Best 12 Test innings against Australia since 1980 (part II)

By Glenn Mitchell / Expert

Two days ago I posted the bottom half of my top-12 innings played against Australia in Test cricket since 1980.

Here is my top six.

6 – Brian Lara, 277 at Sydney, 1992-93

Lara arrived in Australia in late-1992 as a virtual unknown, having played just two Tests.

He left our shores as a man earmarked for big things.

In the third Test at Sydney he produced one of the game’s most astonishing maiden Test centuries.

The match was a high-scoring, rain affected draw but that takes nothing away from Lara’s innings which wreaked havoc on the opposition. He faced 372 balls in the Windies first innings, striking 38 of them to the boundary.

He batted as if he was Gulliver taking on a Lilliputian XI, unleashing from a high back lift with terrific hand speed through the line of the ball.

The Australian attack never seriously looked like getting his wicket and had it not been for a run out he would no doubt have steamed past 300.

Lara loved playing against Australia, scoring nine centuries and averaging 61.1 from 31 matches.

5 – Sachin Tendulkar, 155no at Chennai, 1997-98

Only Jack Hobbs with 12 centuries against Australia is ahead of Tendulkar’s tally of 11.

A constant thorn in Australia’s side – as he has been to most teams throughout his career – he always seemed to rise to the challenge of playing the world’s best, as the Australians were for much of his career.

Of the 11 tons against the Aussies the best of them came at Chennai in March 1998.

It was the opening Test of a three-match series with both sides keen to stamp its authority early. One of the subplots was always going to be the tussle between Tendulkar and Shane Warne.

In the first innings Tendulkar fell to Warne for just four in a team total of 257. In reply Australia claimed a 71-run lead after being bowled out for 328. Tendulkar’s batting then took over.

Off just 191 balls he blazed his way to an unbeaten 155 with 14 fours and 4 sixes. He put on an absolute master class with Warne feeling the brunt of his mastery, finishing with 1-122 off 30 overs.

Every shot Tendulkar played with intent seemed to find a gap. The only thing that saved Australia from further humiliation at the hands of the ‘Little Master’ was the declaration at 4-418.

Chasing 348, the tourists were bowled out for 168.

4 – Brian Lara, 153no at Bridgetown, 1998-99

The teams headed into the third Test level at 1-1 after Lara stole the show at Kingston to get the West Indies back into the series.

He was at his magical best again at Bridgetown.

Australia compiled 490 in its first innings with Steve Waugh (199) and Ricky Ponting (144) leading the way.

The West Indies’ reply was 329, a deficit of 161 runs. That was then extended to 307 by the time the home side started its final innings.

At 5-105 their chances seemed very slim. But again, it was some magic from Lara that not only got them back into the contest but all the way to the line to win by a solitary wicket.

Fittingly, it was Lara who struck a boundary to bring up the winning runs. No other batsman had managed more than 38 in the innings.

Not for the first time, and certainly not the last, Lara carried his team on his own shoulders. It was a virtuoso display that swung between solid defence and exhilarating attack.

Australia bounced back to win the fourth Test and see the series finish at 2-2. Lara’s batting in the last three Tests was that of a truly great player. He rounded out the series with an even 100 at Antigua.

3 – Ian Botham, 149no at Headingley, 1981

England headed into the 1981 Ashes series with Botham at the helm.

Things went pear-shaped early with Australia winning the opening Test at Nottingham by four wickets with the second at Lord’s drawn.

Botham’s form in both matches was modest – in particular with the bat with scores of 1, 33, 0 and 0. Having led England in 12 Tests and averaging 13.4 with the bat, he stepped aside.

In his place came the educated and earnest Mike Brearley, back from the wilderness but a known Test captain.

This freed Botham up to simply play the game. And play the game he did.

At Headingley for the third Test he played one of the great counter-attacking innings of all-time.

In reply to Australia’s 401, England could manage only 174. Kim Hughes enforced the follow-on with England 227 runs behind.

At 7-135 it looked like a catastrophic defeat was looming. And it would have been had it not been for some Botham heroics.

With literally nothing to lose he launched an amazing attack on a bowling line-up that boasted Dennis Lillee, Terry Alderman and Geoff Lawson. His batting was truly brutal as he despatched the ball to all parts, especially down the ground with booming drives.

He got grand support from Graham Dilley (56) but it was Botham who dominated the show.

When the innings ended at 356, Botham had stuck 27 fours and a six in a remarkable 148-ball knock. Australia was still heavily favoured to win the match, needing just 130 to win.

But, with Bob Willis claiming 8-43, Australia was knocked over for 111. The fact that they had any total to defend however was due to Botham’s brilliance.

2 – V V S Laxman, 281 at Kolkata, 2000-01

India had been a dismal place for touring Australian teams for more than two decades when Steve Waugh’s men arrived in March 2001 – the last series win had been under Bill Lawry in 1969-70.

The drought however looked to be over halfway through the second Test of the series at Kolkata.

The tourists had swept aside India in the opening encounter at Mumbai, winning by ten wickets in less than three days.

In Kolkata, the Aussies compiled 445 in the first innings before dismissing the hosts for 171, a deficit of 274 runs. The only real resistance came from Laxman, who made 59 at number six.

Waugh decided to enforce the follow-on. When Tendulkar fell for his second 10 of the match, India was 3-115. That became 4-232 when skipper Sourav Ganguly departed.

Laxman, who had been elevated to number three was then joined in the middle by Rahul Dravid. The pair guided their side to 4-254 at stumps on the third day – still 20 behind – with Laxman on 109 not out.

The next day entered cricketing folklore as the pair batted the entire day, neither offering a single chance. By the time Laxman fell for 281 – the highest score to that point by an Indian in Test cricket – the pair had put on 376 in 104 overs.

Laxman’s footwork to Warne in particular was stunning. He was driving him for boundaries repeatedly out of the footmarks as Warne tried to stem the flow of runs from around the wicket. At times he appeared to be batting with a blade a metre wide.

When Dravid was run out for 180, India declared at 7-657, leaving Australia 384 runs to win, or more realistically 75 overs to bat to force a draw.

It achieved neither – bowled out in the 69th over for 212.

India won the last Test in Chennai by two wickets to continue Australia’s misery in the sub-continent.

1 – Brian Lara, 213 at Kingston, 1998-99

The West Indies were humiliated in the opening Test of the 1998-99 series at Port-of-Spain. Set 364 runs to win, they were all out for 51 in less than 20 overs.

The Caribbean’s cricketing pride was on the line when the series moved on to Kingston.

In reply to Australia’s first innings of 256, the home side was floundering at 4-37 at stumps on the opening day. It looked like Australia would charge to a 2-nil series lead.

Lara however had a very different view. Against an attack that boasted Glenn McGrath, Jason Gillespie, Shane Warne and Stuart MacGill he played what the voice of Caribbean cricket, Tony Cozier described as the ‘most significant innings ever by a West Indian’.

He struck 29 fours and three sixes in facing 344 balls. His ferocious pull shot and devastating cover drives were a sight to behold, as was his lightning footwork to the two leg-spinners.

When he raised his double century, as is the case in the West Indies, he was mobbed by fans. The frenetic outpouring from the crowd actually forced Lara to momentarily seek solace in the change rooms.

If ever there has been a captain’s knock, this was it. With willow in hand, Lara restored faith in the West Indian side as it went on to record a resounding 10-wicket victory.

In full flight Lara was perhaps the most difficult player to bowl to of his era. At Kingston in 1999 he showed just why.

So there you have it.

It is never an easy task coming up with a list like this.

I doubt anyone will be in total agreement but that is one of the great things about sport – we all view it in a different way.

The Crowd Says:

2013-02-20T04:35:20+00:00

SB

Guest


Lara's innings stick out more because of the contrast with the poor batting performances of the other WI batsmen- except for Jimmy Adams. In the course of Laras 213 Australia couldnt get Adams out the entire day either - something often forgotten. In the course of the 153 Ambrose batted out some 6 or 7 overs on his own.Not a good indictment on the bowling. And Lara had loads of luck with favourable LBWs and dropped catches -something often forgotten in nostalgia and as long as the result is positive. Not nit -picking , but putting things in perspective. There have been many many great innings - but in a one-ball game like cricket the role of luck is often underestimated. The pitches were flat and small and the contributions of Walsh/Ambrose were as critical as any towards winning.

2013-02-19T17:36:12+00:00

Neuen

Roar Rookie


Dennis Lillee and Rodney Marsh bet against their own team, backing England at the odds of 500 to 1 to win in the 1981 game. Botham made 149 Willis took 8/43. Between them they collected £7,500. No action was taken against them.

2013-02-17T10:55:52+00:00

pope paul v11

Guest


that's right Anon so he did. And Eddie's 95 was tops. Bloody umpire had no sense of history.

2013-02-17T06:38:58+00:00

Fanatyk

Roar Rookie


As far as it goes, Laxman's epic battle against the Aussies was far more remarkable than any of the innings the little master's records boast of. To stand up to the Aussies while wickets were tumbling all around him, and to come up with that superhuman effort really speaks for itself. Though i do concede that Dravid, too, had a significant role to play in that historic victory.

2013-02-17T05:54:08+00:00

Calum

Guest


Sorry, that was a bit brief so i'll flesh it out... has australia lost more 'unlooseable' agames. I dont think so -I just think that they have been in dominant positions a lot over the last couple of decades because of the strength of their team and therefore it takes fantsatic performances to turn it around and anytime they did lose it is like 'how did they loose that?'. If you look at the majority of performances being talked about here, they are games that have won tests or turned around series when Aus were dominating them. Example is that people are talking about Vaughan and Butcher but not Cook 2010/11. same with Dravid, Laxman and lara, these are innings that completely turned series on their heads - part of the reason they are considered great is because of the status of the series (Eng/India/WI come into the game loosing) and they win the game. I think they only seems unlooseable because they were unusual - exactly the thing that makes them great innings. As by the by, I realise it shouldn't get into the top 12 but Sehwag's 195 at the MCG in 2003 is an alltime favourite for me... topped off by him getting caught on the boundary trying to bring up his double ton with a 6. Still gets me chuckling. Geez Australia and India have had some awesome series in the last 14 years - hope this one coming up is just as good!

2013-02-17T05:43:19+00:00

Calum

Guest


no

2013-02-17T05:40:13+00:00

Calum

Guest


....and 72 not out in the second innnings to win the game at Adelaide Adelaide deck always gets described as flat but it gets a lot of interesting games including this years against the saffers and 06/07 ashes game that was uncannily similar to that india game (except in the result of course)

2013-02-17T04:58:40+00:00

Neuen

Roar Rookie


Actually it was Walsh and Ambrose who turned the tide in the series. That was a dead rubber draw and it had no weight on the outcome unlike the 153n.o from Lara. Smith 108 was opening the batting and in the 4th innings. It pulled so much more weight for me. But like I said he looks like a Octopus getting in a bottle so he will always be overlooked IMO

2013-02-17T03:17:36+00:00

Captain Oblivious

Guest


Hard to disagree with this list. On Lara's 277, although it was made on an easy-paced batsman's wicket, this innings did change the course of that series. Australia was 1-0 up and perhaps unlucky not to be up 2-0, where a certain umpire we should not name failed to give Richie Richardson plumb LBW on at least 2 occasions. Australia scored heavily in the 1st innings and must have felt this was their chance to go 2-0 up at a ground where the WI had often struggled previously. After this, it was all WI and a superstar was born. On another note, and sorry to go OT here, but has Australia lost 'unloseable' matches more than any other cricket nation?

2013-02-17T03:15:05+00:00

Neuen

Roar Rookie


Brian Lara, 277 at Sydney, 1992-93 - Dropped on a 172 played on a pitch where bowlers were cannon fodder 19 wickets for over a 1200 runs. Lara was great and awesome to watch one can really put all his innings there but what has it done to influence the game? A draw where is was batting practice basically. Were Australia worried? Nope. Match status at entry of a batsman. Which innings. What is the score being defended or chased If win or draw, the batsman's contribution to the outcome Result of the match. Quality of the opposition bowling attack, based on their career figures. The type of pitch That is some of the weights one can use. Now lets look like a guy like Smith. Aah of course he will not be on a list cause he looks like a Octopus getting in a bottle batting but he is effective. The guy scored 108 in the 4th inning to setup his team for a historic win against Australia. They chased down 414 which at the time was s record. If I have to weight Smith innings up it would beat Lara's innings in all assets. Result, pitch, score being chased etc etc. I can see you have rather use "posh" or beautiful rather than what influence it had on the game. There isn't many players who scored 100 in a 4th innings and not many sides have scored past 400 to win a test match and series. I think that Smith innings should be ranked as one of the top considering that enabled a team to win a series the first in 16 years in Australia

2013-02-17T00:40:50+00:00

Anon

Guest


Tavare had two 89's in that tour - but the 8 odd hour epic I think from memory was the one where the commentators kept apologising on his behalf because he really was quite a dasher at country level. That series - Eddie Hemmings' 95 as night watchman was stiff to miss as well. Seriously however - best innings I saw was Riche Richardson 122 at the MCG in 88/89. A match that saw a few players taking hits, and out came Richardson without helmet or cap (even Viv was wearing his cap - although that got displaced during his innings). Richardson was just supreme - that to me allowed me to comprehend the raw courage of a bygone era (the pre helmet era). Courage and given by this time we were well into the helmet era - then perhaps a fair degree of stupidity. Also - Dessie Haynes made 143 or something at the SCG when Alan Border of all people ripped through the Windies on a turner. Perhaps Haynes seemed so much better for the failings of his teammates. And in the Ashes series in England in 1985 the Poms certainly put the Aussies to the sword a few times - perhaps we discount the quality of the Australian attack .... given that not even T.Alderman was on that England tour.

2013-02-16T20:06:43+00:00

ronedog

Guest


The 2005 Ashes "heralded the coming end of the Australian 'golden age'"?? Really? Because the history books show Australia won their next 16 Tests on the trot and remained the no. 1 ranked side for another FOUR YEARS.

2013-02-16T17:11:02+00:00

pope paul v11

Guest


Chis Tavare's 89 at melb was startling in the test that brought nail biters back

2013-02-16T07:21:23+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Do you mean 92/3?

2013-02-16T07:17:21+00:00

Jutsie

Guest


that whole series (91/92) was amazing each test had some moment of brilliance or controversy.

2013-02-16T07:15:46+00:00

Jutsie

Guest


I was answering ur first line about best bowling efforts against aus. regarding All round efforts, well i was too young to see khan/botham so would have to vote freddie flintoff during the 2005 ashes.

2013-02-16T06:58:30+00:00

Johnno

Guest


My top 10 -Botham 81 -Ambrose Perth Hadlee GABBA 1985 9/52 in an innings -Flintoff in 2005 i think it was 4th test -Lara 277 -Mohammaed Amir in England was amazaing he ripped though the aussies in 2010 -Harbajen singh in 2001 take your pick both 2nd and 3rd tests were out of this world

2013-02-16T06:57:15+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Don't get me wrong. It was just about the perfect innings. I'm not complaining that it is in the list, just observing that it is very hard to compare different styles of innings. I liked Glenn's description that it was like watching Gulliver play against the Lilliputian XI. It felt a bit that way watching Black Caviar dominate Group One opposition today.

2013-02-16T06:56:01+00:00

Johnno

Guest


I meant more all round efforts. But in a way that could be , we could extend it too just best or most important moments, or game changers in a match. Just all round best performance. Ambrose's 4th innings effort at Adelaide oval in 4th test was amazing.

2013-02-16T06:26:22+00:00

k77sujith

Guest


Good choices but I think Rahul Dravid deserves to be included in your list. His 233 in Adelaide and his 180 in Kolkata in that historic game.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar