Camelot: When racing turns against its own

Jessica Owers Roar Rookie

By Jessica Owers, Jessica Owers is a Roar Rookie


4 Have your say

    Okay. Let’s talk Camelot, because his fall from grace last night at Royal Ascot was spectacular.

    The Classic king of 2012 fell off his throne on the greatest public racing stage of them all – Royal Ascot – and Ballydoyle could only idle nearby and count the dollars, tens of thousands of them lost in stud value.

    The fall-out was horrendous. ‘Camel’ and ‘donkey’ fell about Twitter from some very credible sources. It was hard to read. And out there, on the lawns of Ascot before an audience adulating Al Kazeem, was left a lovely horse, a hero last year, with whom something had gone properly wrong.

    Camelot’s rise to stardom began from his very first run in July 2011. His earliest record is a picket fence of perfect ones – first, first, first, first, first. The Racing Post Trophy, 2000 Guineas, the English Derby, the Irish Derby. And then Ballydoyle, in a gesture that was more sporting than greedy, courted history with the St Leger and found out why very few now chase that elusive Triple Crown. Camelot went down to Godolphin’s Encke in a slim finish that triggered the beginning of the end for him. And it’s been all downhill from there.

    The horse headed into the Prince of Wales’s Stakes last night with redemption weighing far heavier than the nine stone in his saddle. Camelot had bombed in the Arc last October, came back in May this year with a first-up triumph in the Mooresbridge, only to lose the Tattersall’s Gold Cup to Al Kazeem three weeks ago. Where was the brilliance, the consistency that had so stamped his earliest days in racing? The dream, and we love the dreams in racing, suggested it would be all there at Royal Ascot last night, like the guns of Navarone. Camelot slid into favouritism, only to slide home a flat fourth.

    Let’s look at the figures for a moment. There were 11 horses in the Prince Of Wales’s yesterday and Camelot was home in the first four. His record overall reads like this: 10 starts, 6 wins, 2 seconds. £1.926,569 in earnings. Three Classics, four Group One victories. In 10 starts he has been out of the first three only twice, yet the overriding stigma is negative: he comes from a shocking crop, he’s a hyped horse. Hype hype hype.

    So where did it all go wrong? Well, let’s start with the Irish Derby back in July 2012. Ballydoyle headed there out of goodwill alone, and over terrible going that didn’t suit him at all, Camelot slashed out a very hard-earned victory over Born To Sea. It was one of those wins that you like to see in a young horse, when it’s taken to him and he fights back to draw away by two. But at what cost? Six weeks later, Camelot couldn’t find that extra neck to run past Encke in the St Leger. And I’ll never forget that night. Deflation and shock portioned evenly with sympathy for the Coolmore clan and the good of racing.

    Last night, I watched the horse closely. Camelot is such a glamourous thoroughbred, put together like synchronised swimmers. He is graceful in the neck, light on the forehand, beautiful at the eye. He has a face cut straight from marble. He made the rest of the field, Al Kazeem included, look plain. But looks don’t win Group races, and John Berry, via Twitter, was spot on. ‘His sweat today suggests signs of wear and tear.’ Camelot had reached the gates a foaming mess. Yes, something was amiss. This wasn’t the horse of 12 months ago.

    Ballydoyle must be blamed for one thing: they talked this horse up until the sun went down. As Camelot cleaned up the Classics last year, Aidan O’Brien had declared him ‘the best he’s had in his yard’, and that was a mighty call given the arsenal that has powered through the Tipperary yard in the last decade. Did he mean it? Probably, because at that stage he was handling robust Camelot who had turn of foot, staying power and closing speed. How was he to know it would disappear? And regardless of what critics say about last year’s three-year-old crop, Camelot could only defeat what he ran into. By the time the horse was meeting older opposition, it’s fair to admit something had gone terribly wrong.

    I cannot remember a more polarising thoroughbred. People love Camelot, but many more hate him. And they hate him because of the stable he’s attached to, because of the excuses they think have been made for him. They hate him because they loved Frankel, and they hate him because they feel cheated – a Classic winner that has lost the ability to win. But I was ill last night reading the Twitter feeds. I hate seeing racing fans turn on a horse. As much as Animal Kingdom was a bigger picture than the Queen Anne, as much as So You Think was probably better than his loss to Rewilding, so is Camelot more than the troubled puzzle he has become.

    O’Brien says he is keeping the faith. Perhaps he’s been too soft with the horse, he said. Perhaps the colic surgery (in the off season) has taken more off him than we know. But O’Brien can’t win. He says too much, he’s making excuses. He says nothing, he’s got nothing. Regardless, they are pressing on with this lovely, embattled Montjeu horse, suggesting they have no plans to despatch him off to Mike de Kock.

    But the reality is that, as much as So You Think could claw back only some of his reputation with his outgoing victory in the St James’s last year, it will take something like a victory in the Arc de Triomphe to restore Camelot to any sort of glory. And on the state of play, that probably won’t happen. But there is one thing that writing ‘Peter Pan’ and ‘Shannon’ has taught me: there is always, always more to a horse’s canvas than mere results.

    (Originally published by the author on her blog and reproduced with kind permission)

    This video is trending right now! Submit your videos for the chance to win a share of $10,000!

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (4)

    • Columnist

      June 20th 2013 @ 5:03pm
      Justin Cinque said | June 20th 2013 @ 5:03pm | ! Report

      Very interesting article Jessica.

      From my standpoint there’s two ways of assessing Camelot:
      a) He’s finished
      b) He’s a miler.

      The reason I say he’s a miler is that his best victory in my opinion was his dazzling display in the 2000 Guineas (mile) last year.

      When he’s won the two Derbies he’s done it coming from last (getting an easy time of it) and beating his own age.

      He didn’t finish his race off in the Tattersall’s Gold Cup and he didn’t finish it off last night. But if you kept him fresh, he could win Group 1s at a mile in my opinion – in any case the European mile ranks aren’t very strong at the moment.

      If Camelot was to revert to the mile for the second-half of the season and pick off a few Group 1s in England and France I think Aiden O’Brien could get away with his So You Think line of “we got him wrong!”

      If however, he goes back to the mile and continues to disappoint then it doesn’t leave the camp with much except a destroyed reputation for horse and trainer.

      Perhaps it’s time to retire.

    • Columnist

      June 20th 2013 @ 5:23pm
      Alfred Chan said | June 20th 2013 @ 5:23pm | ! Report

      Great piece Jessica!
      Retirement seems the next logical step in my opinion. Starting him in last year’s Arc was where it all started going wrong. He was completely out on his feet leading into the Arc and O’Brien knew in his head that he wasn’t going to win. It took so much out of him and something I hate seeing is 2yo’s and 3yo’s flogged on end over an entire season.
      On a completely irrelevant note, The Fugue is awesome!

    • June 20th 2013 @ 7:41pm
      johnny nevin is a legend said | June 20th 2013 @ 7:41pm | ! Report

      According Aidan O’Brien on the racing post “They will tell you a big operation will take at least four months for a wound to heal. I’ve never really chased him, we’ve been letting the racing bring him but maybe it’s time to chase him. We are very conscious of what he’s been through but maybe we are at the stage where he needs to be chased after a bit.

      “He has a lot of options, the Eclipse and all those races. We’ve got to where we are now, we’ve just got to change a few things.”

      Judging by this statement they haven’t been hard on the horse at home. It sounds to me that maybe they should have delayed his comeback but as O’Brien said, they hoped the racing would bring him along. I don’t think many will be backing him in the Eclipse.

    • June 24th 2013 @ 2:35pm
      Margaret Allen said | June 24th 2013 @ 2:35pm | ! Report

      Is it a coincidence that the Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe started a downturn for both So You Think and Camelot? Perhaps Sir Henry Cecil was right in refusing to take Frankel there – he said then that, quite often, the best horse doesn’t win that race. Certainly, it favours three year olds, and the draw is very important. In any case, I’m convinced that extending a horse’s season for too long and expecting it to perform over very different distances and / or over different surfaces is unlikely to meet with success, and can, possibly, do long term damage to a horse’s performance. It is to So You Think’s credit that he was able to come back and win at Royal Ascot last year. Certainly, he looked much better than he had since leaving Australia – more like his old self.

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.