The great MVP debate

Ned Balme Roar Pro

By Ned Balme, Ned Balme is a Roar Pro

 , , , ,

5 Have your say

    The Broncos defence got them through to Super Bowl 50, but Manning also kept possession well. (AP Photo/Jack Dempsey)

    Related coverage

    Before you ask, yes we are in the midst of the NFL playoffs and yes we are heading into – in my opinion – the best football weekend of the year.

    However, there is something increasingly important to address and it needs to be spoken of now, before the absolute power of the playoffs corrupts absolutely.

    I speak, of course, about the NFL MVP award.

    Now is the most appropriate time to broach this subject, as to be quite honest, most of the leading candidates this past weekend were either underwhelming or inactive.

    While it may seem counterintuitive to do so, it also allows us to resist the urge to be swept up in the waves of emotion that come with playoff results and individual performances.

    The MVP race is well documented, the likely candidates being Peyton Manning, Adrian Peterson, Aaron Rodgers, and Tom Brady.

    Before all the bleeding-heart defensive gurus out there combat the previous candidates with claims of JJ Watt, Aldon Smith and the like, I did take them into account but decided to not go into detail. This is due to the Texan’s awful stumble in the last month of the season, and Smith’s lack of productivity following the injury to Justin Smith.

    Let’s look at the candidates.

    Aaron Rodgers: 4295 yards, 39 touchdowns, 8 intercepts, 67.2% completion rate

    A-Rod carried his Green Bay packers to yet another NFC North title despite not having his entire receiving corps together since week one, having little to no running game, and a defence that couldn’t get on the field (albeit mostly due to injury).

    It was well documented that Rodgers never really got into the groove this year and didn’t display the level of consistency one would expect from an MVP recipient.

    Rodgers also has memorable losses at the hands of the (at the time) lowly Indianapolis Colts, erratic New York Giants, and a Vikings team that had no business being in the playoffs.

    Peyton Manning: 4659 yards, 37Tds, 11 Int, 68.6% completion rate

    Peyton came into Denver to usher in the post-Tebow era and has done so with great success, leading the Broncos to the first seed in the AFC.

    In doing this he has also defied critics by returning to his former level despite four neck surgeries, and leads the league in completion percentage along.

    Number 18’s passer rating of 105.8 is the second-highest of his career, coming second only to his Superbowl winning season of 49 touchdowns to 10 interceptions.

    However impressive it may be, Manning’s tally of 37 touchdowns is no anomaly – he has thrown over 30 in a season seven times.

    Despite the fact that we all acknowledge how superior Peyton is to Tebow, the fact is that the Broncos were still in this position one year ago, so it’s not as if he has turned around a struggling franchise.

    Both Brady and Rodgers have fewer interceptions than Manning, with Rodgers having two more touchdown passes.

    Tom Brady: 4827 yards, 34 Tds, 8 Int, 63.0% completion rate

    In a year when the Bills were meant to step up with their D-Line, and the Jets were going to unleash Tebow, Brady owned the AFC East yet again and clinched the second seed in the AFC.

    Brady once again displayed his prowess through the air, however this was without a healthy tight end corps, as Hernandez and Gronkowski missed 11 games between them and big free agent pickup Brandon Lloyd failed to live up to the hype.

    For the first time since 2004 Brady didn’t have to carry the team, due to the emergence of running back Stevan Ridley, who rushed for 1263 yards and 12 touchdowns.

    The names Brady and Manning go hand in hand, and given the fact that Brady had fewer touchdown passes and a lower playoff seeding, Manning may have the upper hand.

    Adrian Peterson – 2097 rushing yards, 12 touchdown’s, 6.0 yards per carry

    Peterson came nine yards short of becoming the single-season rushing leader, finishing with 2097 yards on the ground which situates him second on the all-time list.

    AP – in as literal a sense as one can – carried his previously 3-13 Vikings to a wildcard playoff berth, despite incompetent quarterback play compounded by receivers unable to catch a cold in a Minnesota winter.

    Peterson also finished with 484 more rushing yards than the second-highest rusher Alfred Morris, with only 13 more attempts.

    This was all achieved while recovering from reconstructive ACL and MCL surgery, after an injury in the last week of the 2011 season.

    AP isn’t a quarterback. It sounds spiteful but in the world we live in these days, quarterbacks win the MVP. The last non-quarterback to win the MVP? LaDainian Tomlinson in 2006.

    Peterson’s Vikings did not win their division and needed a victory in the last week of the season to assure a playoff berth.

    Did I mention that he isn’t a quarterback?

    Who should win?

    Adrian Peterson should win the award.

    If not now, when? If not him, who? If he does not, they might as well rename it the MVQ.

    For the purposes of fairness, I would like to keep the entire notion of AP and Manning’s return from injury (although both tremendous stories) separate to the logic of deciding an MVP.

    No quarterback this season has distinguished themselves as the best in the league. An argument can be made for Brady, Rodgers and Manning, but their stats are indistinguishable and each stat line could be interchangeable between any of the three in any given year.

    What’s more is that Brady, Rodgers, and Manning all have previous accomplishments that comfortably eclipse any of this season’s efforts.

    Of their previous personal bests compared to this season, Brady has 16 fewer touchdown passes, Manning has 12 and Rodgers has six.

    Adrian Peterson, on the other hand, erased any possible doubts of anyone challenging him as the best at his position.

    400 yards more than the second-highest rusher, nine yards from the single-season record, second all-time single season rusher.

    The greatest argument for Adrian Peterson however is the Minnesota Vikings record.

    The respective teams of the other three candidates all made the playoffs last year, which at least means that the building blocks were there to make another run.

    The Vikings, however, were 3-13 and had fourth pick overall in this year’s draft.

    Peterson’s 2012 campaign was the single reason that the Minnesota Vikings recorded a 10-6 record and made the playoffs, a prospect that was inconceivable to any Vikings fan at the start of the year.

    Who will win?

    Sigh. Peyton Manning.

    I don’t like it, and any other year and I would accept it. But given the overall dominance of Peterson’s season, it will be remarkably disrespectful to look to a four-time winner who didn’t greatly distinguish himself from his fellow quarterbacks, statistically speaking or in the win-loss column.

    Stay tuned later this week as I delve further into the Great Rookie Debate, before previewing the Divisional Playoff Round.

    Congrats to Aussie Jesse Williams as well. Roll tidy, baby.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (5)

    • January 10th 2013 @ 10:37am
      Kasey said | January 10th 2013 @ 10:37am | ! Report

      It sounds like you might be interested in the award I actually prefer to the Official NFLMVP…the so called “longest [named] award in sports” The

      TMQ Non-QB Non-RB NFL MVP award

      created due to TMQ’s view that the awards and Pro Bowl selection of various sports media outlets and the NFL tended to unfairly reward what he considered “glory boy” positions, such as quarterbacks, running backs, and wide receivers, as well as players who tended to be more well known due to higher press coverage as opposed to actual quality of play. Previous winners include{shock horror) Both defensive and offensive linemen, Linebackers and Tight Ends.

      I also like his recognition of “All-Unwanted All-Pros.” the best players who were cut by teams in the past but grabbed their 2nd chance and really shined.

      *TMQ= Tuesday Morning Quarterback(Gregg Easterbrook of

    • January 10th 2013 @ 1:03pm
      Smokey said | January 10th 2013 @ 1:03pm | ! Report

      Why isn’t Calvin Johnson at least in the discussion? Peterson just missed out on the rushing record…Megatron broke the receiving record with a game to spare for a weak team with a mediocre QB.

      Also, for all the justified complaints about MVP being a QB-dominated award, the “V” does stand for valuable and you can’t tell me that a star quarterback at the top of his game isn’t more valuable than a star running back.

      • January 11th 2013 @ 7:17am
        Seriously, Who says Oi? said | January 11th 2013 @ 7:17am | ! Report

        If Detroit had done better than 4-12, he might be in the discussion. That yardage record means very little in the grand scheme.

    • January 10th 2013 @ 1:25pm
      Worlds Biggest said | January 10th 2013 @ 1:25pm | ! Report

      Agree Megatron should be in the discussion. My vote would go to Peterson just over Manning. The Vikings wouldn’t have got near the playoffs without AD carrying them. Manning lifted the Broncs from 8 wins to 13 however the AFC West is pitiful so effectively there is 5 to 6 sure fire wins. The Broncs have a good defence and decent running game so if Tebow or another QB was at the helm they still would have won the Division. Manning has a great case however the Vikings were abysmal last year and turned it around largely due to Peterson. Peterson for MVP and Manning for comeback player of the year. Megatron Offensive player of the year, JJ Watt Defensive player of the year, Russell Wilson offensive rookie of the year and Bobby Wagner defensive rookie of the year.

    • Roar Pro

      January 10th 2013 @ 6:11pm
      Ned Balme said | January 10th 2013 @ 6:11pm | ! Report

      While I agree that Megatron had a crazy impressive year, the MVP of the league can’t be seen to be on a 4-12 team and especially not a team that regressed as greatly as the Lions did.
      AP was able to mask the immense flaws in the Vikings were as Calvin couldn’t.
      If the lions didn’t collapse in so many games and even finished 8-8 he would have definitely been in the conversation.

      Both one man operations but the fact that AP carried his team to the playoffs whereas Calvin couldn’t (hardly his fault) pretty much tilts it in his favour

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    , , , ,