Watson out, English panic and NZ’s low ebb

By Andrew Marmont / Roar Guru

What are the key points of discussion in the world of cricket over the past week?

England slam themselves and their methods
After England suffered a nine-wicket defeated in the first Test against India in Ahmedabad, their commentators lambasted the “brutal reality” of their poor performance.

Cricinfo asked, “can things get any worse for England? Are wholesale changes to the team the only way to salvage the tour?” Pardon me, but it is only Test one of four.

The Guardian newspaper reported, “England have only won one Test in India in the last 19 years, so there is nothing shocking about the fact that they lost again in Ahmedabad. It was the manner of the defeat that was alarming. Flower and the ‘intelligent men’, as Alastair Cook calls them, in the management team still cleave to the old principles that took them to No1 in the rankings, as they have done all year.”

Basically, expect fan favourite Monty Panesar to be reinstated for the second Test after the tourists picked three seamers and just one spinner in Graeme Swann.

South Africa picks their best version of a Shane Watson
The Proteas may have cursed their bad luck at batsman JP Duminy’s injury right before the first Test in Brisbane. With Shane Watson’s bid to play as a specialist batsman rightfully squashed on match day eve, South Africa has done the ironic thing and named combative all-rounder Faf du Plessis to make his Test debut in Adelaide.

Is this a subtle go at Australia’s lack of genuine all-rounder stocks or an attempt to plug a Watson-like gap in their line-up? Possibly neither, but du Plessis will have a big job to do either way.

New Zealand forget how to bat, again, but the public don’t care anymore
Ever seen the movie Groundhog Day? You know, the one with Bill Murray, where every day he wakes up and lives the same day over and over again? New Zealand captain Ross Taylor is witnessing the film first hand, except he is Murray and everyone else in it is his cricket team.

What was alarming about New Zealand’s ten wicket loss to Sri Lanka in the first Test in Galle was that, once again, their young bowling attack gave them a chance to win and, once again, a case of batting amnesia took hold when they had their second innings.

The loss takes the Black Caps’ tally to five Test defeats in a row. Perhaps now is the time to seriously get rid of the ‘Black Caps’ moniker and start afresh. Or have we heard that before?

A few answers to Sri Lankan cricket
Ex-ICC Chief Executive Haroon Lorgat has issued a ten-page report about the state of Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) after completing a short stint as a special advisor. Lorgat raises issues such as their lack of professional administration, lack of transparency, weak financial position and recommended less government interference in the SLC, as there is a perception of this.

He interviewed 42 stakeholders during the review and also advised a re-structure of domestic cricket. Like any administration, particularly a cricket one (not picking out anybody deliberately here), widespread change will take time.

Let’s hope these are followed up for the good of Sri Lankan cricket.

Domestic games on small grounds is still the way to go
Victoria’s mammoth run chase to defeat New South Wales at North Sydney Oval in the Ryobi Cup was just what the domestic one-day game needed. David Hussey and Aaron Finch’s dual scores of 140 propelled the Victorians to 4/352, overtaking their opponent’s record 350 to begin the match.

With Twenty20 still the cool kid on the limited overs block for newcomers to the game, a match of this value for excitement proved you’d be better served in these smaller venues than at an empty Melbourne Cricket Ground.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2012-11-25T21:45:08+00:00

Andrew Marmont

Roar Guru


223/2, Taylor 119 no, Williamson 95 no - keep going boys!!

AUTHOR

2012-11-22T03:05:31+00:00

Andrew Marmont

Roar Guru


Thanks Rhys, some good thoughts on England there. Their successful recent history seems a bit distant at the moment... let's hope they get back to their good standards again. A competitive English cricket team is good for the game, I reckon.

AUTHOR

2012-11-22T03:03:39+00:00

Andrew Marmont

Roar Guru


Hi Hog, I guess if Sinclair can add 2-3 years of good performances at Test level, that is better than the underperforming lot who are in now... he is still quality. A lot has to be said about how he was managed throughout his career - they jerked him around a little in terms of his place / role in the team.

2012-11-22T02:57:23+00:00

Rhys

Guest


The problem for England is the inability to cope with spin on the sub-continent. I watched their series against Pakistan at the beginning of the year and they totally capitulated. All signs during the first Test against India point to a similar series result. Aside from Cook and Prior, there wasn't one batsman who looked anywhere near to comfortable. Worse than that though, was the apparent lack of determination to dig in a tough it out. Compton showed some metal against the new ball in the second innings, but I think it will take some time, and a revolving door of players, for Cook to find as reliable a partner as Strauss. Trott looked horribly out of form, whilst Pietersen looked horribly underdone. For all his class on faster, bouncier pitches, Ian Bell is yet to clog up the gaping holes in his game on turning wickets. Patel is yet another unpaid passenger making up the numbers at six, the problem being that Owen Morgan, England's (Ireland's?) most promising prospect to fill the old Collingwood slot, fell to pieces against Pakistan in January. Lastly, what should have proven to be a resistant lower order (Bresnan, Broad, Swann, Anderson) offered little of anything. When Swann and Bresnan had a chance, albeit a sliver, to bat out enough time to force India to make the running in chasing a winning target, out comes the perenial English favourite, the reverse sweep. Time and time again Swann rolled the dice, till eventually, predictably, he was bowled - game over. England at their best are potential world beaters. England at their worst must be painfully frustrating to all and sundry who follow them.

AUTHOR

2012-11-22T00:15:34+00:00

Andrew Marmont

Roar Guru


I've asked myself that question 1000 times in the past 10 years.. it doesn't add up i agree!

2012-11-21T23:58:14+00:00

hog

Guest


Sinclair is a classic example of NZ cricket, he had real potential scored a double century on debut and then spent 10 years underperforming at test level. I remember his last couple of innings for NZ i think it was against eng a couple of years ago lost his wickets way to easily, It was either Simon Doull/Bryan Waddle that said at the time he should never play test cricket again, yet 2 years on he's back in the mix and the guy is 36 i think so what would be acheived.

2012-11-21T23:45:42+00:00

hog

Guest


The issue with NZ is the side should be playing a lot better, i know some might disagree but on paper they are not that bad they have a good bowling attack and batters that should be scoring more runs. So why are they constantly underperforming!!!!!

AUTHOR

2012-11-21T22:59:30+00:00

Andrew Marmont

Roar Guru


Jus are you talking about form or ability? Big difference...and I would agree with your comments in regards to form right now. They are rather throwaway comments otherwise. What does this say about the defeat of Australia in November? Drawing a test against South Africa in March? They are in a rut, big time, in Test and ODI's, and their issue is consistency - performances blow hot and cold - their bowling is promising and has potency, but the batting lets them down too often (i.e. playing long innings). We can agree they are in danger of slipping away big time if they don't compete in their next two big series (against SA and India)..

AUTHOR

2012-11-21T22:11:02+00:00

Andrew Marmont

Roar Guru


And they could do no worse than bring Sinclair back - he is the best performed domestic player by a country mile, and has been for a number of years. He would certainly add some experience and steel to the batting.

2012-11-21T21:49:59+00:00

jus de couchon

Guest


NZ would struggle to compete in the English County championship. Its stretches the Imagination to give reason why NZ might be any better than an Australian State side.

AUTHOR

2012-11-21T21:35:12+00:00

Andrew Marmont

Roar Guru


Thanks Hog - you are right, their line-up is their top one (barring a couple of players, i.e. Ryder and some others). Batting has been a problem for 20 years, and there is no-one in the current line-up who has the hard edge (i.e. Fleming, Astle and the like).

2012-11-21T21:15:49+00:00

hog

Guest


the problem for NZ is who do you replace them with, their was talk yesterday of Sinclair coming back but he spent 10 years underperforming at test level, their is no accountability in nz cicket due to lack of depth the batters know that whatever happens they won't be dropped if AUS scored 118 players would get the chop in NZ yes it's groundhog day.

Read more at The Roar