Is there a utility value for NSW?

By Hossey / Roar Guru

‘Twas ten days before Origin when all through the state, eager Blues awaited their favourite players’ fate, the cockroaches moaned as the toads leaped with glee, ‘and in jersey 14 will be the Knights Kurt Gidley’.

There are very few guarantees in life, and even less in rugby league. While life might guarantee us death and taxes, rugby league only provides one such certainty: Kurt Gidley is going to be named for the Blues.

Each year, pundits outline their teams, ranging from the likely to the ludicrous. Not too many include former New South Wales captain Kurt Gidley, a lightning rod for controversy come representative season.

So as the burrow bellow for Merritt and the peninsula screams for the Stewarts, the Novocastrian faithful form a nervous huddle as they await having to sheepishly defend the inevitable selection of their much-maligned skipper.

For Gids’ many doubters, the announcement that he would not be taking his place in the New South Wales side for Origin I would have been a pleasant surprise. The next thing to consider for coach Laurie Daley was of course, who should replace the irreplaceable?

The decision was made to add South Sydney five-eighth John Sutton and the Bulldogs’ five-eighth Josh Reynolds to the squad, one of whom will take Kurt Gidley’s position on the interchange bench.

For this long suffering Blues fan, the decision wasn’t satisfying in the least. This is because of two key questions I asked myself after hearing the news; does New South Wales truly need a bench utility, and is that the best use of the final bench position?

I do not believe so.

So first of all, does New South Wales require a bench utility?

At first glance, it makes sense. Utility is injured; he is replaced with a utility.

On closer inspection, neither Sutton nor Reynolds offers enough to justify selection in this role. And that’s because New South Wales already have a utility and his name is Luke Lewis.

The one-time Penrith cult hero covers every position that Sutton offers, with the added bonus of being a battle-hardened premiership winner and Test and Origin veteran.

This is the first grade position breakdown between the two, Lewis the former and Sutton the latter: wing (51-0), centre (62-10), five-eighth (20-144), halfback (14-0), second row (13-8), lock (49-28), bench (8-3).

Looking at those numbers, it is hard to justify having Sutton in the team as any kind of utility – Lewis has it well and truly covered.

I can already see the ‘Bah Hossack, what about Reynolds?! He is an Origin style player’ leaping out at me vindictively from the comment section, but he is a different issue all together.

Reynolds can cover the halves and hooker. Now, the halves aren’t too hard to account for, with Lewis’ aforementioned abilities and Greg Bird, who has won man-of-the-match honours playing five-eighth for New South Wales. It’s Reynolds ability to play in the dummy half role that sets him apart from Sutton and Lewis.

Which leads us into question two, is this the best use of the Blues final bench position? As injury cover for Robbie Farah? Robbie proved last year that he is an automatic selection in the nine and one of the Blues’ most important players, claiming the Brad Fittler Medal in the 2012 Origin series.

In Game 2 and 3 there was nobody to relieve him and he proved he can be a dominant force playing 80 minutes. Hooker is an extremely important role in any footy side and Farah is the best in the Blues by a mile.

He should be encouraged and expected to be on the field the entire game, like Maroons linchpin and the perennial fly in New South Wales’ ointment, Cam Smith.

What use will Reynolds be if Farah goes the distance (as he should barring injury)? This leaves the Blues with a sixteen man team or taking one of our best and brightest off the field so Reynolds can have a run.

I disagree with the second option – this is State of Origin, not under six’s. You do not get a run just for the sake of getting on the park.

With that being said I do not want a shortened bench either, so on behalf of all the big boppers of the NRL I’ll ask, Laurie, what does a front rower have to do to get a run?

For the past seven years, many NSW props have been exposed as powder puffs in the wake of the mighty Maroons intimidating rotation of big men.

From the old guard of Webcke, Price and Civoniceva to the new generation of Scott, Shillington and Hannant, the men from the north of the Tweed have always maintained a strong advantage in having big men who could get over the top of our smaller pack and get a significant roll-on.

In 2013, the pendulum finally has the potential to swing in the Blues favour. The Maroons carry no specialist props on their bench, preferring a rotation of lock forward Corey Parker and edge forwards Matt Gillett, Ben Te’o and Chris McQueen.

One could extrapolate that Mal intends to utilise Nate Myles and Sam Thaiday in the role of front rowers, a big ask for two men being called on to start the game and play big minutes.

Andrew Fifita is exactly the type of player to take this opportunity with both hands in the back end of each half – a big, hard running, rampaging body who can wreak havoc with the tired and undersized Maroons pack.

Trent Merrin and Anthony Watmough, although they occupy the role of ‘middle forwards’, prefer to employ some fancy footwork to advance the ball at a retreating line and even sneak an offload out the back, but they do this off the back of the work done by the genuine props like Fifita and Tamou.

High impact, high work-rate players who can move the ball and get the defence on the backfoot.

So to truly attack Queensland’s one true weakness, the Blues need to employ one more prop who can provide the platform for the rest of the side to do their jobs. The evergreen Willie Mason comes to mind, as well as the young mountain man Tim Grant who played very well in the back end of the 2012 series.

But alas, Laurie has stuck to his guns. A utility it shall be, although I am wary of just how much value shall be gained from another one. Regardless of who is selected, congratulations to them and I hope they rip in. Carn the Blues!

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2013-06-02T08:07:39+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


I'd be willing to rely on Hayne, Jennings, Ferguson, Bird and Farah in a situation like that, just like QLD are happy to rely on Slater, Inglis, Smith, Cronk, etc.

2013-05-30T22:55:16+00:00

Chuck

Guest


There is also no shame in being named on the bench and not actually getting on the field (means the team is performing well and probably leading in a tight one). Happens all the time in the NBA for instance. I am simply looking forward to watching Reynolds at origin level - the guy looks as mad as a cut snake and can defintely seem him, gallen and watmough creating some havoc out there together potentially. Also, no one ever mentioned the potential of Gidley not actually getting on the field. In fact, him being pushed onto the field when not required (therefore making everyone else shift positions) has probably been half the problem in past NSW losses. If you are 10 down with 20 to play, who would you rather have on the bench as a last ditch option - reynolds and his uncanny knack at scoring tries, or Johnny Sutton, who has only started to look good now that A Reynolds is a star?

2013-05-30T07:50:24+00:00

Eels fan

Guest


I'd pick brett stuart at fullback josh reynolds at 5/8 adam reynolds at halfback robie farah at hooker and john sutton on the bench as a utility, nathan merrit and brett morris on the wing, josh morris and Michael jennings centre. and the forward pack: tim grant, willie mason, tariqu sims, ryan hoffman, gregg bird, paul gallen (c), james tamou, t-rex. FORGET KURT KIDLEY HIS NOTHING BUT A WASTE OF SPACE, WHAT AS HE DONE FOR THE BLUES!!! i know he can play footy but his TOO OLD!!!!!!!

AUTHOR

2013-05-30T07:31:42+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


Yeah, plenty of great forwards running around for NSW at the moment. It's a shame they can't all fit in the side.

AUTHOR

2013-05-30T07:31:13+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


And we'll struggle to get a good kicking game without dominating the ruck. Hopefully the job get get done by the forwards we've selected because I fear if Reynolds doesn't shine in this game he's going to be our next one game wonder.

AUTHOR

2013-05-30T07:29:18+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


There's many ways to skin a cat. Nobody questioned Queensland when they went without a utility in 12 or 13 either. If Gallen, Lewis and Bird can all play 80 minutes, where does Reynolds fit in your scenario? Farah can play 80 as well. Cronk, Thurston and the QLD backline have all played behind a super dominant pack. Woods, Grant and Mason all provide something that Reynolds cannot create without, good go-forward and fast play-the-balls. I digress, it's not that Reynolds is a horrible idea that will lead us astray. It's just Queensland has a weakness that could be exploited to better effect with a specialist prop.

2013-05-30T01:55:06+00:00

James

Guest


No one questioned the Maroons when they used to have Karmichael Hunt on the bench in '09 or Cooper Cronk on the bench in '10 and '11. But now that it's NSW that are playing a utility it's the end of the world? There are no need for 4 forwards on the bench when Gallen, Lewis and Bird can play 80 minutes. You win origin with creativity, making scoring opportunities for your backs. Just ask Cronk, Thurston and the QLD backline. Reynolds and Sutton can provide that spark in the last 10 minutes of each half. Woods/Grant/Mason can't.

2013-05-30T00:09:21+00:00

Chris

Guest


Total agree mate but it's he future we need to think bout Adam Reynolds will be halfback next year Todd Carney will be 5/8 and Josh Reynolds will be the bench payer like joey. Farah is a 80 min player but remember game 3 last year 10 min on the bench after the head knock would have made all the difference to the game. Also Josh Reynolds plays he game on he front foot in the last 10 of each half he will help the team, Qld alway scores in that time frame. He might help tiring defence lift and stop that try

2013-05-29T23:40:01+00:00

The eye

Guest


Plan must be to bring him on as lock and alternative first receiver on the other side of the ruck to Pearce.Cronk and JT could have trouble tying his arms up and gives the side a lot more attacking options,but it'll be totally nullified if we have a poor kicking game.

2013-05-29T22:28:49+00:00

Sam

Guest


With the depth in our forwards a utility is a total waste of time

2013-05-29T20:47:08+00:00

Silvertail

Guest


Yep !!! Nissan Navara worlds toughest tradie !!!

2013-05-29T18:00:52+00:00

Boomer

Guest


I'm surprised Gidley hasn't been named captain to be honest. -- Comment left via The Roar's iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].

2013-05-29T17:12:29+00:00

Johnno

Guest


I'd go Josh Reynolds in a tight one. Josh Reynolds is fast, out of dummy half could be handy at the back end of each half, vs tiring defence. But heck if you need 10 minutes of pace at hooker just put one of the morris boy's into hooker for 10 minutes, it won't tire them out. So much dummy half running is done by the hooker now. If Mitch Pearce goes down, Maloney can go to half back, or Greg Bird , or Luke Lewis. I would of played Adam Reynolds at halfback, but that's a different story. Coz either way NSW need a kicking game. Maybe John Sutton can do that. But if Maloney struggles both Sutton, or Adam Reynold's can play 5/8. John Sutton has size, but do NSW really need an extra backrower though. As Sutton can play there. Gidley had played a lot of Halfback/hooker, so is a big loss. Andrew Johns, Craig Wing or a Shaun Berrigan, or Des Hasler, or Greg Alexander , would be handy, or a Preston Campbell. All these men, guys like Andrew John's were good utilities. Andrew John's was player of the 1995 rugby league World cup, and played most of the tournament , at hooker. I think it's a toss of the coin, maybe Josh Reynolds, but a very close call, it won't make much difference who they pick.

Read more at The Roar