Who could be the wildcards of the Ashes?

By Tim Holt / Roar Guru

You can begrudgingly accept through gritted teeth the appearance of an Ace or dip your hat in homage of something regal as represented by a ‘picture’, but when a Joker falls it always turns everything on its ear.

Its relation to cricket is in the rise of those nondescript players to be difference makers in either a game or a series with them having the moniker of ‘wildcards’.

These men come out of nowhere to have a profound effect on contests and tip the balance while the ‘greats’ seem to lock horns, trade brilliance and play out virtual score draws.

Keeping this in mind, here are a few likely wildcards in the upcoming Ashes:

Brad Haddin (Australia)
If I were to say to you that it is a certainty that Brad Haddin will improve Australia’s score in a Test match by a 100 runs, you will almost certainly pass me the Dunce Cap and make me sit in the corner.

Consider this, he has replaced Matthew Wade, who as a rule would mess up two to three chances in a match, which could easily amount to some extra 100 runs I referred to.

Think of how defining this could be in the upcoming Ashes in bowling conditions where 300 will be seen as a very good score in most matches.

The ‘wildcard’ nature of Haddin does not end with his safeness behind the stumps; it also translates into a boost to the psyche of Australia’s greatest weapon, their bowling.

With them knowing that they will be supported by an adequate glove man behind the stumps rather than be pushed to the verge of a mental meltdown like Nathan Lyon felt due to Wade’s missed chances in India.

Steven Finn (England)
The focus on the English bowlers will fall on James Anderson and his mastery of swing, and the associated media/fans’ claims of him being comparable to Dale Steyn.

There’s also the case of the virtual ‘little girl with the curl’ in Stuart Broad and whether he can be very, very good or very, very bad.

Then there is Graeme Swann, who will be desperate to achieve some Ashes credibility after averaging 40.13 in his 10 previous Ashes Tests.

It all leaves one feeling very much unloved in Steve Finn, who in no way is guaranteed a place in the XI for the 1st Test with Tim Bresnan neck and neck with him.

With respect to Bresnan, who is a big hearted and accomplished performer, hopefully sanity would prevail and Finn would be chosen.

He’s a bowler who has everything in his kit bag to be a devastating spearhead with pace, bounce and the ability to swing the ball as well as make it talk off the pitch.

I can see him being devastating in the Ashes for the Aussie batsmen will be so much focussed on seeing off Anderson and neutralising Swann that they might, to their demise, have lapses against Finn.

Steve Smith (Australia)
You had to feel for this young lad with him being labelled as ‘The Next Warnie’ out of Australia’s desperation to fill an irreplaceable breach.

Sadly, this desperation led him be introduced to Test cricket when he was no way equipped for it, leading to inevitable failure followed by associated ridicule.

He sunk without a trace we all thought, only to see him rise once more in 2013 for the India tour.

When we of the peanut gallery assumed that he would fail again, he left us with eggs on our faces. He had grown and his sheer relentless desire to succeed had stood out amongst all the other Aussies who were so willing to give up.

He fought and fought, and fought some more.

He was ridiculously overlooked for the Ashes squad earlier. But now that he has been added, you can almost see him struggling with the standard of the bowling and the difficult conditions in the Ashes, but just finding a way to make a contribution.

Meaning that he will finish the Ashes not referred to as ‘The Next Warnie’ , but as ‘The First Steve Smith’.

Jonny Bairstow (England)
I love the irony with the current Ashes, the example being the spotlight shining bright on one Yorkshire man in Joe Root with all and sundry assembling to already give him a Knighthood.

Which is indeed justified, for the lad indeed is a fabulous talent.

But it seems to overlook the presence of another young gem from Yorkshire in the flamed haired Jonny Bairstow.

He’s a player who has been on the outskirts of the English set up, but now is a certainty in the top 6 with the move of Root to the top of the order and the somewhat unfair axing of Nick Compton.

This move, in my mind, is a master stroke, a show of real faith in Bairstow by the team management in the lead up to the Ashes, telling him that the no. 6 position in the line-up is his.

Don’t be fooled either for this lad can play, and it is not only his talent that appeals but the dexterity of his batting gears with him being able to play a back-to-the-wall gritty innings like his 95 against a brutally great South African attack last year, or hammer home an advantage through his clean and huge hitting.

Look for him to be an unexpected thorn in the Aussie side in the Ashes.

The Crowd Says:

2013-07-04T14:05:00+00:00

JMW

Guest


I can not believe Cowan has supporters...are they Poms in sheep's clothing?

2013-07-04T14:02:42+00:00

JMW

Guest


Yeah that was Warner's zenith and we've waited too long for an encore, especially when compared to the more regular brain fades he's displayed off the field. That Hobart match still makes me cringe...I hope to never again see Haddin throw his wicket away again playing so contemptuously. Head down arse up by Haddo an we win!

2013-07-04T13:58:40+00:00

JMW

Guest


Pretty fair view...Maddinson should keep that nutbag Warner out when the Poms visit down under.

2013-07-04T13:54:19+00:00

JMW

Guest


True...and his tendency to throw his wicket away recklessly has only been exceeded by Warner in recent times. He was obviously picked to play though so we're stuck with him for now.

2013-07-04T13:52:02+00:00

JMW

Guest


Hafdin (sic) did he come out here with Fawad?

2013-07-04T13:50:35+00:00

JMW

Guest


I just wish Lyon did provide variety. He has no obvious competition given Professor Ratbaggy's obvious distaste with Steve O'Keefe. I also wish old looking Nate could dismiss the odd batsmen who walks in above number 8 in the order...just saying.

AUTHOR

2013-06-30T22:36:22+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


I really do not think Boof has done anything with the discipline. If anything he has further under mined it by firstly playing up to the Teams Cancer in watson, and now looking like welcoming Warner back with a chance of a place in the first test team. When he should have come in, and made an example of both- told Watson to shut the F Up and stay out of the Media and reassessed Warners punishment by sending him home from the Ashes Maybe that would have taught him, but I doubt it for the lad just looks dumb

AUTHOR

2013-06-30T22:24:47+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


For me- Cowan, Rogers, Clarke, Khawaja, Smith, Watson But we already know that will not happen with Watson certain to open, Clarke at 4 and Hughes somewhere in the line up. As for Hughes, there is really nowhere u can hide him in a line up for if you move him down the order to shield him from swing, he then has to play against spin- which he has no clue against

2013-06-30T12:33:06+00:00

Silver_Sovereign

Guest


Watson, rogers, khawaja, Hughes, Clarke, Smith, Haddin, Pattinson, Siddle/Harris, Lyon, Bird is the only way to go as far as I am concerned. Bird is an unknown quantity for the Poms. Haddin is reckless but can catch better than Wade. The only worry I have is all the left handers facing Swann and Anderson. Hughes should bat lower to stay away from the moving ball. Maybe even at 6

2013-06-30T12:19:05+00:00

twodogs

Guest


True Tim. He may well be showing his true colours? Maybe this spell on the bench and the realization of how quickly life can twist and turn no matter ones talent will lead him to sensible actions. Maybe he just misses his mum. On the mental side though, haven't the whole team been brought undone of late? 4zip to be exact. Seeing that body language is a fair indicator, Boofs presence has seemingly put a spark into the camp. This will be no cakewalk for the poms.

2013-06-30T11:48:05+00:00

Vicboy

Guest


Haddin is not Ian Healy. I hope he does well, but has dropped a few in the past & did not handle sub-continent well. Bowling picks itself - Harris & Bird as injury cover, unless Siddle needs a rest! Batting Cowan, Watson (bowls 8 overs per innings- Clarke can hardly complain with his back) Rogers, Kwarja (sic), Clarke, Hughes/Warner. No need to try and score 4 an over-build partnerships please! Don't try to be superstar, just play your role. I do worry about too many left handers.

AUTHOR

2013-06-30T09:21:49+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


Great testimony to Warner Twodogs, and agree that that innings in Tassie was special in tough conditions and against a very decent bowling attack. I also agree he is easily the Teams second best batsman. Also agree ihe has immense ability and could be a difference maker in any series The only way we differ is that I am a great believer that the game is as much Mental as it is ability and on this point warner is too easily undone He is sadly an imbecile

2013-06-30T08:55:34+00:00

twodogs

Guest


Before his last 'bout', Warner was my key to ashes victory. Now he has become to me, the wildcard. If he can make peace with his now massive ego, he will paste the pommy attach to all parts of the ground. At best he is our 2nd best bat. (what was that? He's reckless with poor shot selection ? Etc.) I say this- remember Hobart when he carried his bat? The ball was zigzagging, swinging, nipping back and the others were dropping like flies. This dude is special. Darren, stick a pin in his head to reduce the size of the ego, give him a go and watch him fly. I honestly believe Warner could be our best and most prolific since bradman. Now, just how can you harvest lighting?

AUTHOR

2013-06-30T07:43:52+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


the non selection of khawaja was embarrassing bordering on...........

2013-06-30T07:31:15+00:00

Praveen

Guest


Under Arthur khawaja was never going to get a chance, I think most UTK fans are just glad he will get his well deserved shot now

2013-06-30T07:27:41+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


I would suggest that that the lower order batsmen are not champion players like Clarke.....yet.

AUTHOR

2013-06-30T07:23:31+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


The sad reality about the Aussie batting Bearfax is that aside from Clarke who would u currently class as Test Class?- I would suggest none....Meaning the lower order has to contribute for them to be competitive. But on the subject of Haddin, his glovework is just as crucial for with all the chances WAde fluffed it was killing the bowlings effectiveness too To be frank with Wade behind the stumps , Australia started every Test match -100 before a ball was bowled

2013-06-30T07:19:05+00:00

Bearfax

Guest


If Australia continue to play five batsmen and a wicket keeper, I would suggest Haddin's scoring will be just as important as his glove work and his experience

AUTHOR

2013-06-30T06:58:32+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


Haddin is what players donning the Baggy Green used to be- Warriors....Though he has dropped off a little bit now- especially in his batting he is still Australia's best option. And i think will be a real difference maker

2013-06-30T06:37:17+00:00

Tasman

Guest


+1

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar