Test cricket's DRS is BS

By Matt Watson / Roar Rookie

The third Test between India and Australia re-ignited the debate over the decision review system (DRS) and whether it should be employed in Tests in India like it is all over the world.

Want my opinion? Well you’re reading this article so I’ll assume you do.

DRS should be scrapped in Test matches.

“Whoa, hang on a sec”, I hear you shout at your computer screen.

Well, let me explain my reasoning.

First and foremost, the Indian Cricket Board (BCCI) adamantly refuses to support and employ the technology and have shown absolutely no inclination towards changing this opinion. Their stubborn stance will inevitably remain.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) are scared of offending the BCCI and so will not enforce any changes regarding mandatory DRS employment if it results in offending the richest and most powerful cricketing nation in the world.

The result of all this is that the ICC looks weak.

This weakens cricket as a whole.

Drop the DRS, let the BCCI win this battle so that the ICC and cricket can win the war.

Secondly, the DRS is lowering the standard of umpiring around the world as it sends out the same negative message: a machine is better at your job than you.

With that playing on an umpire’s mind, their confidence cannot help but be diminished and they start to second guess themselves.

Umpires then do not want to make any 50/50 calls that are such a pivotal part of cricket as they can just let a machine do it or fear they will be proven wrong.

Even when they do make a call, the players have the option to contest it.

So they leave it up to a machine. They even check if a wicket ball was a no ball as they don’t trust their initial judgment.

Scrap the system and use the money on elite-standard umpire training across the board.

They will regain ultimate authority on the field. Howlers may still happen, but if the ICC redirects DRS money towards umpire training and is stricter about them meeting performance standards then these will be extremely rare.

Plus, howlers happen anyway even with DRS in place. Once two incorrect referrals are used up, incorrect decisions cannot be overturned.

Thirdly, and most importantly, DRS destroys the excitement of a Test match.

Think about it.

When a wicket falls, it is a glorious moment. Bat has finally been defeated by ball and stumps have been shattered.

The bowler cheers, the crowd cheers, momentum is gained, the tail is up and everyone is raring to go before the whole process is stopped by the need to review the decision.

As a result, fans are staying home and people are turning off their televisions.

So please take it away, give umpires the confidence to do their job properly.

And while you are at it, thicken the line of the crease so that the umpire can confidently call no ball early.

The Crowd Says:

2013-06-03T19:19:41+00:00

Venkat

Guest


Hi DRS is the best thing happened in Cricket... Enhanced technology to be used hereafter... So DRS would do good for the game of Cricket... Billions n Billions of Indian fans need DRS Decision Review System in Cricket... Already our Cricket GOD Sachin says he wil endorse technology if its close to 100% Very soon technology will be close to 100% so definitely BCCI will accept it... If BCCI respects/acknowledge Indian fans/Cricket lovers then definitely they will accept it...

2013-04-30T14:58:53+00:00

Steve Dasey

Guest


Has anybody else noticed that we are all being brainwashed into the delusion that the machine is always better than us? The simple reality is that the technology is undermining the umpires' authority. It isn't a case that umpires are ducking the issue when they give the benefit of the doubt; the fact is that in those 50-50 (or worse) cases where the umpire would be guessing, the machine has to guess too. If umpiring is to be reduced to that, why not save money and toss a coin? There's a book here that goes into the question in some detail https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/297298

AUTHOR

2013-03-20T13:38:10+00:00

Matt Watson

Roar Rookie


You should doubt it Devils Advocate, I am all for DRS being removed from the game and having test cricket remain as traditional as it possibly can, no matter what Sachin may possibly (and unlikely) say in the future

2013-03-20T11:24:24+00:00

Devils Advocate

Guest


And yet if Sachin Tendulkar said tomorrow he was all for it, you would be its biggest supporter. I don't doubt this for a second.

2013-03-20T00:24:34+00:00

Ian M

Guest


A bit harsh on current umpiring standards I think. If standards were so much better in the past then DRS would never have been brought in. I suspect the technology detects more incorrect decisions rather than any decline in standards. I think the likes of Asad Rauf, Paul Reiffel, Mannie Erasmus, Tony Hill and (last test aside) Aleem Dar are some of the best umpires I can remember, certainly light years ahead of Rudi Koertzen, Billy Bowden, Darryl Hare and Shocker DaSilva to name a few below par recent officials. As an aside, I've always found it strange how there don't appear to be any Indian umpires on the elite panel despite the obvious BCCI influence.

2013-03-19T22:56:54+00:00

Indian cricket fan

Guest


AMEN TO THAT!!! Now only if Geoff Lemon, David Lord and the other lemmings/ostriches on this board would see the light and then focus on the team's and CA's own inadequacies. Too much angst lately. Make cricket strong and celebrate the game.

Read more at The Roar