Can Aussie cycling live without Gerry Ryan?

By Tim Renowden / Expert

Professional cycling teams have always relied on the goodwill of sponsors for their ongoing existence.

That is the nature of a sport that lacks opportunities for teams to raise revenue directly from fans, other than through selling the odd piece of merchandise and the occasional membership.

Football teams also have stadiums to fill, tickets to sell, catering contracts, and local community devotion. Most cycling fans don’t devote themselves to a single team like football fans do, preferring to cheer for individual riders and thrilling performances.

It’s a beautiful part of the sport. I love the fact that I can watch cycling without being dejected when my team loses – there is always something to enjoy.

But for many teams this lack of a geographical and commercial base means eking out a precarious existence, always a season or two from financial ruin, hoping a sponsor doesn’t decide to alter its marketing strategy. It has ever been thus.

So the announcement from Team Blanco management that the team has secured a two-and-a-half-year sponsorship from American consumer electronics company Belkin was welcome news. It’s been a rough few months for the team since long-term sponsor Rabobank left at the end of 2012, fed up with constant bad press.

Australian Blanco riders Mark Renshaw and Jack Bobridge will no doubt be relieved that the distracting uncertainty is over and the team can focus on winning bike races.

But the issue of sponsorship brought to my mind an issue that’s been bubbling away for a little while: how acute is the risk for Australian cycling if Gerry Ryan ever decides to pull his support?

Now, this is not an immediate concern: Ryan has pledged to fund Orica-GreenEdge until 2016, at least. The problem as I see it is that cycling in Australia needs to start seriously diversifying its financial base, or there could be trouble further down the track.

Through his various businesses, Ryan is shouldering a disproportionate share of the financial burden of keeping Australian cycling solvent. Apart from his well known personal support for Orica-GreenEdge, and the women’s Orica-AIS sister team, you’ll see two of Ryan’s companies named in the major partners list of the teams: Jayco and Mitchelton.

You’ll also see Jayco and Mitchelton as the naming-rights sponsors on two of the major racing events held over the Australian summer, the Jayco Herald-Sun Tour, and the Mitchelton Bay Criterium series.

Jayco also co-sponsors the AIS development team (Jayco-AIS World Tour Academy), which is widely seen as the primary development pathway for the next generation of top Aussie road talent, and is the major commercial partner for Cycling Australia. You’ll see Australia’s top track riders wearing Jayco logos in international races.

Now, it’s wonderful that Gerry Ryan feels passionate enough about Australian cycling to pour so much money into the sport. But this comes with risk.

What if Ryan has a falling out with the board of Cycling Australia? What if the wheels fall off the caravan market? What if he decides to put more time and money into his interests in rugby league (Ryan is a former board member of the Melbourne Storm NRL club and has been reported to be interested in buying a stake in the club) or horse racing (Ryan part-owned 2010 Melbourne Cup winner Americain)?

If Ryan eventually walks, it leaves a big hole in Australian cycling’s revenue stream. A hole that big would be difficult to fill at short notice. Fortunately, we have at least three years notice, but now is the time to start diversifying the financial base of cycling in Australia.

Where are the banks, telcos and big retailers? Where are the logistics companies, utilities, insurance giants, mining companies, property developers and other big industries?

Our economy is one of the strongest in the world, cycling is booming here, and the whole thing is being kept afloat by the goodwill of one man, while companies should be lining up to stick their logos on our world-beating pedallers.

The Blanco example illustrates how important this is: by gaining an American sponsor the team may lose some of its famously Dutch character, have to include more American riders, and race more often in America.

How would GreenEdge fans feel if the same happened with “our” national pro team?

The Crowd Says:

2013-06-04T10:40:37+00:00

Mat Coch

Roar Guru


The question is not what value can sponsors give cycling, but what value can cycling give sponsors. Yes the sport is booming in Australia (mental note: must get my bike fixed...) but how can it realistically compete in the same commercial space as AFL, Cricket, Rugby, A League, V8 Supercars etc. More than one of those is on shaky commercial grounds, and they're the biggest sports in the country. It doesn't leave much in the way of crumbs to fall off the table. I believe for any sport to thrive it must find a unique angle, and I can't see how that is on Australian shores. With a population of 20 million we don't have the financial power to fund all these sports (don't forget swimming needs money too) so while short term GreenEdge can look at remaining a fundamentally Australian team, thanks Gerry, in time it's inevitable that it gradually moves to the sports heartland where there is a market big enough to support it. Personally, I'd rather have GreenEdge run out of Turin than not at all.

2013-06-04T02:59:34+00:00

Psych_ling

Guest


Tim, thanks for reminding me of Julian Deans' name...it just escaped me for the min...re: Neil Stephens, watching the backstage passes I generally get the sense that Stephens just wants to be 'one of the boys'...I don't mean to sound harsh but when he made a statement recently along the lines ...we'll just let the big boys do their thing on this stage (rather than OGE)I got the impression he doesn't have enough ego as a leader to drive success...

2013-06-04T02:42:52+00:00

Cam Larkin

Roar Guru


Excellent article Tim.

AUTHOR

2013-06-04T00:46:02+00:00

Tim Renowden

Expert


Seems to me that Stephens has taken a step back this season (at least publicly), and a lot more has been left to Julian Dean and Matt Wilson - both very experienced as riders but relatively new to the DS game. Who knows how the dynamic is working inside the team? Goss has struggled all season and that leaves quite a big hole.

2013-06-04T00:38:01+00:00

Psych_ling

Guest


Hi Kate, yes agree with your comments. I guess it is not uncommon for a new team to have a 'bad' year, but as you say, sponsorship is a fickle thing and they like to see runs on the board! I wonder bout the current DSs? How much has White's departure affected Goss & Gerrans? Not sure about Neil Stephens...& his 2 IC, that Kiwi chappy, this is his first year on the team. Maybe the team needs some new focus at that level?

2013-06-03T23:46:37+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Seriously liquor box, I have been accused of being a drama queen from time to time, but at 37 I think you've got plenty of time to see an Aussie winning on an Aussie team. lol. 37 is not that old, not that I'm about to reveal my age, but man, there's no 4 in your age, which has to be a good thing!!!

2013-06-03T23:43:44+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Great work Tim. Sponsorship in sport is always such a slippery slope. I mean, if you think about it, our beloved football teams are always going through new sponsors. Companies can't support sports teams forever but you're right that cycling is a lot more vulnerable than other sports in this country. At the risk of adding even more fuel to the OGE poor start to 2013 fire, they really need to find some form on the road or else they may not be seen as attractive for other sponsorship opportunities. I agree with psych_ling that there needs to be more coverage here but I think that is starting to happen. I think it's a slow process.

2013-06-03T23:28:27+00:00

psych_ling

Guest


Hi Tim, excellent piece as always. As popular as cycling is here, the only way to get other & perhaps bigger sponsors, such as the big banks, is to have more international racing here, with live tv coverage. There is room on the calendar in the Aussie summer., we need more exposure than the Tour Down Under. A comparable woman's race would be good too. Am hoping Tracey Gaudry can made inroads on this.

AUTHOR

2013-06-03T23:11:19+00:00

Tim Renowden

Expert


Yes, it's true that British Cycling is in a similar position with Sky providing a large chunk of its funding, but Britain also has a much larger bike industry than Australia (local bike manufacturers, apparel companies, online retailers) etc which arguably puts it in a better position to be self-sufficient. The British national programme also benefits from national lottery funding, which is a reasonably reliable income stream that our AIS and state institutes don't have access to. So I would say that British cycling carries less risk than Australian, for now, but I agree that they rely heavily on Sky (apparently James Murdoch is a keen cyclist).

2013-06-03T19:04:06+00:00

Tomas Fish

Roar Guru


It's a good point and I fear it may be similar in most countries, here in the UK if Rupert Murdoch pulled the BSkyB funding, British cycling would pretty much be finished, both countries need to be careful how much faith they put into one individual.

2013-06-03T15:56:56+00:00

liquor box

Guest


I think if this worst case scenario occure we have to hope that GreenEdge remains as an Australian registered team. Other than the now American owned dutch blanco squad we also have the Vini Fantini-Selle Italia team which I thought was technically an English team racing in Italy and the Columbia Team that also races in Italy so there is hope that our aussie team could survive until an Australian Sponso took over. I really doubt GreenEdge can survie long term, What value do Orica or Mitchleton wines really get from the sponsorship? It is a tax write off for sure, but is it really worth it? I just hope to be alive to se an Aussie win any of the grand tours for an aussie team before I die......I am now 37!

Read more at The Roar