Can David Ferrer go all the way?

By Kate Smart / Expert

Last week I suggested that David Ferrer was a tennis player to watch out for at the Australian Open.

As the tournament progresses I still think this is a fair call, especially as Ferrer probably has his best chance ever of making at least the semis, if not the final.

So far Ferrer’s run at the Open has been good with perhaps his poorest game coming in the second round against American Tim Symczek, where he dropped the third set after letting Symczek get some momentum in the second.

Since that minor blip, and let’s be honest that’s exactly what it was, Ferrer’s form has been pretty good. He stated after his fourth round match against Japan’s Kei Nishikori that he’s playing the best tennis he’s ever played.

This is a great sign for his Quarter Final match against fellow Spaniard, and tenth seed Nicolas Almagro – who incidentally has never beaten Ferrer in twelve attempts.

What I perhaps didn’t clearly illustrate in my last piece is exactly what it is I like about Ferrer’s game.

Ferrer’s game is not at all a power game. The 5’9” Spaniard doesn’t serve a lot over 190km/h and as some of you reminded me last week, his renowned fitness is not enough to get him a Grand Slam, but there are plenty out there who would like to see him win one, and I am one of them.

What I love most of all about Ferrer’s game is his constant grinding away at the ball. He is even nicknamed ‘The Grinder’. Ferrer covers the court in a way that few others can, but he does not merely run a ball down.

He runs the ball down and returns it over the net only to make his opponent run for the next shot. There is one thing you can guarantee from a David Ferrer match and that is that he makes his opponent work.

This is what makes Ferrer such a great tennis player to watch.

There is also his consistency. Yes, he can’t match the top three but his record against Murray is 5-6 in Murray’s favour. Not too bad. He also consistently beats those ranked below him, hence, his number five ranking.

This will most likely move to four with Rafa not contesting this year’s Open.

His campaign is also being helped by a favourable draw. He will be a favourite against Almagro and there is every chance that after Novak Djokovic’s marathon five setter last night, Tomas Berdych may be fresher and able to overcome the defending champion.

It will require Berdych to play the game of his life, but it could happen. Ferrer is 6-3 up on Berdych although Berdych has only beaten Djokovic once and that was in 2010 at Wimbledon.

Of course this is all hypothetical. Ferrer does first of all need to get past Almagro but there is the potential to see Ferrer go to the last day of the tournament.

Can he win it?

I would love him to but as I think he’ll probably meet Djokovich in the semis and if he did get to the final he’ll probably meet Federer, who he has never beaten, it is a big ask.

But there is always hope and whatever happens David Ferrer will remain one of my favourite players on the tour.

The Crowd Says:

2013-01-24T11:13:25+00:00

matt

Guest


Amazing call

2013-01-24T10:36:36+00:00

Jason

Guest


Told you.

AUTHOR

2013-01-22T06:12:06+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Today's match has illustrated my point so much more eloquently than what I could. This is what Ferrer is all about and this is why I am such a fan. I do feel sorry for Almagro, he threw it away but as you said Jason, this is what separates the top players. Also, the comraderie between the players was fantastic. When Ferrer challenged on the last point of the first set, he chatted with Almagro and Almagro touching him on the knee before the last game of the match was great to see.

2013-01-22T06:02:32+00:00

Nick Guthrie

Roar Pro


Almagro had his chances but yes you're right Jason, his lack of mental strength cost him. Well played by Ferrer and he summed it up well when he just said "I just try to fight for every point." He never gives up and I also love to watch him play just because of that fighting spirit. It's going to be tough for him in the semi-final though even if Djokovic does lose to Berdych.

2013-01-22T05:17:17+00:00

Jason

Guest


Almagro has served for the match 3 times and failed. Mental strength really is what separates the men from the boys at these levels.

AUTHOR

2013-01-22T05:15:35+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Have labelled myself the kiss of death on my twitter feed. Am so stressed right now.

2013-01-22T04:23:55+00:00

Nick Guthrie

Roar Pro


Nope looks like the curse has struck me haha Ferrer is back in the match here. Hope he comes back and wins for you Kate!

2013-01-22T04:08:14+00:00

Nick Guthrie

Roar Pro


It's really not looking good for him right now. Seems like a bit of commentator's curse perhaps haha?

2013-01-22T03:57:46+00:00

Jason

Guest


Meanwhile, Ferrer is close to going out in straight sets to Almagro. Re Almagro - it's good to see a Spaniard with a single handed backhand.

2013-01-22T03:34:48+00:00

Brian

Guest


At the moment yes Federer 31 yo 17 Slam wins Nadal 26 yo 11 Slam wins Djoker 25 yo 5 Slam wins Murray 25 yo 1 Slam win So yes despite the US Open Murray still needs a few more to be considered in the true top 4. I'd say a player peaks in the mid 20s so the next 2 years will tell.

2013-01-22T03:19:27+00:00

matt

Guest


Kate, the jury is still out on Murray but since the Olympics he has been right there with Joker and Fed. There is the view that, with Lendl in his camp and a slam in his pocket, that he is a changed man. Time will tell (even the next 5 days will tell a lot)

AUTHOR

2013-01-22T03:02:15+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


The French is most likely Ferrer's best shot. I don't think anyone doubts he's not up with the top three, but at the risk of being controversial, whilst I agree Murray is better than Ferrer, I actually think he is a whisker shy of the top three. He's not a champion in the same mould as Djokovich, Federer or Nadal. Spends too much time begging his support staff for help and unlike the others, he's most likely to be beaten by the guys behind him. I think there is a top three, then Murray, then Ferrer, then the rest. Have I just set a cat amongst the pigeons??? Thanks for the comments everyone.

2013-01-22T02:57:08+00:00

clipper

Guest


I think people are making too much of Djokovic's ability to back up for the Berdych match. He's at the peak of his fitness and has no trouble backing up - last years AO had two long and tough semis, but both Nadal and Djokovic were still going full pelt in the fifth. The French will be Ferrer's chance, at least to make the final.

2013-01-22T02:08:14+00:00

Brian

Guest


I agree Berdych has a real shot tonight, and I also think that should Berdych win than Ferrer would beat him in a semi. However be it in the semi against Djokovic or a final against Federer or Murray I can't see him going all the way. Ferrer needs to target the next French Open. Nadal has not played for 7 months and will be seeded outside the top 4. So there's a 50% chance Djoker and Nadal will be in the same half of the draw, if Ferrer can get the other and keep his recent form he should be able to make the Final on the red clay. In his current form he might even win it.

2013-01-22T01:30:35+00:00

Justin Cormick

Roar Guru


Ferrer is a good top ten player, but I cannot see him breaking into the elite group of top four players. The way Djokovic, Federer, Murray and Nadal have dominated at grand slam level makes it almost impossible for anyone else to win a major.

AUTHOR

2013-01-22T00:43:15+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Matt, I agree - good on him for getting as far as he has. I also think this Open is Federer's for the taking: he is in sizzling form. In saying that though, I would say Ferrer's chances are on par with Tsonga's and Murray is only marginally up on him in a head-to-head record. I do also like stirring up the pot because so many people discount Ferrer. Yes, he is not as good as Djokovich or Federer and is unlikely to beat them but he is still an exceptional player who is better than all of the men behind him in the rankings (except when Rafa falls behind him in a weeks time).

2013-01-21T22:31:44+00:00

matt

Guest


Federer in the finals is a massive assumption, I think Tsonga and Murray may have something to say about that. Ferrer is indeed the ultimate grindr, but he lacks the weapons needed against the big boys. Still, good on him for what he has achieved with his limited physical prowess, he is a warrior and mentally they don't come tougher

2013-01-21T21:09:06+00:00

Jason

Guest


No.

Read more at The Roar