Money makes the players go around

By dinoweb / Roar Guru

It has been an issue for years: Australia’s best and brightest young talents head overseas at the first sound of “contract”.

The reasons for this are obvious; better wages, better coaching, better competition, and more chance of being seen by better clubs.

Of course, the best young talent leaving Oz means that the quality of the A-League struggles to improve.

A low quality comp means less chance of being seen by big club scouts. Coaches develop less themselves, and a lower standard means less spectators and sponsors and therefore less money to keep the better players.

It’s all a self perpetuating “Catch 22” situation.

It has lead to around 200 Australians playing for foreign teams. Forgive me if I am wrong, but I would suspect that is more than the number of Australian professionals currently in the A-League.

It is no secret that most, if not all, A-League clubs are losing money. Most fans seem to have accepted this, and expect rich benefactors to continually shovel in cash to keep clubs afloat.

My experience though is that rich people didn’t get rich by being involved in loss making enterprises.

While many of them might help out for one off expenses like transfer fees for new players, or assisting with infrastructure improvements, the clubs generally need to at least be self sustaining on a day to day basis, or those rich benefactors will eventually pull the plug.

For a club like the Mariners, with well documented financial issues, they must find other ways to help balance the books. Poor financial security means they won’t sign players on longer term contracts, so they acquire high potential young players as cheaply as possible, and look to on-sell them quickly for any sort of profit.

It is a valid, short-term strategy to help keep the club going, but personally I have doubts on its long term viability.

The A-League though is changing. There has been a significant rise in standard in the past couple of seasons. This improvement has resulted in better crowds, and now a better TV deal, both of which mean more money in the game.

More money makes the clubs more viable long term, so they can afford to offer longer contracts, more in wages, or attract better marquees. This helps to increase potential transfer fees, once again makes more money potentially available to clubs.

The rise in standard has also meant that coaches have had to improve, or lose their jobs.

A recognisably stronger comp gives our better young players less reason to look overseas at contracts with dubious value to their long term playing development.

A better competition also attracts more interest internationally. More interest means more scouts, more chance of being spotted without the need to leave home, and again, bigger transfer fees.

With the new TV deal coming into effect soon, I can see a time in the not too distant future where this summers threatened exodus of young players becomes a thing of the past. Quality players like Rogic will of course continue to leave, as they should, but only to truly better clubs in genuinely stronger competitions, and not teams of dubious long term benefit.

Instead of being locked in a spiral of no improvement, we are now entering a cycle where an improving competition will lead to better player retention, which will lead to better a better competition and so on.

The days of having more professionals outside the country than in it are coming to an end.

The Crowd Says:

2013-01-18T04:06:54+00:00

Titus

Guest


BREAKING NEWS everybody........as Midfielder seems to be AWOL I posted this link in his absense, enjoy. http://www.foxsports.com.au/football/a-league/central-coast-mariners-coach-graham-arnold-says-tom-rogic-is-replaceable/story-e6frf4gl-1226556307447 ..............and have I mentioned how good the Centre of Excellence is?

2013-01-18T03:11:11+00:00

j binnie

Guest


Dino - You have simply applied what has been going on in the game for years & years & will continue to go on as long as the game attracts,sponsorship,advertising,television or multi-media attention right down to CCM selling a young player to an overseas club. It may surprise you (I dont know your age) but I can distinctly remember George Eastham in 1961, (only 52 years ago) challenging in court the maximum weekly wage figure of GBP 20 ( yes in those days around AUD 40) that the FA decided a player could make,He won.Johnny Haynes,the England international became the first GBP 100 player just weeks later.At that time AC Milan were reported to have offered GBP 80,000 (AUD 160,000) for his signature. Fulham,his club, refused. Now Dino compare those 52 year old figures with what is in existence today.Tranfers for top players (which Haynes was in his day) are now measured in the $50-$70 millions range and Rooney is reported to earn $250,000 a WEEK just to ply his trade. In 52 years,$160,000 to $60,000,000, $200 to $250,000 .The question,can the game maintain this "growth". Think about it. jb

2013-01-18T01:46:27+00:00

Cameron

Roar Guru


Dinoweb, "Of course, the best young talent leaving Oz means that the quality of the A-League struggles to improve." I would have to disagree with that as the likes of Sarota, Kruse, Zullo, Oar and Amini just to name a few have all left with the potential of Rogic and more youngsters step up and take rise to a new batch of youngsters being poached. And in regards to Rogic, Arnold said he would not stand in the way of developing youth as they look to further their careers beyond the shores of Australia.

Read more at The Roar