What's the (golden) point?

By Hossey / Roar Guru

Last Monday night, I witnessed an enthralling rugby league contest between two of the heavy-hitters of the 2013 competition, the Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles and the Melbourne Storm.

Afterwards, I was put through an excruciatingly poor field goal competition deemed to be worthy of deciding who should get the points for the rugby league match which was contested beforehand.

The powers that be call this sequence of pot shots golden point, a comedy of errors in which referees put their whistles in their back pockets and allow the fans to ‘enjoy’ opposing halves try to weave the Steeden over the black dot from whichever position they find themselves in on the last tackle.

I certainly don’t find this kick fest as exciting as the 80 minutes which preceded it.

If I wanted to watch a game decided off the back of one players boot, I’d be watching rugby union. If I wanted to watch kick after kick spray to the side of the posts, I’d be watching Aussie Rules.

Hit backspace and save your keyboard the wear and tear angry AFL and rugger fans, tongue firmly in cheek there. But the point remains: the way in which this period of play is undertaken by teams is firmly not in the high octane, high impact spirit of rugby league.

Is there some kind of shame in a good old-fashioned draw?

It was a hard-fought battle and each team deserved to go home with one point added to their column, which was the result of this particular drop-punt-off in the end anyway. If neither team can get a victory in the allotted time, then neither team deserves to get the same amount of points as a team who can get the job done.

In the regular season, a draw works perfectly. Come playoffs time however, there must be a winner.

The old system of extra time is superior to golden point in every which way. It gives teams a right of reply, rather than the first side in field position getting the victory.

It encourages open and creative play as one point is rarely enough of a buffer. It allows the referees to adjudicate without fear of media crucifixion, although the whistles will be put away to a certain extent.

Finally, it gives the fans an extension of a gripping match and creates a true sense of excitement.

Will that first minute field goal be enough to stave off the opposition for the next nine minutes?

Will my team attempt that penalty goal from 40m out or will they try to run it?

Will the other side try to catch us off guard running on last? The possibilities are varied and the gameplay entertaining – it isn’t simply a case of hit-up, hit-up, scoot, hit-up, field goal shot in the golden point system.

So as I look toward this round’s Monday night fixture between the men from across the ditch and the men from across the Tweed, I hope that one side can get the victory within the eighty, so I do not have to endure another of these ten minute add-ons and scream at my television, ‘what’s the bloody point?!’

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2013-06-03T07:22:46+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


A sweater suits just fine for me.

AUTHOR

2013-06-03T07:22:24+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


To those who think the topic has been done to death, I think that shows how this is something that the NRL needs to address.

AUTHOR

2013-06-03T05:21:19+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


Boz nailed it.

2013-06-03T05:14:00+00:00

seven dollers worth

Guest


funny, I dont where a cardigan to bowls.

2013-06-03T04:28:39+00:00

Boz

Guest


So the lead up to full time, when the teams are level isn't close, tense football? Golden point does nothing but cheapen the previous 80 minutes. For Finals matches play extra time, 10 minutes. If the Scores are still level, then another 10 minutes. Eventually you will have a winner at the end of a specified time period. Let the clock decide when the match is over, Let's not have golden anything.

2013-06-03T03:20:30+00:00

up in the north

Guest


Yeah this topic was flogged to death the other week. And no, I don't have a valid alternative either. But I was at a drawn GF between Parra & St George, in '77 (I think). They went for 10 mins extra time, for 2 halves. Then had to re-play on the following Wednesday anyhow. I can't see that happening nowadays. Channel 9 would not be happy.

2013-06-03T03:13:45+00:00

turbodewd

Guest


Those against GPoint are against close, tense football. Put on your beige cardigan and drive your corolla to lawn bowls. Seriously.

2013-06-03T02:21:55+00:00

muzzo

Guest


Golden try!!! 2 pts for a win 1 pt for an extra time loss or a draw 0 pts for a loss

AUTHOR

2013-06-03T02:12:49+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


Exactly.

2013-06-03T02:10:06+00:00

seven dollers worth

Guest


Maybe they should just flip a coin after 80mins. Heads or Tails to decide the winner, Same thing as a field goal, just lucky.

AUTHOR

2013-06-03T01:53:39+00:00

Hossey

Roar Guru


Daly Cherry-Evans said he would prefer to play the full ten minutes rather than have it end after a field goal. That's invalid though. Since it's inception rugby league has been played for eighty minutes. That's why it had to end there. A draw is a valid result.

2013-06-03T01:17:20+00:00

Renegade

Guest


"whingers will whinge about anything" Gould is the perfect example of this....

2013-06-03T00:28:50+00:00

Boz

Guest


"Everyone enjoys it"..... hmmm. I must of misread what Phil Gould and Wayne Bennett think about Golden Point.

2013-06-02T23:43:13+00:00

Damian

Guest


Bring back the 80 minute draw!

2013-06-02T23:37:43+00:00

Renegade

Guest


Everyone enjoys it, including the players....whingers will whinge about anything. If we didn't have golden point, there'd be articles along the lines of "why did such an enthralling contest have to stop after 80 mins" etc,....

2013-06-02T23:10:51+00:00

Gr8rWeStr

Guest


Completely agree, Pat!

2013-06-02T22:45:38+00:00

Marldon

Guest


Wow another piece of ancient history and a topic debated to death at that time. Suggest readers just look back a couple of weeks for comments.

2013-06-02T22:09:02+00:00

Savvas Tzionis

Guest


There are enough injuries in this very intense and physical code of football. I actually think it borders on scandalous that they force teams to play an extra ten minutes!!

2013-06-02T21:53:32+00:00

Silvertail

Guest


Nothing wrong with a draw , the heros will tell you there supreme "athletes" highly paid , what's an extra 10 min , those same heros have never and probably never will play a high intensity ,highly competitive sport at any level, bring back the draw , the refs find it hard enough fairly adjudicating a game in normal time as it is, having to put up with an extra 10 minutes of supercharged rubbish on behalf of the refs is to much ,,, A draw is still a result

Read more at The Roar