recent World T20 and Champions league. All three have potentially long Test careers ahead of them.

Beyond these select few with Test matches to their name already, we have last summer’s Sheffield Shield leading wicket taker Jackson Bird, the promising Josh Hazlewood, Queenslander Ben Cutting and the talented, proven pedigree of Alister McDermott.

Australia is blessed with a group of quicks unlike any in recent times. Now I know that favourable bowling conditions in shield cricket has been cited as a reason for the exaggerated performances of fast bowlers, but when Ricky Ponting can still average 118.33, I doubt the wickets have been that bad.

The argument that a spin bowler is a must is a noble one. I do understand the need for the change, someone who can exploit turning conditions late in a Test match can be vital. However, when we have a part time spinner with a test six-for (something Brett Lee never achieved) and the wicket of Sachin Tendulkar to his name, surely Clarke can turn to himself for some tweakers if necessary.

In the meantime we’ve got four other fast bowlers who can average fewer than 30 with the ball (something most of our spinners since Shane Warne have failed to do).

Nathan Lyon’s current Test record is solid, above average even. I would like to see him being persisted with. I think Lyon has a lot to offer the Australian team. But, as history has shown, players with sub-par first class records (something Lyon has) rarely lift their game multiple, steep levels overnight and become Test match stars.

Surely the time will come when a couple of wicketless innings will become a drought and before long, Lyon will find himself on the outer.

Don’t get me wrong, I hope he proves my prediction to be completely unfounded and horribly incorrect. But when that time does come, it should be then that Australia avoid turning to another average state spinner and get behind one of our world class quicks.

We should be making the most of an abundant resource; fast bowlers. What does it matter if one gets injured? There’s another of the same class lying in wait. Australia had immense batting depth a decade ago, yet didn’t utilise them – not that they were needed. Now without the greats of yesteryear, playing to our strengths is a must.

In the modern game where player rotation, particularly of fast bowlers, is commonplace and developing a squad is more important than a team, the time is right to give these guys a crack at Test level and expose them to the rigors of Test cricket.

I hope Watson’s injury sees Michael Clarke lean in favour of four fast bowlers on Friday. I’d like to see Starc – whom I believe will eclipse Cummins and Pattinson as Australia’s attack leader of the future – blast out the South African big guns, while Hilfenhaus tempts them with swinging length balls, Pattinson gets in the face of the top order and Siddle charges in as determinedly as when he took a Test hat trick at the very same ground two years ago.

Two of the three grounds Australia will host host South Africa – the Gabba and WACA – are pitches renowned for their pace conducive characteristics. I believe denying Australia four fast bowlers in either case would be a mistake.

Selecting a player based on the convenience of having a specialist spin bowler is not horses for courses and not the forward thinking Australia requires to remain competitive with the world’s number one Test nation.

To start the series with confidence in our young players and an in-your-face bowling unit could very well set the tone for Australia. That tone will be of hard, aggressive and hopefully winning cricket. And I cannot wait. Bring on November 9.

Over to you Roarers. Does Australia’s young pace bowlers have the potential to become the next fearsome foursome and should Australia select a pace quartet for the first Test?

The Crowd Says:

2012-11-13T01:54:03+00:00

Chad Baygon

Guest


Electing to bowl first is considered soft in most cricketing circles, you have to be a hard nut to play test cricket thus batting first... MS Dhoni is your typical soft captain always opting to bowl first. Show some balls!!!!!!

2012-11-08T21:27:12+00:00

jameswm

Guest


I'd like to have seen how Philander would go against say a Haydos in full flight, walking down the wicket to him in the first over.

2012-11-08T13:58:14+00:00

DubbleBubble

Guest


It was his best wicket in Australia.The fact that it turns AND bounces away from the right hander was great for a leggie. The S.C.G wasn't nearly as good to him.

2012-11-08T12:39:45+00:00

Andy_Roo

Roar Guru


My previous comment was made after reading just the first couple of paragraphs. On further reading you said 'Does it really matter if one gets injured'. Of course it does. Clarke doesn't bowl much because of his back problems so he is not a regular option as a spinner.

2012-11-08T12:31:06+00:00

Andy_Roo

Roar Guru


Do we really have plenty of young strong fast bowlers? How many of them are REALLY quick i.e. 150kph plus? All the WI bowlers were. And whilst i am not suggesting they aren't strong a lot of them do seem to be getting injured.

2012-11-08T12:24:51+00:00

pope paul v11

Guest


I agree with the toss to lose and bowl, otherwise bat first, pick Lyon gang. Just for the Halibutt, I checked a ccuple of famous Gabba poor starts on massive Green tops. 1977 bobby Simpson elected to bat with Thommo! Maybe he didn't want to kill any Indians? 5/49 at one point, saved by by Toohey's 82, the only bloke to pass 20. And they won! and Graham Yallop's lambs 1978 - 6/26! Hoggy, Maclean, Yardley got them to 116. Poor Yallop. interestingly both teams played two spinners, with an allrounder in the top six. Them Botham, us......Trevor Laughlin! I can't think of any other total disasters by batting first and only Nasser's terrible send in on a really nice pitch. He was a bit unlucky though to lose the fierce Jones. Or am I thinking of another match? Anyway African's too strong all round unless they have injuries, Philander struggles and ABDV keeping does them no favours.

2012-11-08T08:18:58+00:00

Arthur Fonzarelli

Guest


the questions are 1. Is NAthan a better bowler than the 4th best quick ? 2. Is Nathan a better wicket taking option than Michael Clarke ? My answers would be No and NO. 4 quicks for me at the Gabba and the WACA.

AUTHOR

2012-11-08T07:00:41+00:00

TheGenuineTailender

Roar Guru


Oh alright, I didn't see it obviously so I wouldn't know.

2012-11-08T06:07:13+00:00

Neuen Calvo

Guest


Roberts, Garner, Marshall and Holding could bowl 6 bouncers a over at batsman with less protection. They were fearsome but would they have been as fearsome in todays cricket? I do not think so as Windies cricket started to decline once that rule was implemented. You need bowlers working in tandems. One contain one attack and then your strike bowler who goes for a few but pick up the top order.

2012-11-08T05:46:12+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Nah when he came back for his final 2 overs at the end, it was going Irish, so into the leftie. I remember it well, because I found it curious.

AUTHOR

2012-11-08T03:35:10+00:00

TheGenuineTailender

Roar Guru


It is the safe bet. But that doesn't mean its the best attack.

AUTHOR

2012-11-08T03:34:15+00:00

TheGenuineTailender

Roar Guru


As I said in the article, I hope he proves me wrong. I like Lyon, however I do have my doubts about his ability to perform consistently. If I were a betting man I'd be offering you a wager right now that in two years time, Lyon will have been discarded.

2012-11-08T03:22:20+00:00

Jason

Guest


It is only Steyn that makes the Saf attack "better" than ours. Morkel is massively overrated and I think would be the worst pace bowler on show. And Philander is still a relative test novice (although obviously has done very well in his first year).

2012-11-08T03:21:14+00:00

King Kebab

Guest


Starc has been boweling so well though I wouldnt write off his selection just yet!!!! Although I do love Hilfy You think Pattinson will fire up tomorrow?? Yell and scream?

2012-11-08T03:14:00+00:00

jameswm

Guest


It's bleedin obvious Starc will be 12th man. I'll be staggered otherwise.

2012-11-08T03:00:41+00:00

Matt F

Roar Guru


That should be the bowling line-up. The pitch isn't going to be as green as we all thought a week ago and from what has been said this week they will be playing Lyon. The battle is between Hify and Starc and, given his form last summer, you'd have to think that Hilfy will get the nod

AUTHOR

2012-11-08T02:29:35+00:00

TheGenuineTailender

Roar Guru


Starc does not bowl reverse swing in those 20 overs, he gets conventional swing which comes into a right hander.

2012-11-08T02:23:21+00:00

King Kebab

Guest


My selection lineup: Siddle Patto Hilfy Lyon Or would you replace Lyon with Starc?? Thoughts?

2012-11-08T01:40:52+00:00

Charles

Guest


Agreed re Starc, he hasn't even been a long format bowler for NSW for those very reasons so let's pick him for tests based on ODI and T20 form...let's watch that space and see if comes out injured like the rest of them usually do having preparded poorly. He was very ordinary at AB Field, I could name a few bowlers in that match that would do a far better job, consistently.

2012-11-08T01:20:24+00:00

jameswm

Guest


I don't agree. You pick the best of the conditions to suit your team. If the Don was right, then the team batting first would win every test. You could just award them the game after the toss. What would be the point playing? The Aussies won several tests under Steve Waugh after inserting the opposition.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar