With one eye on the Ashes, Australia must change Test lineup

By RMC / Roar Pro

The tour of India has only gone from bad to worse, and like all armchair experts I have opinions on what we should or shouldn’t have done.

I think everyone in Australia, except for the selectors that is, believes Steven O’Keefe should have been on tour.

I also think players such as Moises Henriques, Steve Smith and Glenn Maxwell should have stayed home.

However we can’t change the past, so let’s look to the future.

It is often said bowlers win matches. But batsmen save matches and regardless of how good the bowlers are they need defendable totals.

Therefore in Test cricket we need to select a top six that can score runs, not select blokes such as Moises Henriques to strengthen our bowling.

Likewise in Test cricket the four bowlers should be selected on the merits of their bowling alone, not because they can bat a bit.

Players such as Cameron White and Glenn Maxwell being selected at number eight is ridiculous.

Players who bat a bit and bowl a bit play a very important role in limited overs cricket, but in my opinion have no place in Test cricket.

Using this logic the side I would select for the third Test is:

Shane Watson: He has to open. It would be handy if he would start bowling again, but he should only bowl eight to twelve overs a day.

David Warner: At the moment he is our second best batsman. I think the selectors should look to the future and also give him the vice-captaincy.

Ed Cowan: The start of his Test career hasn’t been brilliant but at moment there aren’t many other options. I have only seen a little bit of the current tour but even though Cowan hasn’t made a big score at least he has looked capable.

Michael Clarke: I think he is best suited to number four. He likes batting in the middle order and number four means there are two specialist batsmen below him.

Phil Hughes: He has been poor this tour but given he was dominating domestic cricket there doesn’t appear to be a better option. I know it seems ludicrous to select an opener at number five, however I believe he is good enough to make the transition.

Usman Khawaja: He has to be in the side. We need a genuine batsman at number six, not a keeper or someone only selected because they can bowl a bit as well.

Matt Wade: Has improved his wicketkeeping and as always is solid with the bat.

James Pattinson: He is Australia’s number one bowler. I believe he is now the spearhead of the attack, meaning Siddle may not be a walkup start for much longer.

Peter Siddle: I would keep him in the side for the final two Tests as he can keep it tight allowing Pattison and the spinners more freedom.

Xavier Doherty: As I stated earlier, I think O’Keefe should have toured instead of him.

But he performed solidly in the second Test, keeping it tight and cleaning the tail up quickly, something that has been an issue for Australia in recent years.

Nathan Lyon: I can’t understand why he was dropped. If the selectors were worried about his technique then why was he selected for the tour?

He is currently our best spinning option in Test cricket and therefore should be selected for every Test he is available for.

This side may not win the third Test, however I don’t think we have a better side available in India. This would also provide the core of my Ashes squad.

Of these eleven players I would select nine of them for the first Ashes Test. I would stick with the listed top seven, as there is no benefit in continually chopping and changing the batting order.

I would also have Pattinson and Lyon in the side for the first Ashes Test. For mine this is a no-brainer as they Australia’s best fast and spin bowlers respectively.

The other two bowlers I would select for the first Ashes Test would be Pat Cumming and Jackson Bird. I believe these bowlers give Australia the best chance of taking twenty wickets while keeping the bowling tight.

Therefore my side for the first Ashes Test would be; Watson, Warner, Cowan, Clarke, Hughes, Khawaja, Wade, Pattison, Cummins, Lyon, Bird.

I believe we should take the traditional number of sixteen players on the touring party. The five extra players I would take are; Peter Siddle, Mitchell Starc, Adam Vodges, Brad Haddin and Steven O’Keefe.

Siddle and Starc select themselves given their past performances.

Vodges is an aggressive middle order player who I selected on the back of his outstanding domestic form. He showed in the ODIs he is more than capable of replicating this for on the international scene.

I think Haddin has to tour. Hughes is handy with the gloves but if Wade was ruled out before a Test started Australia would be far better off with a specialist wicketkeeper touring.

I selected O’Keefe as the backup spinner just ahead of Nathan Hauritz.

Hauritz has the advantage of Test experience but if at any stage the selectors want to play two spinners they need someone who turns the ball in the opposite direction to Lyon.

If the selectors were worried about injuries or not selecting the correct sixteen players, then I think they should mimic Andy Flower’s ploy of taking a backup sixteen players, rather picking a large main touring party.

If they were to go down this road they could select a backup sixteen such as: Shaun Marsh, Chris Rodgers, Alex Doolan, George Bailey, Steve Smith, Glenn Maxwell, Moises Henriques, Andrew McDonald, Tim Paine, John Hastings, Ben Cutting, Mitchell Johnson, Ben Hilfenhaus, Ryan Harris, Michael Beer, Nathan Hauritz.

By making the right decisions now and putting the right plans in place we will optimise our chance of winning the Ashes.

Selecting the correct side for the third Test in India will not only gives Australia the best chance of salvaging some respectability in India, but also sets us up with the best chance of starting the Ashes on a positive note.

The selectors need to decide which six batsmen are most likely score runs and which four bowlers are most likely to take twenty wickets.

Let’s hope the selectors make the right decisions and plans now to optimise our chances on winning back the Ashes while being competitive in the final two Tests in India.

The Crowd Says:

2013-03-11T12:33:16+00:00

swanny

Guest


In my opinion: Cowan Watson and Hughes all get the axe: For the Ashes 1. Warner 2. S Marsh 3. Khawaja 4. Clarke (c) 5. Bailey/ voges 6. Paine (wk) 7. M Marsh 8. Johnson 9. Pattinson 10. Agar 11. Bird

AUTHOR

2013-03-11T11:33:24+00:00

RMC

Roar Pro


Lroy: You raise a very valid point about how the South African selectors showed faith in the likes of Amla and Styen. The 'pick and stick' philosophy is why I'd like to see Cowan given a more time and Watson reinstated as an opener rather than dropping him. Hughes is an opening batsman, but I think he is young enough and skilled enough to make the transition to the middle order. Michael Hussey played basically his entire domestic career as an opener and then made transition to a middle player to accommodate Hayden and Langer at the top of the order. Even though Hughes is far from being as accomplished as Hussey I think follow suit and be a successful middle order batsman.

AUTHOR

2013-03-11T11:19:47+00:00

RMC

Roar Pro


John: Personly I'd like to see our keeper bat at 7 and definitely no higher than 6. I'd love to see Steve Smith score a mountain of runs in FC cricket, as I think he would be a brilliant number six for Australia. He could play a similar role to Andrew Symonds in the Test side - chip vital runs at the end of an innings, bowl some handy overs and bring great athleticism and energy to our cover fielding.

AUTHOR

2013-03-11T11:07:41+00:00

RMC

Roar Pro


James: Hilfenhaus has brilliant record in his last 10 Test outings, thus he is ranked as the 7th best bowler in the world. You correctly state how he is suited to English conditions. Is was said during the last Ashes series in England 'Hilfenhaus was born to bowl in England'. However the reason he was so successful recently in the Test arena was because be bowled with a high action that produced late swing. This opposed to bowling with a lower action that produced easy to read early swinging deliveries. If he can start bowling the way that Craig McDermott had him bowling against India, he should the first fast bowler picked for the Ashes.

AUTHOR

2013-03-11T10:46:30+00:00

RMC

Roar Pro


TheGenuine Tailender: A very valid comment but I think the selectors have left it too late to make wholesale changes. We should have done it against a side such as Sri Lanka, giving the new players a chance to settle. The current side may not strike fear in the hearts of the English, but I don't think an out form David Hussey or an ageing Chris Rodgers is very fearsome either. I think Watson has to open. It's the only position where he has consistently scored runs.

2013-03-11T10:25:02+00:00

John

Guest


lol .. I told you before hand .. forget Khawaja and move on... he is NOT going to play test Cricket again.. not for this country!!!

AUTHOR

2013-03-11T09:58:44+00:00

RMC

Roar Pro


Ian M: I agree there seems to be so much negativity about the current side. They were never going to be able match the feast of predecessors in 90's and 00's. The main thing I'd like to see from the current side is a bit more consistency in their performances. I like the look of your side for Ashes, except I'd have a batsman instead of Henriques. I don't like the idea of weakening the batting to strengthen the bowling. Great to see you included Hauritz, I still can't understand why he was dropped. When the media asked Michael Clarke why they selected Doherty, despite only taking two FC wickets this season his defence was that Doherty bowls at Belrieve, which doesn't suit off spinners. But Hauritz has to bowl at the Gabba which also doesn't suit off spinners and he has managed to take about 13 wickets this FC season.

AUTHOR

2013-03-11T09:45:01+00:00

RMC

Roar Pro


Yeah mate the whole article was just written as joke - glad someone caught on! The reason I don't have Henriques in my side is because he has a FC average about of 30 and has only made one century in his entire domestic career. He batted wonderfully the first Test, but with side so prone to batting collapses I think we would be better off with our keeper at 7, and a batsman at 6. Watson hasn't score many runs in the last couple of year, but he hasn't been batting his preferred position either. As an opener he averages about 43 and rarely get dismissed below 30. His record of two centuries isn't great, but I would much rather someone who consistently gets half centuries as opposed to someone such as Marcus North. Khawaja and Hughes out preformed other batsmen in domestic cricket, therefore I believe they deserve an opportunity to try and cement their places.

2013-03-11T09:41:29+00:00

John

Guest


I have been telling this for a long time .. Usman will never play for Australia again and they will go to any extent to keep him out.

2013-03-11T08:24:28+00:00

chris b

Guest


Apparently they all voted against Maxwell being in the team for the third test..... Or is it a new way to keep usman out?

2013-03-11T08:23:56+00:00

yewonk

Guest


sounds like descent was shown. im starting to dislike this selector group more than hilditch and co. mickey is not the coach i thought he was and i think clarke might be a megalomaniac.

2013-03-11T08:21:52+00:00

chris b

Guest


Well you can add a new reason to the list now. And they were so desperate to keep him out they sacrificed the vice-cap and best fast bowler to cover it up.... This is gold for conspiracy theorists

2013-03-11T08:19:19+00:00

Ads

Guest


Any reason to not pick Khawaja, 4 players stood down. Pattinson (who would have been rested anyway), Johnson (who wasn't going to play), Watson (likely to be dropped anyway) and Khawaja (wasn't going to be picked??). All failed to do their homework, note homework had nothing to do with batting, bowling or fielding. Hmm wonder if these 4 were the players that weren't going to play in the 3rd test anyway.

2013-03-11T08:18:36+00:00

Lroy

Guest


Hughes has to open... I used to open myself and I can tell you , it is a huge difference coming in at 3 or 4 after you have spent years at the top of the order. Openers face the quicks when they are fresh against a hard ball, that doesnt really swing but does seam... the fielders are mostly behind you... you come in at 3, the ball by then is swinging, you dont have the luxury of nicking cheeky singles ... and by then the bowlers have their line length and rythm sorted out.... People are slagging the guy... lets not remember he was hung out to dry in 2009, he got 2 bad caught behind decisions in the first test (the second one was appalling) .. and was dropped so they could bring in Watson, who was needed to cover for Mitchel Johnson... The kid is only 24, and is one of the few in the side who potentially be a great test player. Watson and Cowan should be dropped before Hughes, dump Cowan, promote Hughes and Khwaja at 3.... and just leave them there for a few games... Seriously, Amla really struggled for the Proteas at first, Styen got carted all over the place by England in his first series ... the SA selectors stuck with them, and now look at them... 2 of the best players in the world. we need to do the same.

2013-03-11T08:18:04+00:00

chris b

Guest


Hussey yes, 3 or 4 years ago, but why on earth would you pick an out of form 35 year old? With all due respect to o'keefee he's not played a test, so I think its a bit rich for him to be regarded as a panacea. He's a bit like khawaja, a good player no doubt, but his reputation has grown by not being picked (which is not to say either shouldn't be picked, but I think some are making them out to be auperstars in waiting).

2013-03-11T08:13:31+00:00

Rob na Champassak

Roar Guru


BREAKING NEWS: Shane Watson, Usman Khawaja, James Pattinson, and Mitchell Johnson axed from the Third Test for disciplinary reasons. http://www.news.com.au/sport/cricket/australian-cricketers-shane-watson-usman-khawaja-james-pattinson-and-mitchell-johnson-axed-from-third-test/story-fndpt0dy-1226595001591 Just what we needed, eh?

2013-03-11T08:12:21+00:00

chris b

Guest


But probably the best suited to England

2013-03-11T07:43:45+00:00

Nudge

Guest


If you seriously think micheal Clarke would pick mates before winning you are kidding yourself

2013-03-11T07:34:14+00:00

Praveen

Guest


Kamran Arthur is a astute coach and knows That our batting is the issue, I am sure he will Bring khawaja in as he will add stability to the top order

2013-03-11T07:30:41+00:00

Praveen

Guest


Along with Hughes he is the grittiest player we have

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar